User talk:Hurricane111/Archive1

This is an archive of inactive discussion. Please do not edit it. If you wish to revitalize an old topic, bring it up on the active talk page.

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

• To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
• Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
• If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
• Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
• Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
• Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
• Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck! User:Meelar

Fund America

I was involved in Fund America, Inc. from 1989 to 1991. I would like to put up more information about the scam. Do you know anything about Fund America in Irvine, California? -- comment by 68.227.236.231.

Ecclesastical State

Hey Hurricane, I was reading your comments and votes in the discussion as to whether Ecclesastical State should be deleted or something else done with it. I was hoping to persude you to not delete it, but instead redirecting it Ecclesiastical Government, which is similar. I think deleting this is going to cause more problems. Yes I agree, the information need to be taken out about Dominion of Melchizedek because it is bogus. Anyway, I'm just wondering if I can persude you to change your vote to redirect. Thanks for listening... Davidpdx 9/25/05 11:40 (UTC)

WP:CP

Hi, you've reported copyright infringements to WP:CP in the last week, a new measure was recently passed to allow the speedy deltion of new pages that are cut and paste copyvios. Please follow these instructions if you come across this type of copyvio. Thanks. --nixie 00:29, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

Blatant copyright infringements may now be "speedied" If an article and all its revisions are unquestionably copied from the website of a commercial content provider and there is no assertion of permission, ownership or fair use and none seems likely, and the article is less than 48 hours old, it may be speedily deleted. See CSD A8 for full conditions. After notifying the uploading editor by using wording similar to: {{nothanks-sd|pg=page name|url=url of source}} -- ~~~~ Blank the page and replace the text with {{db-copyvio|url=url of source}} to the article in question, leaving the content visible. An administrator will examine the article and decide whether to speedily delete it or not.

Help

Help me to edit my article on Don Richardson please. User:Eliecer guillen

HKWNB, HKCOTW, Current events

Hi. Thanks for your contributions to some Hong Kong-related articles. You might be interested to take a look at HK wikipedians' notice board, HK Collaboration of the Week and Current events in Hong Kong and Macao. Happy editing! — Instantnood 15:58, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

British Columbia v. Imperial Tobacco

Thanks for the notice. I'm suprised I missed it. I merged the article into my version as it used the proper indexe title. Both were very similar in any event. --PullUpYourSocks 13:43, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

160.39.129.27

Whats the deal with User 160.39.129.27? Herostratus 22:43, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

209.177.235.109

I would like to thank you and everyone involved in the efforts to control the vandalism that occurs in wikipedia. You recently cleaned up some vandalism on our company page within minutes of its occurrence. As an individual that has a responsibility to protect a small business's image, it is comforting to know that such a forward looking, but easily abused medium such as wikipedia takes an active effort to take it's global responsibilities seriously. From all of the employees of companies that base their operations in a respectful, community building manner, we thank you.

help control vandals

By voicing your support here. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 05:00, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Self-defense

I saw your note to SCZenc,

Just in case it's unclear, 3RR doesn't apply to reverting obvious vandalism, and I feel confident that was indeed obvious vandalism. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 03:48, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for your note, it is greatly appreciated. Although I am confident that was vandalism, I just want to be careful in case there are any doubts. --Hurricane111 03:52, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

I really appreciate that. I'd have had the same feeling about reverting a third time. I always like to find another cautious editor around here! —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 03:56, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

PUDGE

You can't stop me, even if you tried. PUDGE WILL RETURN. hahahahahahahaha —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 204.86.170.87 (talk • contribs) 17:37, 13 December 2005.

It wasn't me! :(

I need your help clearing my name! My IP is shared by my school's computers/internet as well, and some kids (I think one of them, Paul Cleverly, is in my grade) went on wikipedia and vandalized a page, I think it was Renaissance. He trolled it by adding remarks and all sorts of things about his friends and whatever, and when I went on the page (The renaissance is our current project in Music and Language Arts so we were reading the page) and so I get on the page and I see "New Messages", and I click, and there are WARNINGS! I was confused! I couldn't even edit pages on my Log-in account to fix spelling errors and whatnot.

I just want to let you know as one of the moderators who had cleared the vandalism caused by those jerks that I would never do something like that and I hope you understand that this IP is shared unfortunately, so please don't ban it!

Thank you so, so much for understanding! --24.128.43.180 00:53, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Message fix

Thanks for fixing the test message. I was getting logged out and the browser froze up. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 01:35, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Mind Garage

Hurricane you tagged my article Mind Garage as needing cleaned up. I can't make heads or tales of how to. Why don't you do it yourself.~ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Honeybells (talk • contribs) 00:22, 14 December 2005.

Hurricane, I asked Honeybells to move his/her comments out of the article and onto the talk page, even though they are hidden, so I going to ask you to do the same. Leave a note on my talk page if you have any trouble. Thanks. --Shanel 05:32, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

CSDP

Hey - I noticed that the article sounded much like a website/advert when I first saw it which is why I made some edits to move it away from that state - definitely needs rewriting and wouldn't surprise me if it is indeed a copyvio. Thanks for the heads up Paul 05:22, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Also, as a Catholic and a victim of user page vandalism, I'll probably be stealing some of your babel boxes :) Paul 05:23, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Update

Woot, I'm now an administrator. Thank you for your support, and let me know if you see any vandals that can't take a hint. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 06:07, Dec. 17, 2005

Fabian Basabe

Dan100 isn't discussing it. He just reverts valid edits by anons without consideration. Zoe (216.234.130.130 21:25, 19 December 2005 (UTC))

Really this is quite silly. Zoe blanked an article while not logged in with an insufficient edit summary, which I rv'd as simple vandalism. Now she has explained her actions, I have already rv'd myself. Dan100 (Talk) 21:30, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Jill Hardy

Disagree, but fine, AfD'd. Not gonna make me cry if it takes longer to delete. Well, nothing the years of therapy and a few cases of beer can't fix, anyway. -- Jbamb 06:15, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

• Yay! Our Jill Hardy vandal is back! :) -- Jbamb 16:13, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

Harper case

Hi Hurricane, As far as I know there is no set template for the decision box in the Supreme Court cases- what I always do when I add the boxes is copy from one article and paste into another, and then change the info within the table as appropriate. I observed the one infobox with the image being used in R. v. Morgentaler and a few other cases, and have since added it to several others, eg R. v. Sparrow and R. v. Oakes as well as every Supreme Court case I've written myself.

As for feedback on the Harper article, I can say it's good to reference Libman, that was the way it was taught in my class. There's not much else I can say though because I haven't read the case.

Keep up the good work, Merry Christmas, CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 02:19, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Schism

There is a category (which I belong to) called "Roman Catholic Wikipedians". I was wondering if you'd switch to that one, because in my eyes that is the main Catholic Category. It has dozens of users which just don't appear under the Catholic Wikipedians Category. Chooserr 21:51, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

CAoW

Since you are listed as a Roman Catholic, I figured I'd send you this. Wikipedia:Catholic Alliance of wikipedia has been nominated for Deletion. Please vote and/or tell other people to vote to keep this organization on wikipedia. --Shanedidona 02:58, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

Deleting "Good" Posts

Stop deleting good posts, Hurricane111. It's considered vandelism. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by WorldEmperor (talk • contribs) 17:14, 28 December 2005.

• see [my reply] --Hurricane111 23:50, 28 December 2005 (UTC)