Your submission at Articles for creation: El Libero (March 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:19, 19 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Guariflor! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:19, 19 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hello DoubleGrazing hope youi have a nice day. I do wonder why was the redirect declined. Any particular reason? Guariflor (talk) 10:48, 19 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi, did you read the decline reason (the grey box inside the yellow box)? The reason I declined it is that the AfC review process doesn't handle redir requests, there's a wizard for that. Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:52, 19 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:El Libero

edit

  Hello, Guariflor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:El Libero, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 19 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Guariflor. Thank you for your work on Héctor Urban. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 00:59, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Gabriel Alemparte

edit

Hi, Guariflor.

Could you help me with your vote ("Keep") in the deletion discussion of Gabriel Alemparte? There's an user —named Bedivere— who wants to delete the article for a supposed WP:NPOL when the politician in question has received important coverage from the media and also has held state–offices in Chile.

Could you vote to keep it in the deletion discussion, please?

Thanks for your attention.

--Carigval.97 (talk) 21:50, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Guariflor. Thank you for your work on 2023 New Year pardons. FuzzyMagma, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice but the article might be moved once editors from the US realise that there is a US equivalent

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|FuzzyMagma}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

FuzzyMagma (talk) 18:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of 2023 New Year pardons for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 New Year pardons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 New Year pardons until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bedivere (talk) 16:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of 2023 Atacama Region teachers' strike for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 Atacama Region teachers' strike is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Atacama Region teachers' strike until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bedivere (talk) 16:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Mamayuco per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dentren. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 22:53, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Guariflor. Thank you for your work on Miguel Crispi. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:12, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Carlos Ruiz Encina

edit

Hello, Guariflor

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Sadads, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Carlos Ruiz Encina, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sadads}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sadads (talk) 18:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Carlos Ruiz Encina

edit

Hello, Guariflor

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Sadads, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Carlos Ruiz Encina, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

  1. Edit the page
  2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sadads}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sadads (talk) 18:19, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Guariflor. Thank you for your work on Cristóbal Rovira. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:52, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply