Greg1wiki
|
Greg1wiki, you are invited to the Teahouse
edit
|
Hi Greg1wiki! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
October 2013
edit
Hello, I'm McGeddon. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Sodium chloride, because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 15:53, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 16
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Helios, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Franz Boll (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 7
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heliopolis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
edit Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Ra does not have an edit summary. You deleted text there with no explanation, which then needed careful checking to figure out if this was a good thing or a bad thing. An edit summary would have made this easier. Thanks.
The edit summary appears in:
- User contributions
- Recent changes
- Watchlists
- Revision differences
- IRC channels
- Related changes
- New pages list and
- Article editing history
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Dougweller (talk) 11:27, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
edit war warning
edit
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on El (deity). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jytdog (talk) 19:09, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit
Hello, Greg1wiki. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Content dispute on Odyssey
editHi, Greg. I reverted your additions to Odyssey for two reasons:
- You're adding the information in the wrong place. Campbell's "monomyth" was in fashion half a century back, and there could definitely be a sentence or two within a Criticism section. But the "Influence" section is not suitable here.
- You're adding unnecessary detail. Odyssey is more important to the monomyth than the monomyth is to the Odyssey. Why not write a bit on the Odyssey's impact within the article dedicated to the monomyth? It doesn't really belong in any extraordinary detail within the Odyssey page because it isn't important to the Odyssey. In fact, it's more likely to confuse—the mono myth is not well regarded by scholars today, and is virtually never explored in depth by classicists, or even literary theorists.
If you are keen on it going in, please make a thread on Talk:Odyssey and we can seek wider input after giving our rationales in more detail. — ImaginesTigers (talk∙contribs) 17:47, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- Okay, you are right. I will rewrite my information and put in under a new section called "allegorical analysis". I will rewrite it not as influence, but as a similarity analysis. The monomyth stories date back further than the homers odyssey, there are mythical monomyth stories that date back to 200 BCE, the odyssey was written in 8th century bc. Not sure what influenced what. But, there are striking similarities to both stories/journeys and the need for the protagonist to get back home.
- So, I will write an analysis of how the stories have similarities and that the odyssey could fall into the monomyth category. The monomyth is a archetypal pattern of conglomerate stories and not one story. Greg1wiki (talk) 19:11, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- Also, are you saying that Joseph Campbell does not fall into classical or literary theorists category? George Lucas credited Campbell's literary work as influencing his Star Wars saga. Greg1wiki (talk) 19:34, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- To be as clear as possible: the Monomyth doesn't mean anything. Scholars do not use it anymore and have never explored it in detail in relation to Odyssey. It is not a real thing that was discovered by Campbell; it is a theory he projected onto old texts and that classicists and literary theorists do not discuss inn relation to this epic poem because it isn't important or significant.
- I have tried to explain this multiple times now. Joseph Campbell's theory has no bearing on modern classicists or even anthropologists's understanding and should not be in this article.
- What George Lucas structured Star Wars around has no relation to the Odyssey and shows me you don't understand this topic. Please stop adding it back in. I will eventually add a sentence or two on the subject in the right place (when one exists, rather than creating a new, out of place section to include a random bit of trivia knowledge). If you wish to restore the content, please make a post on the Talk page and we can invite other editors to weigh in. On the next occasion I will be asking for intervention. — ImaginesTigers (talk∙contribs) 16:50, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
January 2023
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 21:34, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Greg1wiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was blocked for reason for reverting my edits back. Within the talk the blockers to my edits have give no reasons of basis for their edit reversal other than my edit being pointless or unrelated.Greg1wiki (talk) 23:30, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you can't gain consensus for your edits on the article talk page, then those edits won't be in the article, and repeatedly inserting them is why you are blocked. You might be correct, but you still can't edit war. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 01:49, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
.
Please see the article talk page. You are making edits that are not helpful. --Tryptofish (talk) 23:37, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi, and I can feel where you're coming from, as the cool kids would say. The complete thing called "Seawater", upper-cased, would be a singular thing containing exactly all the seawater in the world (not a drop more or a drop less, including being spread out among and within all lifeforms). It makes a perfect proper noun from that point of view. But Wikipedia isn't always that literal, and the common name for just a part of the Seawater's water is seawater, lower case, so the page has to go with that. As for your learning curve here, please understand that Wikipedia is unlike almost any other social forum in that it is a cardinal rule to be respectful to other editors (which we all mess up on time to time) and another cardinal rule, and this is a good one, is always assume good faith. If someone reverts you, have a conversation and discover why, it's usually always in good faith (hence the rule) which is a good lesson to learn about people, inside Wikipedia and out. Lastly and maybe yeast, don't report people to the admins, but that's my own opinion as I've never done it. That I remember anyway. Well, enjoy Wikipedia, you will get addicted if you stick around and do well (see above rules, the first rule of Wikipedia club is...), but that comes with the territory. Randy Kryn (talk) 15:46, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Anugraha (Grace of God)
edit
A tag has been placed on Anugraha (Grace of God) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
WP:NPOV. Would require a full rewrite
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dylan | ✉ | ✓ 15:07, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Anugraha (Grace)
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Anugraha (Grace) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.yogapedia.com/definition/7647/anugraha. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CandyScythe (talk) 22:02, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Anugraha (Grace of God)
edit If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Anugraha (Grace of God) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.yogapedia.com/definition/7647/anugraha. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CandyScythe (talk) 22:03, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
edit
Hello Greg1wiki! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. CandyScythe (talk) 22:04, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Anugraha (Grace) moved to draftspace
editThanks for your contributions to Anugraha (Grace). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because Severely underdeveloped - please use articles for creation . Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Whpq (talk) 01:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Anugraha (Grace)
edit Hello, Greg1wiki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anugraha (Grace), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:06, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
edit Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)