Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi GreekChanter! You created a thread called Darryl K. Williams at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 10 June 2019 (UTC)Reply


Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi GreekChanter! You created a thread called Possible new article: Darryl K. Williams of Boston and Milton, Massachusetts, USA at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 8 July 2019 (UTC)Reply


Welcome

edit
Hello, GreekChanter, and Welcome to Wikipedia!    

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

GreekChanter, good luck, and have fun. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 03:08, 2 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
I saw you were asking on IRC about how to get your references formatted. I did some cleanup on your draft at Draft:Darryl K. Williams so it looks a little closer to a normal Wikipedia article. You still have considerable work to do, however, since that list of articles at the end cannot stand in for properly citing every substantial fact you have written about Williams in your body text. You might want to read referencing for beginners. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 03:08, 2 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Darryl Williams (advocate) has been accepted

edit
 
Darryl Williams (advocate), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~Kvng (talk) 16:33, 5 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Darryl Williams (advocate)

edit

Hi @GreekChanter: I reverted the edit you put in. I know you created the article but your adding more and more content without any references. Everything that is put into Wikipedia must have references. Please read WP:REFB, it will help you form good references. I also removed the large list of external links you added per WP:ELNO and WP:NOT. Wikipedia isn't an unordered listing of random stuff per WP:NOT. Most of that listing can probably be used as reference, but the external links is no place to dump a large list that should be used in the body of the article. Please do it. If you don't I plan to pull all the non-referenced sections per WP:BOLD, in the next two to three weeks. Lastly the lede it too long compared to the size of the body. It would be worth moving at least two paragraphs into the body of the article. scope_creepTalk 13:32, 27 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

April 2020

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Sotiris Tsiodras, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. First-hand accounts are not acceptable sources.C.Fred (talk) 19:42, 29 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, I didn't know about the text source requirement. I will seek those sources. GreekChanter (talk) 20:47, 29 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply