Wikipedia

User talk:Jac16888/Archive 22

< User talk:Jac16888
Latest comment: 9 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic The Signpost: 10 December 2014
Archive 15←Archive 20Archive 21Archive 22Archive 23Archive 24Archive 25

How to List my Images

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Jac16888,

I find Wikipedia completely exasperating, I mean completely, and every time I create a new article and work with its content, the processes that I use seem to change. In the past I remember it being intuitively obvious how to view all the images I've uploaded in one place. Now I'm tearing my hair out trying to figure out where the images are and where to go to edit them or rename them.

I know you're just passing thru, but maybe you can help me with just a simple command or menu sequence so I can find and list my GD IMAGES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bwisok (talk • contribs) 04:51, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

I'll be honest I know very little about images so I'm probably not the best person to ask, you could try looking at Wikipedia:Picture tutorial as a starting point--Jac16888 Talk 00:24, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Removing a suggestion

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello. If you remove a suggestion from Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English, why don't you remove the {{Not English}} template from the article's talk page too? Arms Jones (talk) 00:02, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Because I didn't know it was on the talk page, that tag goes on the article and doesn't add talk pages to the relevant category--Jac16888 Talk 00:19, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 January 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

page ifeelradio

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

i am trying to create a page for the internet station ifeelradio and you keep deleting it can you explain to me where is the problem because i cannot understand what i do wrong.

Thank you in advance — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ifeelradio (talk • contribs) 22:12, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Please see WP:NOTABILITY, WP:PROMO and WP:COI--Jac16888 Talk 22:15, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

I want to know what will happen to the admin

Latest comment: 10 years ago14 comments3 people in discussion

Hi, as the report I made was just ended by you, I want to know what will happen to the admin in question. Bye. Tibullus (talk) 17:54, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

We're going to bring him back to the centre for a little "re-education". Nothing is going to happen, because nothing needs to happen. Please drop it--Jac16888 Talk 18:01, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
So everything I done is lost? All the time I spent writing and checking if the sources were available down the drain? I don't get even apologies from someone who you did acknowledge wasn't acting in the right way? He gets away with it? Why did you end it saying "before it escalates"? Were you fearing something happened to GiantSnowman, such as having his admin status revoked? Were you fearing I'd taught him a moral lesson? Talk about bias... Tibullus (talk) 18:06, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
You are perfectly free to restore the content...provided you include references this time as you should have done immediately, and as you should have done as soon as you were reverted. I closed it because you are obviously overreacting to this incident and were likely to say something that would result in action being taken against you. As I have said, drop it.--Jac16888 Talk 18:09, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
I would have added the references if you didn't give admin status to every unworthy person out there. What do you mean actions taken against me? He used aggressive language against me and he has duties towards the users and nothing happens to him and I complain about him and I get risked of actions being taken against me? What actions would be taken? Should I see this as a threat? What on earth is this? Why would you assume I'd say something? Is this how you lot see regular users, even those who have been sticking around for ages? Tibullus (talk) 18:15, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Either add the references or don't, what you are doing right now is escalating a minor incident and devolving into attacks and baseless accusations. For the last time, drop it. Go take a break and calm down--Jac16888 Talk 18:23, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
I am perfectly calm. You are the ones making threats. How can you threaten me when I am merely complaining? You are only exposing yourselves even further. What do you whole lot have against me? Tibullus (talk) 18:30, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
When you go to another editors page to have a jab at them because you didn't get your way, that is escalating. It has already been explained to you repeatedly that you were in the wrong as much as GS, more so in fact since BLP & BDP are major policies which you were actually violating. Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass, you're only embarrassing yourself at this point--Jac16888 Talk 18:35, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
How can you say I want to get my way when I've acknowledged I was wrong even though I had good intentions? You never stop making assumptions about me, do you? I already backed away from your silly horse carcass because I won't simply edit that article anymore. If anyone was embarassing themselves it was you lots. It's good to know that users and admins are not on equal foot. Nothing happened to that so-called "admin" (quotations intended, truly) but I get threatened, bashed at, and disregarded. Tibullus (talk) 18:45, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
You have raised a tiny dispute about references into a massive deal, spanning multiple pages, and all for what? What exactly are you hoping to achieve by this? Would you like me to go and block GS for being a bit rude? Knowing that in doing so I would also block you since you are now being just as rude? Go and add your content to your article and stop wasting my time--Jac16888 Talk 18:50, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Tiny dispute? Is that how you whole lot see our complaints? I want an apologies from that "admin" (again quotations intended, truly) for interrupting me, for having me lost everything I was trying to work at for hours. Even you say he was wrong, and yet no one suggested that and you people are trying to make me look like the bad guy. But I'm not getting any, am I? You and your big egos will not accept or agree upon that, it would be too humiliating. He didn't even offer to help me restore things. I'm not editing it. Snobs, you think you're better than everyone else. Tibullus (talk) 19:05, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Grow up--Jac16888 Talk 19:09, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Exactly, you're giving me further reasons to believe you're just watching each other's backs. Disgusting people. Tibullus (talk) 19:14, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Follow up

You warned User:Tibullus about personal attacks - he continues to make them on his talkpage. I wouldn't want to have to login to my admin account to deal with it, when you're already up-to-speed ES&L 18:03, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Neutral?

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Jac,

Hope this gets to you as I ma not sure of directing answers to the right person here. There doesn't seem to be any way to actually reply to a message I get unless I am missing it. You removed my edit on Rosemary Beach. I had described the village as it is today, listing prices and stylus of housing now available there and added a list of current restaurants. Not sure what you thought was not neutral about this. Please let me know. I have not been doing this too long so do not want to violate any rules. I am in the process of changing wording on some articles I edited as I just found out I cannot use my own copyright work that was used on another site. So I am in here trying to straighten that out. (I'm still not sure why I can't use something I own the copyright to?)

KatyrwKatyrw (talk) 23:36, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Wikipedia is not a tourism guide, nor is it a place to promote a village and its housing. As such, none of that info belongs. If there's an article about a specific restaurant that already exists on Wikipedia, then it's appropriate to link to it in the village article. You cannot quote anything you own the copyright to without releasing it fully to the Foundation via a different process - and most people don't want to give up their rights to their material that way. It's also probable that you don't qualify as a reliable source at this point anyway. Hope that helps ES&L 18:07, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 January 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Recent Page Deletion

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Greetings,
Recently you deleted the Wikipedia page for the applications and games company, Twyvel Apps, stating that there is no explanation of significance (real person/animal/organization/web content/organized event)). The page was in no way advertising the company, it in no way gave links to purchase the products - it was a fully functional, information fuelled article on a mid-lane iOS gaming platform company that attracts tens of thousands of users world-wide on it's applications. Wikipedia even states that it "has grown rapidly into one of the largest reference websites". An article referencing a large iOS based company (with the required referencing added) seems to fit this description and policy quite nicely, which for the record, Twyvel Apps's Wikipedia page was constructed alongside this iOS/Game development company's article (Backflip Studios) so the page was well in it's rights to be created, live and active.

Furthermore, Wikipedia is known for providing background information on companies and persons who form/run these companies, however having no research page available ceasing interested users/other companies from researching the Twyvel Apps company - which is what Wikipedia is all about - researching information on just about anything.

I ask that you please Rollback the deletion of the article. Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xsile (talk • contribs) 10:28, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) See WP:NCORP and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS ES&L 12:10, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Takis Fotopoulos

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Thanks for the help. I saw the problem, but did not know where else to sign at "Authority Control". Can you tell me where to sign? John sargis (talk) 19:31, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

You don't sign articles anywhere, basically. An article history page is the record that you made an edit, imagine if every person who made a change to an article signed it?--Jac16888 Talk 23:36, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Mr. Men Show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Turbinia

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello you have made a change here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Turbinia&oldid=prev&diff=591146894 . You have left a live link but it now goes nowhere. I wonder whether you intended this and if so why. Robertforsythe (talk) 11:01, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Links from the articlespace to the userspace are not allowed, as userpages are not subject to the rules and guidelines that articles are. I left the link for the possibility that the subject could be an article one day, if that is not the case please remove it--Jac16888 Talk 13:32, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 January 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Deletion of M movie

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Greetings, I notice that you deleted M movie under CSD criterion A1. When I reviewed it, it was neither short nor without context; can you please verify that this was not an error? VQuakr (talk) 00:20, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 January 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Suéter (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keyboard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Re:Translations

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

@Jac16888: I'd answer to you in my talk page. Ravave (talk) 18:45, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

@Jac16888: Answer --Ravave (talk) 19:06, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Hispanic Scholarship Fund

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi,

I want to establish a Wiki page for the Hispanic Scholarship Fund, however, I found that the page had been deleted by you in 2008. Would you give me some background information, as I want to reestablish the page using proper protocols.

Below is the information that shows up about the deletion:

16:58, 14 December 2008 Jac16888 (talk | contribs) deleted page Hispanic Scholarship Fund (G12: Blatant copyright infringement)

Best, and thank you for your time, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Astilleros (talk • contribs) 01:20, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Pretty much what it says on the tin really, I deleted the page because it was copy and pasted from the HSF about page, which made it both a copyright violation and blatantly promotional. If you want to create it again I recommend you try the WP:AFC procedure--Jac16888 Talk 17:39, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I can that there is a spammer who is continuously spamming wikipedia by adding spam link for soapboxing and advertising. Please check all contributions of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Vishal1811 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.202.64.220 (talk) 16:42, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Ciro Procuna

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for translating Ciro Procuna back to English. As I read the article, it was completely Spanish and I thought weather Cprocuna translated every much. So again I want to personally thank you for your edit. Have a good day! Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 18:35, 31 January 2014 (UTC)


Baby K (artist) translation

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hey, thanks for that!   Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:11, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

RfD on redirect from Cyrillic/Russian with R from alternate language (Цари́ца)

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dear Jac,

at WP:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2014_February_3#Цари́ца there is a discussion on Russian/Cyrillic redirect ([[Цари́ца)) to Tsaritsa. I may be very much mistaken but I know at [[WP:PNT}} once a few months ago I suggested redirecting or creating an {{R from alternate language}} and was told that is kinda not what it is for. Personally I can't see why someone typing in Cyrillic – if they were using an external search tool etc – would want to end up at Tsaritsa in EN:WP instead of Царица in RU:WP. Also ru:Цари́ца appears to be a DAB page (I don't speak Russian) so those kind of Interwiki links seem rather broken.

If you could care to cast your eye at the RfD and give your opinion I would be very grateful: that does not mean of course you have to agree with me, but that I think your opinion would be noted there. Best wishes and thanks for all the hard work you do at PNT. Si Trew (talk) 02:16, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

why you delete my page

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wang_qingzhou&action=edit&redlink=1

check it .

I really reference the some source of the website which it is http://news.artron.net/20131007/n517074.html & http://wangqingzhou.artron.net/news_detail_290545.

And we can provide something we have the copyright.

tell me how can i provider the prove to you ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tinwillchow (talk • contribs) 06:54, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Because it was copy and pasted from multiple locations. I'm sorry but we can't just accept your word that you own the copyright, and even if we could we still wouldn't want the content as it was, it was blatantly promotional and biased. If you want to write an article about the subject please do so in your own words, and in a neutral way--Jac16888 Talk 18:12, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

revert

Hi,

Last year the page "Andrisoft_WANGUARD" ( Userfication at User:Vborcan/Andrisoft_WANGUARD ) was deleted for notability concerns. That's no wonder since the Anti-DDoS software makers are few, but on this market segment and on dedicated mailing-lists Andrisoft is well represented. It was mentioned by Infonetics: http://www.infonetics.com/pr/2013/1H13-DDoS-Prevention-Appliances-Market-Highlights.asp University of Warsaw (Poland) held a conference on it: http://aegis.edu.pl/agenda/ Several other mentions exist on the web and about 200 companies are using Andrisoft WANGUARD. Few are listed on www.andrisoft.com Can I revert the page please ? Many people found out about the product from wikipedia.. they are network engineers not SEO specialists.. Thank you for you time!

February 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Iron Man: Rise of Technovore may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * {{

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:56, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Atlas ramachandran may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • //atlasera.com/ |title=ATLAS |publisher=Atlasera.com |date= |accessdate=2014-02-20}}</ref> is an [[Indian businessman, film producer, and actor, who is most known as the chairman of Jewellery chain

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:30, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 February 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 19 February 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Atlas Ramachandran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Diego Armando Giraldo Castillo

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi,

Why did you delete the Diego Armando Giraldo's Page? I understand that it was not in english but I was supposed to do it this week. It said that I have two weeks to do it, so I don't understand why did you say that the page is for advertising purposes when it's not to. Diego Armando Giraldo is an outstanding singer and composer born in Colombia, Latin Grammy winner and Anglo Grammy nominated.

Can you please tell me what happened? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Management86 (talk • contribs) 17:19, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

The page was blatantly promotional, and as you say it was not in English. Try again, in english, in a unbiased tone, and using WP:AFC--Jac16888 Talk 17:31, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 February 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I really need your help!

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is an article named Thailand National Film Association Awards. But not many information is available in English, and most of the source are in Thai language. What should I do to avoid that article deleted? You have to help me. --MrFawwaz (talk) 14:40, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Why would you delete my page?

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Why the heck would you delete a page about someone. If you think you are good then go write about yourself — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.19.167.39 (talk) 22:51, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

I wouldn't write about myself for the same reason I (I'm guessing, since you haven't told me what it was called) deleted your page - notability--Jac16888 Talk 23:16, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited (192642) 1999 RD32, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Busch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

(test) The Signpost: 05 March 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Vandalism Help

Latest comment: 10 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Hi Jac, looking for some help with some persistent vandalism. Someone keeps blanking a user's talk page at this url, persistent harassment over the course of years: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:114.76.153.199 How do I initiate proceedings to get them banned from wikipedia? Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.170.22.171 (talk) 01:54, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

You know it is me removing it and you know why, just like I know you are the same person who has spent the last 4-5 years repeatedly restoring it (which is pretty sad by the way). Please take your trolling elsewhere, not interested--Jac16888 Talk 17:14, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
You've spent the same amount of time removing it and locking the page, loser. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.148.183.7 (talk) 11:28, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Difference being that it takes me 10 seconds to do so and I get to enjoy the thought of your little tantrums every time I do--Jac16888 Talk 11:33, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
not sure how long you think it takes me to revert it, chump — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.148.183.7 (talk) 11:40, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Boohoo, the nasty admin keeps taking away my toy. Go cry about it to somebody who gives a shit--Jac16888 Talk 11:45, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 March 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

March 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ana Stojanoska may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *''The birth of the character of the text-play relationship (with examples from the play "[[Closer_(play)|Closer]]" – [[Patrick Marber]], directed by [http://
  • *''Skills that transforms into art - Code of Macedonian tradition as a quote in the dramaturgy of [[Dejan Dukovski].'' (Foreword to the book: “''[http://www.worldcat.org/title/drami/oclc/652340857?

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:45, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 March 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 26 March 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Regarding the deletion of time table of trains from Kollam Junction Railway Station Page

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I understood that Wikipedia is not a directory to keep all the info available in this world. That's why you deleted the time table. But What about the other railway station pages?? Almost all the pages in wiki regarding the railway stations in India are denoting the details of various trains passing through/having halts at the particular station. Why you deleted the info from this page only?? Almost all the major railway station pages like Trivandrum, Thrissur, Ernakulam Junction etc are displaying the details of trains in the page itself. But its removed by you from Kollam Railway Station page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.111.177.222 (talk) 11:29, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) No train station pages should ever have schedules. This isn't WikiTravel nor a how to catch a train guide ES&L 12:08, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
ESL said it exactly--Jac16888 Talk 16:37, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 April 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

deleted page

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, recently you deleted a page that I was trying to translate from English to Italian (bottle episode -> episodio bottiglia). Maybe I made some mistake (with 'save' I didn't mean to publish that page, but just to 'save' it to improve it later... I'm sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ser dark (talk • contribs) 08:34, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

You the Italian Wikipedia--Jac16888 Talk 11:31, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 April 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Non-admins closing discussions as delete

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Jac16888, I was hoping to talk to you about non-admin closures, specifically those where there's consensus to delete. It was brought to my attention that you discouraged a non-admin from doing so, though the specifics of that case aren't what I want to discuss. You're right to cite WP:BADNAC, of course, which is clear that such closures shouldn't be performed (for what it's worth, the guideline at WP:NACD uses weaker wording). But I wonder if this isn't outdated, or a barrier to good-faith editors that want to help out with backlog maintenance.

I'm not sure what your areas of admin expertise are. I work mostly at RFD, RM, and MFD, so I'm drawing on my experiences here. At RM, some non-admins (myself included, when I was one) will close discussions as move when they can't actually perform the move, using {{db-move}} to clear the way. That's against BADNAC too, but having seen RM from both sides, such practices haven't caused any harm—quite the contrary, they've helped a good deal in a forum that fairly regularly has a formidable backlog.

If a non-admin is making such closes in bad faith, is fumbling the technical aspects, or judging consensus poorly, by all means, they should be stopped. But I've encountered several competent non-admins who have made closes like this (or with {{db-xfd}}), and their involvement has been very helpful in tackling backlogs where admins are in short supply. I realize there needs to be some more centralized discussion if we're going to loosen these restrictions. But in the meantime, I think we could apply an "any reasonable admin" standard. If any reasonable admin would come to the same conclusion, and if the non-admin tags the page to be deleted appropriately, is it really in the project's best interests to discourage these closes? --BDD (talk) 19:12, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

NAC is very clear, (as is NACD: "Non-administrators should not close discussions in which they lack the technical ability to act upon the outcome") and it's just obvious from a technical viewpoint, if an editor is incapable of deleting a page then they should not be making a decision that said page should be deleted. All using templates such as the above does is remove an item from one backlog and add it to another, it does little to actually reduce the workload--Jac16888 Talk 19:19, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Hm. In my experience, the CSD categories don't tend to be very backlogged. There are administrators who probably don't want to sit down and assess consensus in a discussion, but if it's already been decided, they're happy to push the button. --BDD (talk) 20:20, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
If as an admin I came across such a tag, I would as part of my due diligence check the xfd to determine that the consensus was judged correctly, just as I would closing an afd or deleting a prod or any other action, and I would expect any other admin to do the same. I feel like this tagging way also reduces culpability "It wasn't my fault I just closed I didn't delete it", "It wasn't my fault I just deleted it, I didn't close it"--Jac16888 Talk 21:03, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Incomprehensible Philippines pages

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Jac16888
Thanks for noting and PRODding these pages, created by Mayapa, Calamba (talk · contribs) which I noticed, about an hour ago, have had the PRODs and maintenance templates systematically removed without explanation by a Philippines IP, 112.207.52.18 (talk · contribs). I have re-tagged as required, though some now have a single ext. lk as a source.

One you didn't actually PROD, Sirang Lupa, Calamba was created by a now indeffed editor Jhaeyvan Clarin (talk · contribs) (abusing multiple accounts), and has now been edited by user 'Mayapa, Calamba', and the above IP. Funny that!

I have a strong feeling we have another sock of Ivan Clarin (talk · contribs). See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ivan Clarin/Archive. Hope this is some interest. Regards, --220 of Borg 05:29, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I have redirected all the remaining pages to Canlubang, Calamba, and blocked the two sock accounts I saw, if any more crop up I'll take care of them too--Jac16888 Talk 21:57, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
No problem! and   Thanks --220 of Borg 00:58, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Recreations of Aas Mohammad

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, Just to let you know thatAas Mohammad has been recreated as Aas Mohammadd and Aas mohammad. Flat Out let's discuss it 09:06, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Please use proper edit summaries

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Just stating "nope" like you did here [1], [2] is not constructive, thank you. Palosirkka (talk) 17:38, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Any experienced editor checking those edits would have seen the reasoning behind the summary right away, saying nope was quicker than writing out my full meaning: "not a chance in hell does this promotional bullshit belong here"--Jac16888 Talk 17:50, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Heads up

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

this was caused by an edit conflict that was quietly merged. didnt notice the close until later and never checked the timestamps. Werieth (talk) 19:42, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

11 December 2013 Euromaidan assault article problem

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Recently I've translated the article "11 December 2013 Euromaidan assault". It was my project at the university,as I study English-Ukrainian translation. Unfortunately, it was marked as one for deletion. I would like to mention that this is only a translation of the Ukrainian article. If this article is not good, it's main version in Ukrainian should be deleted. And also I'm sure that this article is not biased, as I witnessed the events described in it and may affirm that everything is true. thanks for your time — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zshpodarunok (talk • contribs) 20:28, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Content on the English Wikipedia has no affect on the Ukrainian Wikipedia, and vice-versa, just because there is an article over there, does not mean there should be one here. The article itself comes across as very biased and one-sided, with virtually no sources at all to back up the statements it is making--Jac16888 Talk 21:32, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

re: X key and Template:Keyboard keys

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello — in December you deleted the article “X key” which is referenced by Template:Keyboard keys. The template is now showing a red link, which should probably be removed. I've peeked at the template source, and removing the dead link seems simple enough, but having never edited a template, I'd like to confirm that it's really that straightforward, lest I do damage to the fifty articles which use this template. Any warnings, caveats, or subtle side effects I should be aware of, other than WP:DDMP? Thanks for any wisdom you wish to offer!   50.181.30.121 (talk) 07:45, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Yep, looks like it's as straightforward as it seems, go for it mate--Jac16888 Talk 17:05, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  Hiya, Just wanted to say thanks for making me see sense yesterday at ANI!

It's just I've never had it blatantly copied but yeah in hindsight it was probably a stupid fuss over nothing,
Anyway Thanks :-)
Regards, -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 13:54, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 April 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bapatla page

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

You have reverted my edits, may i know the reason. I've just organised info and based on the tag i have edited. If anything mistake, I obey. My view is does the parliament, assembly constituency and MLA names and private school names are required on a town or village page. You can see hyderabad, vijayawada pages, where they only mention civic administration instead of politicians names. Also, they mention only important universities or colleges rather than private schools names ehich are in every street.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Vin09 (talk • contribs) 19:37, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

I reverted your edit by mistake, and immediately reverted myself, then I removed this which I assume you added by mistake--Jac16888 Talk 18:41, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Talkback

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Hello, Jac16888. You have new messages at Talk:List of Masha and the Bear episodes.
Message added 17:13, 1 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:13, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Giannis Kolokas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pyrgos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Meyer Vaisman

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi! I'm consulting the article about Meyer Vaisman from Italy (I'm here for a trip), but I normally live in Spain and the page was created in the Spanish Wikipedia, I leave here the link: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meyer_Vaisman. I din't copy it in the english one, but I wrote in the spanish one. Could you REDIRECT the page you deleted to the right one? (https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meyer_Vaisman). I'm the autor. At the beginning there was two pages with the same name, because the title of the first one was wrong (smal letter of the surmame)

Please you can leave your message for me here: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario_discusi%C3%B3n:LiminalB — Preceding unsigned comment added by LiminalB (talk • contribs) 19:23, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 May 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Sorry!

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I am sincerely sorry, for the link on the article about Harry Potter. I read it need more sources, and that website had the right amount of spells used in the 7 books about Harry Potter. Please forgive me, I was trying to help articles. Cheers!-- Allied Rangoon‧talk 16:10, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 May 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grupul_Carpatin_F%C4%83g%C4%83r%C4%83%C8%99an

Latest comment: 10 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

To whom it may concern

The reason why I revert to the previous form of the page is because it is the mirror page of

https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grupul_Carpatin_F%C4%83g%C4%83r%C4%83%C8%99an

Your comment "this is a horrendous mess of an article" it is really "very objective".

On https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanian_anti-communist_resistance_movement there are no details about this Group, just a short mention of Ogoranu.


Please free to email me on bogdan.bobolea@gmail.com

I have subtitled the movie that deals with this group:

http://youtu(dot)be/KzvWxPIekKQ

And also for your knowledge you can watch this clip, too.

http://youtu(dot)be/medQcDcgHwc

Regards,

Bogdan Bobolea

PS

What is your nationality ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bogdan.bobolea (talk • contribs) 21:48, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

I'll address your post-script first, my nationality is irrelevant, and yours should be too. I have reverted your restoration, in it's current state this article does not belong on Wikipedia, it is badly written and translated, overly biased and barely sourced, the fact that it relates to a Romanian Wikipedia page is irrelevant. If you feel there should be an article on this group please begin by expanding the Romanian anti-communist resistance movement page, or by creating a page from scratch using WP:AFC. Do not restore it again--Jac16888 Talk 21:57, 18 May 2014 (UTC)


0. Please bring proof that the page is bad translated !

1. Based on what principle there is no option to have a separate page regarding this Group ?

2.The page you decided to "delete" is the translation of the Romanian page. So your argument "the fact that it relates to a Romanian Wikipedia page is irrelevant". In this case you should delete that page, too.

3. The Romanian page has a lot of books in the Biography. The same books were listed in the page deleted by you.

4. You should have start this discussion regarding these allegations NOT to delete it !

5. How can you judge if the information was biased if you can't speak / read / understand Romanian.

6. I don't think that your last idea seems to sound as a threat. Is it or not ?

7. I would like to bring this discussion to a higher level - having a sort of umpire that would listen to our ideas and decide accordingly.

Have a nice day ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bogdan.bobolea (talk • contribs) 22:24, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Content on the Romanian Wikipedia has no bearing on the English Wikipedia and vice-versa, the two are entirely independent. The bias of the page is clear when it includes long and dramatic quotes from members of the group. I am not saying there should be no article on the group, rather I am saying you should start again without basing it on an obviously biased translation. Create a page at [[User:Bogdan.bobolea/Sandbox and begin again, include hard facts only, as many references as you can (i.e. more than just two documents of unclear origin, and take a look at articles on similar subjects for an idea of what you should be doing, such as American Indian Movement or Prague Spring, then submit the page to WP:AFC and allow it to be properly assessed by expert article writers--Jac16888 Talk 22:52, 18 May 2014 (UTC)


Hello Jac,

A.

You are saying:


“Content on the Romanian Wikipedia has no bearing on the English Wikipedia and vice-versa, the two are entirely independent.“

My reply:

“From Wikipedia’s “Terms of Use”:

“Part of our mission is to:

Empower and Engage people around the world to collect and develop educational content […].

Disseminate this content effectively and globally, free of charge.

You are free to:

Contribute To and Edit our various sites or Projects.


1. Our Services

The Wikimedia Foundation is dedicated to encouraging the growth, development and distribution of free multilingual content, and to hosting the full content of these wiki-based Projects for the public free of charge. Our role is to host some of the largest collaboratively edited reference Projects in the world […]”

a) I couldn’t find any mention regarding the fact that it is forbidden to have a Wiki page mirrored in another language;

b) How on Earth does Wikipedia fulfill its mission (to disseminate effectively and globally) if you are denying the existence of twin pages in other languages?

c) If it is possible to have a version in English of a Romanian Wiki page, for what purpose the English version must have lesser words than the original one?

d) By deleting the page using very “objective remarks” (“this is a horrendous mess of an article”) have you or haven’t you broken the idea “Our role is to host some of the largest collaboratively edited reference Projects in the world”? From where I am standing the deleting action is not a sign of cooperation.

Why didn’t you put a warning as usual: “This page has some issues”? or “This page will be deleted in two weeks because of the following criteria a)… b)… etc ?” so I could had adjusted it accordingly.

Why did you leave the link valid so it would be a circular reference?

When you are on the page and you click on Grupul Carpatin Făgărăşan it goes back to the beginning of the same page.

You did a similar action before:

Turbinia Hello you have made a change here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Turbinia&oldid=prev&diff=591146894 . You have left a live link but it now goes nowhere. I wonder whether you intended this and if so why. Robertforsythe (talk) 11:01, 18 January 2014 (UTC) Links from the articlespace to the userspace are not allowed, as userpages are not subject to the rules and guidelines that articles are. I left the link for the possibility that the subject could be an article one day, if that is not the case please remove it--Jac16888 Talk 13:32, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Should I be biased (as you are enjoying so much using this word) to presume that you had left in both situations a valid link so the persons who created those pages to think that everything is OK? A broken link (red) would have triggered the alarm, wouldn’t it?


B.

You are saying:

“The bias of the page is clear when it includes long and dramatic quotes from members of the group”.

I am saying:

Since have you advised me to study about the Indian movement look what I have found:


bestessayhelp(dot)com/examples/history/native-american-studies/history-research-methods-appropriate-bias-%E2%80%93-essay-sample

History Research Methods. Appropriate Bias? – Essay Sample McCullagh, C. Behan. “Bias in Historical Description, Interpretation, and Explanation.” History & Theory 39.1 (2000): 39.Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 3 Aug. 2011.

History is made by those who write it, so it is unsurprising that bias is present in historical descriptions, interpretations, and explanations. However, few people realize the extent and severity of the bias commonly showed in historical texts, and avoiding cultural bias is often difficult to identify- much less correct.

McCullagh claims that personal bias is not as harmful as cultural bias […]

C.

You are saying:

“I am not saying there should be no article on the group, rather I am saying you should start again without basing it on an obviously biased translation.

Create a page at [[User:Bogdan.bobolea/Sandbox and begin again, include hard facts only, as many references as you can (i.e. more than just two documents of unclear origin, […]”


I am saying:

The references used in the page are written by

1.Ion Gavrila Ogoranu – the leader of that Carpathian Group Fagarasan

2.Florian Banu :

has a PhD in History, superior councilor at the National Council for studying the Securitate Archive;

is co-editor of ”Bande, bandiţi şi eroi”. Grupurile de rezistenţă din munţi şi Securitatea (1948-1968), Bucureşti, Editura Enciclopedică, 2003, (co-editor); ("Gangs, bandits and heroes” Resistance groups from the mountains and Securitate;


author of “Securitatea. Structuri/cadre, obiective şi metode, vol. I (1948-1967), Bucureşti, Editura Enciclopedică, 2006 (co-editor); (Securitate. Structures/ staffing, objectives and methods);

co-author of România. 1945-1989. Enciclopedia regimului comunist. Represiunea. A-E, Bucureşti, Institutul Naţional pentru Studiul Totalitarismului, 2011 (co-autor). (Romania. 1945 – 1989. The Communism Encyclopedia. Repression A-E)


The book written by professor Florian Banu used as reference is called “Mişcarea de rezistenţă armată anticomunistă din România - între negare şi hiperbolizare/ Publicat în Rezistenţa anticomunistă – cercetare ştiinţifică şi valorificare muzeală, vol.I “ (The armed anticommunism resistance movement from Romania – between denial and augmentation – published in Anticommunism Resistance – scientific research and museum capitalization, Vol. I)


I didn’t know that in order to publish a page on Wiki I need to perform a research similar to a Master's or a PhD Diploma and to read so many books. If you had left the page as it was, some readers (not you) would have had the chance to challenge the information provided by me and to write other ideas, different than those exposed by me.

“From Wikipedia’s “Terms of Use”:


a. We do not take an editorial role: Because the Wikimedia Projects are collaboratively edited, all of the content that we host is provided by users like yourself, and we do not take an editorial role. This means that we generally do not monitor or edit the content of the Project websites, and we do not take any responsibility for this content.

From my point of view, you have grossly breached this rule.

PS

And finally: I am proud to be Romanian. This is the reason why I am writing about my fellows who died in the mountains fighting against the Communism and I am disseminating information about their actions. Of course my English is bad, but nobody is perfect.

As McCullagh said “the personal bias is not as harmful as cultural bias”, I strongly suggest to take your time and watch those two YouTube video translated into English by me. If you don’t trust my English: I have a translator diploma (English – Romanian) and I worked two years in UK.


By the way, would you be so kind to tell me how can I contact directly the person who oversees/ who is monitoring your activity to inform him/ her about our misunderstandings?


Thank you!

You have missed virtually every point I tried to make, along with vastly misinterpreting both Wikipedias terms of use and meaning of bias. To answer A, I did not say we won't have an article that is on another Wikipedia, just that the fact they have one does not mean we have to. They have no creative control over us, and vice-versa. Your comment about my edit to Turbinia is as far as I can tell, completely irrelevant. B: Not even clear what you are saying here, the page as it was had an obvious bias and was therefore unacceptable by Wikipedia policy as I have already linked to. C: In other words you have a reference from an obviously biased party, and a single reference that may be of value. One reference is not anywhere near enough. Regarding the rule you claim I have breached, I have no connection with the Wikimedia Foundation, which is the one claiming no editorial role. I am an administrator and a editor, i.e. I do take an editorial role, and I have nobody who oversees me in doing so. In your postscript you make clear your fundamental misunderstanding of what Wikipedia is. Wikipedia does not "disseminate information", it is an encyclopedia, the role of which is to summarise and report already disseminated information. In order for you to attempt to improve this page I have moved it to your userspace, User:Bogdan.bobolea/Grupul Carpatin Fagarasan. Here I suggest you make an effort to bring it in line with our policies, then submit it for approval through WP:AFC--Jac16888 Talk 20:41, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Waun Ki Hong

I edited the research section and added references. I then requested a move to rename the page Waun Ki Hong. Is it possible to delete from public view the editor's (your) previous comments about the article needing references, etc. as these issues have been addressed? I hope the revised version is sufficient to meet the criteria for published articles. Thanks for your assistance.Houston5December 19:22, 19 May 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Houston5December (talk • contribs)

The Signpost: 21 May 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Request for comment

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 May 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Re Astrantia carniolica

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thank you for deleting all those redundant pages - I forgot to add the / on my userpage when creating the new articles ! DavidAnstiss (talk) 09:13, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 June 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Mahfouz Marei Mubarak bin Mahfouz

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Jac,

Regarding the page of Mahfouz Marei Mubarak bin Mahfouz that has been deleted, we have recreated it again under name of Mahfouz Bin Marei Bin Mahfouz to match Wikipedia's citing policy. However, the new page has been deleted too today. Could you please either retrieve the new page again or at least retrieve the old page and we will rectify it.

Kind regards, Ahmad — Preceding unsigned comment added by Midoahmad (talk • contribs) 15:59, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahfouz Marei Mubarak bin Mahfouz for why the page was deleted, it cannot be restored unless you address the issues raised in that discussion--Jac16888 Talk 16:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Prod of Hronovka and Regnerka

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You tagged Hronovka and Regnerka for deletion with the rationale: incomprehensible. I disagree: although written in terrible English, the basic facts of the article were easily understandable. I have rewritten the article in clear English, and removed the PROD, although I still doubt the notability of the topic. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:51, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Article moved, but now unreachable!

Hi! I wrote an article named Volsonis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volsonis) that has been deleted because it was written in another language (croatian). The article now exists here https://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volsonis, but it's actually unreachable - when I type "Volsonis" in google, it shows the old article which has been deleted (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volsonis). How can I make the article in croatian (https://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volsonis) to appear in google results? Thanks!

Article moved, but now unreachable!

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi! I wrote an article named Volsonis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volsonis) that has been deleted because it was written in another language (croatian). The article now exists here https://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volsonis, but it's actually unreachable - when I type "Volsonis" in google, it shows the old article which has been deleted (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volsonis). How can I make the article in croatian (https://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volsonis) to appear in google results? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidestanic (talk • contribs) 14:40, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Be patient, it will show up eventually--Jac16888 Talk 16:32, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  Thanks for cleaning up all those messes I made with the health care articles. I left awful redirects everywhere and you found them all and deleted them without me even asking. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:45, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 June 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion


Latest comment: 10 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Can you explain me why you have reverted some changes on photo gallery software ? Silverpeas contains a web photo gallery software writen in Java that may interest some readers of this page ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ebonnet38 (talk • contribs) 07:15, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

I reverted the edits to remove Silverpeas because I had deleted the article about it and every item on that list needs an article. I deleted the article because it showed no indication of notability--Jac16888 Talk 07:47, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
I am not agree with showed no indication of notability. I can add a lot of reference about Silverpeas (for example http://www.open-source-guide.com/en/Solutions/Applications/Portals/Silverpeas) Can you please add the last page version.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ebonnet38 (talk • contribs) 10:22, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
That is not a valid reference. Please see WP:REFERENCE--Jac16888 Talk 10:17, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Your point of view is not objective. Please see WP:REFERENCE. Maybe we should ask other people about it. I have made a Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ebonnet38 (talk • contribs) 12:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
I don't see on what grounds you're making that claim, I would be willing to bet it is you who is not objective here. Your request has already been declined--Jac16888 Talk 11:53, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Murphy Betancourt

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello there I'm sorry for the bother Murphy Betancourt page was delete the person that was trying to make Murphy Wiki page he didn't know how to get References but I do know how to so I will love to make Murphy Betancourt a new Wiki article, That's why I'm here today if you could please unblock his page.

Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhonlopze (talk • contribs) 13:13, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

There was nothing in any of the deleted versions which suggested any notability. If you want to try and create the page please create a draft at User:Jhonlopze/Murphy Betancourt and then submit it for approval through WP:AFC--Jac16888 Talk 13:46, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 June 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 25 June 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

mohamadrezarezaei.com

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

hi why my page as mohamadrezarezaei dot com delete by you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maplay (talk • contribs) 14:32, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Because it had no useful content and it was not in English--Jac16888 Talk 16:34, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 July 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi jac... what is the reason behind deleted page Kunwer Sachdev and he is the well known person in India and MD and Co-founder of Su-kam power systems. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shiv.k.gupta (talk • contribs) 08:14, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

The Center for the Initiative on Belarus

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I do not understand what it is the problem with this article. This is not advertising, just info about a non-profit. And there millions of ad pages in Wikipedia. Please explain. Kavaleuski (talk) 18:23, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

FYI, the article has been recreated (still in Belarusian)--I've reapplied the translate tag, but not a speedy tag. --Finngall talk 18:36, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
It is very promotional, shows little to no notability, other articles are of no relevance, and as Finngall says it is not in English, this being the English language Wikipedia--Jac16888 Talk 18:45, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Lake Murray State Park in Oklahoma

Why would you delete the wiki for the oldest and largest state park in Oklahoma, Lake Murray State Park Please email response to Richard.Tipton@ardmoreite.com

Thank you Richard Tipton

Lake Murray State Park in Oklahoma

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Why would you delete the wiki for the oldest and largest state park in Oklahoma, Lake Murray State Park Please email response to Richard.Tipton@ardmoreite.com

Thank you Richard Tipton — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.116.115.160 (talk) 15:21, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 July 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

July 13,2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Jack,It's me Saurav Lamshal..II have helped to delete unnecessary wiki articles...Now I know properly about it..Can U please give me some authoritative rights ?? Saurav Lamshal (talk) 18:18, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Take a look at WP:PERM, but please note that A) To get most additional rights you need much more experience than you currently do (a few thousand edits and a few months editing at least), and B)None of the different rights available are in any way "authoritative"--Jac16888 Talk 18:21, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

should I Apply for it or...when I edit and promote pages...then will Wikipedia automatically provide me some additional rights or I should Apply for it man ? Saurav Lamshal (talk) 18:34, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

You apply for the different rights on the page I linked above, but please understand, you will not get them right now, you need much more experience--Jac16888 Talk 19:22, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Article Headlines

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Jac16888,

I represent XPRIZE, and am wondering why all of our edits keep getting deleted. We are trying to establish our brand, and that is very difficult to do when Wikipedia has us and our competition incorrectly listed. XPRIZE is our official registered trademark, even though we are still known to the IRS as the X PRIZE Foundation. We only use the space in filings with the government, but all public facing media presents our brand as XPRIZE.


We can be listed as XPRIZE or XPRIZE Foundation for our main article page. There should not be a space between 'X' and 'PRIZE'. The same goes for all of our competitions: Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander XCHALLENGE (currently listed just as Lunar Lander Challenge), Ansari XPRIZE (currently listed as Ansari X Prize), XPRIZE Cup (currently listed as X Prize Cup), Progressive Insurance Automotive XPRIZE (currently listed as Automotive X Prize), Wendy Schmidt Oil Cleanup XCHALLENGE (currently listed as Wendy Schmidt Oil Cleanup X Challenge at Oil_Cleanup_XPrize), Google Lunar XPRIZE (currently listed as Google Lunar X Prize), Archon Genomics XPRIZE (currently listed as Archon X Prize), Qualcomm Tricorder XPRIZE (currently listed as Tricorder X Prize), Nokia Sensing XCHALLENGE (not yet listed except in the article about the foundation), and Wendy Schmidt Ocean Health XPRIZE (not yet listed except in the article about the foundation).

If you could please help us with these edits and possibly even locking them, we would greatly appreciate it. It is a constant fight to control our brand as there are so many outlets that are misrepresenting us.

Thank you,

Zachary David zachary.david@xprize.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zach xprize (talk • contribs) 17:21, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Zachary, please read WP:COI first of all, as it is vitally important that you understand that Wikipedia is not the place for you to establish a brand. With regards to moving articles to the correct names, please make requests at WP:RFM--Jac16888 Talk 18:22, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 July 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

365 Days TV

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

A article have notable. See an interwik in Russian Wikipedia. ru:365 дней ТВ--Many baks (talk) 18:44, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

The fact is exists on the Russian Wikipedia is irrelevant, there are no sources and nothing to indicate this is in anyway notable--Jac16888 Talk 23:48, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Soliciting comment...

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi! Would you care to review my FA nomination for the article Of Human Feelings? The article is about a jazz album by Ornette Coleman, and the criteria for FA articles is at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 18:39, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Page Deleted by You "A famous Indian Industrial"

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Jack,

I know I am not expert in wiki page but when ever I found free time I spent on wikipedia to provide relevant and real information to the world. I have created a page of Su-kam Power Systems Founders "Kunwer Sachdev" but it was deleted by you (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion) without knowing fact as of I have already placed news articles to support this page.

It would be great if you guide me where i have made mistake so i will fix and will give my time on wiki.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Shiv.k.gupta (talk • contribs) 11:17, 21 July 2014

It was overly promotional, please see WP:NEUTRAL--Jac16888 Talk 16:52, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ashraf Ali Thanwi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ahmed Khan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I see that you concluded here that The Stronato (Paraguay) was (not a copyvio)

It looks a bit complicated to me. Here's what I observed:

  1. In this edit User:Calliopejen1 added a substantial amount of material, inclduing the Stronato material to History of Paraguay with the edit notice (+PD content from library of congress!) . However, I do not see any notice of attribution or identification of the source in that edit, the next few subsequent edits, or present in the article as it existed on 2 July 2014 just before removal.
  2. user:The Northaptonshire pins cut the material from the article and created a new article. I believe this violates our own rules for attribution.
  3. user:The Northaptonshire pins referenced the material to Mother Earth Travel which I doubt qualifies as a reliable source.

I think there's some work to do to make this right, but I want to start by figuring out whether my summary is accurate and complete.--S Philbrick(Talk) 18:36, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

I'll be honest I just checked that it was moved from another article as the status says, but the does seem a bit more tricky. I think you're right on your first point, attribution of the source material should have been/be added. WP:SPLIT says that the only attribution needed is "the page receiving the split material must have an edit summary noting "split content from article name" in the new article which was done, although I suppose it should have been linked. Re point 3, the mother earth page appears to be copied from the Area Handbook of the US Library of Congress, which I'm guessing is where the original content came from, so perhaps that should be repointed to just the actual book rather than another page hosting--Jac16888 Talk 18:48, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Given your answer, I'll copy the above, and move my subsequent post to Talk:The_Stronato_(Paraguay)--S Philbrick(Talk) 19:10, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

English version "Adolfo Fernandez"

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Jac15888; Im trying to create the english version of the article about Adolfo Fernandez Garcia: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolfo_Fern%C3%A1ndez_Garc%C3%ADa

but it was marked for deletion marked as (Advertising). Why ? this guy is one of the most recognized artists in cuba and its retired in US, how can it be advertising ? the purpose of the article is purely informative.

sorry for my english (My native lang. is spanish).— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ideologic (talk • contribs) 21:45, 25 July 2014

I deleted it (twice now), because it was blatantly promotional. It was also an unsourced biography--Jac16888 Talk 22:00, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 July 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Why did you delete my page

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello,

I had a page in draft called 'Hebburn Town Juniors FC'. can you tell me why it was deleted? I know there was conflict with copyright, but I thought as it was in 'draft' I could sort it later. As it happens it's not an issue as I administer the website the text was taken from anyway. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ngray jarrow (talk • contribs) 09:24, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Copyright is a legal issue, therefore it is an issue even as a draft. Even without the copyright information the page was still not suitable to be an article as it was overly biased and promotional--Jac16888 Talk 16:39, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I'd like to ask that an article your ran through PROD, The Detonators (band), be userfied to me. I'm working on histories of 1980s American punk bands and this one should clear GNG (article in Flipside #47, etc.). Thanks, —Tim /// Carrite (talk) 22:23, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

User:Carrite/The Detonators (band), all done--Jac16888 Talk 22:34, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, nice to hear from you. However, I don't think my discussions with other editors are anything to do with u. Good day. Bewbslova (talk) 20:10, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

You thought wrong--Jac16888 Talk 20:11, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

You deleted the page Permutationally Invariant Quantum Tomography due to an overlapping text with

https://sites.google.com/site/pitomography/pitomography

The site owner added on the top of the page

The text of this website is available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creataive Commons and the GNU Free Documentation Licence (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts).

Please let me know whether this is sufficient, or whether you can undelete the page. (Or we have to make it again.)

Thanks! Quantum1956 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.133.22.204 (talk) 23:17, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

You're right, there was no copyright issue here. However, I am still hesitant to restore it, as it seems to be little more than a barely sourced original research essay. Can I suggest you create the page as a draft and perhaps take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Science/Guidelines for some guidance--Jac16888 Talk 15:51, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. I think, it was a summary of two of the scalable tomographic methods. Please tell me how I make a draft. Could you please restore the page as draft? Is the draft visible only for the creator? Quantum1956 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.133.22.204 (talk) 10:04, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

IACES webpage

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello,

I am President of IACES (International Association of Civil Engineering Students). At the moment I am rewriting the Wikipedia article regarding IACES, differently from the one in iaces.org In the next days I will try to update with the best amount of info I can.

So please, don't delete the page in the next days even if you find it incomplete or with few information. I will ask another member to fill up with more information, specially in history section.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbcalejo (talk • contribs) 23:28, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Please see notability and WP:COI, both of which directly apply to you and this article. Rather than deleting the article again I have moved it to your userspace (it can be found at User:Jbcalejo/IACES), please work on it there (particularly focusing on adding reliable 3rd party references to establish notability), then submit it to the the WP:AFC system--Jac16888 Talk 15:55, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 July 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of comets by type, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sandbox. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

IACES article

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello

I have seen the article about IACES has been moved to my personal area. What do I need to do so that it is accepted in the following link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IACES?

It was not copied from the website, does it need anyway any kind of authorization?

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbcalejo (talk • contribs) 10:53, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

See my answer above--Jac16888 Talk 12:32, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

why did you delete my post

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

You said it was irrelevant it was about a rapper,just like Trinidad James is a rapper, Jay-Z, snoop dogg I don't get how it was irrelevant — Preceding unsigned comment added by Savagemitten (talk • contribs) 16:18, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Please see WP:NOTABILITY--Jac16888 Talk 17:01, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Article removed

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

hello,

Why you remove my article (Rancah Post)?

Look at the garbage you did not delete with same article with me, it worst than mine you know.

I have real company at Rancah Post, under Mitra Maya Media Inc.

Thanks,— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitrakerja (talk • contribs) 05:20, 5 August 2014‎

A) English Wikipedia = English content, not Indonesian. B), Please see WP:NOTE, WP:COI and WP:SPAM--Jac16888 Talk 16:49, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Women's wheelchair basketball team

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Thanks for saving the wheelchair basketball article. I realized after I'd filed for A2 deletion that the translation had begun, though I didn't see it at first look since it was in the infobox. —Largo Plazo (talk) 16:59, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for saving the article. I thought it would not take long to translate (working from the bottom to the top) but there was some fiddling with layout and templates, and then I was interrupted by off-wiki drama. I have now finished the translation, and moved it back again, but since I don't have the tools, this leaves a redirect behind, which now needs to be speedily deleted. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:06, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Page deleted. What now?

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi,

Some time ago, I created page of a composer Andy Harris, which has been deleted because of copyright's due. However a few days ago, Andy Harris sent and e-mail to permissions-en@wikimedia.org with statement taken from here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Declaration_of_consent_for_all_enquiries . I don't exactly know what to do now. Is the statement enough? Page will be restored?

Regards Lukasz Widz — Preceding unsigned comment added by LukaszWidz (talk • contribs) 23:31, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 August 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Prince Richardson

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

You closed this AFD listing the result as speedy delete. Would the result just be delete, as the discussion had pretty much run its course? WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:15, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

You're right, I didn't look at the date it was re-opened. I've changed it to non-speedy for future g4ing I'm sure will occur--Jac16888 Talk 19:19, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Checking to make sure we are reaching the same conclusion

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I see that you concluded that Fantasia (franchise) is not a copyvio.

I looked briefly, but it appears to me that some of the phrasing that matches this site, does so because that site (without attribution) borrowed from an earlier Wikipedia article, such as Fantasia (1940 film). However, while copying within Wikipedia is permissible, it much be properly attributed. I see that the editor has been reminded of this recently.

Does this match your take? If so, would you be willing to inform the editor? If you would prefer that I do it, please inform me, but I'm out of town for a couple days starting soon, so cannot get to it until late in the week.--S Philbrick(Talk) 18:52, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Yes that was my take on it, I've left them a note--Jac16888 Talk 19:03, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, I'll close the copyvio issue.--S Philbrick(Talk) 19:59, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

I am creating a page for Special:Mypage/Venkatesh S.

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

HI Sir,

I have prepared a page for Venkatesh S. (cinematographer of the movie Vadacurry), When i first prepared I did it with the name of Venkatesh.S which did not link with the article of the movie where the name is given as "Venkatesh S." Since i did not know how to change the heading i created a new one and mapped to the name in the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vadacurry

Please publish the deleted page or allow me to publish the new article with the same name as "Venkatesh S."

Thanks, Abu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Urfriendabu (talk • contribs) 08:04, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Please read WP:NOTABILITY and WP:SOURCE, and then create a page which meets those policies using the WP:AFC procedure--Jac16888 Talk 18:06, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Jens Drolshammer

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm not yet satisfied regarding the copyright status of Jens Drolshammer. If you based it on this edit, I don't think that is good enough. As a technical point, it asserts a release of some text but doesn't adequately specify the subject text. Presumably, it refers to this page but it doesn't say so. Second, it doesn't even assert ownership of the copyright of that page. I've looked through that site, and may well have missed something, but I found a reference to a CC license which is not compatible, so we need to find evidence that the particular page in question is subject to a different license. Plus there are other issues, but I'll just stop here and say I'm planning to blank it and submit it to WP:CP. If you have investigated and found some things I've missed, please bring them to my attention. If you can find evidence that this page is NOT governed by the Terms of service, please let me know.--S Philbrick(Talk) 02:09, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Deletion of Page

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Sorry, but I could not understand why you deleted the page "JoyRaj Text File Encryption Program v2.17.7.14" from Wikipedia. If there is a valid reason then please let me know it and also let me know if I can create the page again.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neptune8907 (talk • contribs) 18:20, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Please see WP:NOTABILITY, which that page did not demonstrate--Jac16888 Talk 22:35, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 August 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Difference between Prismatic compass and Surveyor Compass

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

You have recently deleted this page because of copying from youtube. Have you checked the page?? It was from surveying text books of S.S BHAVAKATTI and C.L Kochher page 132. This bot was in my opinion malfactuning. Now I would like you to revert your edit or I am going to challenge your deletion. If there was something copied from YouTube, prove it. Owais khursheed (talk)

So what you're saying is you copied from a text-book, not the youtube page? Still not allowed. Also this is encyclopedia, a bulleted list of details about two different compasses is not an article--Jac16888 Talk 17:34, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Okay, also copying is not prohibited in wikipedia but copy right voliations is forbidden. One can go to a public library and collect data from different books for an article to be written on wikipedia. Am I right ???

Copying content from anything anywhere into an article on Wikipedia is not allowed unless the original content is released under the license we use, Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Otherwise it is a copyright violation--Jac16888 Talk 18:29, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Please Reconsider the deletion of the content.

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Jac16888,

I am writing this with respect to the following page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Lakes_Institute_of_Management

I have come to understand that our page is deleted and the reasons mentioned are 1. Copied content 2. Promotional content.

You can check the reasons as per the cache page from Google: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Lakes_Institute_of_Management&ion=1&espv=2

Also, please find attached the screenshot.

I would like to submit the following explanation for reconsideration request:

1. I would like to mention that the said page is a very old page and we have not copied any content. Instead the web links mentioned hereunder have copied pour content and is the reason behind CorenSearchBot searching the same.

2. Promotional Content: The content is written to explain about the institute, campuses and Programs offered with relevant references.

Its an old content and is there since last many years. You can check the web archive version of the same as under:

https://web.archive.org/web/20120426100056/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Lakes_Institute_of_Management

We respect your authority and would like you to reconsider and let us know what changes should we make in the content to have the page up and running.

Thanks. Webmaster ajit (talk) 06:48, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

The content as it stood was clearly promotional, written with a blatant bias towards the institute. I suggest you create a new article from scratch using the WP:AFC system, and following Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools/Article guidelines--Jac16888 Talk 17:11, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Deletion of Siam Society

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi. Please reconsider your deletion of the Siam Society article under CSD G12. While the bot did identify some duplicate phrases, I don't think the whole article was "unambiguous copyright infringement". Even if there were close paraphrasing issues, the copied contents should have been small enough to have been fixable by copyediting. --Paul_012 (talk) 11:50, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

It was copied almost word for word, with a few minor changes here and there, it was certainly a copyright violation.--Jac16888 Talk 17:19, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 


Gaurav294 (talk) 10:46, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

I deleted it because it was blatantly promotional. It was also not in English, this being the English language Wikipedia--Jac16888 Talk 10:47, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 August 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Biography of Niloy Alamgir

Hey Jac I have created Niloy Alamgir biography ..but wikipedia not approving it though we have provided many important news link, Niloy is a popular model & hero in Bangladeshi cinema and TV media as well.. i am new here pls wish u help me to improve Niloy Alamgir .. for your information, first i created this biography from a another id Niloy.alamgir11 but as wiki don't consider it as proper way to create some article with similar to ID name so i made a new ID.

wishing ur early response

Isle of Wight Blue

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I notice that you've deleted my page. Since you have a history of having deleted 28556 pages this is clesrly something which you feel strongly about. This is the first page I've created. Just thought I'd have a go and see what happened. I picked this page since I noticed a like to a non-existant page and this was it. Perhaps it was not sufficiently rewritten from the sources but I was surprised that it was deleted as "unsambiguous advertising or promotion". I though I'd be okay on the "noteable" criteria since there are pages for other types of cheese.

Could you give some guidance as to how the page failed this criteria since it seems to me that the information was factual.

Peter Larkins (talk) 09:25, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

It was deleted for multiple reasons. The first was that it was very promotional, in a tone that was attempting to sell the cheese. The second was that it appeared to have been copied and slightly changed from another page on the internet, making it a copyright violation. Finally, just being cheese does not make it notable. Your article would require multiple 3rd party references to demonstrate notability]]--Jac16888 Talk 16:59, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Ref desk hatting

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Hello, just saw you hatted this post [3] as "trolling" -- can I ask why? Asking questions about movie plots happens a lot on the entertainment desk, and is not usually considered a problem... I was considering undoing the hat, but thought it would be polite to ask you about it first. SemanticMantis (talk) 17:45, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

That IP is a long (long long) term troll, who ask generally asks inane plot questions and refuses to accept the answers, rather re-asking them again and again--Jac16888 Talk 17:48, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Please unhat the thread. Your opinions do not trump those of other good-faith contributors who have responded to a question.In general, I think you do a fine job of deleting vanispamcruftisements. Regards. Edison (talk) 04:00, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Why would I unhat it? Long term trolls do not get fed--Jac16888 Talk 16:44, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Text was NOT copyrighted

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Jac16888,

why did you delete "The Mugshots" article? I am Mickey of the band and I simply copied parts of our OFFICIAL biography, which is of public domain, on this Wikipedia article! You can fin our biography, written by our friend Mack Maloney on our website, facebook page, reverbnation page, we print it, use it in emails and so on! It is also on our MTV page, that does not mean we are infringing a copyright! It is NOT COPYRIGHTED at all! It is absolutely free! Please let our article be, we need it as we work hard to promote our music and removing The Mugshots from Wikipedia because we "copied" our own biography - completely free of copyright - is grotesque, to say the least!

Thanks for understanding,

Michele Savoldi (aka Mickey E.Vil) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coatlx (talk • contribs) 16:39, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Two things. One, as Coren has already told you just because content is widely available does not make it public domain. Two, you have vastly misunderstood what Wikipedia is for. It is not a platform for you to promote your music, we do not allow promotional content and we do not allow editors to write with a blatant conflict of interest as you have--Jac16888 Talk 18:06, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Justin Scoggins

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I created a page for Justin Scoggins. You deleted the page on 4 November 2013 because the fighter failed WP:NMMA and thus no presumption of notability was provided or established. The fighter has continued to fight and now appears to meet WP:NMMA so I created the page. Since you previously deleted I wanted you to be aware. Also note that the page was twice created and deleted after you deleted it, but those were speedy deletes that appear to pertain to copyright issues. RonSigPi (talk) 22:34, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

History of Mosul

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

So why can't Mosul have a history page? The city is thousands of years old, and as it stands the article just sort of skims over the history. It could go into much greater detail. --Harizotoh9 (talk) 16:04, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

It can, and you're welcome to do so, however if you want to fork the content from the existing Mosul page, please do so properly following the instructions at WP:FORK--Jac16888 Talk 19:13, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Decline of prod

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You declined my prod at Sulfuric acid (data page), but when the data page exist the template chembox (infobox) at Sulfuric acid makes a section named "Supplementary data page" and a link to the data page article. Christian75 (talk) 08:35, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 August 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Request Restore

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I would like to request the restore of the Draf Draf:FINkers United, as I am an OTRS team member verify, and I have confirmed that the copyright holder of the website from which the aritlce is based off of, under the licensing of CC-BY-SA-30, and GFDL. See ticket 2014090110006575. If needed I will help make sure that the content is from a more Neutral Point of View, as I have read the reasoning of the deletion that you gave. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 05:59, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

I'm sorry but I don't really want to do that. I saw that OTRS has been contacted re the page, however even with that permission, the page was so clearly written to promote the article that I had to delete it. The article needs to be written completely from scratch--Jac16888 Talk 15:55, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Charles Carleton Massey

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi! I've often seen your "not a copyvio" summary, never before had any reason to question it. But I was surprised to see it on Draft:Charles Carleton Massey, as that appears to be substantially copied from this wiki (Dup det report), which (a) carries no no licence and (b) subject of course to the laws of karma and general muddle-headedness, appears to be licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence, which is not acceptable to us. I think that page should go as a G12. Or have I misread something? Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:45, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

You're correct, I suspect I must have skimmed that license page, seen the creative commons page and not spotted the non commercial part. I have deleted the page, apologies for my error--Jac16888 Talk 18:52, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Thank you, and thanks for all you do. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:21, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Re: Removal of reference to map methodology for Phalaenopsis_hieroglyphica

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello. I think your removal of the reference to the map featured in the Phalaenopsis_hieroglyphica article is unwarranted. Your editorial summary seems without justification as other users have found the referenced information helpful. Please return the reference for this map to the article, thank you. ChristineBushMV (talk) 17:50, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi Christine. Your reference is essentially a Self-published source, (and also original research) which is not considered to be reliable. --Jac16888 Talk 18:49, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 September 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hillhacks page removal

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi

This is regarding the removal of the hillhacks page due to "A7: No explanation of significance (real person/animal/organization/web content/organized event"

The page is an informational page about an organised event. Any information on what would consitute an explanation of significance of the event would be most helpful to updating the page in an appropriate manner.


Thanks

Vanya (talk) 14:34, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello Vanya. An event simply existing is not enough to warrant an article. You need to demonstrate notability, through the use of multiple, reliable, 3rd party references--Jac16888 Talk 14:36, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Jill Lane

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Hi Jac16888, I was reviewing the new page you just deleted on Jill Lane. I had gone to WorldCat to verify and add the books cited. I was in the process of trying to help out a bit when I saw the Jill Lane page was deleted by you. Do you think it possible to work with the new editor who might have copied the citation rather than speedy delete? We need more articles about women and Jill Lane appears to be quite accomplished. I was hoping to help the person. Maybe you can help me. Is there a way to assist before a speedy deletion? Suggestions appreciated.Kmccook (talk) 17:04, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

It was a copyright violation, I had no choice but to delete due to the legal issues involved. You're free to start a new one if you like, you just can't copy the content from somewhere else--Jac16888 Talk 17:12, 7 September 2014 (UTC)


hi jac12888,

You deleted several of my post regarding the Hemispheric Institute of Performance and Politics. I represent the institute, I have been working on building a profile on wikipedia. My apologies, for not doing this correctly. I've been learning how to post a wikipedia entry as I go. Please kindly allow me to create an entry regarding the Hemispheric Institute of Performance and Politics. The content are from our site and will be edited by our editors this week. The URL: HemisphericInstitute.org is the official URL for the institute. and the /hemi directory was created by our IT department, we do not have control over this file structure. I have also created entries for our academic journal, emisferica.org. again this is our official domain name, but again due to restrictions by the University we are affiliated with (NYU) we cannot make changes.

Thank you in advance, and i'm sorry for the mistakes in creating this entry.

Kind regards,

--Dxtr (talk) 17:27, 7 September 2014 (UTC)dxtr

Everything you created was copy and pasted from the Institute website, which clearly states it is copyrighted, and therefore the pages were copyright violations and had to be deleted. However even if you were to release those website pages to the public domain, your articles would still not acceptable. They were unsourced and they written with a clear promotional tone (as evidenced by your clear conflict of interest). Please follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Your first article, then create an article using the Wikipedia:Articles for creation system so that it can be properly reviewed

The Experience Gospel Concert

Latest comment: 10 years ago10 comments2 people in discussion

hello. why did you delete my article without at least sending me a message on what was wrong with it, so I can correct that? Mokeji (talk) 21:37, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

I deleted it because a) it was entirely promotional and b) it was a copyright violation--Jac16888 Talk 21:40, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Responding to your first reason - I'm puzzled as to the classification of the article as promotional. I have read other articles on Wikipedia that provide information in similar lingua about other events/personalities. How is this article different? Mokeji (talk) 22:01, 9 Septemiber 2014 (UTC)
If I came across another article as promotional as your, I would delete that too. The fact that you may have seen similarly promotional articles does not justify keeping yours--Jac16888 Talk 22:06, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Aren't articles tagged when something is wrong with them to notify the creator that the post needs cleaning up before being deleted if need be? Isn't this supposed to be in keeping with Wikipedia's emphasis on mutual regard among users and proproductive collaboration? Mokeji (talk) 22:55, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
In some cases yes, however in this case the article was so blatantly promotional that it had no place on Wikipedia, as well being a copyright violation which is also justification for instant deletion. If you want to try again, please do so in your userspace, use WP:AFC and bear in mind WP:NEUTRAL, WP:NOTABILITY and WP:REFERENCES--Jac16888 Talk 23:01, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
The article was actually not finished, and the event is similar to the Woodstock music festival (available on Wikipedia). Can you help and be more specific as to what needs to be properly done to present a more acceptable article for this event on Wikipedia? Thank you. Mokeji (talk) 10:43, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
I read this under Wikipedia's NPOV policy - "As a general rule, do not remove sourced information from the encyclopedia solely on the grounds that it seems biased. Instead, try to rewrite the passage or section to achieve a more neutral tone. Biased information can usually be balanced with material cited to other sources to produce a more neutral perspective, so such problems should be fixed when possible through the normal editing process. Remove material only where you have a good reason to believe it misinforms or misleads readers in ways that cannot be addressed by rewriting the passage. The sections below offer specific guidance on common problems." So should this deleted article not have been treated as such? Mokeji (talk) 11:09, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
You missed the key word in that policy "sourced". Your content was not sourced, therefore it was of no value, and the above does not apply. In addition you are missing the much bigger issue in that the content was copyright protected, therefore keeping it would be breaking the law. Let me be clear, I will not be restoring your article. As I have already said, you are free to write a new one, in your own words, a neutral tone and sources--Jac16888 Talk 12:49, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Alright, thank you. I am not requesting for a restoration of the article. I am new here and the deletion raised some concerns for me. My enquiries are for more clarity. Please can you give any specific helpful pointers on what makes for a neutral tone to avoid any article I write again being interpreted as not being so? Mokeji (talk) 13:26, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Have a read of WP:NEUTRAL and WP:FIRST. The general idea is you can't write about how great and awesome the subject is, just clear facts and as many references as possible to back them up--Jac16888 Talk 15:12, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Page Deletion

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello Why did you delete my article (The Experience Gospel Concert) without at least sending me a message to alert me to what was wrong with the content? Maybe I could have corrected what was wrong. Mokeji (talk) 21:49, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Please see the above section--Jac16888 Talk 21:55, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Paul Fitzgerald, S.J.

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Not sure why this page was deleted. He is the new president of the University of San Francisco. His previous assignment was at Fairfield University, where his bio also appeared on its web site. It does not belong to Fairfield University, it belongs to him. We are his staff. Our student worker spent a couple of hours creating this page and now it is deleted. Please provide an explanation.````tippycanoeandtylertoo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tippycanoeandtylertoo (talk • contribs) 01:14, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Please see WP:COPYVIO, the website the article was copied from is copyrighted, therefore we could not keep this article--Jac16888 Talk 09:14, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Dr Mabroor Bhatty

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

You have deleted the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr_Mabroor_Bhatty due to copyright infringement from the website, but I am a colleague of Mr Bhatty and therefore have full permission to use the copy as I in fact wrote it to begin with. How can I get the page back online? Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShazanIQ (talk • contribs) 17:26, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Well that content would have to be legally released, meaning anybody in the world could use it, are you sure you would want that? If so please submit a request to the WP:OTRS system--Jac16888 Talk 17:38, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 September 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

My Deleted Page

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

hi today i crated the Page of Our Organisation "Erbil International Film Festival", but during the edit and complete the content i see the page is deleted. Please check again and mention why delete this page. our Film Festival is new International Film Festival since 2014 and happened continuously every year. and now we prepare the organisation to start the 2015 of our event. you can see all of text and data from the our official website: http://wwww.erbilfilmfestival.org Please restore the page for complete the Data

Regards Manoochehr Totonchi 2nd Festival (2015) Director of Public Relation Erbil International Film Festival — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mobtaker61 (talk • contribs) 22:40, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

There are several issues here. The first is that, as you say, you have used the data from your website, your website which clearly states is copyrighted. Therefore we cannot use that content unless it is released to an open licence (meaning anybody in the world can use it). Even if you were to release the content, we still wouldn't want it, as the content you added was blatantly promotional, we need our articles to be neutral, and since you are writing with a clear conflict of interest it is unlikely you would be able to do so. Finally, your article showed little notability, particularly through the use of reliable 3rd party references. If you want to try again, please create the article in your userspace (at User:Mobtaker61/Erbil International Film Festival), in your own neutral, sourced words, then use the WP:AFC to submit it for approval, I will not be restoring the article as it stood.--Jac16888 Talk 22:49, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Fiya on da track

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

i own the right to that article. what do i need to show to verify i own the website and all content on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmbrown20 (talk • contribs) 02:01, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

You could use WP:OTRS to release the content, although to do so would mean releasing it to the whole world. There is also the issue that even without the copyright the article would be deleted at it does not demonstrate notability, through the use of reliable 3rd party references--Jac16888 Talk 16:51, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Jsem Moravan

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, why you deleted lyrics of Jsem Moravan, I am aware of some mistakes in english grammar but it was accurately translated! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThecentreCZ (talk • contribs) 17:41, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Louise Cook

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I am not sure why the page was deleted. I own the copyright for cutecookie.co.uk? — Preceding unsigned comment added by StefanDavis37 (talk • contribs) 20:22, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

You would need to release that content through WP:OTRS, making it free (for the whole world to use by the way). Even if you did that the page would still get deleted as it was blatantly promotional--Jac16888 Talk 20:26, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Dr Mabroor Bhatty OTRS release

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Jac16888. OTRS has received permission from the copyright holder to use the content at mabroorbhatty.com/ (external link). It appears that you delete the article listed above as a copyright violation of mabroorbhatty.com. While I am on the fence regarding this subject's notability, if you feel the article meets our biography standards please undelete the article. Thank you, Tiptoety talk 21:17, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Meh, looks borderline to me, can't really bring myself to restore it--Jac16888 Talk 21:52, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 September 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

reason for deleting page "helena ma"??

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  reason for deleting page "helena ma"??
please see "Cookies (group)" and republish article for "Helena Ma" Ai helena (talk) 09:08, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Reason for deleting "Helena Ma"???

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please look over article "cookies (group)" and republish article "Helena Ma" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ai helena (talk • contribs) 09:10, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Please see WP:NOTE--Jac16888 Talk 18:36, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Go Nawaz Go

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello,

You created a page 'Go Nawaz Go'. Why they deleted it? Lets create it as a movement....

Please Reply... Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by RanaAnees (talk • contribs) 11:33, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

marathon electric motors

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello,

Just for the reference of the word " marathon electric motors" i created this page. I guess you should not have any issue in this. as marathon brand if regal beloit corp.

Thanks Ravish — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ravish03 (talk • contribs) 13:03, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

I don't understand what you're asking, but I deleted your page because it was blatantly promotional and a copyright violation--Jac16888 Talk 13:07, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Canadian Office of the Building and Construction Trades Department, AFL-CIO (BCTD) - Advice on how I can avoid this being deleted again.

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello Jac,

I have been trying to add this wiki page "Canadian Office of the Building and Construction Trades Department, AFL-CIO (BCTD)" It says it has been deleted due to unambiguous advertising. I have tried to write it in a style that matches the parent company: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Building_and_Construction_Trades_Department,_AFL%E2%80%93CIO

Could you please give me some advice of how I can avoid it being deleted again?

Thank you, I look forward to your reply.

Dani Valois — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dani Valois (talk • contribs) 14:54, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) User:Dani Valois: The parent organization is barely notable enough to have an article - the Canadian Office has no chance to exist as a content fork (note: I'm Canadian, so one might think I'd have a different perspective) the panda ɛˢˡ” 15:43, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

DRAFT: Raoul Owens (Copyright)

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

RE: Raoul Owens (Draft)

Hi Jaci16888.

I recently produced a page on behalf of Raoul Owens which you have for now Deleted. Reason- Copyright infringement from : http://www.raoulowens.com/en-gb/introduction/

I have full approval to use this content because I work for Raoul Owens. Can you please let me know what documentation you need to allow the contents from the above webpage to be included on the Raoul Owens Wikipedia page that I would still like to be published.

Please advise. Thank you

Diid Osman — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diid Osman (talk • contribs) 15:55, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

If you wish you can submit a request to WP:OTRS, please note that will mean releasing the content for the whole world to use as they see fit. Please also note that even without the copyright issue the page was very promotional, and unlikely to be accepted as an article--Jac16888 Talk 16:43, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Jack Van Zandt

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

You deleted my entry for "Jack Van Zandt" because of supposed copyright issues regarding the American Composers Forum webpage. However, I am Jack van Zandt, the owner of the copyright on that information (I created the page myself). Please restore the article. I have sent an email granting permissions as per the notice I received. Thanks, Jack Van Zandt — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maryvernon (talk • contribs) 21:25, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

It is up to the OTRS team to confirm you have given permission and restore the article, however without sources to demonstrate notability it is likely to be deleted again, and since you have a clear conflict of interest you should not be writing about yourself here--Jac16888 Talk 21:28, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

OK, I see the error of my ways. I was misinformed re COI policy. Please delete and disregard my request for reinstatement. Jack Van Zandt — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maryvernon (talk • contribs) 21:54, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 September 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Continuously deleting page due to Copyright

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Jac, I have tried to make a Wikipedia page twice now for my boss, the President of USF, Paul Fitzgerald, S.J. The page has been deleted twice for copyright infringement. The page we linked to and that was claiming to be copyright infringement comes from Fairfield University, where Fr. Fitzgerald used to work. I have emailed Fairfield University and this is a direct quote from the email we received: All the content that has been uploaded on Fr. Fitzgerald’s behalf has been cleared with the publisher and we have their permission to include that full text content. In an attempt to alleviate the copyright concerns that Wikipedia appears to have, I have edited each of the entries to include a copyright statement that includes the statement, “Archived here with permission from the copyright holder.”

How can I get this page back up or at least prevent it from being deleted again? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmmcgovern (talk • contribs) 23:42, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

First of all, you should not be writing about your boss at all, since you have a clear conflict of interest. Your say so is not enough to clear copyright, the content needs to be legally released (to the whole world, not just Wikipedia) using our WP:OTRS system.--Jac16888 Talk 16:28, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Thomas Jakl

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Okay that is odd-I don't know how I put a prod on that article that apparently did have refs unless if someone vandalized it before hand. I don't know what to say! Wgolf (talk) 17:42, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Apparently the talk page of the creator of Saugata Mitra redirects to Thomas Jakl which apparently messes us Twinkle. No idea why the redirect was there, but I've removed it--Jac16888 Talk 17:46, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
  • -Thanks-might want to look into that and maybe stop the page from being redirected to the userspace. When I saw that I was going "I don't even remember putting that there" Wgolf (talk) 17:47, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 October 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

plato article: name

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I fail to see why you abolished my changes to this part of the Plato article.

What I put in nuanced the discussion a bit without going beyond established knowns.

Tdw1203 (talk) 00:29, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Looking at it again, I can see why you made the change, however it is not an especially clear addition, and particularly you should not be signing articles--Jac16888 Talk 16:49, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Should keep or deleter the page Dao's theorem

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dear Mister Jac16888,

What do you think about Dao's theorem, should keep or delete the pages? please let me know about your idea at

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dao%27s_theorem

Thank to You very much.

Best regards Sincerely --Eightcirclestheorem (talk) 09:39, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for the help with Ivar Aasen

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Thank you for the help confirming it was done (removing the template and section). I didn't know if I could or an administrator has to. --Kanashimi Hyoketsu 16:23, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

No worries, thanks for your work on it, and you're free to remove it if you want to--Jac16888 Talk 16:24, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 October 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

deleted page Age of Warriors

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Jac16888, could you let me know what does it mean "No explanation of significance (real person/animal/organization/web content/organized event". Age of Warriors is a iOS GAME, and it's notable. Because it's featured on the iTunes Home Page.Should I write some relevant staffs first, such as Funcell123 and GamEver? Any reply will be highly appreciated. Best regards lqrqw — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lqrqw (talk • contribs) 02:55, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

rv your template edit on General Theological Seminary

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Jac16888, I reverted your recent edit in General Theological Seminary removing a template param. The removed part is a valid template param, and was correctly formated. If the removal was a valid edit, please explain. Usage details at {{Failed verification}}; thanks! Mathglot (talk) 10:12, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello! I went through and added the suggested text to poetics.com.The website and its contents belong to Darick J. Simpson. He is also the person that contributed to the contents of my last page on him. Please let me know if there's anything else you need me to do or need me to add to his website in order to meet Wikipedia's specifications. Please find the suggested text that was added to poetics.com The text of this website is available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). Thank you for your assistance. (Lorenalexis (talk) 03:44, 12 October 2014 (UTC))

Page Deletion

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Why was the wiki for Forrest Getemgump deleted. I have the rights to use any content on Forrestgetemgump.com because I am him and that is my website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calhounrecordshop (talk • contribs) 21:25, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Firstly, your say so is not enough to release the content, it needs to be done through WP:OTRS, where you release the content to the world, not just Wikipedia. Secondly, even if you do release the content I would still delete it, as it was blatant promotion. Please see WP:COI, you should not be using Wikipedia to promote yourself--Jac16888 Talk 21:38, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 October 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Atrenta

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Jack, I have been adding an article on Atrenta. Atrenta is an important player in the EDA industry. See the list of companies here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_EDA_companies - most of these companies have a page on wikipedia. I therefore request that you do not delete the page on Atrenta since many users are looking for this company for the value it adds to the EDA ecosystem. It is NOT an advertising. Atrenta and its product SpyGlass have already been mentioned on some of the pages as below.

Thanks

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_EDA_companies http://iitk.ac.in/dora/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=245:ajoy-kumar-bose&catid=238&Itemid=401 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lint_(software) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardware_description_language — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cpuri1 (talk • contribs) 11:21, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

The content you are attempting to add is blatant promotion and we do not allow that on Wikipedia. If you are not able to write about the company in a neutral and unbiased way, it will continue to be deleted--Jac16888 Talk 15:39, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

O Amor e a Sociedade

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Do not redirect pages to themselves, it is not constructive. If the article is crap - and I agree it fits that description in my book, but I tend to be a harsher critic than most - nominate it for deletion. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:57, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

I have no idea how that happened, I intended to restore the previous redirect to Clodomir Santos de Morais, the author, would you mind that?--Jac16888 Talk 18:00, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
No objection. I have no strong feelings but it's been in disarray too long to stay that way for much longer. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:27, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 October 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Atrenta

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

hi, let us add atrenta to the eda list..atrenta is one of the large players in the eda world! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.176.78.103 (talk) 17:33, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

No, for the same reason I already told you above. Please see WP:PROMO, Wikipedia is not the place for you to promote your company--Jac16888 Talk 18:32, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mario Maiolo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian People's Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 October 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Patty Ann Peterson

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Good morning I received a note from you asking not to use Wikipedia as a means of promotion. Please rest assured, that is not my intent at all.

I am trying to create a page that documents Patty Peterson, radio broadcaster and singer. She is different than the Patty Peterson actress. Any suggestions I would be grateful.

Thank you Carrie — Preceding unsigned comment added by Icarrem (talk • contribs) 17:26, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Please see WP:PROMO, the content you were attempting to add was blatant advertising, clearly written with the purpose of promoting the subject. If you are not able to write about this subject in a neutral and unbiased manner, you will not be allowed to do so at all.--Jac16888 Talk 18:08, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 November 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Stuart Styron

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello Sir,

you asked me why I`m deleting all the links....- All Links were not right, they all were not correct. Most of them also broken with old informations. I`m just doing all in a new form. I need almost 3-4 Hours and than I`ll be done and the page is fixed with the newest update.

So please let me go on with all. When I saw the page I had a shock. What happened with that all? I had never problems with the page. It looks like they wants to delete it. That would be very bad and I never let them do that. Thats not okay, when your page is going to be deledet after 18 Months. I have lots of people around me and they also liked the wikipedia Page on Facebook! There are almost about 140000 Fans on. If someone delete the page, I will lost all of them. So, let me know, if I can go n with the update, Sir.

Best Regards - (talk --Fasterthanyou123 (talk) 02:43, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

If you're going to delete a lot of content from a page like that, it is important that you use an edit summary to explain it, other wise it looks like vandalism. I also get the feeling I need to point out WP:COI, and mention that you do not own this page, if the community decides it does not meet our standards it will be deleted.--Jac16888 Talk 14:19, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Harris Isbell

Latest comment: 9 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

When I searched for Harris Isbell and found that there wasn't a page, I decided I wanted to create one. It would primarily be an objective page focussed on a review of his research (I have a PhD in a related area, and have read and cited his articles before). However, I see you deleted a page, so I wanted to check on why that was. (BTW, this is my first interaction with Wikipedia other than as a user).

Finney1234 (talk) 15:58, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

I can't find any record of that page, what was it created under?--Jac16888 Talk 17:49, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

This is the link that made me ask on your page. I see now that the deletion has something to do with an bad redirect, rather than content, so I guess I should go ahead and create and submit an initial page. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harris_S._Isbell&action=edit&redlink=1

Finney1234 (talk) 21:10, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

I see. It was moved into the userspace (See User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )/Harris S. Isbell) for another editor to work on as it was not ready to be an article. I recommend you talk to User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) to see if he is still working on it and how you can help make it into an article--Jac16888 Talk 22:34, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Feel free to use the "move" function to migrate it into Wikipedia space, it was never deleted from mainspace, just a redirect was. I started the biography after coming across the name while researching another scientist. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 00:06, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Restoring deleted page

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hello Jac,

I am not even sure if this is the right way to contact you. Please excuse me if I am not doing it right.

According to this page below, it seems you are the Wikipedia administrator that marked this page as deleted.

I am not sure what went wrong, so I would appreciate your help to undelete the page if possible.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PHPClasses_repository&action=edit&redlink=1

This page is about the PHP Classes repository site, one of the largest PHP community sites with about 1.3 million registered users, growing at over 200 new registered users a day, near 4000 contributors that have sent over 8000 PHP programming components. There a few more statistics in this page:

http://www.phpclasses.org/browse/statistics/statistics.html

This site is the only site that organizes a world wide contest for innovative PHP programming components. Since 2004 we organize this award that distinguished over 1100 innovative PHP components and their authors

http://www.phpclasses.org/winners/

http://www.phpclasses.org/award/innovation/

I am not sure what to do to restore the page. I had the problem of the page being deleted in the past and it was restored but I am afraid I did not understand what exactly was necessary to keep the page. This was was there before.

http://web.archive.org/web/20130706173318/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PHPClasses_repository

I am not as experienced as yourself in editing proper Wikipedia pages. So I would appreciate if you could give me some guidance as I am sure this is a very relevant site for the PHP developers that have been using it since 1999 when it was created.

Thank you in advance for your time and patience.

Mlemos (talk) 01:53, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

The page was deleted due to the fact it did not demonstrate the "notability" of the subject. I've no doubt the page is important to you and many others but the same could be send for thousands if not millions of other websites that are only important to the people who use them. To demonstrate notability you need to have reliable, 3rd party references which discuss the subject, so for example you mention multiple facts you feel make the site notable, if you had news articles or something similar discussing that, then perhaps an article could stand. Take a look at the articles for some other websites for an idea of what I mean.--Jac16888 Talk 21:23, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I think I see what you mean. I agree it is a fair principle. I am sure there are external references that can be mentioned to justify notability, like for instance the following page in the Gamification base site. What do you think? Is this suitable? If so, what shall I do next? Is it possible to recover the deleted page so I can update it with more up to date references and notable facts?

http://www.gamification.co/gbase-entry/php-programming-innovation-awards/

Mlemos (talk) 01:40, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

I'm not sure if that link would constitute a reliable source or not to be honest. I have restored the page to your userspace, User:Mlemos/PHPClasses repository where you can work on it, then I recommend you submit it to our WP:AFC system where it can be reviewed and you can be advised on how to improve it--Jac16888 Talk 21:59, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

FinLit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dear Jac16888,

I would like to understand the editing criteria. In the List of social networking websites there are too many websites that has a very weak wikipage, similar to the one that I created for Finlit. So I would like to learn more about your decision to delete a page that is very similar if not the same as other pages that I visited from that list.

Here are some of them:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANobii https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FledgeWing

Let me know.

Thanks and regards, Gabe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Belforti (talk • contribs) 19:59, 15 November 2014

Both of those articles have multiple 3rd party references to demonstrate notability which yours did not, but even if they didn't that would not be a reason to allow yours to stay--Jac16888 Talk 20:04, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 November 2014

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyvio

Latest comment: 9 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Hi! As a courtesy, I wanted to let you know that I've contradicted you somewhat by rewriting the stubs at Moxlie Creek and Indian Creek (Olympia) during the process of reviewing articles at WP:SCV. Both articles were copied nearly verbatim (especially the latter) from http://olympiawa.gov/city-utilities/storm-and-surface-water/streams-and-shorelines. I see Olympia Woodland Trail is in much the same condition. I mention this only because you removed the CSBot notices. Cheers, Basie (talk) 20:50, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

My understanding (hopefully correct) is that as the source is a US gov website, the content is free to use unless specifically stated otherwise, although there is nothing wrong with rewriting the content--Jac16888 Talk 20:59, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Aha! That would make it much easier. I'll enquire. Cheers, Basie (talk) 21:02, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Public domain#U.S. government works--Jac16888 Talk 21:04, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Yeah, the trouble is the distinction between state and federal government:
"U.S. Government Works
In the U.S., any work created by a federal government employee or officer is in the public domain, provided that the work was created in that person’s official capacity. ... Keep in mind that this rule applies only to works created by federal employees and not to works created by state or local government employees. However, state and local laws and court decisions are in the public domain."
http://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/public-domain/welcome/#4. Pinging Moonriddengirl as I'm still very new to SCV and I'm sure she's forgotten more than I'll ever know about US copyrights! Cheers, Basie (talk) 21:19, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know that Moonriddengirl has been under some time pressures, but has replied. Essentially, although the issue was a bit murky, she feels the correct approach is to respect the "all rights reserved" statement. Cheers, Basie (talk) 18:06, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Open Broadcaster Software

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello Jac16888,

Last year you flagged the article on Open Broadcaster Software for deletion and ended up moving it to the creator's talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Voxletum/Open_Broadcaster_Software At the time the software was relatively new and unknown so that was fine, but it has continued to grow and gain popularity since then, and I believe at this point is is noteworthy enough to be reinstated as an article. Open Broadcaster Software (OBS) is commonly used to stream on Twitch, a website which is the 4th largest source of internet traffic in the US as of earlier this year.[1] If you visit Twitch's help section http://help.twitch.tv/customer/portal/topics/358640-broadcast-hardware-and-software/articles they have various articles (presumably sorted in order of popularity/importance) and the article on OBS in the 3rd one listed. If one of the largest websites in the US acknowledges OBS as a standard streaming application I feel that that is sufficient evidence of it's noteworthiness. Additionally, the official OBS twitter account has 22k followers. https://twitter.com/OBSProject

In light of that, do you think this article could be reinstated? I'm still a relatively new editor, so I don't know what the exact criteria for something to be noteworthy is, so if you feel additional evidence is needed I would be happy to go hunt for more evidence until you are satisfied that this program is noteworthy enough to have its own article.

Thanks! CurlyWi (talk) 02:54, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

  1. ^ "Wall Street Journal chart lists Twitch.tv fourth in U.S. peak traffic". Wall Street Journal via on Gamers. 5 Feb 2014. Retrieved 10 Feb 2014.

I'm sorry but neither of those are a sufficient reference to establish notability. However you're free to move it to your own userspace/work on it where it is, and then I suggest you use the WP:AFC system for review--Jac16888 Talk 18:03, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Cantemus is first of all a latin word

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I wonder what people expect when they find an article on "Cantemus". Well, those that are friends of an association with that name, will be glad to see their association here. But all the others expect maybe a more general approach. Maybe starting with an explanation of the word itself. Then, my idea was to supply a list over all choirs with that name I could find via google. The current article version covers only one choir with intermediate international relevance, and that is not optimal. An Article about e.g. "Paris" that only covers Paris Hilton and is silent about the capitol of France should be called silly, shouldn't it? Brmf (talk) 05:35, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Firstly please see WP:NOTDIR, Wikipedia is not a directory, we don't list every single instance of a name. However that was not the reason I reverted you. To follow your example, if you actually look up Paris, you see that it is an article about the city, and only the city, we then have other pages about other subjects with the name Paris. We do not have one article called Paris which covers every single piece of information about every single entity named Paris--Jac16888 Talk 18:16, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

The situation with Paris is much easier. The vast majority agrees that the most important meaning of Paris is the capitol of France. When someone picks up "Paris" in a conversation and searches Wikipedia to learn more about it, it is likely he hits the right page at once. When someone picks up "Cantemus" it is likely that the Lihuanian choir is not that he was looking for. That's why I think, the Cantemus-page should be a kind of disambiguation page, and the article about the Lithuanian choir should be renamed to Cantemus(Vilnius) or Cantemus(Lithuania). I can agree if we list only the, say, 5 bigger choirs in the disambiguation page, and I write an article about Cantemus(Stockholm). Could this be okay with you? Brmf (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 November 2014

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 03 December 2014

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

translate

Latest comment: 9 years ago9 comments2 people in discussion

What's up with this? – JBarta (talk) 21:43, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Someone added a big block of untranslated text, standard procedure is to restore the article back to its translated self--Jac16888 Talk 22:22, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Then why do we have translate tags? And where is this standard procedure documented? – JBarta (talk) 23:25, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
For that purpose, and for somebody at WP:PNT to see and deal with it as quickly as possible, sometimes that means translation and sometimes it is removal--Jac16888 Talk 23:36, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
At this point your choice to remove it seems arbitrary to me. Help me to understand. In what circumstance is text in an article translated and in what circumstance is it simply removed? If you can point to guidelines covering this and from which you made your choice, it would be appreciated. – JBarta (talk) 23:43, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
The purpose of PNT is to clear untranslated content as quickly and efficiently as possible, this content is problematic and PNT is not a translation service. Non-english content occurs in two ways. In the case of an entire new article it is either translated, deleted, or turned into a stub. In the case of content being added to an existing article, most of the time it is removed, particularly in cases such as this where the content has sat like that for 6 months. Wikpedia has a procedure for adding translated content (WP:TRANSLATION) using the Expand Language tags--Jac16888 Talk 00:18, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
I'm still unclear (why I'm having a hard time understanding this I don't know). The closest I can come to an understanding of your actions and WP:Translation is that Wikipedia only wants to translate material that already exists on another language wiki. If someone contributes a block of non-English text directly into an article (either from some other location or their own prose) you would just prefer to delete it. If that's the case I'm not sure I entirely agree, but so be it. – JBarta (talk) 16:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
That is almost the case. PNT is not a translation system, like AIV/RFPP/UFAA/etc it exists to solve a specific problem in the most efficient and appropriate way possible. It that is to remove the content, that is what we do, the content is still in the history if an interested editor wishes to translate it, but it does not benefit the project to remain visible--Jac16888 Talk 17:39, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
You say that leaving foreign text in the article does the project no good. I would argue that removing it does even less good. You say the foreign text is still in the history, but for all practical purposes that doesn't matter because it's unlikely to be noticed there. If however it remains visible and a "Needs Translation" tag is put on it, especially if that tag is listed with other articles with such tags in some central location, then it stands a reasonable chance of not only being noticed, but actually getting translated at some point and becoming part of the article. Of course you might fall back on "I don't make guidelines, I just follow them", but being a person familiar with translation topics in Wikipedia, if you're ever in a discussion concerning those guidelines, maybe you'll consider forwarding these points I've made. – JBarta (talk) 18:40, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 December 2014

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Archive 15←Archive 20Archive 21Archive 22Archive 23Archive 24Archive 25
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jac16888/Archive_22&oldid=1136177861"