Hpark2016
Why do you want to withdraw the draft for Pauline Kim? She is unquestionably notable according to WP:PROF. I removed minor material from the article draft, and am prepared to move it to mainspace as an article. DGG ( talk ) 16:47, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
- the way we work is to leave it in Draft until it is strong enough that nobody wiis likely to deleeit in mainspace. In this case, the relevant standard, WP:PROF is so clearly met that nobody is likely to try to delete it, and if they do try, they will not succeed. I agree there ie more that could be said, but the main thing that is missing is a review of her book, to show that it is in fact a major text,mainspace. It would be good to have birthdate and place, tho it isn't essential. So I'll leave it in draft space for a while.
What you in general do not need to do is remove it from draft space because you cannot complete it immediate. You have 6 months to finish it. DGG ( talk ) 19:54, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
The article Pauline Kim has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jmertel23 (talk) 12:54, 12 July 2018 (UTC)