Jatin1219

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pratapgarh Farms & Resorts (March 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pratapgarh Farms & Resorts and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:26, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Jatin1219! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 09:26, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Election results for Right to Recall party candidates

Hi, per Wikipedia:WikiProject_Indian_politics/Constituencies:_Article_structure#Election_results, only candidates who get more than 1% of the votes, should be mentioned in the list. Please refrain from adding the election results for candidates who do not meet those criteria. Those rules mentioned were arrived at after a healthy discussion among members of the Indian politics Wikiproject. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:05, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi

Can you please provide a link of discussion where the said decision had been taken.

I can't find the said "healthy discussion" on official Indian politics wikiproject talk page.

Thanks. Jatin1219 (talk) 10:56, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

It has since been archived. Here you go: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Indian_politics/Archive_3#Election_Results_section_of_Constituency_articles. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:02, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi

Thanks for bringing the above discussion in my knowledge. I have read the whole discussion and concluded that the result decided does not adhere the "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia" pillar among Wikipedia:Five pillars. An Encyclopedia is a place where even the smallest and most basic information is available to public,the same goes for the wikipedia as it serves as a mean of information for general people.

As for election results, the information of all the big parties are available on every news platforms but the information about smaller candidates are not available to general public through mainstream sources. The news platforms are not Encyclopedias so they does not need to present such details but the wikipedia is an Encyclopedia that should account even the minute detail.

Untill the proposal of "mentioning only candidates who gets more then 1% votes" is admitted into wikipedia as an official policy,i will continue my work according to conscience.

Thanks and have a great day ahead. Jatin1219 (talk) 03:59, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

I'll point out that there are constituencies where there are more than 20 or even 30 candidates for some elections. WP:NOTDIRECTORY might apply. You'd find less argument about adding results for a candidate from a party that is deemed notable (i.e. has a wikipedia page). -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:16, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Maybe you can reopen the discussion on the Indian Politics Wikiproject. Please add your above argument and link to the original discussion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:19, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jatin1219. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 14:40, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jatin1219 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The said account is not mine. Most of the accusations in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jatin1219 are false, and I have been blocked without even being given any chance to defend myself. I use a generic signature method which is used by most Wikipedians. I have never posted any request to retrieve any article written by info.apsharma and . I don't know why I am being targeted here. Jatin1219 (talk) 15:47, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

What's the relationship, then, between this account and User:Oyemithoon? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 17:10, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jatin1219 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

No relation with oyemithoon. I don't know who he is. First They accused me of having Ap.info as a sockpuppet and now they are accusing me of having oyemithoon too without it even being mentioned in the investigation, get your accusations straight first, please. Jatin1219 (talk) 08:29, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

 Confirmed to Oyemithoon, Paune Ghaptalis. I'll go block these sockpuppet accounts now. Yamla (talk) 09:41, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Pratapgarh Farms & Resorts

Hello, Jatin1219. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pratapgarh Farms & Resorts, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Right to Recall Party logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Right to Recall Party logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 15 October 2024 (UTC)