User talk:J947/Archive 7
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions with J947. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
< Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 > |
All Pages: | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - ... (up to 100) |
New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020
Hello J947,
- Source Guide Discussion
The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.
- Redirects
New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.
- Discussions and Resources
- There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
- A recent discussion of whether Michelin starred restraunts are notable was archived without closure.
- A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
- A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.
- Refresher
Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
YGM
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
Regarding your reverting my edit
@J947:
Regarding your good-faith reversion of my equally good-faith correction of your close, I thought of discussing it with you first, but figured since you and I had a good rapport, that you would not mind.
Nevertheless, I still feel that it is not a "speedy disambiguate." I'm not sure there is such a thing, but logically, it would be the same as a "speedy keep" when the nominator withdraws their nomination except they concur with the unanimous recommended outcome of the participants (as we do with "speedy retarget"). Since you were neither a participant or the nominator, it is not, technically, a "speedy disambiguate," but can still be closed early per WP:SNOW. Thus, I believe "WP:SNOW disambiguate" should be the result.
Cheers,
Doug Mehus T·C 00:17, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Dmehus, you don't need to ping me; it's my own talkpage.The nominator supported the disambiguation, as did many others, so I felt there wasn't a need for further bureaucracy. It was speedy as it was unanimous; being a participant in the discussion isn't a required prerequisite for speedy closure. J947 (c), at 00:53, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- J947, I know being a participant in the discussion isn't a prerequisite for closure, but I also know, like me, you are a stickler for details, and, while I have no problem with you closing the discussion early, I just think that "WP:SNOW disambiguate" reflects our current guidelines. There are speedy redirects, but that seems to be related to drafts from Draft: namespace and typically the outcome over at MfD. Yes, I guess, you could've noted in your close, "closing for nominator," which would make it a "speedy disambiguate," but at the same time, Uanfala specifically requested that it be closed as WP:SNOW closure (presumably, because "speedy keep/disambiguate/retarget" has a different meaning in that it was withdrawn by the nominator). Doug Mehus T·C 01:04, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- See also WP:SPEEDYKEEP and WP:SNOW. In the past, I used to get the terms confused, but essentially, "speedy" results are either from the nominator's withdrawal or early closure by anyone when the nomination is out of process or made in bad faith, etc. So, like I say, no concerns with the early closure whatsoever—thank you—but just thinking it should be "WP:SNOW disambiguate." I know the "speedy" checkbox makes it easy, but what I did is just type WP:SNOW disambiguate/keep/retarget into the "result" box of the "other" option (similar to how you have to use the "other" box to enter "delete" when closing as "speedy delete" for a processing administrator). Doug Mehus T·C 01:09, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Okay, there were two closures that you closed as "speedy"; the one for disambiguation can probably stay as "speedy disambiguate," but I would add to your closing rationale, "Withdrawn by the nominator. Closing for her." That way, it's clear. With regard to nautical units, which I didn't amend as you closed that afterward, that one should be amended to "WP:SNOW retarget" because that's what it was—you came along as a non-involved editor and closed it early, and Uanfala wasn't withdrawing the nomination. Hoping you won't mind making those minor changes with this added clarity. Doug Mehus T·C 01:27, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Involved SNOW closures are generally frowned upon; it was unanimous so I was being unbureaucratic about it. J947 (c), at 01:42, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- J947, no one had any objections to Uanfala even doing an WP:INVOLVED WP:SNOW closure, including me. So, at minimum, I do think that one should at least be updated. No one is going to mind. After all, we're not a bureaucracy, as you say, and have no rules. ;-) Doug Mehus T·C 01:48, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- If you are still not wanting to do an involved WP:SNOW closure, could you at least revert the closure of the nautical units RfD and let a non-involved participant close as "WP:SNOW retarget" since that's what Uanfala and I were wanting? I personally have no issues with your involved closure, but since the terms "speedy retarget" and "WP:SNOW retarget" have different meanings in the context of subsequent deletion discussions (think about it at AfD or MfD; an article withdrawn as "speedy keep" or "speedy retarget" can influence future deletion discussions were an article closed early per WP:SNOW). I get the desire to avoid bureaucracy, and that's why I have no issues with the involved closure, but it's key that we get the closing rationale right. Doug Mehus T·C 02:28, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Involved SNOW closures are generally frowned upon; it was unanimous so I was being unbureaucratic about it. J947 (c), at 01:42, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for explaining
Yeah I do agree it is possible for the articles to be kept or retargeted. But since it is almost midnight UTC Gesus is the only one that looks like it might not get deleted since it is the only one that someone asked to keep. 71.34.25.253 (talk) 23:44, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 13
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (February 2019).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 13th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Scripts Submit your new/improved script here
|
|
I hope everyone is having a great year so far! --DannyS712 (talk) 15:53, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 March 2020
- From the editor: The ball is in your court
- News and notes: Alexa ranking down to 13th worldwide
- Special report: More participation, more conversation, more pageviews
- Discussion report: Do you prefer M or P?
- Arbitration report: Two prominent administrators removed
- Community view: The Incredible Invisible Woman
- In focus: History of The Signpost, 2015–2019
- From the archives: Is Wikipedia for sale?
- Traffic report: February articles, floating in the dark
- Gallery: Feel the love
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- Opinion: Wikipedia is another country
- Humour: The Wilhelm scream
Administrators' newsletter – March 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2020).
- Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops
must not
undo or alter CheckUser or Oversight blocks, rather thanshould not
. - A request for comment confirmed that sandboxes of established but inactive editors may not be blanked due solely to inactivity.
- Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops
- Following a discussion, Twinkle's default CSD behavior will soon change, most likely this week. After the change, Twinkle will default to "tagging mode" if there is no CSD tag present, and default to "deletion mode" if there is a CSD tag present. You will be able to always default to "deletion mode" (the current behavior) using your Twinkle preferences.
- Following the 2020 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: BRPever, Krd, Martin Urbanec, MusikAnimal, Sakretsu, Sotiale, and Tks4Fish. There are a total of seven editors that have been appointed as stewards, the most since 2014.
- The 2020 appointees for the Ombudsman commission are Ajraddatz and Uzoma Ozurumba; they will serve for one year.
Be careful when editing for format
In this edit, you removed part of another editor's comment. Please be more careful in the future. Thanks for fixing the formatting, though. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 20:49, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oops, thanks for noticing. J947 (c), at 21:13, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- No problem. Happens to everyone at some point. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 00:35, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 March 2020
- From the editors: The bad and the good
- News and notes: 2018 Wikipedian of the year blocked
- WikiProject report: WikiProject COVID-19: A WikiProject Report
- Special report: Wikipedia on COVID-19: what we publish and why it matters
- In the media: Blocked in Iran but still covering the big story
- Discussion report: Rethinking draft space
- Arbitration report: Unfinished business
- In focus: "I have been asked by Jeffrey Epstein …"
- Community view: Wikimedia community responds to COVID-19
- From the archives: Text from Wikipedia good enough for Oxford University Press to claim as own
- Traffic report: The only thing that matters in the world
- Gallery: Visible Women on Wikipedia
- News from the WMF: Amid COVID-19, Wikimedia Foundation offers full pay for reduced hours, mobilizes all staff to work remote, and waives sick time
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 14
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (March 2020).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 14th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Scripts Submit your new/improved script here
|
|
Stay safe, --DannyS712 (talk) 05:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2020).
|
- There is an ongoing request for comment to streamline the source deprecation and blacklisting process.
- There is a plan for new requirements for user signatures. You can give feedback.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold a
Arbcom RfC regarding on-wiki harassment
. A draft RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC (Draft) and not open to comments from the community yet. Interested editors can comment on the RfC itself on its talk page.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold a
- The WMF has begun a pilot report of the pages most visited through various social media platforms to help with anti-vandalism and anti-disinformation efforts. The report is updated daily and will be available through the end of May.
By the way, you could have just “edited raw watchlist” and copy that list. It would have looked less messy, probably. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:00, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, that is a good point. — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 19:09, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the suggestion about categorizing redirects!
J947, I was just wanting to thank you for the suggestion of adding categories to my redirects. I never knew that this is done with redirects as I've never seen a redirect with categories in it. From this, I guess you opened up another "frontier" for me to build infrastructure for the redirects. Since the redirects are meant to support the main pages, it could be said that this is the infrastructure to support the infrastructure. Another quick thing, I have a bot assigned to me that reviews redirect pages for me since I was creating so many in the past and up to this point.
Thanks for the pointer! --Skim
- @Skim127: No worries. :) Also, thanks for telling me that you are in the redirect whitelist, it may save me quite a bit of time manually reviewing. — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 20:02, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Happy Birthday!
- Thanks! — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 01:16, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello, actually, Category:Redirects with old history is a subcategory of Category:Redirects from moves. However, I'm not sure if this categorisation is correct and I think I've seen some of the redirects being not from moves; also, I've only noticed this categorisation right now and have myself tagged some of the categories as redirects from moves as well. I'll probably start a discussion on the redirect project talk page. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 15:42, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
- That's interesting, I think it is best to initiate a discussion on that. — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 20:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
- Had forgotten about this; done. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:12, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
have a good evening :)
Thanks for the help. Have a Happy Easter. :) DMBFFF (talk) 06:15, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
How is this an R to list entry? 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:26, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- @1234qwer1234qwer4: Chiswick Chap has made a lot of edits to that article after I categorised the redirect. See this revision. — J947 [cont] 20:00, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't notice. I've also corrected Andúnie. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 11:12, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Teahouse
Here are some links you may find helpful as a Host:
- Helpful scripts you can install to make Teahouse responding easier,
- templates to use and, of course:
- the question forum itself.
Editors who have signed up as hosts, but who have not contributed at the Teahouse for six months or so may be removed from the list of hosts.
Sandbox
I cannot move my sandbox or edit the request for move page. What do I do? Wynn Liaw (talk) 08:56, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Wynn Liaw: The histmerge has been done. In the future, the safest thing to do when you are editing an existing article in your sandbox, is to provide a link to that sandbox in your edit summary. — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 21:38, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Like, in the existing article? Wynn Liaw (talk) 01:52, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Wynn Liaw: If you are improving an existing article in your sandbox, link to the sandbox when you add the content to the existing article. — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 01:54, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- What happens when I move on to another page? Wynn Liaw (talk) 02:42, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Wynn Liaw: The history of your sandbox will still be there. — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 02:49, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- But what happens when I get autoconfirmed and can move the page? Do I request it for deletion? Wynn Liaw (talk) 03:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Wynn Liaw: You do not have to list it for deletion, a redirect will be automatically left behind. — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 03:05, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- But all my old drafts will be visible. Wynn Liaw (talk) 03:22, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Wynn Liaw: Yes, if you move content to an article the history can be legally required for attribution reasons. What you can do is what I do: have multiple sandboxes. — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 03:26, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- But all my old drafts will be visible. Wynn Liaw (talk) 03:22, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Wynn Liaw: You do not have to list it for deletion, a redirect will be automatically left behind. — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 03:05, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- But what happens when I get autoconfirmed and can move the page? Do I request it for deletion? Wynn Liaw (talk) 03:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Wynn Liaw: The history of your sandbox will still be there. — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 02:49, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- What happens when I move on to another page? Wynn Liaw (talk) 02:42, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Wynn Liaw: If you are improving an existing article in your sandbox, link to the sandbox when you add the content to the existing article. — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 01:54, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- Can I request for history merge instead? Wynn Liaw (talk) 04:46, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Wynn Liaw: You could – but as only one person frequents that venue, the best thing to do is to link to where you drafted changes in your edit summary when you add the content to the article. — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 05:09, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- If I may butt in; a history merge is something that gets done after a stuff up. You don't cause the need for one deliberately. Schwede66 05:42, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- I will do that until I am autoconfirmed, which will arrive very soon. Wynn Liaw (talk) 06:14, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Wynn Liaw:, the best thing to do is to link to where you drafted changes inside the edit summary of your addition to the article. — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 06:18, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- I will do that until I am autoconfirmed, which will arrive very soon. Wynn Liaw (talk) 06:14, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- If I may butt in; a history merge is something that gets done after a stuff up. You don't cause the need for one deliberately. Schwede66 05:42, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Wynn Liaw: You could – but as only one person frequents that venue, the best thing to do is to link to where you drafted changes in your edit summary when you add the content to the article. — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 05:09, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- Like, in the existing article? Wynn Liaw (talk) 01:52, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 April 2020
- News and notes: Unbiased information from Ukraine's government?
- In the media: Coronavirus, again and again
- Discussion report: Redesigning Wikipedia, bit by bit
- Featured content: Featured content returns
- Arbitration report: Two difficult cases
- Traffic report: Disease the Rhythm of the Night
- Recent research: Trending topics across languages; auto-detecting bias
- Opinion: Trusting Everybody to Work Together
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- In focus: Multilingual Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: The Guild of Copy Editors
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 15
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (April 2020).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 15th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Scripts Submit your new/improved script here
|
|
- Wikipedia:User scripts/Most imported scripts now also shows the number of active users for each script. It will now be updated by a bot periodically.
- Twinkle's Morebits library added a new
Morebits.date
class to replace the moment library. It can handle custom formatting and natural language for dates, as well as section header regexes. If you were usinggetUTCMonthName
orgetUTCMonthNameAbbrev
withDate
objects, those have been deprecated and should be updated. - User:SD0001/find-archived-section was made a gadget. You can enable it from your gadget preferences, in the Browsing section.
Hope everyone stays safe. --DannyS712 (talk) 20:27, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2020).
- Discretionary sanctions have been authorized for all pages and edits related to COVID-19, to be logged at WP:GS/COVID19.
- Following a recent discussion on Meta-Wiki, the edit filter maintainer global group has been created.
- A request for comment has been proposed to create a new main page editor usergroup.
- A request for comment has been proposed to make the bureaucrat activity requirements more strict.
- The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. You can review the proposed design and share your thoughts on the talk page.
- Enterprisey created a script that will show a link to the proper Special:Undelete page when viewing a since-deleted revision, see User:Enterprisey/link-deleted-revs.
- A request for comment closed with consensus to create a Village Pump-style page for communication with the Wikimedia Foundation.
K4 at RfD
At this point, it may be worth starting an RfC to discuss whether it's an acceptable/worthwhile use of resources to nominate trivial misspellings at RfD. RfD is naturally going to attract editors that want to delete random misspellings, so it's entirely possible that the current status quo of you being the lone keep vote is just a local consensus. As it stands, the consensus in each of these individual discussions is strong enough that my hands are generally tied as far as closures are concerned, but if there was an overriding consensus that hunting down minor typos is a waste of time these discussions could be procedurally closed. signed, Rosguill talk 23:57, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
New message from Prahlad balaji
Message added 00:40, 21 May 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
--Stay safe, ◊PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 00:40, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Re: RfD log pages
Ah, I wasn't aware. Thank you for telling me. Scrooge200 (talk) 20:49, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Userpage of I'm Aya Syameimaru!
Hi, I am I'm Aya Syameimaru!. I designed a professional userpage for myself here. How do you think of it? Check it out, then you'll get an idea. «ias!|,,.|usbk» 06:32, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- @I'm Aya Syameimaru!: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a userpage showcase. I strongly recommend that you leave your userpage alone and focus on building the encyclopedia instead. — J947 [cont] 20:06, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- Okay. I«ias!|,,.|usbk»I 02:26, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject notice
Hi J947, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.
Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.
To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!
Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 (talk)
The Signpost: 31 May 2020
- From the editor: Meltdown May?
- News and notes: 2019 Picture of the Year, 200 French paid editing accounts blocked, 10 years of Guild Copyediting
- Discussion report: WMF's Universal Code of Conduct
- Featured content: Weathering the storm
- Arbitration report: Board member likely to receive editing restriction
- Traffic report: Come on and slam, and welcome to the jam
- Gallery: Wildlife photos by the book
- News from the WMF: WMF Board announces Community Culture Statement
- Recent research: Automatic detection of covert paid editing; Wiki Workshop 2020
- Community view: Transit routes and mapping during stay-at-home order downtime
- WikiProject report: Revitalizing good articles
- On the bright side: 500,000 articles in the Egyptian Arabic Wikipedia
Administrators' newsletter – June 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2020).
- CaptainEek • Creffett • Cwmhiraeth
- Anna Frodesiak • Buckshot06 • Ronhjones • SQL
- A request for comment asks whether the Unblock Ticket Request System (UTRS) should allowed any unblock request or just private appeals.
- The Wikimedia Foundation announced that they will develop a universal code of conduct for all WMF projects. There is an open local discussion regarding the same.
June 2020
Hi J947, I'm Ezhao02. I'd like to ask for your advice if you have time. Currently, I'm involved in an edit war with an IP editor on Progressive Slovakia over whether the wording in the lead should state "that" or "which". I've created a section to discuss this at the talk page, but the editor in question will not respond after repeated requests for him or her to do so. (Note: there are actually 2 IP addresses; I'm assuming that they're the same person because the editing on one stopped before the editing on the other started and because they edit the same types of pages [Slovak political parties].) What would be the best way to proceed? Ezhao02 (talk) 01:08, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Ezhao02: firstly, it's best to stop edit warring on the change as it barely matters at all. If you wish to pursue your preferred change, then don't revert the IP(s) any more. Try to see if they can communicate on a talk page – and if they don't, then my advice is to just disengage from the conflict as it doesn't really matter. — J947 [cont] 01:32, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Okay, thank you for the advice. Ezhao02 (talk) 02:06, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:03, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Language and linguistics request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Mottainai on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:12, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:First Jordan Hydro-Electric Power House on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:42, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Food and agriculture in Nazi Germany on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Edward Colston on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020
Hello J947,
- Your help can make a difference
NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.
- Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate
In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.
- Discussions and Resources
- A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
- Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
- A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
- Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
The Signpost: 28 June 2020
- News and notes: Progress at Wikipedia Library and Wikijournal of Medicine
- Community view: Community open letter on renaming
- Gallery: After the killing of George Floyd
- In the media: Part collaboration and part combat
- Discussion report: Community reacts to WMF rebranding proposals
- Featured content: Sports are returning, with a rainbow
- Arbitration report: Anti-harassment RfC and a checkuser revocation
- Traffic report: The pandemic, alleged murder, a massacre, and other deaths
- News from the WMF: We stand for racial justice
- Recent research: Wikipedia and COVID-19; automated Wikipedia-based fact-checking
- Humour: Cherchez une femme
- On the bright side: For what are you grateful this month?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Black Lives Matter
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 16
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past two months (May and June 2020).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 16th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Scripts Submit your new/improved script here
|
|
If anyone else would like to contribute to future issues, please comment at Wikipedia talk:Scripts++. --DannyS712 (talk) 20:13, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2020).
- A request for comment is in progress to remove the T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) speedy deletion criterion.
- Protection templates on mainspace pages are now automatically added by User:MusikBot II (BRFA).
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
RfC regarding on-wiki harassment
. The RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC and is open to comments from the community. - The Medicine case was closed, with a remedy authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for
all discussions about pharmaceutical drug prices and pricing and for edits adding, changing, or removing pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing from articles
.
- Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold an
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:2016 United States presidential election on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:31, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Propaganda on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:BMW Z3 on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Political history of the United Kingdom (1945–present) on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 26 July 2020 (UTC)