Harvey2525

Welcome

Hello, Harvey2525, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 17:15, 7 June 2018 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Decentralized Exchange (June 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Decentralized Exchange and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Decentralized Exchange, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:15, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Harvey2525! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 17:15, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notice

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. <RetroCraft314 /> 04:08, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

DDEX.io

I moved the article DDEX.io to Draft:DDEX.io because it did not seem ready. Please continue to edit it so that it demonstrates the subject's notability with references from reliable sources. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:56, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 19:12, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Harvey2525 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear Admin, thanks for your message. I am a technology enthusiast who is extremely interested in AI, AR/VR, Blockchain etc. I believe those technology will fundamentally change our life in the near future. Currently only Internet company has its own wiki page such as Google, Baidu etc. But blockchain related foundation deserves its due attention too. In addition, I have no relationship with the exchange mentioned in my article i.e. I am not employed by them. I am just doing some research about decentralized exchange and this one catches my attention. Of course in the future I will continue the work to add more articles about decentralized exchange as general and introduce some good ones to the public. I believe that current financial system deserves disruptive innovation to improve the well-being and convenience of all the human. If I used inappropriate words in my article, I can modify to make it more neutral. Thanks.

Decline reason:

I have no doubt that you are acting in perfectly good faith, but unfortunately you have evidently not understood the reason for the block. You are blocked because your editing was promotional, and you have asked to be unblocked so that you can edit to give publicity to a subject which you think "deserves" more attention, and to provide "disruptive innovation" for a system which "deserves" such disruption. Wikipedia does not permit editing for the purpose of publicising or promoting anything, whether the motivation for doing is financial, a personal belief that the subject is noble and "deserves" to be better known, or anything else. You are unlikely to be unblocked unless you convince an administrator that you understand that, and will not continue to edit in order to gain attention for subjects you believe in. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:04, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Harvey2525 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear Admin, thank you so much for your prompt reply and the detailed reasons. I see your points now. Sorry this is my first time to publish an article on Wikipedia and in the past I only publised on other medium where there was no rule on the content. I shouldn't have ignored the fact that on Wikipedia the article and argument should be neutral i.e. without subject bias and personal emotion, and it cannot be promotional. The article should be well-supported by a great number of independent resources. And the article should be a good introductory resources for beginners who want to understand a new topic but the article itself should not be misleading i.e. being too positive or too negative on the subject. We as an author should only state facts. The audience should make the judgement instead of the author. I will keep those rules in mind when I make my contribution to wikipedia community. Thanks!

Accept reason:

I have accepted your request. Please note that any promotional editing will result in a reblock. As always with any editor, if you have any questions, please feel free to ask me. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 22:32, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hydro Protocol (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Firefly was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hydro Protocol and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hydro Protocol, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ƒirefly ( t · c · who? ) 00:37, 18 June 2018 (UTC)