JanosKörmendyRacz

Welcome to Wikipedia from the Medicine WikiProject!

Welcome to Wikipedia and WikiProject Medicine

Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Medicine (also known as WPMED).

We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of medical articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are interested in editing medical articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing Wikipedia articles are:

• Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on our talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the WPMED talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
• Sourcing of medical and health-related content on Wikipedia is guided by our medical sourcing guidelines, commonly referred to as MEDRS. These guidelines typically require recent secondary sources to support information; their application is further explained here. Primary sources (case studies, case reports, research studies) are rarely used, especially if the primary sources are produced by the organisation or individual who is promoting a claim.
• The Wikipedia community includes a wide variety of editors with different interests, skills, and knowledge. We all manage to get along through a lot of discussion that happens under the scenes and through the bold, revert, discuss editing cycle. If you encounter any problems, you can discuss them on an article's talk page or post a message on the WPMED talk page.

Feel free to drop a note on my talk page if you have any problems. I wish you all the best on your wiki voyages! Zefr (talk) 18:30, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Medical sourcing

Please don't add medical content without using a reliable medical review explained in WP:MEDMOS and WP:MEDRS. The Wikipedia medical community is biased toward facts and evidence-based medicine. --Zefr (talk) 18:17, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Apitherapy, you may be blocked from editing. Warning: WP:3RR. Zefr (talk) 19:41, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Bodog F. Beck

Your edits on this article were not acceptable. You inserted personal comments and unreliable sources. Please discuss your edits on the talk-page. Psychologist Guy (talk) 22:11, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

JanosKörmendyRacz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #27290 was submitted on Oct 24, 2019 20:49:20. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 20:49, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JanosKörmendyRacz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sorry mam, sir 1. The American lady is not my sockpuppet. She has the same biography of Dr Beck as myself in hand. 2. The editor means that a newspaper 77 years ago is more accurate, as the USA library, the USA Court record in Manhattan New York today. Sorry, this is not consensus-based, Lot of people do not agree. 3. Not self Publishing, Lilli Publishing. Hungary. Buy one, then you see it in detail, before that please do not devaluate. Please check my massive contribution to this article, and do not let one man destroy the whole idea of Wikipedia. If Wikipedia is under censorship of this man, then I have to distribute the correct information otherwise. So please - remove the block from me. - say to Psychologist guy not to play god and accept the rules of Wikipedia. There is no consensus about his false data, even based on a newspaper.

Decline reason:

Please review WP:NOTTHEM and WP:GAB if you want to craft an appeal that has the possibility of being accepted. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:29, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked sock puppetry

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JanosKörmendyRacz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I do not accept previous decision. I did not sock puppeted. The American lady is not my sockpuppet.

Decline reason:

This unblock request is deliberately wasting our time. If you are unwilling to address the concerns raised in the sockpuppet investigation, please do not waste our time with a pointless unblock request. Take the time to reread WP:GAB. You are welcome to write one last unblock request after doing so. Yamla (talk) 13:25, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.