Gwelliano
July 2020
edit
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Escape the Night. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Isaidnoway (talk) 22:56, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Escape the Night shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Brojam (talk) 23:13, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:30, 24 July 2020 (UTC)August 2020
edit | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 06:18, 6 August 2020 (UTC) |
Gwelliano (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm NOT a sockpuppet. I've never been a sockpuppet. You literally blocked me indefinitely from editing after ALL I DID was to add information on a page, and fix spelling errors. My youtube channel has been provided multiple times. I'm not Leahmerone, and I can prove it if you need to talk to me. Gwelliano (talk) 01:53, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Obvious sockpuppetry is obvious. Please appeal on your original account. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 07:32, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Gwelliano (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What type of moderators are you guys? Can you not check my account details? Maybe compare mine and Leah's IP addresses? Maybe compare our join dates? I joined in 2018 and have made edits on the Escape the Night page since that's what my entire image is. I make videos on the show and my channel has been linked on the EtN page multiple times? I'm literally a moderator in the EtN discord and a Youtuber. If you want to talk my Discord tag is Gwelle#3105, and my Youtube channel is https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2dws7U5sbpOlfT4DgAUo2w. My twitter is @Gwelliano and my Instagram is @Gwelliano as well. If you can't unblock me after I gave you a serious of evidence, it just proves how bad moderation here is. Gwelliano (talk) 18:06, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
A simple denial is insufficient in sockpuppetry cases, as every sockpuppeteer denies doing so. If you are not a sockpuppet, you will need to provide a plausible explanation as to why the evidence might indicate otherwise. And I would suggest that insulting the very people who will consider your unblock request is not the best path to getting unblocked. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 23:33, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Gwelliano (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I really don't know why you're pushing all of this because YOU believe I'm a "sock puppet". I provided you with information that clearly indicates that I'm not a sock puppet. If that can't get me unbanned I'm not sure how those you also unfairly banned get justice, cause this is literally insane. Not only did people revert every edit I make, not only did both of the moderators that read my review decline, knowing there was proof, the worst thing of all is you're refusing to listen to me because you're pushing your own agenda. I will make sure people hear about this. Gwelliano (talk) 8:51 pm, 8 August 2020, Saturday (15 days ago) (UTC−4)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline as blocked user has not responded to proposal in over a week. only (talk) 15:51, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
@Lee Vilenski, CaptainEek, 331dot, and Yamla: I honestly believe this one as not being a sockpuppet. There may be WP:MEAT concerns since it's odd that it showed up right after the other user got blocked from the article, but looking at the histories, I'd believe them to be separate users. Also, TonyBallioni ran a checkuser that I think would have caught it had there been a connection between these two accounts. Would you be willing to consider an unblock if I implement an indefinite partial block from the Escape the Night page to mitigate any future MEAT concerns at that article? only (talk) 17:57, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- I believe this to be WP:MEAT, which firmly counts as sockpuppetry. I have no objections to unblocking with an indefinite partial block. --Yamla (talk) 18:52, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Gwelliano, I have restored your talk page access; do you accept the restriction proposed by Only? Salvio 17:11, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- To make sure it's clear: if you accept, I'll partially block your account, which means that I will turn off your ability to edit the Escape the Night article, but you will be able to edit every other part of Wikipedia. only (talk) 17:13, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Sure, I also think this is a MEAT case, happy to unblock with restrictions on page in question. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 17:17, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- To make sure it's clear: if you accept, I'll partially block your account, which means that I will turn off your ability to edit the Escape the Night article, but you will be able to edit every other part of Wikipedia. only (talk) 17:13, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Gwelliano, I have restored your talk page access; do you accept the restriction proposed by Only? Salvio 17:11, 16 August 2020 (UTC)