User talk:Hazel77/Archive 1

Archive 1

WP:FILMS Welcome

Welcome!

Hey, welcome to WikiProject Films! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films and film characters. If you haven't already, please add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.

• The project has a monthly newsletter. The newsletter for November has been published. December's issue is currently in production; it will be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

• Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
• Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Announcements template to see how you can help.
• Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Wikipedia. Check it out!
• Want to collaborate on articles? The Cinema Collaboration of the Week picks an article every week to work on together.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Nehrams2020 (talk) 08:50, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Films December 2007 Newsletter

The December 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films January 2008 Newsletter

The January 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have any suggestions for improvement or desire other topics to be covered, please leave a message on the talk page of one of the editors.Thank you. Nehrams2020 (talk) 01:31, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikicrimes

Sorry, I was creating a article about my project wiki that me and my professor are doing called wikicrimes (www.wikicrimes.org), and I was editing somethings when it has been deleted. Anyway I am going to write all article first and try to format with pattern wikipedia, and later post it, it was my first article. --Dobau (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

It has not yet been deleted, so you are still free to place the {{hangon}} template on the page and contest the deletion. Sorry if I jumped the gun a bit in tagging it for deletion, though I notice it has now been deleted. Really sorry for the late reply, as well, I've been very busy with no time to check wikipedia recently.--Hazel77 (talk) 15:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films February 2008 Newsletter

The February 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:37, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films coordinator elections

The WikiProject Films coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect five coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by March 28! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:34, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films March 2008 Newsletter

The March 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:18, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films April 2008 Newsletter

The April 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:05, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films May 2008 Newsletter

The May 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:59, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films June 2008 Newsletter

The June 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 23:53, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

CSD:A7

Hi. :) I came across your speedy deletion tag on Sattam Oru Iruttarai, and I just wanted to point out to you that {{db-a7}} is specifically for people (individually or grouped) and websites. There is currently no consensus for speedily deleting other articles types under this criterion. Other articles that fail to assert notability should go through proposed deletion or articles for deletion. Thanks for keeping an eye out on article quality. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:00, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Oops, my mistake. I didn't think it was notable (Probably wrong there as well :P) and it slipped my mind that the criterion wasn't appropriate, I'll remember that for next time.--Hazel77 ^talk 13:29, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

My User Page

Thanks for catching that; my very first user page vandalism. I'm so proud! --Blowdart | ^talk 20:24, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Glad to be of help :D.--Hazel77 ^talk 22:12, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films roll call and coordinator elections

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:07, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter

The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:17, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

WHAT IS WRONG WITH MY ARTICLE?!?!

You recently speedy deleted my article myminicity. Please tell me whats wrong with it. You can find it under User:Nurasko/myminicity Nurasko^{Talk page}

As I said on the talkpage of that article this morning: You need to give evidence of notability (i.e. Why it it warrants a place on wikipedia.--Hazel77 ^talk 22:48, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

• I understand why you deleted the article, but now the user page? Why should the USER PAGE be deleted? User pages can be used like sand boxes. This page should NOT be deleted user:nurasko/myminicity, Click Here To Go To The Discussion & Click Here to watch the page. Nurasko^{Talk page} 21:15, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

The page is a recreation of deleted material. Wikipedia is not your web host and while you are welcome to use your userpage as a development ground for articles in-progress, it is not meant for long-term storage. I nominated it for deletion as there have been no attempts to improve it since it was originally created and you had not respond to my messages regarding the article's issues.--Hazel77 ^talk 21:45, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

It should also be noted that recreating the same page in more than one place does not make it more likely to be kept.--Hazel77 ^talk 21:48, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

RE: thanks

You're welcome, anytime! Maxis ftw (talk) 21:58, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

WP:FILMS Questionnaire

As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:47, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: 5 Girls

Hello Hazel77. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on 5 Girls to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. Ale_Jrb^talk 11:30, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

OK, that is a reasonable change. I believe it was a borderline case and it is probably true that a PROD is more appropriate. Thank you for letting me know.--Hazel77 ^talk 13:32, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

A little TOO speedy deletion

If I remember correctly, the page was blanked by the author. My understanding is that that made it an appropriate candidate for speedy deletion?--Hazel77 ^talk 14:26, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Ah. Then the police officer will tip his hat and pull away after wishing you a cordial good day. ElijahBosley ^{(talk ☞)} 20:29, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

73rd Oregon Legislative Assembly

Re: this edit. Actually, the spelling was correct. See Bill Morrisette. Thanks, Valfontis (talk) 02:39, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Ray Lesniak

Senator Lesniak has come under fire by critics who cite his control over widespread political corruption in New Jersey as one of the state's top three 'power brokers' on the Democratic side of the aisle. He was profiled in a 1986 Bergen Record article entitled "The Politics of Greed" and he admitted that he is a power broker in a 2005 interview with Asbury Park Press reporter Kathleen Hopkins. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.46.70.19 (talk) 19:23, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Be that as it may, it does not make Wikipedia a suitable repository for links related to political campaigns. We do not judge the "worthiness" of the causes, merely whether or not it is suitable for inclusion in the article.

Personally, I do not hold Senator Lesniak in particularly high regard but neither my, nor anyone else's, opinion is not a suitable basis on which to write an article. Wikipedia does not have a political bias.

If you wish to include some of your information in that article then you should discuss it on the talk page, making sure you have multiple accurate and reliable third-party sources but it does not justify a link to an external campaign.--Hazel77 ^talk 21:35, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, Hazel... I would encourage you to expand the page according to Wiki standards (I will try to put something together but I don't know what time I can put into "it). You mentioned 'I do not hold Senator Lesniak in particularly high regard' -- Are you in NJ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.46.70.19 (talk) 17:38, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Ugardanti Article

Hello Sir you affixed these two templates on Ugardanti article. I Could add more referenced data in that. but i am not getting what your templeates is all about. I am new to wikipedia and wrote a bit, i start getting these guideline errors still i manage to outcome many. Now i again faced same templates from you. Kindly show me the path thankyou (Sharpreetsingh (talk) 09:19, 5 January 2011 (UTC))

The templates link to the specific policies that they are referring to. To clarify my intention, though: I felt that the article needed more reliable third-party sources to demonstrate that it is notable enough for inclusion in an encyclopedia.--Hazel77 ^talk 15:20, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

What type of reliable third party sources you required? It is composition written by Guru Gobind Singh aside of Dasam Granth. Scholars have started study of this text too, as many of texts of guru gobind singh are not studied scholarly and Nihung Sampardaye which have whole text of Guru Gobind Singh, slowly giving away many texts of Guru Gobind Singh. There is one study article available and Dictionaries available which could help in translation. I am adding details as i find from relevant source and what i find myself studying deeply in it. i am trying to reference whole lines. I want to solve problem given by you, you want me to attach study by scholars which have till done. Controversial issues with text and so on, but it will take time as i have started writing this i feel is not fine to stop article in between. Kindly guide me the best. Thanks(Sharpreetsingh (talk) 23:18, 5 January 2011 (UTC))

Reliable third- party sources normally means independent, trustworthy sources. Basically, the idea is that these are publications which considered the subject notable enough to publish an article on it. They should be trustworthy enough that we can rely on the information given being accurate.

If it's a new text then we understand that it's difficult to find studies on it. Basically, just do your best and try to get as many sources as possible.--Hazel77 ^talk 17:28, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Sure Sir, i am trying my best to give appropriate reference, to my article. Aside books i am also attaching Speeches of Authentic organizations or members on said topic to support the article. i will keep track the information about text available in past and will update here. The information provided is fully referenced and base on content. Thank you for guiding and sorry for such late reply, as unable to edit wiki due to some personal reasons.(Sharpreetsingh (talk) 12:18, 20 July 2011 (UTC))

Speedy deletion declined: Parampamthalli Sree Mahadeva kshethram

Hello Hazel77. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Parampamthalli Sree Mahadeva kshethram, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not "an article about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content". Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 16:58, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Nathan Hale Ray Middle School - not eligible for A7 speedy deletion

Hi, I have declined speedy deletion because schools are not eligible for an A7 speedy. This is stated clearly at WP:A7 and on the template. Non-notable middle and elementary schools are normally redirected to the school district when it has a page otherwise to the lowest level locality article. I have redirected this page. HTH. Just Chilling (talk) 00:27, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Douglas Nelson

An individual who is a 2 time Olympian is typically considered to be notable. As per WP:MANOTE CrazyAces489 (talk) 04:12, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

response

Hello there, this is Thad Ernst from Erns8874, I appreciated the work you have done, but I have post additional info on the revision you have worked on. I appreciated your contribution. But please state your name and share your final thoughts about the topic. or three tildes. UTC 19:47 25 March 2015

Erns8874 (talk)

Sincerely Erns — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erns8874 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hazel77. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

I noticed you program in JavaScript...

The JavaScript WikiProject is now up and running. We organize and develop JavaScript articles, navigation aids, and user scripts.

Scripts undergoing development, and the state of JavaScript on Wikipedia, are discussed on the talk page.

For an overview of JavaScript coverage on Wikipedia, see Draft:Outline of JavaScript and Index of JavaScript-related articles. For everything on user scripts, see User:The Transhumanist/Outline of scripts.

The WikiProject also organizes every resource it can find about JavaScript out there, such as articles, books, tutorials, etc. See our growing Reference library.

If you would like to join the JavaScript WikiProject, feel free to add your name to the participants list.

Hope to see you there! The Transhumanist 15:19, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hazel77. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Food

Curd Rice

Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, it's going International. To make this event a grant success, your direction is key. Please sign up here as a volunteer to bring all the world's food to Wikimedia. Danidamiobi (talk) 08:46, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Hazel77. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Hazel77! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:15, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)