IntellectualCutie
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
January 2020
edit
Hello, I'm NonsensicalSystem. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gardenista have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. N0nsensical.system(err0r?)(.log) 13:52, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gardenista. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. N0nsensical.system(err0r?)(.log) 13:56, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
paid editing
editI'm not sure how given your block on your first account and several subsequent IPs, that you still don't get the point but you may not edit. Continuing this path of deceptive, spammy behavior looks bad for you and your client. Praxidicae (talk) 14:08, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
January 2020
edit | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. Your ability to edit this talk page has also been revoked. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then appeal to the Unblock Ticket Request System or the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-en wikimedia.org. —CYBERPOWER (Chat) 14:17, 8 January 2020 (UTC) |