Jay1Rudra1

December 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Draft talk:Sunil Prem Vyas. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 15:12, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sunil Prem Vyas (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sunil Prem Vyas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sunil Prem Vyas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:59, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Jay1Rudra1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:59, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

David.moreno72 06:41, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Jay1Rudra1! You created a thread called article got declined every time. at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sunil Prem Vyas (January 16)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is a request to spin out an article, a form of splitting. Proposals to spin out a topic from an article into another stand-alone article should be discussed at the talk page of the existing article.

This does not mean that the draft should be spun out, and it does not mean that the draft should not be spun out. It does mean that discussion should be on the talk page of the existing article. (If this draft is resubmitted without discussion on the talk page of the existing article, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.) Discussion should be at Talk:Take It Easy (2015 film).

This draft was twice declined, on 25 November and on 18 December, with advice to discuss the split at Talk:Take It Easy (2015 film). It has twice been resubmitted without such discussion. This is not a good-faith attempt to discuss and obtain consensus.

Discuss, and then request an administrator to move this rejected draft to permit a new draft to be considered after there is consensus for the split.

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:13, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Sunil Prem Vyas

I have removed the Rejection from Draft:Sunil Prem Vyas in order to permit it to be re-reviewed. However, please be aware, as you have already been told both by User:The Mirror Cracked and User:Cyphoidbomb, there is a backlog for the review of drafts, and, in the recent past, you have resubmitted this draft tendentiously without responding to the comments of the reviewers. Any further disruptive editing may result in a block or even a topic-ban from Sunil Prem Vyas. I will not be reviewing this draft because I have become involved and will allow it to be reviewed by a neutral reviewer, but you may have to wait for a neutral reviewer. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:16, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Do you have any connection with Sunil Prem Vyas? Please read the conflict of interest policy, and make any required declaration. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:16, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Also, have you edited using a different account, and changed account names? If so, please make the appropriate declaration in accordance with the alternate account policy. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:16, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Sunil Prem Vyas has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sunil Prem Vyas. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:23, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Question

Have you ever edited under any other name? Robert McClenon (talk) 20:39, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Answer

Hello Mr. RobRobert McClenon, Yes, I had edited under another name as well. Jay1Rudra1 (talk) 09:01, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sunil Prem Vyas (March 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sunil Prem Vyas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sunil Prem Vyas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:13, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

User:Jay1Rudra1/sandbox

Hello, Jay1Rudra1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:Jay1Rudra1/sandbox.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:05, 16 July 2020 (UTC)