GrAmPaGe EdIt FiXeR

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Grammer Plot, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 22:42, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

Hi Grammer Plot! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 09:28, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Unecessary

I meant exactly what I said. The heading is unnecessary. In fact, the plot needs reduced to half of what is there. I will likely reduce it to a paragraph shortly unless someone else takes up the task. CNMall41 (talk) 18:37, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Why should it be reduced to a paragraph ? The plot is fine as it is. The heading isn't unnecessary either, period. Grammer Plot (talk) 19:27, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

November 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Shaitani Rasmein. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. CNMall41 (talk) 21:01, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

The only reason I keep editing it the way I see fit instead of settling with other edits is because most editors are not editing accurately. For instance, when editing the cast, bot editors like putting unknown under recurring characters instead of putting their real names. And there are specific words that are meant to be in Hindi, but bot editors will change them. They're the reason I'm in this edit war because they're making rubbish edits. And then you on the other hand want to remove the entire plot and leave only a paragraph. GrAmPaGe EdIt FiXeR (talk) 05:59, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

"I keep editing it the way I see fit" - That's not how things work. If everyone edited "how [they] see fit," it would be absolute chaos.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Shaitani Rasmein. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. FINAL WARNING CNMall41 (talk) 06:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Why did you only focus on that part ? I did say why I do it that way. Besides, you're not any better. You're also editing it to your liking. Removing the entire plot, leaving only a paragraph and then give me a final warning for just adding to that same paragraph ? That is unnecessary. Why aren't you saying anything about the bots that are making rubbish edits on the cast ? Why do you have to resort to blocking me instead of trying to come to an agreement with me like you said in your warnings ? GrAmPaGe EdIt FiXeR (talk) 09:56, 13 November 2024 (UTC)