User talk:IndianaJonas

Speedy deletion nomination of EclipseSource

Hello IndianaJonas,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged EclipseSource for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

CoconutOctopus talk 19:44, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

EclipseSource moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, EclipseSource, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bbb23 (talk) 21:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Just one question: Are you aware that EclipseSource and Eclipse_Foundation is not the same thing? The citations are mainly from Eclipse_Foundation which according to Wikipedia is "The Eclipse Foundation AISBL is an independent, Europe-based not-for-profit corporation that acts as a steward of the Eclipse open source software development community, with legal jurisdiction in the European Union.[1] It is an organization supported by over 350 members, and represents the world's largest sponsored collection of Open Source projects and developers." 2003:C5:8727:A400:998A:6C48:53A2:A45A (talk) 21:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: EclipseSource (May 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MarcGarver was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

There are really only 3 references which are repeated multiple times. One is to the company's own website, one is to a blog, and the other to the Eclipse Foundation. There are some other minor references that refer to the company. Collectively these do not demonstrate that the company passes the threshold of notability for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EclipseSource and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MarcGarver (talk) 12:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello, IndianaJonas! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MarcGarver (talk) 12:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:EclipseSource

Hello, IndianaJonas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:EclipseSource, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:09, 28 October 2024 (UTC)