User talk:Hayman30/Archive 2

Justofied

Thanks for weighing in at Bbb23's talk page. I was considering notifying you as you were the one who originally reported Lysvincent 2nd and have also interacted with "Justofied". Ss112 17:44, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

File:IOS 11 32-bit iPhone 7 Plus.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IOS 11 32-bit iPhone 7 Plus.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Using semicolons to bold

Per your edits to Malibu (Miley Cyrus song), please don't use semicolons to bold per WP:PSEUDOHEAD. This is no longer correct to do for anything other than a single-entry description list. Bold is also preferred for screen readers, or smaller headings can be used. Ss112 11:23, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

@Ss112: Alright, I'll bear that in mind. Thanks. Hayman30 (talk) 14:55, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

iOS 11 Latest Preview Software Release Template

Why do you revert all the edits in this template? The developer beta is more important than the Public one, so we must add the developer one. –User:Dimsar01 _talk 19:51, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

@Dimsar01: That's apparently your opinion. We should discuss and generate a clear consensus before making any controversial and significant changes to an article or template. I'd also like to get LocalNet to join the discussion on the template's talk page. Hayman30 (talk) 23:16, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Did You See

That IP editor/Hadji87 does not seem to be getting the fact that the article has virtually no worthwhile information besides peaks and fails WP:NSONGS; they appear to have restored Did You See. Ss112 17:31, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

@Ss112: I don't feel like edit warring over this, especially after looking at their edit summary. Hayman30 (talk) 02:52, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Why do.u delete my article im adfing sources

Can Eranwiki (talk) 10:37, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Hagar

• I'd already decided to amend the writing, more educationally explanatory for anyone who doesn't realise that 'to take a wife' in old testament language actually = just sex, sometimes rape - rather than what we might now think of, some kind've ceremony, all happy consensual. In translation the original Bible meanings have been lost or altered which denies a modern student the full picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmyMoosey (talk • contribs) 11:08, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Tagging of Butler Dispatch

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Butler Dispatch. I do not think that Butler Dispatch fits any of the speedy deletion criteria  because "one of the largest online news sources for several large television networks." is a claim of significance and there are other claims present as well.. I request that you consider not re-tagging Butler Dispatch for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 13:04, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

@DESiegel: I don't think that'd be a credible claim with their own website and Facebook pages as sources, especially with the COI editor. Hayman30 (talk) 13:15, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Please re-read WP:CSD#A7 and WP:CCS. A claim of significance need not be supported by any sources at all. The sourcing does not matter for purposes of A7. If a search might find sources supporting such a claim, that is good enough, even if the article is totally without cited sources. Please do not tag for A7 based on the quality of sources in future. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 13:28, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Pratik Dnyaneshwar Patil (Bunty)

WP:CSD#G1 (Patent nonsense) specifies pages consisting entirely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history. It does not cover poor writing, partisan screeds, obscene remarks, implausible theories, vandalism or hoaxes, fictional material, coherent non-English material, or poorly translated material. ... In short, if you can understand it, G1 does not apply. This page may be about a non-notable person. It may be unencylopedic. Perhaps it should be deleted via AfD or PROD. But it is not G1 Patent Nonsense, and it should not be blanked as such. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 15:04, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

@DESiegel: I didn't refer to G1, I simply said that those paragraphs are nonsense. I doubt that those duplicated paragraphs about Lorem Ipsum are meaningful, or related to the topic at all, they're clearly a placeholder. That's why I don't see anything wrong with my blanking of those sections. And I can't believe that you literally reverted through two of my edits without actually looking at what I did with the first one. Hayman30 (talk) 15:17, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

As I read the article, it is describing the use of Lorem Ipsum as a technique in mocking up web pages. That is not a mere placeholder. I apologize for reverting your perfectly valid correction of the level 1 header -- that was an error on my part. Thank you for reinstating it. I still don't think blanking is helpful in this case, but perhaps there is a case to be made for it. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 15:41, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Another editor found that the whole thing was a copyvio (which i didn't really expect) sand I have deleted it as such. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 15:47, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

2017 G20 Hamburg summit

Hi Hayman30, regarding [1]: I'm totally with you. But I had to change it 4 times now because someone keeps adding and pretend that PHI is invited and participating. Which is not the case. Therfore I was a bit "screaming" in the comments ;) Have a nice day --Flor!an (talk) 16:10, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Snoop Dogg

Hi User:Hayman30, noticed a lot of Snoop Dogg single covers are too short or wide (one example is for Snoop's Upside Ya Head, but one of many). Also: can you get covers for Life of da Party, Murder Was the Case (song) (remix), New York, New York (Tha Dogg Pound song), 2 of Amerikaz Most Wanted, Wrong Idea, Mission Cleopatra (song), Do U Wanna Roll (Dolittle Theme) and Wiggle (song) please? Appreciate if you can, because you did a great job uploading art for "Disconnect" - Clean Bandit.--Theo Mandela (talk) 23:15, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

iPhone 7

Hi there! I have a question. I just looked at the iPhone 7 article, and noticed that in the wikitext, the photo for "Comparison of ports" is located in the Hardware section, but in the actual article, it is located in the Issues section, along with every other photo. Is this just an issue with my screen or are you noticing this too? LocalNet (talk) 07:21, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Lysvincent

Do you actually know Lysvincent in real life? An editor claiming to be Lysvincent is saying you know him and that they "told [you] everything". I don't particularly care to respond there because that long rant isn't going to convince anybody or help them get unblocked, but I just thought I'd ask. Ss112 10:12, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Also was just thinking that if you know them in real life, you might ask them to stop editing with IPs or just in general—it's not helping their case, as Yamla blocked that IP for block evasion as well. Ss112 08:05, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

@Ss112: He is my classmate as he claimed. Just gonna clear things up by the way, I'm not affiliated with him nor sharing the account with him. He did told me that he's not JustofiedT147AG, but it's pretty hard to believe with all those similarities flying around and his admission of using No Mono. Hayman30 (talk) 12:46, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

"Hello, I'm Hayman30. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Peg Entwistle— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hayman30 (talk) 05:36, 13 July 2017 (UTC)"

The edit was completely relevant and constructive. If an artist refutes a purported inspiration for a work, it should be referenced to. Otherwise the statement is misleading by omission. Please revert back my edit. 124.190.67.188 (talk) 05:49, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

You'll need a more reliable source than a simple tweet. Hayman30 (talk) 14:19, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

It is a primary source; the twitter account is verified as belonging to and operated by the artist in question. Therefore, it is a reliable source. 124.190.67.188 (talk) 05:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

2015 European Athletics U23 Championships

Hi, I don't know why you remove my change. 2017 European Athletics U23 Championships take place in Bydgoszcz.Costamagica (talk) 07:05, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Articles can be under construction.

There is a whole template for that, either you don't understand how Wikipedia works or you need to read WP:GOODFAITH. Also my IP changes all the time but I am that woman you kept reverting for your lack of understanding of the "under construction" part of articles. --1.55.199.82 (talk) 08:40, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Not sure why you're mentioning the template when you didn't use it at all. I never said your edits are made in bad faith. Hayman30 (talk) 09:01, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Help with template

Hey hayman can you tell me that how to remove issue template from the page that i was created.Gauravsinghmpi (talk) 15:27, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) The templates that are on the page are to advise of possible issues within the page itself. Until the issues are addressed, please leave these in place. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:39, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

@Gauravsinghmpi: See above. You can't remove them until each specific issue is resolved. Learn how and when to remove those template messages. Hayman30 (talk) 15:43, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Can anyone review my page rajkiya engineering college Ambedkarnagar and tell me that how to remove these issues.I s i have to add more references their.Gauravsinghmpi (talk) 15:59, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Finding reliable sources that are independent of the college and that cover it in some detail would indeed help (after you have dealt with your block, of course). Currently I don't see there's much to be said about this college; redirecting the page to the parent university may be a better idea than having a stand-alone article. Huon (talk) 20:05, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Your recent reversion to Conor Newton

You reverted a contribution by 171.33.200.214‎ here, and warned the IP user. Although this user is a frequent vandal and is on the edge of being blocked, in that case the change was correct. It was incomplete (the signing should have been in the career section too) and it's been updated again, but still... is there a protocol for reverting a warning? I've recently been doing a lot of WP:RCP, and I've probably issued incorrect warnings myself. David Brooks (talk) 00:54, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

@DavidBrooks: The IP did not cite a reliable source when making the change, and that's probably why I reverted their change I believe, should've gone with the unsourced warning instead. I don't think warnings can be reverted but I usually just replace them with {{ow}}. Hayman30 (talk) 05:59, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Coldplay A L I E N S

According to Davide Rossi (string), Rik Simpson (Producer), this sing actually written in Viva la Vida session in 2008. Check this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Fsk3sQyZt8 . At 43:40 you can listen A L I E N S part. This video was recorded in 2009. Have a nice day. I'm huge Coldplay fan. Don't ignore me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esambuu (talk • contribs) 05:42, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

@Esambuu: I don't think a YouTube video would be a reliable source for such claim, the channel also appears to a fan channel that uploads stolen videos. I'd suggest you to find a reliable third-party written source instead. Hayman30 (talk) 05:49, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Hayman30, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Widr (talk) 10:12, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

You removed my edit in the article of assam.

I had changed the name of assam to asom because i read it in the scholastic yearbook 2017 .so please first read the book and then email me your reply to mayankmishra704@gmail.com Mayankmishra704 (talk) 14:30, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

@Mayankmishra704: Your changes were removed since they're not supported by a reliable source. Furthermore, you're changing the name of a state in India. Such a significant change could be controversial, so I'd suggest you to first discuss with other editors on the article's talk page in order to generate consensus. You should also provide a reliable source, something you've read in real life that cannot be found on the Internet is generally not accepted. Please familiarize yourself with WP:V. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 15:24, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Blind reverts

Next time, please you the tools within the arsenal of the site BEFORE you commence to blindly revert edits with unfounded justifications. As shown here, removing the word "world" and restructuring the content already within the article is not an "unexplained removal of content".71.196.240.248 (talk) 07:05, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Wouldn't be reverting your edits if I'm blind. You indeed did not provide a explanation for the removal of the word "World" inside the infobox. Hayman30 (talk) 07:09, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Mike Kanellis

How is changing his name to the name he goes by on WWE Television each week unconstructive? He's seen more on Smackdown more so than he ever was by his given name on RoH or Impact. That's the name most will search when looking him up. That's the name I searched to get here and tripped over this error. By this logic, Hulk Hogan should be listed as Terry Bolea, The Undertaker should be listed as Mark Calaway, Sting as Steve Borden and so on. Evalas618 (talk) 02:49, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

@Evalas618: You have to cite a reliable source to verify the name change, and I'd suggest discussing with other editors first before you make such a significant change, may even require a page move. Hayman30 (talk) 02:51, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

How's this? http://www.wwe.com/superstars/mike-kanellis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evalas618 (talk • contribs) 02:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Here's your reliable source.

Since I'm being threatened with a ban for simply updating a current name that far more people know the man by, you can change it.

http://www.wwe.com/superstars/mike-kanellis Evalas618 (talk) 03:10, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

I was just adding the guys junior footy club — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jindaleejags (talk • contribs) 04:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Article Incident.

Hey I do apologise for providing a valid reason for the change, the song was actually used at the London 2017 Gay Pride festival. I am sorry that this has happened. Also thanks for creating a article for Came Here For Love, I am one of Sigala's biggest fans. Sorry for any inconvenience. -James — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesphoenix1234 (talk • contribs) 09:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

@Jamesphoenix1234: No worries. If you want to add back the statement, make sure you've got a reliable source with you. Hayman30 (talk) 15:21, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For always beating me to reverts ^_^ Keep up the good work ;) --George AKA Caliburn · (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log) 10:24, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

SOGo article outdated

-- Hello, I'm Hayman30. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to SOGo— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the -- sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hayman30 (talk) 12:12, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

sorry mayman30,

i did not want to be distructive. just wanted to point out, the article is outdated. it contains information which is not valid any longer (e.g funambol, mapi). this fact should be clearly stated in the article in order to prevent people from wasting their time (as i did).

sorry again for disruption.

sp — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.30.210.188 (talk • contribs) 14:45, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello user editing from 213.30.210.188, I don't think adding "(outdated)" to the infobox heading would be an appropriate way to point out the issue, you should use the {{Update}} template instead. It's always helpful to open a thread on the article's talk page, as you did in the first place. Hayman30 (talk) 14:52, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Union de Industrias Militares

Hi, I just wanted to tell you that the right spelling of UNION (either in Union de Industrias Militares or anywhere else) is UNIÓN. I don't know how typing the right spelling is not constructive, it makes me wonder if Spanish is a constructive language. |212.198.122.22 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:53, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Request for context

Hi Hayman30. I was wondering (as an admin) whether you could provide any background context about this, this, this, this, this and any others. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 19:30, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

@Zzuuzz: I believe it all started with literally a single revert I made on Cash (Chinese coin) two weeks ago. An IP user, who appears to be a recent major contributor to the article, moved a bunch of see also links into the body without specifically explaining why besides that they're editing on mobile, which doesn't make sense either since you can't edit the whole article or multiple sections at the same time on mobile. After that I received immediate personal attack (1, 2). There's also a discussion on the article's talk page that you could refer to in case it might be useful. Hayman30deservestodie is likely a sock of the IP user, as there's a image of Chineses coin on their user page from what I can recall. I never know Brain-made-out-of-Hayman30, Codename Alex, Widr 2 and Sunshine Alexi existed, but they're apparently also their socks, it's pretty obvious with them giving each other random barnstars and continuous claims of me not assuming good faith, not respecting mobile users and whatnot. They're also archiving talk page messages like a boss after they started using new IPs, although there's virtually nothing to archieve. I don't understand why they can't move on. Hayman30 (talk) 10:27, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. We had a Chinese money troll several years ago.. some quite strange behaviour. I'll knock these on the head - they might resurface but hopefully won't become a long term problem. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 12:00, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

I am the person who made some of those accounts though I did ask my friends to help too. I know that it sound odd but the reason why I did it was because Hayman30 never apologized and the deservestodie part referred to the anti mobile mentality of users as him not to the editor himself but if you all really perceive this as a problem then I will stop creating accounts and only edit as an IP but all I really want is an apology for the WP:BADFAITH reverts by this user. I will stop making accounts anyhow the reason I made more was because the ones with Widr in the name got blocked before I could even ask a question and the reason my IP is never the same is because I travel a lot for my work and edit occasionally while on a break. At least I hope that this can be resolved in a civil manner and the reason I got more aggressive was because my image got deleted based on a false copyright claim by @Daphne Pontier: or whatever despite literally my accounts asking why I constantly got blocked. For the record I am not Codename Alex that is the husband of a friend I am the rest. If only one person told me why I got blocked with Widr 2 which I only named as that as a reminder why I even made an account I would have never made more. Is an apology for a nonsense revert really too much to ask for? I never vandalized a single article. 2405:4800:1484:915E:BC16:D63F:761E:5FE8 (talk) 10:39, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

I was trying to protect future readers from spoilers

Hi, I saw that you reverted a recent edit I made to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/End_Times_(Breaking_Bad). I was simply adding a spoiler warning since reading the article personally ruined the ending for me, and I was hoping that others wouldn't be so unfortunate. If this was a violation if Wikipedia rules, I apologize, but otherwise, I was wondering if you could reconsider reverting the edit. 2601:249:C00:2AD8:315C:D019:855C:D87F (talk) 06:17, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Reverting my edit on Glorious (Macklemore song)

For the change I made, a reference or citation should not be required. I merely corrected the article which mistakenly indicated a 3 piece horn section. Simply watching the performance in question, or following the already provided reference to view a screenshot, shows 4 people with brass instruments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.83.72.229 (talk • contribs) 08:53, 26 July 2017 (UTC) ** Correction, the screenshot shows 1 of the members with a guitar, but he does play trumpet as well during the performance, which can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-_ub09u3wo&t=3m45s

There's no such thing as "a reference or citation should not be required". Verifiability, not truth. Billboard magazine is a fairly reliable source in the music industry, so I wouldn't question its accuracy. Moreover, as far as I can tell, the member in white shirt you're talking about is a "guitarist *slash* percussionist" as Kaufman claimed, so I guess he doesn't count. Hayman30 (talk) 09:10, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

The iOS 11 article is wrong

You recently undid a one word change that I made. The line "iOS 11 switches the top-left cellular network strength icons from five dots to four signal bars, similar to that before iOS 7.[43]" is incorrect. There are five signal bars, not four. If you're curious, feel free to google "iOS 11" and you will see for yourself. Change it back if you want wikipedia to have correct information. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.24.96.142 (talk • contribs) 16:12, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

References

Hello user editing from 73.24.96.142, your change was removed because it's not supported by a reliable source. The sentence is also absolutely correct, I'm pretty sure there are four signal bars not five, the current source says four as well. Literally all images on Google are showing 4 signal bars, you might want to double check. And yes, I really want to maintain the correctness of information on Wikipedia, and that's why I reverted your change. If you've got multiple reliable sources to explicitly verify that there are actually five signal bars, feel free to come back and make the change again. Hayman30 (talk) 17:09, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Also pinging LocalNet in case he might be interested.

Hey! AppleInsider states "four", and the image used in their article also has four bars. *However*, that article was about the June 9, 2017 beta. That's a pretty long time ago, and I think there have been several beta releases since then. It's possible that Apple has updated it with five in a newer beta, but that's not what our sources say. Verifiability is more important on Wikipedia than the truth, even as odd as that sounds for an "encyclopedia" :P LocalNet (talk) 17:19, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

@LocalNet: Thanks for stopping by, I'm pretty sure it has not been changed since the first beta. I've took a quick look at build release articles on the Internet just now, none of them mentioned the signal bars. Moreover, I'm currently on the fourth developer beta as well, which is the latest preview version I believe, and it's showing four of them. Hayman30 (talk) 17:32, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Well then this is both verifiable and true. Yay! :D haha LocalNet (talk) 17:33, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Request for namechange

We (Artificial Solutions, creator of the app) are obligated (though i cant say more as I´m under NDA) to remove the name "Indigo" from this wikipedia page. Are we able remove all traces of "Indigo" or to delete this page all together? :::@Hayman30: — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.84.15.210 (talk) 10:53, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

LOWER BAY//THE SOUND

Hayman30 -- I'm a producer on this film and the studios Orion Pictures and Samuel Goldwyn films have changed the name of the film and released a proper poster.

Please see two official links showing this information below

http://deadline.com/2017/07/the-sound-rose-mcgowan-jenna-mattison-orion-samuel-goldwin-1202136198/ http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4669278/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stormgiraffe (talk • contribs) 03:01, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Oluwa2Chainz nominates articles for deletion for fun

Oluwa2Chainz Vandalises articles for no just reasons.

Go through his contributions and you will agree with me that he nominates articles for deletion just for fun. Mhubng (talk) 08:46, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Transdev Burnley Edit

Hi, I'm contacting you regarding my edit to Transdev in Burnley & Pendle. I'd like to let you know that they are currently re-branding into the Burnley Bus Company, as per, for example, their Twitter name and photo. Please put my edit back live, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dantheman2016 (talk • contribs) 14:20, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Lapzeson / Lapzeon

Hi Hayman30. The name is spelled Lapzeson on the websites that are included in in the references of the English wikipage that is about her. Please also check http://www.noemilapzeson.com/ and https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noemi_Lapzeson. Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rwmv (talk • contribs) 09:47, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Pratapaditya

Hi,

The content has been removed because it lacks historical authenticity and it was far from actual truth and reality. Since it was casting untrue negative aspersions on and vilification of highly revered historical hero like Pratapaditya ,the veracity of such content must be backed with such strong references whose historical authenticity must be undoubtedly true and based on well researched facts. The research and study of academicians and historians do not support the veracity of this content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hindu.Bengali (talk • contribs) 10:08, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Recycle track Systems

Hi Hayman, You have requested the speedy deletion of Recycle Track Systems. I ask that you allow me to continue editing because I saved it before I was finished editing. I would like to have access to to the page as there is information in the text that I would like to edit and improve. Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JacobMoore (talk • contribs) 14:16, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

More Mess

Hey Hayman30, I just created the redirect More Mess and saw More Mess (song) already existed. Just letting you know, if you're going to create an article for it, it should probably be at a less disambiguated namespace, as there's no other article of that name (so there's no need for the "(song)"). Ss112 15:03, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

An apology.

I am writing this because I finally read a message you wrote on July 16th (yeah, a little late on my part), and I see how much I personified you as something you are not, years ago I came into conflict with some guy called FleetCommand who was very uncivil and kept calling me names, since then whenever I get reverted I think of that event and somehow I projected him onto you. You can’t read my mind or edit on a mobile device so my actions seemed like vandalism, ultimately I must admit that I did get angry because you said that you have no obligation to wait but you self-reverted when you did see that my edits were meant to be constructive and I should've taken your reverts with WP:GOODFAITH, you're a human being and I treated you like less. I hope that if our paths were to meet after 6 months that we could simply improve articles together and not make a fuss about what happened, I was kind of honoured when I saw that one of the first edits you made after our dispute was on an article I created years ago. 😅 Cheers, and enjoy making this a better place for the readers, they deserve it. has given you a dove! Doves promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!

---

Spread the peace of doves by adding {{subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

@DoRD: @Drmies: Yeah, I'm evading my block one last time to write this here, please add the date to my talk page so I can set the timer in my calendar 📅, the only reason I am writing this today is because I want to open up about it before I go “cold turkey” and even avoid reading Wikipedia for 6 months, cheers everyone. btw thanks for restoring user page Michel, see you in 6 months.

Sent from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. --118.70.151.49 (talk) 23:50, 8 August 2017 (UTC) (Donald Trung, known block evader.)

Removing genres

Hi User:Hayman30, if there's a reliable source for a genre it should be in a "Composition" section ideally. The term "dance" is only acceptable for articles of artists whose music covers a multitude of rhythmic, uptempo genres, it's just too broad to be meaningful in song articles. It's much more useful to name specific genres when possible (User:Life of Tau knows a lot about this if you want to find out more).--Theo Mandela (talk) 08:13, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

@Theo Mandela: That's clearly your personal preference and opinion. I was messaging you about your behavior of removing genres without actually looking at the sources listed on the page, assuming that they're unsourced simply because the source is not placed inside the infobox. Hayman30 (talk) 06:36, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Konecranes article

Hello! Restocking added a note on Konecranes article on May 2015 about saying that "This article contains content that is written like an advertisement". The article has been edited a lot since that and a while ago Restocking removed the warning. You added it back. Why? Can you tell me what should be changed to get it permanently removed? --Jjanhone (talk) 08:10, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

More information

Hello, Hayman . Could you provide more information about why you reverted my edits if they were well-cited??. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hadriensaori (talk • contribs) 18:17, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

@Hadriensaori: We usually avoid using AllMusic as a source for genres as it's considered unreliable per WP:ALBUMAVOID. Hayman30 (talk) 18:22, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

V30 Draft

Hey, I recently created a draft of the upcoming LG V30. It would be great if you could help expand it. Thanks. Darius robin (talk) 16:19, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

@Darius robin: Hello. The newsroom source says "next flagship smartphone from LG Electronics", they never implied that it is the V30, meaning that the entire article is a blatant violation of WP:CRYSTAL. You are merely guessing that the next phone from V lineup is called the V30. I'd suggest you to stop working on the draft until there is more verifiable information available. See WP:TOOSOON in case it might apply. Hayman30 (talk) 16:43, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

@Hayman30: Here we go: Official press release. Darius robin (talk) 16:46, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Transdev in Burnley and Pendle

Please stop reverting my edits, and stop calling them 'unsourced'. I have put two sources into my edit description that do state that Transdev in Burnley & Pendle are now known as 'The Burnley Bus Company'. If you still for whatever reason think I'm making stuff up, they have even changed their livery: https://www.flickr.com/photos/60505704@N04/36216287661. I don't think it would be feasible to put Twitter and Flickr links as sources, plus Harrogate Bus Company has been changed. I'm just trying to keep Wikipedia up to date. If you want to do it, fair enough. But please stop unnecessarily reverting my edits.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dantheman2016 (talk • contribs) 17:52, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

@Dantheman2016: You need put the sources in the article, no the edit summary. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial. It might require a page move as well. Hayman30 (talk) 08:49, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

iOS 11 Screenshot

The iOS beta 6 released a couple days back, so if you have updated to it, could you please update the screenshot at "File:IOS 11 Homescreen iPhone 7 Plus.png" for the new icons that came with it. Thanks. Darius robin (talk) 05:22, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks :) Darius robin (talk) 06:41, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

AVĪCI (01)

Hey Hayman, I thought you might know: are any of the songs on AVĪCI (01) singles? Maybe "Without You"? It seems to be the song from the EP getting the most traction. It feels odd putting it in the other charted songs section of Avicii's discography. Ss112 12:47, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

@Ss112: None of them are singles as far as I am aware. Hayman30 (talk) 13:33, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Device Globe

Just a quick tip, this article has been created before for advertising purposes. See logs: filter a , filter b, deletion log.

Users in question: Deviceglobe (perma-blocked), Guptavipin0403 (current article)

-★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. 🖉←} 01:35, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

@PlyrStar93: The recreated version was't too much of an advertisement, so I went with A7. Hayman30 (talk) 02:03, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Reverted credits updated to conplicated

Why was this reverted? It is correct & confirmed. Ab954 (talk) 17:12, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

@Ab954: You cited Discogs as a source, which is considered unreliable per WP:ALBUMAVOID. Hayman30 (talk) 17:16, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

"Friends" Production Credits

Re: Production credits for "Friends" by Justin Bieber and BloodPop; Josh Gudwin should only be credited for vocal production, not production of the track (two different credits.) Source: https://genius.com/Justin-bieber-and-bloodpop-friends-lyrics

TIDAL's information has yet to be updated to reflect this — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.205.44.121 (talk) 22:36, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Genius is unreliable as it's crowd-sourced. Hayman30 (talk) 08:58, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Grumpy old man

Regarding this edit, I'm very impressed with how polite you were. (I wouldn't have been!) Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:20, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

request a name change Leeds College of Art

Hi Hayman30, Can you help. I am attempting to request an article name change from Leeds College of Art to Leeds Arts University. The Collge was granted University status last week and has now changed its name to Leeds Arts University Changes also need to be made in the body of the text to reflect this. Thanks, I'm new to this! Rachael.hicksonpearce (talk) 15:44, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

References

 Done TimothyJosephWood 16:11, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Damacharla janardhan page edit

Why are you thinking like that..update the changes i have added to mr damacharla janardhan page Manoj8978 (talk) 06:35, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Platform Symphony

I think you've made a mistake reverting my change. The software is owned by IBM for some years and was rebranded "IBM platform symphony" this year. Or do you mean to preserve it for historical reasons?

See http://www.platform.com/Products/platform-symphony => "IBM Spectrum Computing" and https://www.ibm.com/us-en/marketplace/analytics-workload-management

LennyWikidata (talk) 07:06, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

(edit conflict) @LennyWikidata: Please cite a reliable source for your changes. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial. Hayman30 (talk) 07:09, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

@LennyWikidata: Please put those links the link into the article. Hayman30 (talk) 07:11, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

http://www.platform.com/Products/platform-symphony is in the article already. Do you want me to replace it with the otherlink or add the link? — Preceding unsigned comment added by LennyWikidata (talk • contribs) 07:13, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

@LennyWikidata: Sorry, I was referring to the latter. Hayman30 (talk) 07:16, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Done. The rebranding appears to have happened with version 7.2. Before that it was called "IBM Platform Symphony" for some time. I've added the latest versions to Wikidata https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7661461. LennyWikidata (talk) 07:44, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

ATT page

Dear Hayman30

I have updated the Wikipedia page of the Association of Taxation this week. It is an accurate and fair description of the organisation. I would be interested to learn why you keep reverting the page to an older version, which is now inaccurate. The risk with you changing the page to an old version is that it misleads the public about the ATT today. Can I request that you do not edit this page, again?

Best,

Hamant Verma — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.13.110.164 (talk) 09:52, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

No, you couldn't potentially prevent anyone from editing pages. Your revision was reverted because it was written like an advertisement. Encyclopedic content should be written from a neutral point of view. At the same time, please do not restore your changes right away without giving any explanation whatsoever, after they're reverted. You should discuss your changes and generate consensus on the article's talk page. Hayman30 (talk) 10:06, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Silence

But R&B was sourced on the page. I thought that it was how you were able to put dance as a genre without needing to add it right next to the genre. --Death Mach!n302 (talk) 13:59, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

@Death Mach!n302: No, it says "blends soulful R&B with atmospheric electronic sounds", doesn't directly imply it is a R&B song. Hayman30 (talk) 14:02, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burton_L._Mack External Link to Bio

August 2017 Information icon Hello, I'm Hayman30. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Burton L. Mack— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hayman30 (talk) 07:12, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
--------------------------
Hi Hayman30. On the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burton_L._Mack is an external link to a 404. I have no idea where a replacement may be. And, if you actually do get to the bio referenced, I would like to know. I'm interested in reading it. Meantime, if you cannot reach the link (as I cannot), shouldn't it be removed? I do not know how you define "constructive," but pointing out that a link does not work seems constructive to me. Clearly, I did/do not know the proper protocol to to call attention to this problem ... if you see it as a problem. When you checked this bad link, did you just look to see that a page came up, or did you look to see if it had a bio for Burton Mack? When I first tried it, no bio came up; when I tried again, no bio came up. Did you really find a bio? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.228.196.10 (talk) 09:34, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Websherifff

Hello, as i saw you are also fighting against this user, who is fakely adding credits to Look What You Made Me Do. I revert his changes stating sources but he keeps changing no matter what. He even threated me. What can we do to stop him? Anonpediann (talk) 11:29, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

@Anonpediann: I've reported them over at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Websherifff. Hayman30 (talk) 12:27, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Central Library of Greenland

https://www.katak.gl/kl/web/arena — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5k8421 (talk • contribs) 14:21, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Pills & Automobiles

"club banger" does not mean that it is an EDM sons, means that it could be easily played in clubs, while here, on an even more reliable source, it says "in his trap music element", so it is like that, i add some sources to make it even clear --Rideordieyoung (talk) 14:28, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

@Rideordieyoung: It refers to club music there, which is basically EDM. "In his trap music element" does not directly imply it's trap music. You did not add any source. Hayman30 (talk) 14:31, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

no it doesnt, look here if u dont know what a "club banger" is please--Rideordieyoung (talk) 14:35, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

@Rideordieyoung: Yes it does. Urban dictionary is unreliable. "Trap" is improperly sourced since the author did not directly imply it's a trap song. Hayman30 (talk) 14:41, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Ok, i can give you tons of other sources about "club banger", 1, 2, and i added 2 other sources that are saying that is a trap song, what are u sayin??--Rideordieyoung (talk) 14:46, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

@Rideordieyoung: Both sources are invalid, HotNewHipHop quoted Urban Dictionary while abbreviations.com couldn't find any results. Both of the sources you added to the article does not directly imply it's a trap song. Lindsey India of XXL wrote: "...in his trap music element", while Nick Mojica of The Boombox wrote: "...the trap-inspired track", doesn't necessarily mean it's a trap song. In order to support your improperly sourced genre, sources will have to say something like: "It's a trap ballad". It'll have to be expressed in a straightforward manner. Hayman30 (talk) 14:54, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

More than Friends (song)

Hi User:Hayman30, would you be up for creating an article for More than Friends (James Hype song) (there is no article called More than Friends (song) at the moment though) please? Currently in the UK Singles Chart top 10. [2] It sounds very typical of a deep house remix, but I can't find any sources. --Theo Mandela (talk) 14:24, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

@Theo Mandela: I see no significant indication of notability at the moment. Hayman30 (talk) 14:29, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Alright, be on the lookout please, especially if it climbs the charts as expected [3]. Thanks, --Theo Mandela (talk) 14:38, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer granted

Hello Hayman30. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

• URGENT: Please consider helping get the huge backlog down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
• Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
• Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
• Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Alex Shih^Talk 14:38, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

iPhone X

Hi Like iPhone 8 Plus, iPhone X is a phablet. --Panam2014 (talk) 12:04, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Pages that fail WP:NALBUMS

Hey Hayman, I've noticed in the past, you've redirected several pages for failing WP:NALBUMS—you seem to have a knack for spotting/finding them. I redirected several of the articles created by a user (Sidewalkfins87) semi-recently for failing the notability requirements and they recreated them yesterday. I was wondering if you could take a look at them and see if they pass any kind of measure, or maybe redirect them yourself if they do/add them to your watchlist to monitor if they're recreated? I could do it myself, but I don't have a grudge against this user, so I don't want to give the impression I do by picking on their articles. Asking as you're impartial. Thanks. Ss112 15:17, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

@Ss112: I've redirected those they've restored recently. They appear to cite the same websites that are apparently closely affiliated with the record label (ipecac.com, label's official website; orlprojects.bandcamp.com, label's page on the online music store) on all of those articles. I've also went through their comments on user talk pages, to all appearances, they lack basic understanding of policies on notability, despite your attempts at explaining the situation, and is upset because what they've "spent hours upon hours building" was removed. Hopefully this won't escalate into an edit war. Hayman30 (talk) 06:42, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Sorry for Copy your Userpage

I am new at wiki world. I started only few days. I am just follow your style not for bad intension. Now I changed my userpage. Can you tell me what is delete policy. In my artical page it notify me always. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siddiqsazzad001 (talk • contribs) 15:13, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of K2 (Kygo album)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as K2 (Kygo album), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Zawl 21:56, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Yeah Hayman, I've got to say, I took a squiz at your contributions earlier after you changed where my Macklemore redirects pointed to (no issue with that, just pointing out when and why I did it) and saw you created that. I thought maybe you were confusing pop music shorthand for an artist's upcoming album (abbreviate the letters of the artist's name and append the number album it is of theirs; for instance, Nicki Minaj's upcoming album has been called "NM4") for the actual title. Ss112 22:43, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Alone (Jessie Ware song)

I've already provided valid sources confirming Alone as the third single from Glasshouse, so why do you keep reverting it?--Librious (talk) 12:37, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

@Librious: Yes, it's the third single from the album, but that doesn't mean it's not a promotional single. Singles that are made available for purchase alongside the album announcement are classified as promotional singles. In this case, "Alone" is was released alongside the announcement of Glasshouse, thus is a promotional single from the album, but not a standalone single like "Midnight" and "Selfish Love". Hayman30 (talk) 12:40, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

@Hayman30: Following your logic, "Look What You Made Me Do" should be classified as a promotional single as well, that doesn't make any sense. Yes, "Alone" was released as promotional, but it's now confirmed as the third official single, so it shouldn't be classified just as promotional anymore, thus the edits I've made.--Librious (talk) 14:10, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

@Librious: That's not "my logic", I didn't define what is meant by the term "promotional single", therefore I don't really care whether it makes sense or not. Being the "third official single" doesn't mean it couldn't be a promotional single. It's the third single released off Glasshouse, but at the same time it was released in promotion of Glasshouse, as you admitted, thus should be classified as a promotional single. By the way, no need to ping me on this page, this is my talk page. Hayman30 (talk) 10:27, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

And where does it say that promotional singles have more relevance than official ones?--Librious (talk) 15:51, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

@Librious: What are you talking about? I never mentioned relevance at all. And what is the "official ones"? Hayman30 (talk) 22:46, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Look What You Made Me Do

Moved to Talk:Look What You Made Me Do § Release date

August 24, 2017 Actual release date. August 25, 2017 Formal release date.

I choose the latter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musicfavorite21 (talk • contribs) 10:54, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

@Musicfavorite21: You don't get to choose, there isn't a choice anyway. I don't know what a "formal release date" is, but a majority of sources on the page are pointing at the August 24 release, and it indeed was released on that day, as you admitted. Regarding the conflict between sources, discuss on the article's talk page, instead of performing a series of reverts. Hayman30 (talk) 12:26, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

August 24, 2017 is ACTUAL release date.

https://www.riaa.com/gold-platinum/?tab_active=default-award&ar=&ti=LOOK+WHAT+YOU+MADE+ME+DO&lab=&genre=&format=&date_option=release&from=&to=&award=&type=&category=&adv=SEARCH#search_section https://www.bpi.co.uk/award/14534-1598

RIAA and BPI stipulate that the release date is August 25.

http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/chart-beat/7950114/taylor-swift-look-what-you-made-me-do-number-one-hot-100

"After its Aug. 25 release, the song soars to the top with the highest weekly streaming and sales sums for a track in 2017 and breaks the record for the most weekly streams ever for a song by a woman." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musicfavorite21 (talk • contribs) 13:00, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

It is clearly stated in Apple Music that the song was released on August 25. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musicfavorite21 (talk • contribs) 13:16, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Moved to article's talk page. Hayman30 (talk) 13:22, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

You always correct release date to 24 August 2017, but It's like saying 'Every 1989 single except Shake It Off was released on 27 October 2014'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musicfavorite21 (talk • contribs) 07:21, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Ronen Maili

Hello

The recovery that you made about Ronen Miley is a mistake, because I found out that the transcription was wrong, and that is why I came to correct it. Best regards. על הטוב (talk) 14:08, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

@על הטוב: Please kindly cite a reliable source for your changes. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial. Hayman30 (talk) 14:13, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

I wrote the entry, and it turned out that I had a mistake in translating the name into English. Best regards. על הטוב (talk) 14:15, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

cy0pt edit

Was it the links that made the article seem promotional? If so, I've removed them to just give a starting page from which others can build. The Bobby June Show 14:15, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

@Cy0pt: Not only are the links promotional, the nature of your user page is promotional. Wikipedia should not be used for advertising. It also appears that you have a conflict of interest, as you signed your comment with the show's title. Hayman30 (talk) 14:22, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Ah, ok. So there is absolutely zero way of at all, in any way, saying anything about yourself. Correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cy0pt (talk • contribs) 14:26, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

@Cy0pt: If you you work directly for the show or its company, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by any entity associated with the company, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Cy0pt. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Cy0pt|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Hayman30 (talk) 14:31, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Rachel Marsden

The edit (which you apparently reverted) pertains to the number of times the talk show in question airs each week. As you can see from the show page itself, the show airs THRICE weekly (and not TWICE weekly): https://fr.sputniknews.com/radio_desordre_mondial/

Yes, please put the source in the article. Hayman30 (talk) 13:04, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

iPhone X

We already had a discussion about this at Talk:Phablet, but User:Natureium keeps replacing "phablet" with "smartphone" in the iPhone X article. Please see Talk:iPhone X. Darius robin (talk) 09:24, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Page changes Chisinau

Thanks for constructive criticism. I will take it in account. I really have some technical problems to put the graphical files on the pages. Please, be patient to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbsoluteVasilii (talk • contribs) 14:00, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	I see you reverting all the time Bobherry Talk Edits 15:23, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Whatever It Takes (Imagine Dragons song)

That user is nasty. Be patience until ID announce as a single (with reliable source). 115.164.222.131 (talk) 18:17, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Oops "officially". 115.164.222.131 (talk) 19:03, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Why?

Why do you seem to have a problem with any edit I make? I brought this issue up at the MOS page, as I'm done feeling attacked. You're owning abilities in an edit-warring setting are troublesome, and it makes me not want to edit any article you touch, which is not what Wikipedia is about. livelikemusic talk! 12:53, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

@Livelikemusic: I have absolutely no clue why you feel about me that way, or how you are feeling "attacked". This table on MOS:DATE clearly indicates that a comma after the year is only required for mm-dd-yy dates, and MOS:COMMA directly implies that the comma is only required for "dates in month–day–year format", not sure what your issue is here. It's really none of my business if you decide to not edit any article I've edited and put on a drama, you're just trying to put me in bad light. I largely avoid having personal conflicts with other editors, and I don't want this one to start. Hayman30 (talk) 13:50, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Review an article

Hi Hayman,

Could you please review the K-391 article page? It is new article about Norway DJ and music producer K-391.

Hope you will be review my page.

Thank you, Siddiq Sazzad (talk) 18:37, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Kygo discography and First Time (Kygo and Ellie Goulding song)

Nothing was wrong with my edits to Kygo discography and First Time (Kygo and Ellie Goulding song). Our IP address only updated the albums. (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:10, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Your edits are unsourced, which conflicted with our verifiability policies. Also, could you declare what you mean by "our IP addresses"? Hayman30 (talk) 03:40, 22 October 2017 (UTC). By "our IP address", we are taking about the person operating from the IP address 68.195.141.2 68.195.141.2 (talk) 20:02, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Adamclemance13

Just thought you should be aware I have reported Adamclemance13 for edit-warring once again. And since you were involved in the previous report, figured you'd want to be included. livelikemusic talk! 20:06, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Migos

Please tell me how "Too Hotty" isn't a Migos as a featured artist.

Just letting you know I'm going to re add it on there. We can go back and forth all day bro. Jay2020 (talk) 15:08, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

@Jay2020: No. Doing such is considered edit warring. Please discuss before you add it back. Hayman30 (talk) 15:13, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

@Hayman30: I provided a source to show that its a Migos song. Not a individual feature.

http://www.billboard.com/music/quavo if you look under his page on billboard it's not on there.

@Jay2020: It doesn't matter how Billboard handled the credits for charts. Reliable sources on the song's page are confirming that the song is no longer a Migos song but instead, individual features. Hayman30 (talk) 15:22, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

@Hayman30: Well it should it go under guest appearances then. Right? Since their individual features are included on there.

@Jay2020: I suppose. Also, no need to mention me on this page, this is my user talk page. Hayman30 (talk) 15:27, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Okay cool. I'm glad we came to a mutual agreement.

Faking It (Calvin Harris song) artwork

Hi Hayman30, Can you upload the artwork for Faking It (Calvin Harris song) please? If you can, here's what it looks like [4], cheers. Theo (edits) 17:38, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

RE: October 2017

Hello;

I've seen your reverted edits and I think you were wrong about that. I have undid your edits again, because even if genius is "crowdsourced", it still provides a reliable source to the website. I was gonna include a citation but you have removed it before I did that. Thank you for notifying me anyways --2001:8F8:172D:FB6:E55E:7BCE:A657:5895 (talk) 09:45, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop this nonsense, as you did at How Long (Charlie Puth song), How am I not citing a reliable source? Don't try to act smart by saying "Genius is crowdsourced, thus is not considered a reliable source" Why don't you tell me how is this website crowdsourced instead of explaining your bullshit of yours!! --2001:8F8:172D:FB6:E55E:7BCE:A657:5895 (talk) 09:58, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Please do not make personal attacks. Content on Genius is user-generated, which is unacceptable as a reliable source per WP:UGC. Please do not further restore your edits or edit war unless you could provide a reliable source. Hayman30 (talk) 10:06, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

I am sorry. I just wanted to add information, and just so you know I am not trying to Vandalise any page in Wikipedia. 2001:8F8:172D:FB6:E55E:7BCE:A657:5895 (talk) 10:25, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Bedroom Floor

Hello Hayman30,

I did not make any changes or edits to article Bedroom Floor. You may have been mistaken. This is also a not shared IP address. Kindly re-check it. I do not have anything to do with that article. Regards. 47.8.14.216 (talk) 20:47, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Hayman30. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 16:59, 1 November 2017 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:59, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Shockandawe

Just noting to you, in case you missed it, that the user BlaccCrab has changed Shockandawe from "single" to "song", as you created the article content. I've restored it, as The Fader source calls it a single, but, well, these things do get changed quite frequently sometimes, as happened with the singles from Imagine Dragons' Evolve and Maroon 5's Red Pill Blues. Ss112 02:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Why you removed my article?

Hi user:Hayman30, My article about Back to Beautiful song that you removed. You didn't massage me or warn. Suddenly deleted! This is not right. I collected all informaion with right way. If any section missing then it maybe fill up by another user.

Siddiq Sazzad (Chat) 08:56, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

@Siddiqsazzad001: I was typing the message on your talk page when you messaged me. Read it if you wish. Hayman30 (talk) 09:05, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Regarding "adding Taylor Swift as producer on Look What You Made Me Do"

Thanks for letting me know about my mistake there, but I don't think I should add source there because it is listed in album liner notes (here; https://www.discogs.com/Taylor-Swift-Reputation/release/11113712) and also in Reputation (Taylor Swift album). So, it's a common thing and don't think we should add a source. Rezistant (talk) 14:27, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Ignite

Check which singles are Alan Walker singles. Alan Walker discography#As lead artist Eurohunter (talk) 09:01, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

@Eurohunter: "Back to Beautiful" is a Alan Walker single too. Featured singles are not excluded from singles chronologies. Hayman30 (talk) 09:05, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

No. It's single of Sofia Carson. Due to Alan Walker is featured artist in this case (not along performance), single is excluded from Alan Walker singles chronology. Eurohunter (talk) 09:09, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

@Eurohunter: Featured singles are included in singles chronologies as well. Hayman30 (talk) 09:14, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

It would be wrong. Eurohunter (talk) 09:15, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

@Eurohunter: No. Look at articles of songs with features. Hayman30 (talk) 09:18, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Featured singles it's something different. Eurohunter (talk) 09:19, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

@Eurohunter: You have no idea what you're talking about. An artist's featured singles are included in their single chronology, they don't have to be credited as lead artist in order to be added. Look at any single with features. Hayman30 (talk) 09:24, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

And exactly due to this cause lead singles and featured singles are in separated secions in the discography. Eurohunter (talk) 09:46, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

@Eurohunter: It doesn't matter. Hayman30 (talk) 09:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Kids in Love (Kygo album)

Hi. I was just wondering, are you considering creating this article? If you are, please create it at Kids in Love (Kygo album). I know you created Kids in Love (album), but a while ago I noticed the Mowgli's had an album of the same name and was surprised it didn't have an article, so I've been looking for sources the past few days (I even emailed Jennica about it earlier) to create one for it (probably not a very big one, but it charted on the Billboard 200 besides it all) with plans to imminently try to get a page going for that. I'm also asking because even if I weren't intending to create another article for an album titled Kids in Love, I would think admins would want to merge the history of Kids in Love (Kygo album) with another namespace if it were created (as the recreations and history are not exactly trivial), and that would just be creating another task for them to do. Ss112 08:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

@Ss112: I've been drafting the article for a few days on my own and it's almost complete. My laptop broke and creating articles on mobile isn't enjoyable at all. I will probably create it at your desired namespace, you should know I don't give a crap about credits and stuff, so I'd be happy to cooperate. Hayman30 (talk) 08:59, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Oh, that sucks. Hope your computer troubles are sorted soon then! Ss112 09:43, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

"Addiditonal information"

Hi Hayman30,

I can see why you're mad that I'm "adding possibly wrong information" to your pages and articles about songs, but trust me, the information is correct. I am a composer in my free time and I have spent time to break down artist's music and study the chord progressions and stuff like that. I'm sorry if you felt that it is wrong information, but if you'd like, I can add back the information about the key/tempo of the songs.

Regards, SnappedBinkie18 — Preceding unsigned comment added by SnappedBinkie18 (talk • contribs) 02:18, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

War & Leisure

I think you are wrong on the definition of notable albums for this album. I am not a fan or follower of Miguel, so I am not restoring the album because I am enamored by the artist or the album. There are several news articles that are about the album. I mentioned it in the last restoration edit summary, but for , the article title says "Miguel Announces Release Date For “War & Leisure”; Drops Video For “Told You So”". Thus, it is not a glancing message, it is the subject of the article. Same for the article from fader , where the title is "Miguel confirms new album release date, shares “Told You So”" An album does not have to have the notability of Rolling Stones Sticky Fingers to be listed in this encyclopedia, and the creator/developer of the War & Leisure article has done a sufficient job of proving notability for the article to remain. If you want to be helpful, instead of deleting, why not help build the article? Improve the references, find new ones. Please don't delete it again, it has proved itself notable enough to exist as a stub. Now it needs to grow into a start or a c class article. Mburrell (talk) 00:24, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

References

User removing charts; help?

Hey Hayman. I see sometimes when you create articles, you add charts and have a pretty good grasp of them, and you also edit articles the user Abi-Maria has. Anyway, today they've been on a "this isn't on WP:CHART so it's not reliable" editing spree, and they've been told to discuss and stop edit warring, and now reported to an admin. They've been given warnings in the past, and now another by me, and asked to follow WP:BRD. Would you be able to keep an eye out, and if you see this user continuing to blank large portions of charts from pages, revert and ask them to discuss? I get the feeling this user will just revert and never discuss. They have 2,000 edits and seem to think this is the way Wikipedia works. Thanks! Hey @SNUGGUMS: pinging you here instead of another full talk page message saying the same, they've done this on What About Us (Pink song) and I value your opinion as well. Can you help keep an eye out? Ss112 10:30, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

@Ss112: I don't really know how charts work lol, but I'll certainly notify them if they've made any disruptive edits that I happen to come across or they went pass 3RR. Hayman30 (talk) 16:00, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Reping @SNUGGUMS: FYI, pings only go through if there is a new comment with a new signature. They don't work when you edit a previous comment.

I so far have seen nothing of major concern, and hopefully won't anytime soon. Something I will note for that page is that unless one specifically states otherwise, naming a nation in the lead implies it reached that range on its main chart. Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:37, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

SNUGGUMS This also concerned me regarding the likes of Latvia, Poland, Croatia, Portugal, Lebanon, Czech Republic and Slovakia are airplay or digital charts, it is indeed misleading as they are not the country's official charts but I see Ss112 undid my edit for this. Abi-Maria (talk) 17:59, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

@Abi-Maria: There was no misleading implication there, because I specifically changed the wording to say "topped charts", not "the charts" of each nation, which would imply they were the official charts of each nation. I didn't even add these to the lead; I didn't care. That was SNUGGUMS, as far as I'm aware. You need to stop being so pedantic about clarifying what is what, including on Perfect (Ed Sheeran song). It's getting tiring. Ss112 18:33, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

I did add lots of places to the lead, but can't remember which ones were added by other users. In any case, while I removed anything that I knew was a component rather than a main chart, Abi-Maria, I admittedly am not entirely familiar with which charts are which for the places you've mentioned. When the component is in fact a legitimate one to mention at all, it's better for the tables instead of the lead unless perhaps there was some major achievement among the components. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:39, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Ss112 It is very misleading to readers as they will believe these charts are the countries main charts when they are merely airplay or digital charts which is implying false information. Hardly pedantic. Abi-Maria (talk) 18:46, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

@Abi-Maria: Having the parenthesised title and link to that chart's page telling us what type of chart it is is the point of having such a thing there. Now you look like you're following me to other songs' pages. You've never even edited Friends (Justin Bieber and BloodPop song) before, and now you're fighting about crap there. Drop it because this is hounding and holding a grudge. Ss112 18:48, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

I am not fighting about anything actually. I am shocked at how quick you are to jump down my throat and throw around false accusations. you are undermining all my legitimate edits and baiting edit wars wherever I edit. You know very well you are in the wrong implying false information by not indicating that the said charts are not airplay charts and since when have TV airplay charts become a thing on Wikipedia? Are you joking?! Abi-Maria (talk) 18:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

You edited the article for "Friends" mere minutes after I did despite never having edited it before. Are you actually meaning to imply you didn't edit that just because I recently did? And chose this time to suddenly start being pedantic about having very specific wording next to names of countries when we have links right next to the name of the country that explain what types of charts those charts are? Please. You must be joking if you expect me to believe that. I'm not going to continue to annoy Hayman with this pointless conversation and the notifications he gets on his talk page because of it. This is the same retread of a conversation we had on your talk page earlier. Don't follow users because you didn't get your way in an earlier dispute. That's what wikihounding is. If you're not, good, nothing to worry about. The chart crusade is getting really old. Ss112 18:56, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

You have undid, found fault with nearly all of my edits recently so if there is anyone who is looking for conflict it is you. I saw the Friends article was in a bad state and edited it, I never undid anything or edited in a way that undermined your edit in anyway like you are constantly doing with me. Stop the bullshit and blatant lies. Abi-Maria (talk) 19:06, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

I didn't say you undermined my edit. I said you edited the article directly after I did and found fault with things on it. It was hardly in a "bad state". You can stop your bullshit while you're at it. I'm done squabbling with you. Ss112 19:22, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

I would suggest that you leave me alone and stop with the hounding while you're at it. I will take it to WP:ANI because I cannot even make a single edit on Wiki with the circumstances you are putting me under. Go take your frustrations out on someone else, thank you. Abi-Maria (talk) 19:39, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Says the editor who followed me to Friends (Justin Bieber and BloodPop song). Get over the earlier dispute and leave me alone. Let's agree to leave each other alone, at least. Thanks. Sorry about all the notifications, Hayman. Ss112 19:45, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Deleting articles without discussion

Hi, I noticed you deleted an article on a newly released album. Other editors restored it. You again deleted it. I restored it. You deleted it. This is not how en.Wikipedia works. It may not meet the technical criteria for EDITWARRING but it doesn't look good from the edit history. As it happens this newly released album would seem to only pass WP:GNG by celebrity of artists and looks like notoriety as a flop, but that's not the point. None of us gets to steamroller through our edits repeatedly, certainly not in repeatedly deleting an article we don't think notable. If you want to delete an article please use WP:PROD and if that is challenged then AFD like the rest of us. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:55, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

@In ictu oculi: Please, don't talk to me as if I'm a newbie. Hayman30 (talk) 09:04, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Just take it on board, okay. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:06, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Massachusetts vandal

Please feel free to have fun and do what you feel is necessary to improve and seeking for similar behavior under different accounts and IPs. 183.171.183.137 (talk) 17:28, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

The page is going deletion soon; see talk page. 183.171.181.3 (talk) 02:53, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Re:Echame la culpa

But it's more ridiculous than thousand of users are not required the reference but to me if. --186.84.65.243 (talk) 05:32, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

You don't have to leave these pointless comments that are not helpful at all just to make your actions look less disruptive. Hayman30 (talk) 08:36, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

MetroLyrics

I found the discussion. Please discuss at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Songs#MetroLyrics. Both http://www.metrolyrics.com/thunder-lyrics-imagine-dragons.html and and http://www.metrolyrics.com/whatever-it-takes-lyrics-imagine-dragons.html have an edit lyrics link prominently displayed at the top of the page. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:03, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

More Than You Know (Axwell and Ingrosso album)

Hey, since I think you're probably the best creator of content for electronic music articles on Wikipedia, when you get time, would you be able to work on/add sources to this? The user SpongePappy created it but as I think they've also done for other pages in the past, didn't add any sources. Thanks! Ss112 07:23, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

@Ss112: I have a couple articles on my list to create and exams are approaching in less than two weeks, so I probably couldn't get my hands on this one until sometime around mid-January. Thanks for informing me anyway. Hayman30 (talk) 05:33, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Wolves (Selena Gomez and Marshmello song)

Hey, I know charts are not your area of focus but rather like a secondary concern, but can you keep an eye on the article for "Wolves"? Some IP is removing a Croatian peak, a chart published by Croatian Radiotelevision, a public broadcaster, claiming it's "not official". They also claimed a Czech chart published by the Czech branch of the biggest recording industry association in the world (the IFPI) is "not official". Seems to be just WP:IDON'TLIKEIT. Ss112 06:02, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Strongest

Hey Hayman30,

We can continue to undo each others work (you believe it is not notable, i believe it is) but it's an edit war. If you want to delete an article can I suggest you use WP:PROD and if that is challenged then AFD. Thank you. Tobyjamesaus (talk) 10:14, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

@Tobyjamesaus: I really have no idea where you got the idea of "a song is notable if it charted on one or two weekly national charts and I add some links to its iTunes pages". You clearly have not read WP:NSONG thoroughly. It explicitly states on the page that ranking on national or significant music or sales charts indicates only that a song may be notable, not that it is notable. To quote the first line, "songs and singles are probably notable if they have been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label." Digital retailers do not fall into this category of sources, nor do chart publishers. I suggest you to review your understanding on notability guidelines before proving me wrong. This also isn't your first time, you have a traceable history of mass-creating stubs on unnotable songs, and I would urge you to stop doing so, not to mention that you have the autopatrolled flag. Song articles can be redirected if they are clearly do not pass NSONGS, especially when they don't even meet WP:GNG. Hayman30 (talk) 12:23, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

@Hayman30: Thank you for your message. I understand the different between may and is and I respectfully disagree these songs are not notable. I have read and understand the criteria and I wasn't attempting to prove you wrong, merely saying let's not have an editing war and put AFD on them, which you've now done. We'll wait and see. Tobyjamesaus (talk) 04:14, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Échame la Culpa

Hayman, I think you need to be a little chill yourself. Coming around four minutes after another editor has changed something that doesn't even matter is certainly not being "chill", it looks pedantic. Great, so you monitor your watchlist. It didn't need to be "fixed" and there's nothing to be consistent with in this regard. Ss112 10:45, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

@Ss112: I was referring to the second edit on the consistent part, sorry if I mislead you on that. Yeah I'm pedantic, whatever, I was really concerned about that extra byte. Don't get overly triggered over something so minor. Hayman30 (talk) 10:54, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

If we really want to go down that avenue, I'm pretty sure everybody on Wikipedia could be considered "triggered" when we talk about issues, revert somebody or basically edit at all since we're all here electing to spend our time collaborating on something we don't actually need to trying to make it better... (because to the Internet, caring = triggered) Ss112 10:58, 26 December 2017 (UTC)