User talk:Isochrone/Archives/2020/October

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Darren-M in topic RW RfC close


Benedict Carton page

I'm trying to clean up (or better, delete) the page I created for my colleague Benedict Carton. His work title is out of date, and the Isibaya reference is poorly sourced. Zschrag (talk) 18:39, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Zschrag, I think I may have inadvertently pressed my revert key. Apologies. — Yours, Berrely • TalkContribs 18:42, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. The rules state that "contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately," and I believe the Isibaya credit falls within that. I would be happy to see the page deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zschrag (talkcontribs) 18:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day!

  Hey, Berrely. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
Megan☺️ Talk to the monster 12:13, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 

Administrators' newsletter – September 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020).

 

  Administrator changes

  AjpolinoLuK3
  Jackmcbarn
  Ad OrientemHarejLidLomnMentoz86Oliver PereiraXJaM
  There'sNoTimeTheresNoTime

  Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely 1) if the result of a deletion discussion is to draftify; or 2) if the article is newly created.

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Minecraft server

 Template:Infobox Minecraft server has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 00:20, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Talkback

 
Hello, Isochrone. You have new messages at Talk:Roblox.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

RW RfC close

Hiya. I appreciate I'm very late to the party on this but I'm curious about your close at Wikipedia_talk:RedWarn#RfC:_Dealing_with_abuse_of_RedWarn. Do you not feel as though you're WP:INVOLVED given you're part of the development team? I don't necessarily think it's a bad close (it would be hard to close it any other way, I think), but not sure I would have closed it in your position? Not a criticism in the slightest, but would be interested in your thoughts? Best, Darren-M talk 03:35, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

I honestly realised my mistake afterwards (albeit I was hardly involved at all in the development at that point) but I thought it was a waste of time after I closed it to reopen it again. I thought as long as I hadn't voted (which I hadn't), it would be appropriate to close it. If you believe the RfC should be reopened, I urge you to do so, and I apologise for my error. — Yours, Berrely • TalkContribs 09:42, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Berrely, Thanks, that makes sense. I can't see that it could have reasonably been closed another way so I don't think there's any value in reopening it. Best, Darren-M talk 11:52, 25 October 2020 (UTC)