Groucho777
May 2020
editHello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Full Monty has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Full Monty was changed by Groucho777 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873371 on 2020-05-29T16:19:34+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:19, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
July 2020
editHello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 17:16, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Groucho777 Despite the warning above, you have continued to add unnecessary details to film plots that take them beyond the recommended maximum wordage. I suggest you do as recommended and read the guidance at WP:FILMPLOT. Continuing to edit as you do constitutes disruption, for which the ultimate penalty is suspension of your editing account. This is your second warning. Normally you will be reported to the administrators after the third. Sweetpool50 (talk) 18:57, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
March 2021
editHello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Alex Beresford, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rankersbo (talk) 19:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 14
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pierrot le Fou, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page OAS. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
April 2021
editHi Groucho777! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 14:20, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. I just told you about marking edits that change the meaning of an article: they should never be marked as minor. DrKay (talk) 14:33, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Prince Andrew of Greece and Denmark, you may be blocked from editing. Once again you have marked an edit as minor when making an edit that is not minor. DrKay (talk) 19:37, 9 April 2021 (UTC)