Hlangeveld

Welcome!

Hello, Hlangeveld, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Hi Henk. :) Alai 01:12, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Gloranthan content

Just a warning, from a fellow Gloranthaphile, about using wikipedia to map out lots of Gloranthan concepts: there's a risk that if you create lots of small pages people will call it fancruft, say it isn't encyclopediac and put in a Wikipedia: Votes for deletion motion on it. Some ways to avoid this are:

To write fewer, longer articles, with lots of subsections. Eg. an Elder races of Glorantha page rather than an Aldryami page;
To ensure that at least some of what you are writing relevant to people with little interest in Glorantha. When I did a big rewrite of the Glorantha article last September, I tried to put as many hooks as I could to the general role-playing audience. I'm guessing this would work well for the Maximum Game Fun article;
Lastly, wikipedia supports links to non-WP wikis. In fact, a Gloranthan wikicity might make a lot of sense: it would solve some technological problems that the whitewall wiki had;
And lastly an IP warning: content here should be GFDL compatible, and some Gloranthan content maybe is covered by the Issaries Fan Material Policy, which doesn't look very GFDL compatible to me;

Don't mean to rain on anyone's parade, but forewarned is forearmed and all that. --- Charles Stewart 20:54, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the warning. I'll watch out. For the most part I've been creating articles where only empty links were there before. Your point about Aldryami is well taken. It should be part of a greater article like you said, or even more generic in a section in the main Glorantha page.

Henk Langeveld 22:03, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

A bestiary page may be more interesting to some other fantasy role-players, who are looking for ideas to steal for their bestiaries. Also, the Glorantha article could get quite long. Perhaps Creatures of Glorantha is the better page? Moving the Aldryami page to either of these names would be the best way to incorporate it, since it conserves the page history. --- Charles Stewart 08:14, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Xena: Warrior Princess

Xena: Warrior Princess has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.

Nomination of Aldryami for deletion

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aldryami is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aldryami until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. NellieBly (talk) 02:13, 20 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic