December 2022

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:27, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello! I understand I added unsourced or poorly sourced content. I would like to ask what can I do to be unblocked. :) Gogo g2002 (talk) 14:37, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gogo g2002 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello! I understand my mistake. I would like to ask what could I do to be able to edit again. :)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you:
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 15:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

New unblocking request

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gogo g2002 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello again! I understand that I was blocked for adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. I am sorry and in the future I will try to make my edits useful and non-harmful.

Decline reason:

We'll need more than your promise here. Please tell what steps you will take to address the concerns about your editing; it would help to give an example of a properly sourced edit. 331dot (talk) 17:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello again, 331dot! First of all, I need to check if the information has sources. An editor should be respectful and objective and ask for help when needed. If I decide to create an article, I have to create it as a draft and submit it for approval. Here is an example:
Manchester City suffered a 4-1 defeat against Sporting CP in a Champions League match.[1] Gogo g2002 (talk) 14:14, 7 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

New unblocking request

edit

 
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Gogo g2002 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello again, 331dot! First of all, I need to check if the information has sources. An editor should be respectful and objective and ask for help when needed. If I decide to create an article, I have to create it as a draft and submit it for approval. Here is an example:
Manchester City suffered a 4-1 defeat against Sporting CP in a Champions League match.[2]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hello again, [[User:331dot|331dot]]! First of all, I need to check if the information has sources. An editor should be respectful and objective and ask for help when needed. If I decide to create an article, I have to create it as a draft and submit it for approval. Here is an example: :Manchester City suffered a 4-1 defeat against Sporting CP in a Champions League match.[2] |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello again, [[User:331dot|331dot]]! First of all, I need to check if the information has sources. An editor should be respectful and objective and ask for help when needed. If I decide to create an article, I have to create it as a draft and submit it for approval. Here is an example: :Manchester City suffered a 4-1 defeat against Sporting CP in a Champions League match.[2] |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello again, [[User:331dot|331dot]]! First of all, I need to check if the information has sources. An editor should be respectful and objective and ask for help when needed. If I decide to create an article, I have to create it as a draft and submit it for approval. Here is an example: :Manchester City suffered a 4-1 defeat against Sporting CP in a Champions League match.[2] |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
  1. ^ "Man City's heavy loss to Sporting CP takes them to 'dark place' and shows problems facing Pep Guardiola". Sky Sports. 6 November 2024. Retrieved 7 November 2024.
  2. ^ "Man City's heavy loss to Sporting CP takes them to 'dark place' and shows problems facing Pep Guardiola". Sky Sports. 6 November 2024. Retrieved 7 November 2024.