Welcome!

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page The Process (Skinny Puppy album), have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with notable and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Miniapolis 23:15, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

May 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Romartus Imperator. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dennis Levy have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Romartus Imperator (talk) 19:13, 13 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Notice of your recent edits

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your recent edits. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Users User:Hamish_Gary and User:Bargyman. Miniapolis 23:13, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Copyediting

edit

Hamish Gary, we can always use another copyeditor, so I appreciate your efforts. But please don't label your changes as "mandatory", especially when what you are actually doing is mainly stylistic, as in your first edit, at Indian summiters of Mount Everest, or this edit to Joe Orton, where your changes were to U.S. English from British English. Far from being mandatory, the Joe Orton edit was in fact incorrect: under English Wikipedia policy, articles should be in the variety of English associated with the subject (in this case, a British person) or if there is no such association, left in the variety used by the first editor. The Orton article is tagged "EngvarB" at the top as guidance. Many people are unaware of how greatly other varieties of English can differ from their own, or that other varieties are equally correct, but since this is an international project, part of copyediting here is to respect the issue. Also, be sure to look at the whole article when you copyedit: your edit to Sam Shockley, again stylistic changes labeled "mandatory grammar changes", affected very little of a sprawling article with many problems; did you not consider there was more needed doing to justify the article having a "copyedit" tag? In fact, your edit to Sarah Knauss introduced a grammar error, a singular verb with "both". If you are not sure why many of your changes do not qualify as grammar corrections, or what is a required change, maybe step back for a while and focus on obvious misspellings (checking first that they are not UK or other non-US variants!), obvious misuses of words, and things like that? Yngvadottir (talk) 01:05, 18 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zero Dynamics has been accepted

edit
 
Zero Dynamics, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-Liancetalk/contribs 21:50, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Zero dynamics

edit

Hello, Hamish Gary,

Thank you for creating Zero dynamics.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi Hamish Gary, I attempted to review your recently created article, but I'm afraid that I find it incomprehensible. (For context, I have a PhD in mathematics, though in a field distant from differential equations.) It would be extremely helpful if you would expand the lead section of the article so that it summarizes the article and explains what it is about.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joel B. Lewis}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JBL (talk) 21:46, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of DJ Ruppert for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DJ Ruppert is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Ruppert until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

CUPIDICAE💕 16:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Lentz's algorithm

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Lentz's algorithm requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 20:48, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nick Ayala (December 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 01:28, 17 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Hamish Gary! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 01:28, 17 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lentz's algorithm (December 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeromeenriquez was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Jeromeenriquez (talk) 07:03, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello Aafi, please let me know what changes can I make to get her article published?

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pritika Choudhry (February 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheAafi was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Aafī (talk) 16:36, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spodak Dental Group (February 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Loksmythe were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Loksmythe (talk) 19:48, 10 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pritika Chowdhry (February 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CUPIDICAE💕 18:30, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Munir Mawari (March 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 15:51, 28 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Global Heritage Alliance (April 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CNMall41 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 16:32, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Klingit

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Klingit, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Tulsi 24x7 05:32, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Klingit (August 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 10:56, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clinic Center (November 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Storchy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Storchy (talk) 15:22, 24 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Hamish Gary. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Storchy (talk) 15:23, 24 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Klingit

edit

  Hello, Hamish Gary. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Klingit, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Draft:Klingit

edit
 

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Klingit has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz Read! Talk! 06:51, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Clinic Center

edit
 

Hello, Hamish Gary. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Clinic Center".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 23:33, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Patrick James

edit

  Hello, Hamish Gary. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Patrick James, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Patrick James

edit
 

Hello, Hamish Gary. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Patrick James".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alice Tector (September 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 16:53, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply