Helloarunsunil007123
Welcome!
editTutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
- Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
- It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
- If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
- Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
- When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
- If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
- Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
Happy editing! Cheers, 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 11:17, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
November 2024
editHello Helloarunsunil007123. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to User:Helloarunsunil007123/sandbox, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Helloarunsunil007123. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Helloarunsunil007123|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. -Lemonaka 10:22, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hello Lemonaka,
- Thank you for reaching out and bringing this to my attention. I would like to clarify that I am not being compensated, directly or indirectly, for my edits on Wikipedia. I do not have any financial or promotional interest in the content I have contributed.
- I apologize if my edits gave a different impression, and I appreciate your guidance on adhering to Wikipedia’s policies. I will be mindful of these standards in future contributions and make sure my edits are aligned with Wikipedia’s principles of neutrality and transparency.
- Best regards,
- Helloarunsunil007123 Helloarunsunil007123 (talk) 19:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- This response cannot be accepted. It is almost certainly LLM generated. I will thus ask you a further time and will expect a reply by you not by "AI" 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 11:36, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Helloarunsunil007123, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Helloarunsunil007123|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 11:38, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hello FiddleTimtrent,
- I appreciate your guidance and want to clarify that I am not being compensated, directly or indirectly, for any edits on Wikipedia. I have no financial or promotional interest in any of the content I’ve contributed. My intention has always been to provide neutral, informative contributions, and I apologize for any impression to the contrary.
- Please let me know if there are specific concerns about my contributions. I will ensure that my edits strictly adhere to Wikipedia's policies on neutrality and transparency going forward.
- Thank you,
- Helloarunsunil007123 Helloarunsunil007123 (talk) 15:04, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: ChargeMOD (November 7)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ChargeMOD and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Hello Curb Safe Charmer,
- Thank you for reviewing my submission for “ChargeMOD” and providing detailed feedback. I understand now that the draft needs to include more reliable, secondary, and independent sources to meet Wikipedia’s notability standards. I’ll work on improving the article by adding references that are in-depth and strictly independent of the subject.
- I’ll also review the guidelines on referencing and citing sources to ensure the draft aligns with Wikipedia’s requirements. I appreciate the resources and support options you mentioned, and I’ll reach out to the Articles for Creation help desk or Teahouse if I need further assistance.
- Thank you again for your guidance!
- Best regards,
- Helloarunsunil007123 Helloarunsunil007123 (talk) 19:35, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Helloarunsunil007123!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:51, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
|
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:32, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
This material used to be at your user page. Without my move it woudl have been summarily deleted. Please see WP:USERPAGES 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 11:16, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Use of Large Language Models in responses
editAnalysis of your responses here suggest that you are using a Large Language Model to generate your responses here. This makes this responses invalid, though you are responsible for them. We need to hear from you, the human being, not from some AI LLM, please. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 11:35, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Xylem (November 11)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Xylem and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your thread has been archived
editHello Helloarunsunil007123! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |