Jamaru25

August 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Moors. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Aṭlas (talk) 03:12, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Juba II. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Read Numidia or [1] Doug Weller talk 16:14, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Why haven't you read the article on Numidia yet?

Or even looked for sources, eg this one. Doug Weller talk 08:30, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Mauretania. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. the ancient Morocco territory despite the fact that the first sentence of the lead says clearly "Mauretania (/ˌmɒrɪˈteɪniə, ˌmɔːrɪ-/; also spelled Mauritania)[3][4] is the Latin name for an area in the ancient Maghreb." Doug Weller talk 13:46, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Sources galore for Juba II

See Talk:Juba II. Doug Weller talk 13:59, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

February 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Ras el hanout. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. M.Bitton (talk) 23:51, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Talking about unsourced content was your first thing that you have did in very long time, and now you're talking like you haven't did nothing?! Please don't say things that you're doing the contrary of it Ras el hanout is originated and originally from Morocco and you didn't accept this fact, it's spread in other countries because of trading that doesn't make it Common in North Africa, please stop and accept this fact. Jamaru25 (talk) 00:10, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

"Ras el hanout is originated and originally from Morocco and you didn't accept this fact" Not what the source says.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:14, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

----WikivianiHow about this source https://www.spiceography.com/ras-el-hanout/

Jamaru25 (talk) 00:21, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

It's a random website with no published work. Please take a look at WP:RS.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:27, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Wikaviani isn't this considered as a source Bro?! Please think again. Jamaru25 (talk) 00:31, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

It may be a source, but it's not a reliable source, that's the problem with these kind of blog/websites.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:33, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Wikaviani have you ever seen this [is not a reliable source]?! We want Wikipedia to be trusted source, if my source isn't reliable that's will make that topic very effective. Jamaru25 (talk) 00:39, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Abd al-Mu'min. M.Bitton (talk) 22:28, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

All Arabic sources saying that Abd al-Mu'min is Born in Nedrouma near Tlemcen in current Algeria and when I correct your mistakes you say that I am Violating WP's Policies?! I was about to pust the source. Jamaru25 (talk) 22:35, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 02:13, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello Jamaru25. You've been warned for edit warring at M'semen per the result of the above complaint. You may be blocked the next time you revert that article unless you have obtained a prior consensus for your change on the talk page. Please pay attention to our policy of WP:Reliable sources. If it seems to administrators that you are ignoring that policy, there could be problems for you. If you have questions about policy, please ask any experienced contributor. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:45, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello @EdJohnston:,

• I appreciate your patience with me, but I want you to believe that I have added the first source which it comes form a Moroccan cookbook returns to the 13 century, even that M.Bitton (talk · contribs) was eager to remove it every time, in the page 72 the writer of this book has mention every single Moroccan dish during Al-Marinid Dynasty including M'semen which is pure Moroccan word and make it pure Moroccan bread, while other North African countries have not until 21 century because of the Media and etc.

• I may look doing wrong from your angle but in my angle I did something good because I edited with a source, while he didn't mentioned any source to defend his changes.

• If Wikipedia based on sources M.Bitton (talk · contribs) I noticed every change he did he have never cited any source which make his changes as false information.

• If Wikipedia wasn't reliable as source why are those people believe in their own researchs

• And thank you for your time Mr.Ed Johnston.
  • And this list of my sources:

Jamaru25 (talk) 11:47, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

References

Hello Jamaru25. A book published in the 14th century (1377) may be of historical interest, but it wouldn't normally be used as a reliable source for facts. See WP:PSTS. Instead, we would rely on the work of modern scholars who would interpret the earlier source. You can ask at WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard if you are not convinced. EdJohnston (talk) 13:32, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello Mr. @EdJohnston:,

• • I am glad that you have shown an interest in my source and also for believing in me, I really appreciate it.
  • I have check it this morning and I found a bit difficult to understand 😅.
  • Let's rely on modern scholars as you mentioned Sir. Jamaru25 (talk) 17:21, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

About your changes on the Harcha page

I understand why you made those modifications, but you should check the last source which mentions harcha as a "Maghrebi" bread, leaving some doubts about where it is traditionally located. There is no doubt that Morocco (Middle Atlas) is the origin, but it is still uncertain if Algeria is somehow involved or not. Hence the need to keep references to Algeria, and require citations. I hope you understand. -- Ideophagous (talk) 07:05, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello brother, in the first draft there was no mention of Algeria, and this bread is actually Moroccan while Algeria they have no idea about it. They are our neighboring country but they don't know how to make it. It Moroccan not Maghrebi because it doesn't exist in Algeria, Tunisia, and Libya. Jamaru25 (talk) 14:18, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

That guy all he does is attack articles related to Moroccan gastronomy, culture and history He recently attacked Pastilla,Ras el Hanout, Tajine etc...according to him everything was introduced to Morocco from Algeria, if algerian gastronomy was that rich why didn't Tunisia and Libya benefit from it.--Parabenz (talk) 04:30, 7 May 2020 (UTC)