H12345678r

Welcome

Hello, Hansel reinhart, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Doug Weller talk 11:13, 7 October 2020 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Christian Identity

I've reverted you. We need secondary sources meeting WP:VERIFY and WP:RS I'm afraid. And Nazis lie, Finck's a good example.[1][2] Here he makes it clear he wants to get rid of Jews and Blacks."When we get enough of these Negro and Jewish frauds out in the eye of the public, perhaps sufficient Whites may seriously ponder the necessity for their own survival, to rid the world of Negroes and Jews."[3] It is possible an article could be written on the organisation but it would have to meet WP:ORG and although I can see mentions such as [4] but that's just a mention of his racist forum. I also found his conviction for murder.[5] Doug Weller talk 11:47, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Your recent editing history at Charlemagne shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:14, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

I have already added an entry to the talk page. Please actually check the talk page before suggesting it. Hansel reinhart (talk) 23:23, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your edits on Charlemagne. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing You have now been reverted already 4 times. You risk getting a block if you persist. Saschaporsche (talk) 09:40, 9 October 2020 (UTC)