JckM235

Unblock

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:05, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

• Could you please explain your connection to these accounts?--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:10, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

I never seen those before, I share a network connection with a bunch of people. Could it be that? User:JckM235 22:17, 6 June 2016 (UTC) Also I bought this computer off someone too. User:JckM235 22:23, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

You're editing common topics, both logged in and out, across multiple IPs. Another checkuser can review the evidence, but the connection between you and User:Monci M. Mus is strong.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:25, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

They are not my accounts. Every edit I did is in good faith. User:JckM235 22:38, 6 June 2016 (UTC) The account you referred to did mostly political articles that I don't do and few video game articles I haven't edited. User:JckM235 22:55, 6 June 2016 (UTC) I'm not disruptive or damaging to Wikipedia, I even undo edits by vandals. User:JckM235 23:36, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JckM235 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't know why I was blocked. User:JckM235 22:04, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are blocked because we believe you have been using multiple accounts in violation of WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 00:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JckM235 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I only have one account, the accounts mentioned aren't by me. As I have, I'll use just this account to make constructive edits as I've been doing. User:JckM235 00:59, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

As above - a checkuser has technical evidence linking your accounts. Please make this request from your main account going forth. I am revoking your access to this talk page. SQL^{Query me!} 04:48, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

JckM235 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #15997 was submitted on Jun 18, 2016 21:56:53. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 21:56, 18 June 2016 (UTC)