JMRH6

Heritage Trust for NW

A heritage centre might be planned but a bolded entry for something that has not yet happened is unreasonable. Please add this info when there is something to write about.--J3Mrs (talk) 18:41, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

I have corrected your entry about the brickwork, it is still in a diaper pattern, not was, it hasn't been changed.--J3Mrs (talk) 19:16, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

you obviously dont know this, but the diaper work is on a very small section of the building (below one gable) which is a small percentage of the whole house brickwork. The diaper work was removed from the rest of the building, when it was renovated by George Webster in 1832-3, therefore most of the building is no longer covered in the diaper pattern. JMRH6 (talk) 02:03, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Corrected using existing references.--J3Mrs (talk) 08:33, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks that does read much better now too. It is a shame the diaper pattern wasnt kept on the rest of the house as it would have been stunning! bit odd the design of the building extensions and odd the way that the diaper has been kept on the wall below one gable on the front wall of the house JMRH6 (talk) 09:44, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

List of residences in Emmerdale

You are receiving this notice because you are a significant contributor (at least two edits) this year to this article. The article has been tagged for months now as suffering from a number of problems. Fixing these is crucial to the very existence of the article. Notice of this was placed on the article's talk page in March of this year without subsequent response. Notice of this was placed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Emmerdale at the same time, without subsequent response. This is a last ditch effort to get those people most interested in the existence of this article to fix the extant problems before it is placed for deletion. If you can, please address the article failings as highlighted in the warning boxes at the top of the article within the near future. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 19:32, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Verifiable

I might not have a clue but I have a ref.--J3Mrs (talk) 21:23, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

for? JMRH6 (talk) 21:25, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

If your refereing the HTNW website then there are many more exhibitions than that at the centre that is just a few of the main ones listed on the website, if they were to list them all then there wouldnt be enough room on the page! JMRH6 (talk) 21:28, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

hey JMRH6 - looks like this page has been seriously vandalised (again)...I have some fantastic piccies and history of the Big House project to share, will post when I get the chance :) Cupcake with my compliments :) Pryn (talk) 21:15, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Restoration Home

Hi - nope, i have previously added two www references to the building featured in programme 6 - but they have repeatedly been deleted. I am seeking to provide the reader with some useful background into the history of the house. Pryn (talk) 23:38, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Yeah i think its the other two editors who have deleted it recently, that is the thing i find on here, you get people editing stuff that you know about and they dont have a clue or have never been to the place, as long as you can provide a reference for your work that is valid then your laughing. It is good if you want to write about Big House! If you look under episode six and click on the Big House in the red writing then it should bring up a new page and you can start to add your info there, i can then look over it if you wish to add and cut bits out that make it better to read and then im sure some other people will look into it too. JMRH6 (talk) 00:25, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

I see you have been updating this page...didn't get round to re-posting my verifiable and referenced info re the BIg House (busy on other projects) but noticed a page has been added - an advert for the current owner's business by the look of it... Pryn (talk) 15:54, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Residences and Businesses in Emmerdale

You are receiving this notice because you are a significant contributor (at least two edits) this year to this article. The article has been tagged for months now as suffering from a number of problems. Fixing these is crucial to the very existence of the article. Notice of this was placed on the article's talk page in March of this year without subsequent response. Notice of this was placed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Emmerdale at the same time, without subsequent response. This is a last ditch effort to get those people most interested in the existence of this article to fix the extant problems before it is placed for deletion. If you can, please address the article failings as highlighted in the warning boxes at the top of the article within the near future. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 18:53, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Coronation Street

I found that out before you sent me that message. Anyway, my apologies for reverting your edit. Miguel AG^(talk) 23:53, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Eshton Hall

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Eshton Hall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Seduisant (talk) 01:04, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Whats the point of posting that when it had already gone? I dont even get the chance to edit it!? JMRH6 (talk) 09:22, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

BHAG

Hi I am just wondering why the Image on the Bank Hall Action Group page was deleted recently? Thanks JMRH6 (talk) 00:53, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

It was deleted because freedom of panorama legislation in the UK doesn't cover two-dimensional objects (so a photograph of a sign can't be licensed under a free-content license), and the image doesn't meet Wikipedia's requirements for non-free content. --Carnildo (talk) 01:51, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Right, ok i will try find an alternate image... thanks JMRH6 (talk) 11:14, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

John Harington, 1st Baron Harington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Edward, Prince of Wales, Harington, Melling, Thurnham, Farleton and Hutton Roof

John Harington, 2nd Baron Harington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Farleton

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:00, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bank Hall Estate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rufford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:07, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wilton's Music Hall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enfield (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:03, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Trivia

The Bank Hall Gardens article was created for stuff that is irrelevant in the hall article. A five second glimpse is NOT worth mentioning in the hall article. J3Mrs (talk) 12:18, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

That is why you will find i have moved it to the "gardens" section, the fact is that it did appear on the tv even if it was the gardens more so than the hall the location still was Bank Hall where they filmed the clematis so it is fair that it is under the garden section than totally removed. JMRH6 (talk) 12:24, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Nope, wrong.J3Mrs (talk) 12:25, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

How is that wrong and whats with the "your garden article"? its not my garden article as i thought you told me ages back that users do not own pages on wikipedia?JMRH6 (talk) 12:28, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Weatherfield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Baldwin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stoughton Grange, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Farnham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Secret of Crickley Hall (TV series), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Warner, Tom Ellis and Paul Clayton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Crickley!

I have replied to you here -- Gareth Griffith-Jones/The Welsh Buzzard 23:02, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Just to keep you in the loop -- Gareth Griffith-Jones/The Welsh Buzzard 12:55, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Cheers I have also replied thanks for keeping me 'in the know'.JMRH6 (talk) 14:43, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Just got in from a long walk with my dog and read your reply ... well said!
Actually it has made me think that if I could e-mail sometimes it could be useful with editing this project and in view of your post last night. What do you think? I imagine future incidents are probable. I am still feeling sad from reading it.
-- Gareth Griffith-Jones/The Welsh Buzzard 16:40, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Yes most certainly, operation Hawk Eye starts now! :) JMRH6 (talk) 21:43, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Good. Now to set it up. You now need to go to Preferences --> User profile --> and check the box: Enable e-mail from other users Don't worry! Your e-mail address does not appear anywhere. Cheers! -- Gareth Griffith-Jones/The Welsh Buzzard 22:15, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Sorry i meant about the other incidents in the future lol! Oh and there is a facebook group now too for the program JMRH6 (talk) 22:38, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Ah,ha! and I was referring to your post of last night ... we were talking at "cross purposes" ...
-- Gareth Griffith-Jones/The Welsh Buzzard 22:46, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Glad you agree with me over the showing of actors' names in the summaries and thank you for doing it. What do you think of it after my copy-editing last night? -- Gareth Griffith-Jones/The Welsh Buzzard 13:00, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

I think it looks fantastic! I must admit i havent done the episode 2 yet, been a little busy with other things but i will try and do it ASAP. If you then want to Copy edit it then im fine with that, im just going to write it out the same as the last one then you can cut and trim it, if thats okJMRH6 (talk) 13:49, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank for that compliment. I am pleased with it too.
Your idea about episode 2 is a good one ... "two minds are better than one" ... when you've done it, I shall get straight on with the copy-editing, so don't bother too much with the spelling and punctuation.
-- Gareth Griffith-Jones/The Welsh Buzzard 14:05, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Secret of Crickley Hall (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Sackville (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

George Webster (architect)

Regarding his birth place, are you sure that the RIBA source (which I cannot access) is more reliable than the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography? You can reply on this page, to keep any discussion in one place. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 09:22, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Yes aparently the RIBA reference to the Biography of George Webster and the date of birth is the same. He lived in Kendal but was born in Cartmel JMRH6 (talk) 12:07, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Greetings!

Gareth Griffith-Jones – The WelshBuzzard – is wishing you the season's greetings.
Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's solstice or Christmas,
Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus,
or the Saturnalia,
this is a special time of year for (almost) everyone.

Thank you Gareth, I hope you had a lovely time and best wishes for the New Year! p.s dont think im going to get round to completing the other two episodes of crickley hall... sorry, im not able to spend as much time online at the moment JMRH6 (talk) 12:54, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, JMRH6. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Peter Legh (1706–1792) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Peter Legh (1706–1792), is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Silikonz💬 21:27, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Peter Legh (1706–1792)

Hello, JMRH6. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Peter Legh (1706–1792), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Peter Legh (1706–1792)

Hello, JMRH6. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Peter Legh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:27, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)