Welcome!

edit

I don't know why I have been marked as a suspected sock puppet for some other user.

That was by SpacemanSpiff at User talk:SpacemanSpiff#Deletion of Helpchat App. Maybe he will explain. – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 11:41, 22 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
Hello, Himanshi 010, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking   if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! – XLinkBot (talk) 11:49, 18 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

July 2016

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Helpchat (app) has been reverted.
Your edit here to Helpchat (app) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztCKUxGRWAE) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:49, 18 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ankur Singla

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello. A tag has been placed on Ankur Singla requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Malunrenta (talk) 18:49, 15 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

September 2016

edit

  Hello, Himanshi 010. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
  • instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 06:09, 16 September 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Himanshi 010 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not related to the blocked account. Just because I edited someone else edited, I get banned? How is this fair? I can submit proof of my identity if required

Decline reason:

It was confirmed by technical analysis that you were using several accounts in violation of WP:SOCK. You have to explain that if you want to be unblocked. You may use our WP:Standard offer. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:55, 23 September 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User talk:Vanjagenije Can you please explain what kind of technical analysis is this? I have not used several accounts. This is the only Wiki account that I have. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Himanshi 010 (talkcontribs)

He means WP:CHECKUSER.--Launchballer 06:41, 26 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

User talk:VanjagenijeUser:Launchballer But my IP address cannot be same as any of those people as I don't even know these guys?? Can you share the results of this analysis?

User:Vanjagenije But it only says that he doubts we are sock puppets but not sure. Where is it confirmed?

User:Bbb23 Can you please explain this?? Himanshi 010 (talk) 15:51, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

The clerk said he had doubts; I did not.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:00, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

User:Bbb23 Where is the confirmed part & how do you confirm?? Also can I request the undeletion of Helpchat page since a lot more credible sources were added after it was decided the page needs to be deleted. Himanshi 010 (talk) 06:20, 29 September 2016 (UTC) Himanshi 010 (talk) 16:20, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Help me!

edit

Please help me with the blocking? I am not a sock puppet of any of the listed address. Even my IP address can't be the same as theirs. So how am I being blacklisted? Can anyone help on how to revoke this?

Himanshi 010 (talk) 06:44, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

It is very clear from the technical data (which the checkuser sees) and the behavioral information that other admins (including me) see that you are a sockpuppet or at the least coordinating with the group. If you continue to misuse your talk page then your talk page privileges will be revoked. —SpacemanSpiff 06:46, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

User:SpacemanSpiff The only behavioral information is that these people edited one same page as me ( we didn't even work on the same timelines). I understand that being a new user, I have broken a few policies which I now understand better and I apologize for. Is there any way to revoke this ban? And how is this misusing my talk page? This is the only page where I can ask anything. I get it you're an admin and you've your privileges but you can't talk to me like I am some criminal or anything. I asked a genuine question and you're outright threatening me. This is bullying. Himanshi 010 (talk) 07:00, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

You've been given that answer before in your unblock request. There's no bullying involved, you and the other socks have just been wasting the time of editors here and your talk page access will be revoked if that continues. —SpacemanSpiff 07:02, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

User:SpacemanSpiff If you would have noticed that I have requested an answer from the admin who has done the user check. He has not replied yet and as far as I understand I am not breaking any rules here so what you're doing is bullying. I didn't specifically ask you to come & reply to my help message. And if I were actually a sock why wouldn't I go ahead and create a new account instead of wasting my time with you here? Himanshi 010 (talk) 07:13, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Done, your talk page access is revoked. You are welcome to use the WP:OFFER if your socking/disruption ceases. —SpacemanSpiff 07:16, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply