Gondorian

A Request of You

Hi There! Now that he's dead, who holds copyright that belonged to Harold Hersey? Thanks.

Welcome!

Hello, Gondorian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Mike Christie (talk) 23:52, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Off-Trail Publications

A tag has been placed on Off-Trail Publications requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan2 (talk) 23:04, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

		The Modest Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent contributions! 129.49.72.78 (talk) 16:58, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Adventurers' Club of New York

Hi. At Adventurers Club of New York you wrote "The club's monthly newsletter was titled The Adventurer. It originated in late 1926 and ran at least until 1960." Cool! Have you read any, where'd you find them? matt me (talk) 22:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi! I lucked into a batch of these from a book dealer, most issues from 1933-43. Most of the content is club business, primarily summarizing the previous month's dinner. Since a number of interesting people spoke at these dinners, it's an invaluable resource. By the '30s, many of the members were elderly, so obits are a frequent feature. Still working my way through them.... Gondorian (talk) 22:29, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Brilliant, go for it. I learnt about the club from the anthology 'call for adventure', would like to read the golden jubilee book. matt me (talk) 22:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Matt, I haven't seen Call for Adventure, but that's undoubtedly the more interesting of their two books. Golden Jubilee is full of club stuff--presidents, events, meetings, dinners, etc--without too much actual "adventure." And it's a sloppily produced book to boot, with misspelled names, spurious index listings, and so forth. But it can be had relatively cheaply, so the risk is low. :-) Gondorian (talk) 19:14, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

User Gondorian, above you said that you have copies of 'The Adventurer' newsletter that covers 1933-1943. Are they any know publicly available copies of the newsletter? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.167.60.28 (talk) 16:53, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

I don't know of any online or publicly available copies. Maybe they've been microfilmed. LOC and NYPL would be the best candidates.

Do you have scans of your copies that you would be willing to share? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.205.231.219 (talk) 19:47, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Weird Tales

Hi -- thanks for working on the article about sf magazine history. I don't have the source you're working from, but some of the material you're adding is already in the Weird Tales article, and I think it may be a bit too much detail for the summary history article. Could you take a look at Weird Tales and see what you can add there, and then perhaps we could talk about how much of that needs to be in the history article? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:36, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, Mike. I wrote The Thing's Incredible!, so can assure you that it's a must-have. :-) It covers the first two years of WT in depth, with relevant befores and afters. Today, I was alerted that History of US science fiction and fantasy magazines to 1950 was a Wikipedia feature, so I opportunistically did a little clean-up. I've looked at the Weird Tales page before. It's a can of worms, at least in the areas of history that I'm conversant with. Those need a major overhaul, as there is a lot of misinformation. I was hoping someone else would do it. :-) It's not a trivial task, as one would want to correct the errors while also preserving as many of the previous contributions as possible. That being said, if you think some of today's contributions should be scaled back, I don't have a problem with that.--John: Gondorian (talk) 23:10, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi -- no, need to remove anything you've done; I think we could talk about that once Weird Tales is improved. I wrote much of that article but I don't have your book. Could you perhaps list on the Weird Tales talk page the errors you see on that page? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:29, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Don't feel bad about the misinformation! One of the main points of the book is that the experience of the first two years was so wrenching that none of the participants spoke truthfully about it, so the record was full of contradictory or incomplete accounts. I had independent info that helped me resolved all those issues. But, yes, I'll list the problems on the WT talk page. Gondorian (talk) 18:37, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

I've added a list of suggested corrections to the Weird Tales talk page. Gondorian (talk) 19:55, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John R. Coryell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Barbara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:28, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)