Jammy2

Sugababes Album Sales and Certification

For your information, instead of undo-ing all the edits on the Sugababes page, 3 times platinum means albums that have sold more than 900,000 copies. As Taller in More Ways and Three haven't sold this much, they have NOT gone platinum 3 times, just twice.

Stop editing it. If you continue to edit, I will continue to revert.

I DO live in the UK, and you clearly have no idea what you're talking about when you mention shipping/selling. Check the BPI website (incase you don't know, BPI are the awarding body for CD certifications). It's the best source for this type of info. Search for Sugababes, and it will show you their certification awards. Clearly states that the only album to gain triple platinum status is AWDF. Feel free to argue with them if you like, but as for making up sales and the such on wikipedia, I guess you must feel very proud.

A sign of a great mind when someone begins a dispute with "whatever". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Loveem (talk • contribs) 15:39, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Dixie Chicks

Hi, The Dixie Chicks are a band not just a girl group thus are able to correctly assert they are the top selling female band. A band plays their own instruments. Benjiboi 14:27, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 14:30, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Pocket Full Of Sunshine

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pocket Full Of Sunshine, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. tomasz. 11:58, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

NPOV

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Rihanna appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Acalamari 21:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Sugababes

There are some problems with your undoing on Sugababes. First, WP:MOS does not permit #1 singles to be bolded. Secondly, you have reincluded some uncited material and removed my request for citations. This is not permitted. I'll go ahead and undo these. Thanks. --Yamla (talk) 18:38, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Creole

Yes i kno i am CREOLE! Beytonces mom is Creole. So dont tell me about my people. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TR122 (talk • contribs) 05:51, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Creole

Don't discuss a topic that you know nothing about and this is not an English class. But the fact is Beyonce's mom is Creole. That was my only point. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TR122 (talk • contribs) 04:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Creole

I was simply stating a point of the Creole mixture. My personality is fine. You were the one to start this. Check yourself. I didn't disrespect you either so don't come at me like that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.61.228.15 (talk) 04:40, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Creole

Ok well my bad. I agree. We should let it go. Creoles should stick together. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TR122 (talk • contribs) 02:27, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Hairspray (2007 film)

Hi Jammy2, I was just wondering if you could provide a source for the information you added to the article about Ruth Brown making a cameo appearance as an audience member in the film's final scene. If this information is true I'd love for it to be included, but I've been working with this article for over a year now and I've yet to come across a source that provided such information, so the sentence has been left out in accordance with Wikipedia's rules regarding verifiability. Any help you could provide with this would be much appreciated, and thanks for taking an interest in the article. :-) —MearsMan ^talk 01:41, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

I've left a response to your comment on my talk page. And yes, you did a fine job of starting a new topic, there was absolutely nothing wrong with it. =) Oh, and in case you didn't already know, when you leave comments on talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, it's nice to sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment (you can also click on the signature button located above the edit window). This automatically inserts a signature with your username and the time you posted the comment, similar to the one you see at the end of my comments. This information is useful because it allows other editors to tell who said what, and when. —MearsMan ^talk 20:21, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)