Welcome!

edit
 
Some cookies to welcome you!  

Welcome to Wikipedia, Heron10! I am Brewcrewer and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:33, 21 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Our American Cousin (opera), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from the March 2007 concert program, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Our American Cousin (opera)/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Our American Cousin (opera) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Station1 (talk) 23:04, 15 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

August 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Eric W. Sawyer may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:24, 5 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at AfC The Garden of Martyrs was accepted

edit
 
The Garden of Martyrs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Folklore1 (talk) 01:20, 1 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Scarlet Professor has been accepted

edit
 
The Scarlet Professor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dial911 (talk) 04:41, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


|}

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Heron10! You created a thread called publish article in sandbox at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 8 November 2018 (UTC)Reply


Your draft article, Draft:Rachel Zoll

edit
 

Hello, Heron10. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rachel Zoll".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:10, 13 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

October 2023

edit

  Hi Heron10! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Paperback Software International that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. I'll also note that, as you phrased it, it looks like Sawyer was responsible for all of the software on the list, whereas your edit comment suggests that it was just the final item on the list. May I suggest that you review your edit, and also provide a source if you are going to maintain Sawyer's name in there. Nat Gertler (talk) 17:39, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

I clarified my changes to Paperback Software and included reference stating Sawyer designed and coded VP-Expert Heron10 (talk) 21:38, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: VP-Expert (October 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 20:45, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps you can help me understand how to salvage this article. I thought it was an interesting early artifact from the 1980's in the evolution of artificial intelligence. It is not an advertisement as the tool is outdated and obsolete now. Would it be "more neutral" if I added more context, discussing its limitations and show how later expert system shells have been enhanced by "fuzzy logic" and how they have been supplanted by software employing neural networks. Would mentioning other expert system shells that were contemporary to VP-Expert be helpful? I thought the subject was notable because of the significant applications that were built with the tools. I am puzzled by your objection to the references. Heron10 (talk) 22:38, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: VP-Expert (October 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Star Mississippi was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Star Mississippi 15:42, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: VP-Expert (November 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 13:01, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: VP-Expert (November 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 19:27, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: VP-Expert (November 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:49, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: VP-Expert (November 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by BuySomeApples were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
BuySomeApples (talk) 03:41, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: VP-Expert (November 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lightoil was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Lightoil (talk) 05:36, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Joshua Lynn

edit
 

The article Joshua Lynn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:BLP1E -- the material here that isn't about on specific case is local by-the-numbers politician coverage that doesn't reach WP:NPOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 20:52, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:VP-Expert

edit
 

Hello, Heron10. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "VP-Expert".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 14:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)Reply