James48843

Welcome!

Hello, James48843, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  --BigDT 06:25, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Marion Blakey

Hi. I have declined your request for protection to this article since you are the only one to edit it in over a month. Please see Wikipedia:Protection policy - I don't think protection is what you are looking for. Also, I have removed some of the information that you added. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires that material relating to living persons, particularly that which is negative or inflammatory, be well-sourced. Unless there is a reliable and verifiable source for that information, it should not be included in the article. Thank you. --BigDT 06:25, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Gasoline heater

Nice work on this new article. A quick search shows there's several mentions of gasoline heaters in other articles. I'm sure we can work it into shape with some wikifying and minor copyediting. Do you plan to edit it more or can I go ahead and edit it? --Martinship (talk) 06:39, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

I was about to redirect to gas heater that has been here since 2005, but his new article seems to be more detailed than the gas heater article that's been here since 2005!--Sallicio^{$\color {Red}\oplus$} 06:42, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Executive Order 13233

My apologies, I rolled back your edit adding a link to the Obama EO. I'd meant to use UNDO, and include a comment explaining my reason. My reason is that it's already cited with a link in the body, and the references are unnecessary in the short lede. Unfortunately, I hit the rollback link instead of Undo. Rollback which is supposed to be used only to revert vandalism, and your edit clearly was not that. TJRC (talk) 01:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of WMRP-LP

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article WMRP-LP, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Radio station with no indication of notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. FlyingToaster 05:29, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

WMRP-LP

It was brought to my attention that the WMRP-LP‎ page was up for deletion. I worked on the page and added an infobox, some templating, FCC links and other linkage and added it to appropriate pages. I also noticed that you were the creator of this page, hence my bringing this to your attention. Please continue the good work you are doing on radio stations articles and if you like, please consider joining the Radio Station WikiProject. Take Care...NeutralHomer • Talk • February 11, 2009 @ 06:18

David Cicilline

As per WP:STATUSQUO do not reinstitute contested changes prior to talk page. The main issue is disproportionate weight being given to one action, conflicting with WP:UNDUE.--Loodog (talk) 23:22, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of TSPTALK

A tag has been placed on TSPTALK, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. IBen (talk) 23:34, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Re:Please reconsider

Hi James48843. Well, I really hate to break it to you but whether you meant it or not, the text of TSPTALK really was an indisputable WP:ADVERT. Unfortunately, per Wikipedia policies I cannot restore it verbatim to the article mainspace. Since the article is a draft, if you like, you are free to create a subpage in your userspace and work on it there. Once you are finished, you can move it back into the mainspace. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:13, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Nazarov M-58 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nazarov M-58, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 10:07, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Nazarov M-58

Hello, James48843. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nazarov M-58, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

WMRP-LP

Last month, WMRP-LP adopted an oldies format and their new identifier of Retro 104-7. A new logo was uploaded by myself, but now there is an issue with the logo that can't be solved by myself or WMRP-LP. Can you add your input in File:Logo for WMRP-LP Retro 1047.jpg ? Thank you. Steelbeard1 (talk) 20:46, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

January 2024

Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Wilder Brigade Monument—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 21:37, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Airbus Mobile

On the Airbus Mobile you added this sentence:

However, no United States FAA Production Certificate has been issued to the USA factory for any model. All manufacturing takes place under authority of Airbus, France, even though no European Authority regulates facilities inside the U.S.

As this could be seen as a controversial, a citation is needed. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources. -- RickyCourtney (talk) 21:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC)