Inspiringflow

Welcome!

Hello, Inspiringflow!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:55, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Moving pages

Hi Inspiringflow, I see you're trying to get a page moved. Please see WP:MOVE for information on how to move a page. Your move requests are being formatted incorrectly, so please make sure if you are filing a move request that you use the templates exactly as formatted in the examples. If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. To reply directly to me, start your message with {{u|Primefac}}. Primefac (talk) 14:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

In the meantime, I have moved your draft into the article space; it is now at Cercle d'Études Scientifiques Pierre Rayer. Primefac (talk) 14:05, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks you so much Inspiringflow (talk) 19:08, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Good morning

How are you ?

well I hope I have a new article awaiting submission.

Can you see me quickly please? here is the link to the page: Brouillon :Thierry Rayer — Wikipédia (wikipedia.org) Inspiringflow (talk) 18:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

I wanted to say I hope you are doing well

I have a new article awaiting submission.

Can you see me quickly please? here is the link to the page: Draft:Thierry Rayer Inspiringflow (talk) 18:23, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

New article submission

Primefac

Good morning How are you doing?

I hope you're doing well

I have a new article awaiting submission. Can you see me quickly please? here is the link to the page: Inspiringflow (talk) 18:26, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

link the page : Draft:Thierry Rayer Inspiringflow (talk) 18:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Your draft has been submitted for review. Please be patient. Primefac (talk) 18:39, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

I have just corrected the underlined points of error, can you review this for me if it is already good? Inspiringflow (talk) 16:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thierry Rayer (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Miminity was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thierry Rayer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 04:23, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Primefac

Miminity

I just made changes to the article

here are my different points to highlight in relation to my article

1. Forbes France : Forbes is an internationally recognized publication specializing in economic and financial topics. His reputation in the field of business and entrepreneurship is well established. In France, Forbes follows rigorous editorial guidelines ; Forbes France is a local franchise of Forbes International, whose journalistic standards and publishing methodologies are recognized worldwide.
2. Entreprendre.fr  : This site is dedicated to entrepreneurship and publishes economic analyses, portraits of entrepreneurs, and market studies. The site is followed by a large number of professionals and business leaders.Entreprendre.fr is a specialized and recognized platform in its field, targeting a qualified audience.
3. Arab News : Founded in 1975, Arab News is one of the leading English-language newspapers in the Middle East region, recognized for its coverage of international, economic, and political news. o Its status as a publication with a large international readership and its importance in regional analyzes reinforces its reliability.
4. Khaleej Times : Khaleej Times is one of the oldest English-language newspapers in the UAE, with a long history of covering economic, social and political affairs from the Gulf and beyond. o This regional publication's reputation, journalistic experience and influence make it a credible source for information regarding the Gulf and surrounding regions.
5. UNESCO : UNESCO is an officially recognized international organization and part of the United Nations. UNESCO publications are based on rigorous research and scientific methodologies. UNESCO is a reference institution for educational, cultural and scientific issues, widely cited in academic publications.
6. Ministères français (Finances, Europe et Affaires étrangères) : Ministries are official government sources. Information from these institutions is based on official data and is often cited as undisputed references. Data or reports from French ministries are used by many international and academic institutions as first-rate sources.
7. Chambre de Commerce France-UAE : The France-UAE CCI is a major institutional player in commercial relations between France and the Emirates. Its reports and publications are based on reliable statistics and validated economic analyses. Chambers of Commerce, as official economic actors, produce information used by businesses and governments.
8. Le Louvre (Paris) : The Louvre Museum in Paris is one of the most prestigious and influential museums in the world. It houses thousands of renowned works of art, and its publications, catalogs and reports are recognized for their scientific rigor. The Louvre's research and publications are often carried out in collaboration with international experts and academicians, which guarantees exceptional quality of the information and analyzes disseminated. • Additionally, the Louvre is a governmental cultural institution in France, which further strengthens its legitimacy.
9. Le Louvre Abu Dhabi : Louvre Abu Dhabi, in partnership with France and supported by the government of the United Arab Emirates, is a major cultural institution in the Arab world. It was founded as part of an intergovernmental agreement and is recognized for its ambition to bring together works of art and artifacts representative of world history and cultures. • Louvre Abu Dhabi's exhibitions and publications are carefully selected and validated by committees of international experts, which guarantees their reliability and relevance. • Like its Parisian counterpart, the Louvre Abu Dhabi is also involved in educational and academic projects, thus strengthening the credibility of its publications as reference sources for Wikipedia. Cultural and Academic Impact
10. For the Louvre and the Louvre Abu Dhabi: • Their role in research: The two museums are at the heart of much academic research and are often cited in journals specializing in art history, archeology and anthropology. • Their international reach: They collaborate with other world-renowned institutions, thereby increasing the reliability and accuracy of the information they publish. • Their educational importance: These museums play a key role in artistic and cultural education through programs, traveling exhibitions, and educational publications. In summary, the Louvre and Louvre Abu Dhabi are major cultural institutions whose credibility is firmly established in the academic and artistic world.
11. Reputation and Traceability : Their reliability is based on : • Their history: These publications generally have decades of experience in their field. • Their rigorous methodology: These sources use strict editorial approaches, fact-checking and transparent methodologies. • Their institutional recognition: Many academic, governmental institutions and private companies rely on these sources to obtain reliable information

Inspiringflow (talk) 13:06, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Inspiringflow! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 04:23, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thierry Rayer (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Miminity were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thierry Rayer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 13:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thierry Rayer (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Miminity was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thierry Rayer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 13:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Can you enlighten me on this so I know what to do? Inspiringflow (talk) 13:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thierry Rayer (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OhHaiMark was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thierry Rayer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OhHaiMark (talk) 19:43, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thierry Rayer (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Utopes were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thierry Rayer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:07, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Quick Note

Please do not reply to my Archived Talk Page. Use my Talk Page Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 23:51, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thierry Rayer (September 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thierry Rayer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 01:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Inspiringflow. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Thierry Rayer, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 13:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thierry Rayer (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Miminity was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thierry Rayer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 00:22, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

September 2024

Your recent edits to User talk:Johannes Maximilian could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you.

You said "So, be very careful with what you say. Are you insinuating that an influential person would have paid a journalist to publish an article? These are defamatory statements you are making." which is tantamount to a legal threat or is susceptible to interpretation as a legal threat. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Inspiringflow, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:14, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello Inspiringflow. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Cercle d'Études Scientifiques Pierre Rayer, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Inspiringflow. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Inspiringflow|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Draft:Cercle d'Études Scientifiques Pierre Rayer while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:57, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thierry Rayer (September 12)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Timtrent was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia does not accept AI generated articles. GPTZero diagnoses this as 100% AI

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Thierry Rayer

A tag has been placed on Draft:Thierry Rayer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Wholly AI generated according to GPTZero

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Your purpose here on Wikipedia

It is clear that your purpose here is to use Wikipedia to promote and publicise yourself and your work. There are many websites where you can do that, but, as has been explained above, Wikipedia is not one of them. You are, of course, very welcome to start making contributions to the encyclopaedia on other subjects, in line with Wikipedia policies and guidelines, if you are interested in doing so, but if you are interested only in writing about yourself then Wikipedia is not the right place for you. JBW (talk) 22:23, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Cercle d'Études Scientifiques Pierre Rayer has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cercle d'Études Scientifiques Pierre Rayer. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cercle d'Études Scientifiques Pierre Rayer (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cercle d'Études Scientifiques Pierre Rayer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:11, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Thierry Jean-Micel Rayer

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Thierry Jean-Micel Rayer, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 10:44, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Cercle d'Études Scientifiques Pierre Rayer moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Cercle d'Études Scientifiques Pierre Rayer. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. NiftyyyNofteeeee (talk) 14:18, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Inspiringflow, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Inspiringflow|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. That time has elapsed does not relieve you of the obligation to answer the formal question about paid editing. JBW has noted that your purpose does not appear to be to create an encyclopaedia, but solely to promote yourself and your organisation(s). 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:25, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cercle d'Études Scientifiques Pierre Rayer (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cercle d'Études Scientifiques Pierre Rayer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hey man im josh (talk) 16:31, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because despite numerous messages explaining why the way you have been editing is inappropriate, you persist in the same way. Your purpose here is evidently to use Wikipedia to publicise your organisation and yourself, which you have been told is unacceptable. You have also repeatedly submitted your unsuitable draft (with minor changes which don't address the reasons for its being declined). Since the draft is never likely to be accepted, all that you are achieving is taking editors who have to keep dealing with those repeated submissions away from more constructive tasks, as well as wasting your own time trying to achieve an end which will never be fulfilled.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  JBW (talk) 16:56, 11 October 2024 (UTC)