Welcome!

edit

Hello, Hcoder3104, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Ontario did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Magnolia677 (talk) 15:44, 30 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Beachville, Swox, Ontario moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Beachville, Swox, Ontario, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 01:59, 1 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beachville, Swox, Ontario (June 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bearcat (talk) 16:41, 4 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Hcoder3104! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bearcat (talk) 16:41, 4 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Beachville, South-West Oxford, Ontario concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Beachville, South-West Oxford, Ontario, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 28 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Beachville, South-West Oxford, Ontario

edit
 

Hello, Hcoder3104. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Beachville".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 07:59, 28 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Democratic Socialists Of Canada

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Democratic Socialists Of Canada, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:18, 27 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Democratic Socialists Of Canada moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Democratic Socialists Of Canada, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster talk 19:18, 27 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Liberal Party of Canada

edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Liberal Party of Canada. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Mr. No Funny Nickname (talk) 18:05, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

May 7, 2021

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Liberal Party of Canada, you may be blocked from editing. — Kawnhr (talk) 16:16, 7 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

THEY ARE A CENTRIST PARTY — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hcode3104 (talkcontribs) 10:08, 7 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Ideologies and political positions are determined through reliable sources and community consensus, not a single user's opinion. And I know you must know that, because in order to change the ideology/position to your preferred version— twice— you had to ignore the comment in the code that specifically warns against making changes to those fields without consensus. I would direct you to the Talk page, but that you've also been cutting out a paragraph on their notable, left-leaning policies leaves little doubt as to your motivation here. So just knock it off. — Kawnhr (talk) 17:50, 10 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Education Quality and Accountability Office, you may be blocked from editing. Mindmatrix 20:06, 10 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

May 13, 2021

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to engage in subtle vandalism by making unexplained changes to information, you may be blocked from editing. — Kawnhr (talk) 16:47, 13 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Beachville, South-West Oxford, Ontario

edit
 

Hello, Hcoder3104. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Beachville".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:42, 2 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

I already have requested its undeletion. Hcoder3104 (talk) 13:06, 2 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

User talk page move

edit

Hello - I've reverted your move of your user talk page. Moving your user or user talk page doesn't rename your account, it just moves the actual page to somewhere it doesn't really belong. To request renaming, please see WP:CHU and read through the instructions. Happy to answer any questions if you have them - I'll watchlist this page so you can just reply here. Thanks! :) firefly ( t · c ) 16:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

ITN recognition for Alexa McDonough

edit

On 16 January 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Alexa McDonough, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 17:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please stop.

edit

Democratic Socialists of Canada moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Democratic Socialists of Canada, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Nyanardsan (talk) 09:35, 6 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I created that over a year ago, and I don't edit it any more. Hcoder3104 (talk) 17:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Suggestions

edit

I had look at your contributions and you're trying to improve to warn editors, just in case you need, there are tools that you can use for free to warn users, and it can help you to revert fast: try to warn/revert using Twinkle or RedWarn. —Ctrlwiki (talk) 15:57, 9 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the suggestion! Hcoder3104 (talk) 15:58, 9 February 2022 (UTC)Reply


 

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Slatersteven (talk) 15:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Note this will be my last warning if you revert again I will report you.Slatersteven (talk) 15:08, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Holy shit how many times do I have to say it is the others who are engaging in an edit war. You will be warned on your talk page. Hcoder3104☭ (💬) 15:13, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
You are as well, as you have made 4 reverts over a 24 hour period, in violation of wp:3rr as far as I can tell no one else has violated that.Slatersteven (talk) 15:19, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
As I have noted, the three of you are working together so you won't reach the three revert rule to make me seem like the bad one. Hcoder3104☭ (💬) 15:20, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
And you need to read wp:npa as you have just accused us of wp:meatpuppetry.Slatersteven (talk) 15:42, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
I am not making personal attacks. And yes, I am accusing you of uncoordinated meat puppetry. Hcoder3104☭ (💬) 15:45, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
"Uncoordinated meat puppetry" is an appt definition of consensus. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:54, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
What the hell is "Uncoordinated meat puppetry", if its not coordiantesd its not meat pupppetry.Slatersteven (talk) 16:05, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
That's called "a consensus against your edits." ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:44, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Page block

edit

You have been blocked for one month from Elections in Cuba for edit warring against multiple users. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | tålk 16:16, 14 February 2022 (UTC).Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hcoder3104 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I provided reasoning for the tag, and the others did not provide one for removing it. Therefore, I was not edit warring. And I apologize if you believe I was. Hcoder3104☭ (💬) 16:39, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You were unambiguously edit warring, and I apologize if you believe you weren't. The block is correct and will remain. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 16:54, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hcoder3104☭ (💬) 16:39, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Couple of things

edit
  1. Your signature looks to contain images, which is not permitted: WP:SIGIMAGE. Please fix this.
  2. You keep posting at WP:ITNC that dead links should be removed. This isn't the case- they should be fixed, there are many ways to do this, see WP:DEADREF. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:02, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
    Emoji not an image. Also, I don't mean dead refs, I mean dead page links, e.x. SkiSkiSki. Hcoder3104☭ (💬) 18:07, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
    Redlinks (which is the Wikipedia term for them) are fine, they just mean a page hasn't been created yet. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:43, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
    And they are being displayed on wiki as images not emojis, and are difficult to click on. All of which means you're making it harder for people to contact you. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:44, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

March 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Pavlov2. I noticed that you recently removed content from Communist Party of the Russian Federation without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Pavlov2 (talk) 15:09, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Pavlov2 Hello! The party statement that was cited never said the party support the invasion, peace rhectoric, like that of the PRC, was expressed. Hcoder3104☭ (💬) 15:18, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, you may added it back if I have done the wrong revert.
Sorry again. Pavlov2 (talk) 15:31, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
All is good! Hcoder3104☭ (💬) 15:32, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of United We Can (disambiguation)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on United We Can (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 11:56, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Route of Che for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Route of Che is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Route of Che until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:42, 1 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Signpost "Tips and tricks"

edit

Hi Hcoder3104! I was wondering if your draft Signpost piece was intended as serious or humorous; if it's the latter, it should most likely be marked that way. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 03:31, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

It's kinda both??? I don't really know how to describe it 😂. Hcoder3104☭ (💬) 13:06, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Golden Horseshoe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kitchener. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 9 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, I'll fix it. Hcoder3104☭ (💬) 18:25, 9 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

April 2022

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Israel, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sir Joseph (talk) 19:00, 12 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Cathy Rojas

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Cathy Rojas at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SnowFire (talk) 23:10, 12 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

ANI notice

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Jayron32 18:19, 22 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi Hcoder, I want to warn you to be careful of what you post in discussion, even if stricken out by yourself. Such comments can be dangerous regardless of political views, and yours was too far over the top, even if taken humorously. Please remember that commenting on living people still falls under WP:BLPTALK. Thanks! Red Phoenix talk 18:29, 22 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ooh sorry about that got a little carried away. Hcoder3104☭ (💬) 19:25, 22 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 24 April 2022

edit

ITN recognition for Nagaenthran K. Dharmalingam

edit

On 28 April 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Nagaenthran K. Dharmalingam, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

London

edit

Hello, I would invite you to take a look at the 2018 Ontario municipal elections page. What I did with London is completely inline with that page; and I plan on adding more municipalities when I get the chance.-- Earl Andrew - talk 16:07, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

I understand that, but it needs to be a standalone article. Hcoder3104☭ (💬) 16:34, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello, I've reverted your edits on the 2022 Ontario municipal elections page. I will once again refer you to the 2018 Ontario municipal elections page, and how it is set up. Cheers. -- Earl Andrew - talk 13:34, 11 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
There is certainly an issue with how that page is organized, maybe it should be changed aswell. "Seperated municipality" has no definition and is not mentioned on List of municipalities in Ontario. Hcoder3104☭ (💬) 13:39, 11 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

The next personal attack you make

edit

will result in your being blocked from editing. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Someone was supporting literal facism what was I supposed to do. Hcoder3104☭ (💬) 13:07, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 29 May 2022

edit

The Signpost: 26 June 2022

edit

Concern regarding Draft:Democratic Socialists of Canada

edit

  Hello, Hcoder3104. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Democratic Socialists of Canada, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 1 August 2022

edit

The Signpost: 31 August 2022

edit

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

edit

Your draft article, Draft:Beachville, South-West Oxford, Ontario

edit
 

Hello, Hcoder3104. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Beachville".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:05, 11 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 October 2022

edit

The Signpost: 28 November 2022

edit

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 1 January 2023

edit

The Signpost: 16 January 2023

edit

Your draft article, Draft:Democratic Socialists of Canada

edit
 

Hello, Hcoder3104. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Democratic Socialists of Canada".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:13, 3 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 4 February 2023

edit

February 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Flibirigit. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hamilton Bulldogs, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Flibirigit (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Just added a reference. Hcoder3104☭ (💬) 18:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC) Hcoder3104☭ (💬) 18:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 20 February 2023

edit

2023 NLL Stadium Showdown moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, 2023 NLL Stadium Showdown, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 11:34, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 NLL Stadium Showdown (March 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 03:53, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 9 March 2023

edit

The Signpost: 20 March 2023

edit

The Signpost: 03 April 2023

edit

The Signpost: 26 April 2023

edit

The Signpost: 8 May 2023

edit

The Signpost: 22 May 2023

edit
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Atlas Lacrosse Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Philadelphia Wings.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 5 June 2023

edit

Hamilton Bulldogs

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Hamilton Bulldogs, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Requested moves and previous discussions regarding the article's name. Flibirigit (talk) 23:08, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

The team relocated. There is no discussion to be had, needs to be moved. Hcoder3104☭ (💬) 23:13, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 19 June 2023

edit

The Signpost: 3 July 2023

edit

The Signpost: 17 July 2023

edit

The Signpost: 1 August 2023

edit

The Signpost: 15 August 2023

edit

The Signpost: 31 August 2023

edit

The Signpost: 16 September 2023

edit

The Signpost: 3 October 2023

edit
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 141st IOC Session, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Squash.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

A cheeseburger for you!

edit
  unionize! defaultkid99 (talk) 14:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 23 October 2023

edit

The Signpost: 6 November 2023

edit

The Signpost: 20 November 2023

edit

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 4 December 2023

edit

The Signpost: 24 December 2023

edit

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Hcoder3104. Thank you for your work on Centre Slush Puppie. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:39, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 10 January 2024

edit

The Signpost: 31 January 2024

edit

The Signpost: 13 February 2024

edit

The Signpost: 2 March 2024

edit

The Signpost: 29 March 2024

edit

The Signpost: 25 April 2024

edit

The Signpost: 16 May 2024

edit

The Signpost: 8 June 2024

edit

The Signpost: 4 July 2024

edit

The Signpost: 22 July 2024

edit

The Signpost: 14 August 2024

edit

The Signpost: 4 September 2024

edit

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

edit

The Signpost: 19 October 2024

edit

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

edit

The Signpost: 18 November 2024

edit

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply