User talk:Jim1138/Archive 16

Archive 10

←

Archive 14

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

Archive 18

→

Archive 20

Hi Jim

Hi Jim

The editing which I done to pages related to barcode was not for promotion. I did so as I liked the website of barcode solutions and I thought that if I will give the contact in wikipedia it will be easier for the persons who want to buy bhings related to barcode. So,please allow me to do so as there will be easier for barcode buyers to know and buy. Agarwal.mayank (talk) 10:24, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Deaths 2013

Please stop with the page edits and conform to the policy. A Red Linked person has 30 days to have an article written from the day of death. The only need for notoriety is that it is covered in multiple avenues (newspapers, trade magazines, etc.) or goes across a wire service. I have noticed several attempts by you today to revert edits. Please stop as research goes into this before they are posted. If you feel someone has put someone up in error, take it to the Deaths 2013 talk page. It can be reviewed by the community before it is decided upon. If you continue, further action may be required, so please stay within policy. Thank you and look forward to seeing you post some people of your own. Sunnydoo (talk) 11:54, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Here's our hidden editor's notes when the Edit button is clicked (not that many read this):

(1) Please list only those meeting Wikipedia notability guidelines. Please include a reference to a reliable source. If a Wikipedia article for the deceased does not yet exist, please reconsider whether the subject is actually notable. If so, please consider writing an article yourself. Those without a Wikipedia article are removed after one month.
(2) Please understand that the intent of this article is to report notable deaths. Tragic deaths, while unfortunate, do not necessarily render the deceased "notable". If you report the death of a subject that does not already have a Wikipedia article, please consider starting one, provided that the deceased is notable. Please include third-party sources other than the obituary.
(3) Please list entries in alphabetical order by family name. Please avoid overlinking. As such, please do not add links to nationalities, common occupations, or common causes of death. Rather, please include only "links that aid navigation and understanding". Thank you.

Most times, we give additions a chance. — ^Wylie_Coyote 12:05, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice. Is this written up somewhere? A link would be appreciated. Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 12:12, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

That's why I said not many may read it. Click "Edit" at the top of Deaths in 2013 and scroll down in the editing section. Look for the <!- -> part. — ^Wylie_Coyote 12:20, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

That's not necessarily Wikipedia policy. Where is it written on one of the "Wikipedia:" policy pages? Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 19:14, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Before I get all the questions about the "Deaths in XXXX", please understand that I've only been a Wikipedian for 14 months. The policies at the article were there before me and adopted/created by others before me. I think the reason "Deaths" is given some leeway is because it is more global and more viewed than most other Wiki-articles. People just go there first to view who's died/add someone. By "global", I mean it crosses language lines. Some of the redlinks are from non-English Wikis whose contributors think should be in ours. Case in point: January 5's "Joselo" entry. I mentioned on the talk page there that he does have a Spanish wiki, created long before he died, and is probably more notable in Venezuela for that page than for our version. This is why "Deaths" is more flexible than standard Wiki articles and/or list pages. Last year was the first year they adopted the proper citation format, which came down to a very close approval vote. It now causes massive load times after the middle of the month, but it is more standard. If you wish to take this and other issues up with the "Deaths" article, may I suggest you bring it up there, as I don't have experienced answers to give. I only abide by the 37-day redlink policy as I usually create the individual monthly article when the time comes to remove it from the yearly article. Sorry that I can't be anymore help, but hopefully I've steered you correctly. Thanks. — ^Wylie_Coyote 00:35, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Checker's Speech slush fund

Why did you remove the correct reference to Nixon's "Fund" as a slush fund? Why is describing the fund as a slush fund requisite of a source? That's like sourcing why an orange is called an orange? Are you biased in favor of washing Nixon's legacy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.38.183.9 (talk) 08:53, 7 January 2013 (UTC) By the way Wikipedia's OWN DEFINITION of SLUSH FUND CITES Nixon's Checker's Speech! You should not have removed the reference to slush fund as wikipedia itself refers to slush fund and the Checker's Speech. Will you undo your bad edit?108.38.183.9 (talk) 09:02, 7 January 2013 (UTC) The reference to slush fund is of particular importance when dealing with a man who was later so intimately involved with such absolute scandal involving slush funds during Watergate for obstruction of justice and perjury.108.38.183.9 (talk) 09:17, 7 January 2013 (UTC) Apparently you are more concerned with purging Nixon's past of taint than with honesty. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.38.183.9 (talk) 09:21, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

about the edits

so you think writing 'extremely insensitive & irresponsible' was inappropriate? this is a so called "godman" we are talking about - who is making such statements about a gang rape victim being responsible for the heinous crime towards her since she did not call them "brothers" and plead?! this is a guy who has a following of millions ... just imagine how many people can he influence by such a callous remark.

what do you think? and yes, i have given the sources too ... am not talking without sharing references

=

I get your point ... am probably just too pissed right now. Thanks anyway — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peabird (talk • contribs) 09:43, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Vitreous enamel

Hi. You added "vitreous china" as a See Also on the "vitreous enamel" page. This is mistaken as there is no connection, and consequently the edit has been reverted. To explain: vitreous enamel is a glass coating on metal whilst vitrous china is a ceramic material. The only similarity is the word "enamel", but it is used for different reasons: vitreous in vitreous enamel refers to the material being glass (which is amorphous & so by definition not ceramic) whilst in vitreous china it refers to the material being non-porous of material (which is crystalline.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.8.231.241 (talk) 09:38, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Asaram bapu

Hi Jim Below are the links that you can refer to: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-5yRetshKs http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kv6L-IKsDJA — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.157.95.68 (talk) 10:02, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Editing as Corporate Body

Hi Jim - thanks for alerting me to the fact that I cannot edit as our organisation - I guess I now need to change the corporate a/c I just created (WaterfordCityCouncil) to my own personal one. Can you tell me how to do this.Cp1302ger (talk) 11:09, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Why i changed yaksha.info to blog.ishafoundation.org

I edited it because the site yaksha.info no longer exists. It was replaced with http://mahashivarathri.org/ and yaksha doesn't have a blog. All the official blog posts related to yaksha.info is posted when it is time in blog.ishafoundation.org only.

117.239.66.131 (talk) 07:22, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

IP blanking footie arts

I have only left a single warning there - wasnt sure whether more was needed seeing it has stopped SatuSuro 03:18, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Not sure what you are referring to here. Jim1138 (talk) 03:29, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

sorry about that -http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=180.194.245.152 silent since - cheers SatuSuro 09:16, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

thanks for the advice - havent been to aiv for so long its amazing... cheers SatuSuro 10:26, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Personal Attack

Thank you! I appreciate the help! Namaste — DocOfSoc • Talk • 03:46, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

WLLO-FM

All of my changes involving radio station technical facilities information come from the Federal Communications Commission website. The source for WLLO-FM is http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/fmq?list=0&facid=125532.

68.108.241.162 (talk) 04:41, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Blanking

wow -it took you less than a minute to decide you wanted to delete my page. Nice. I wish I could help that quickly — Preceding unsigned comment added by I hate thinking of names (talk • contribs) 05:02, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Blanking is generally assumed to mean a request to delete. I hope I did not jump the gun. I use wp:huggle which pops up new changes and saw your blanking. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 05:05, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Do what you like - after a week of trying to prove notability and getting hamstrung by the lack of celebrity, I really have had enough of the whole wiki process. I have had nothing but vague or condescending feedback, Im sorry you are getting hit with a rant, but I ma really frustrated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by I hate thinking of names (talk • contribs) 05:13, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Great minds?

Hahahaha... You're a minute too slow. :P ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 05:31, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Photo changes

I removed content because it seems the photo is not attached to any article. Is this correct? Not sure if its a file that exists independently for a particular reason or a remnant of a deleted article. Should it remain on its own? 208.54.86.229 (talk) 07:26, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

2003 Grand Prix motorcycle racing season

I've edited some citations. Please correct me if i'm wrong, Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arif in bali (talk • contribs) 07:55, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

sorry dude! was for a project. Won't happen again but thanks for saying my artworks were fanciful! Stelaur (talk) 11:07, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank You

Hi, Jim1138,

I am a Taiwanese Wikipedian who mainly edits at Chinese Wikipedia since 2008. Thank You for kindly helping protect my user/talk page. I am a rollbacker and often confront with at least one long-term abuser among others. With lots of new IPs and accounts, this suspected person (very likely from China) vandalizes various articles these three months again and again. I was already targeted many times. Thanks and Have a Wonderful 2013!

--Wildcursive (talk) 09:00, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Disruptive editing

Hello Jim1138! I'm sorry for the disruptive editing of the strongman article. I made an unfortunate mistake and accidentally overwrote Park Chung-hee while adding the section about Adolf Hitler. In addition, it seems, I misunderstood the note and citation-system. All these brackets and tags are very confusing to me and I lost concentration trying to add what seemed like a simple and correct section. It's indeed quite a puzzle trying to contribute! Thanks for your notice!

		The Good Friend Award
		Let's be friends! Netanyaahoo (talk) 10:54, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Kopites

Hi Jim,

I think the external link was relevant in the way that the Kopites of Liverpool have an option of expressing themselves online the same way as expressing themselves in the Kop and the link provides the kop's thoughts.

8.18.97.192 (talk) 21:55, 12 January 2013 (UTC) Shravan

I am not sure what you are referring to here. What article? I did not see any recent change I made to Kopites Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 01:39, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

List of LGBT characters in television

The reason why I removed Dean Winchester from the list is because he is not bisexual. After 8 seasons, they would've given us at least a hint of bisexuality coming from the character. I do not believe it is correct to insinuate something like that, and misinform people, even if it is said unconfirmed, only because the bromance between him and an other character is so highly exaggerated by a big part of the fandom. That is all. I really recommend you to remove him from the list again, as it would be the most rational thing to do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.202.38.246 (talk) 06:14, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balaklava

Nowadays Balaklava is considered as a famous Ukrainian resort in summer. Many tourists visit it because of the great interest in historical places, alluring beaches and unforgettable mountain scenes. The largest part of tourists is from Former Soviet Republics.

That's what in reality. Balaklava is my homecity. I have an access to a local newspaper where that information was taken. http://kurer.sebastopol.ua/ - an official site of that newspaper. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.221.190 (talk) 08:09, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Ivan Fisher

I need some help; Ivan fisher has been suspended by NY courts, well described, but xyz1234567890 keeps reverting it out. What is best way to stop him? I have left messages on Fisher and his talk pages.Mwinog2777 (talk) 06:45, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

How about a Wikipedia:Third opinion? Or, Wikipedia:Request for comment? The NY Times does seem to be quite clear that he was suspended, but Xyz appears to disagree. Do you have a court document stating that Fisher is suspended? Otherwise this might fall under WP:BLPCRIME, with the emphasis on might. I would suggest starting a conversation in talk:Ivan Fisher, perhaps removing the warning. That is usually a prerequisite to filing a complaint on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. 3RR does bite back, be careful. I am rather busy and won't take the time to look into it now. Good luck, and thanks for minding the fort! Jim1138 (talk) 07:02, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

M1 Limited page.

Hi,

I have left references to news reports for my changes. In case you did not see it, please check out : http://www.todayonline.com/Singapore/EDC130116-0000013/M1s-switch-glitch-frustrates-customers http://www.straitstimes.com/breaking-news/singapore/story/m1-outage-affected-customers-3am-20130115 http://www.straitstimes.com/breaking-news/singapore/story/m1s-3g-services-partially-restored-20130116 http://www.asiaone.com/News/Latest%2BNews/Singapore/Story/A1Story20130116-395803.html http://www.asiaone.com/News/Latest%2BNews/Science%2Band%2BTech/Story/A1Story20130115-395639.html http://www.m1.com.sg/M1/site/M1Corp/menuitem.bbba2e1e0cd45957f15a947b3f2000a0/?vgnextoid=4eb685df70e3c310VgnVCM100000695a230aRCRD http://www.m1.com.sg/M1/site/M1Corp/menuitem.7024de8762cf9977f15a947b3f2000a0/?vgnextoid=9314091290c3c310VgnVCM100000695a230aRCRD&vgnextfmt=cid%3A8445091290c3c310VgnVCM100000695a230aRCRD%3Apdate%3A1301161129 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.78.248.244 (talk) 04:07, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

shoelace nipples

Dear jim1138,

First of all, im a big George Lucas fan. That said, shoelace nipple has been a common nickname for the aglet for as far as I can remember. I would have made the change sooner, but I am new to the internet. During the great depression, when my mother made aglets out of "paper and glue" (as your wikipedia article shows) and she convinced my siblings and me to take care of them by calling them "shoelace nipples" which, at the time (1933) was easier to pronounce than aglet for my younger brother, Woodrow (1929-1987). The name "shoelace nipple" caught on in our camp of Okies and we, in many ways, survived the depression by beginning to manufacture them as a cooperative in the San Joaquin Valley. This term is common in the oral traditions of the Central Valley of California.

Best,

Job MacKenzie Nevada City, California — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.231.12.83 (talk) 05:05, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Off-Off Campus edits

Jim1138, I made the edits to the Off-Off campus article because the original article contained some factual errors. The Compass Players started at Fred Wranovic's Compass Tavern down 55th Street from Jimmy's (Woodlawn Tap) and both establishments were near but not actually on the Uni. of Chicago campus despite many student's (and faculty's) hazy memories. As a frequenter of both establishments in the 1950s and 1960s, I have fond but not entirely hazy memories. Jimski20 (talk) 22:13, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Cynthia Ann Parker

Hey! About the edit I made to Cynthia Ann Parker's page. In the intro paragraph, it says she was kidnapped at age nine. But, she was born on October 29, 1827, and disappeared on May 19, 1836. The math adds up to her being kidnapped at age eight, not nine, if the kidnapping was after Oct 29, then she would've been nine. And even in the info box, that's what it says. Truly, it's no big deal at all, that's just what was going through my mind when I made the edit. Keep it the way it is, or change it, whatever you like. I just wanted to help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.173.69.245 (talk) 01:39, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

The problem appears to be that her birth date is anywhere from 1824 - 1827. I added refs for those dates and gave her age at kidnapping as 9 or 10. Still does not clarify everything. I would suggest checking sources to verify things before changing them. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 02:03, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

No big deal but...

...if you're going to remove comments accidentally left on my userpage, please move them to my talk page. Thanks! — Francophonie&Androphilie^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 02:17, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

(Just saw that you asked him to move it. Still, he seems, to be honest, a bit clueless [that whole comment is based on confusing me with another editor], so it might be a good idea to just do it for him. Or for me, because I'm lazy.). — Francophonie&Androphilie^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 02:19, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

No noise

I reverted this edit since in the edit film's name in infobox was changed, but seeing you are working there I have re-reverted my edit! Please have a look! --Tito Dutta (talk) 16:14, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

You were correct. I restored the page the way the IP edited it and left him/her an apology. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 19:04, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Adding NANOR technology to Emerging Technology page...

You also deleted my addition to the emerging technology page.

The MIT/Jet NANOR/LANR is new technology that should be there.

It works and has been rigorously tested by Massachusetts Institute of Technology...

Brant — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.191.247.17 (talk) 23:15, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Hey Jim , Ravindra Jadeja is a reknowned cricketer in our country and he is respectfully called Sir in our country . I dont have any link substantiating that . Please include the changes i have made — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.192.222.49 (talk) 05:21, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello Jim

I don't beleive this. I can't beleive there are IP's like this. Can you explain me what was the problem of that IP?--Pratyya ^(Hello!) 09:13, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Kind of like whacking a beehive and watching the bees buzz about? Maybe like me, nothing better to do. I just revert vandalism instead of generate it... I finally requested wp:rfpp. Jim1138 (talk) 10:08, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

about doddathota

i observed some false matters in that content. the person named subramnya prasad kodappala not exist in this place. So to prevent vandalism and unwanted edits from unregistered user please protect the page Rsullia (talk) 09:14, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia has an "anyone can edit" policy. See Wikipedia:Protection policy. If a page gets vandalized excessively and Doddathota is not by any means heavily vandalized, one can request page protection via wp:rfpp. Only administrators can add and remove page protection. I am not an admin. My recommendation is to put the page on your watch list. BTW: Doddathota was not vandalized, it was more like wp:spammed. See wp:vandalism for information on what vandalism is and is not. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:20, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

re:doddathota

thanks friend but early some comments added and it was removed, the user named chomamudara added some content which comments a person in this area. Any way in this edit the old content removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rsullia (talk • contribs) 09:33, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

oh sorry i dont know about that Rsullia (talk) 09:43, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Notability edits

Thank you for removing the non-notable individual from Eureka, California. Would it be possible to weigh in on this deletion discussion of a man who makes ceramic pots into "Kandle Heeters"? Your assistance most gratefully appreciated. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:59, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Laiko Music

Yes, it is a Greek genre, so I supposed it is composed by Greek lyricks. What else, Italian Lyricks i don;t think so? Have you any other version/proposal for this? --176.116.153.22 (talk) 05:25, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

"Composed by Greek lyrics". dictionary.com: lyrics That means that the song was "composed by Greek words". I don't think Greek words composed any songs. Jim1138 (talk) 05:27, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

What does it means? I said that Laiko is a Greek music genre. It could be literally song or just a folk song. The reason that is called laiko is that it is existed in Greek language. --176.116.153.22 (talk) 05:33, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

You wrote that is composed by Greek lyrics Greek lyrics don't compose music. Jim1138 (talk) 05:36, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

The word composed means is a part of the same with the word consists, what else? --176.116.153.22 (talk) 05:38, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

You're saying that Greek language composed the music. Does not make sense. Jim1138 (talk) 05:40, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Madea Gets A job

Why is it keep getting deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.223.25.117 (talk) 08:57, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

How do I move a image to the other side of the wiki?

I need help with moving a image to another side of the wiki,All I did was replace the existing image and it moved to the other side of the wiki and I don't know how to get it back.~~```09:58, 21 January 2013 (UTC)Morganlynn19988 (talk)

Photobox photo

Thank you very much for your help! I was just testing yes,but then I actually wanted to edit the photobox photo,how do I do that?99.14.233.23 (talk) 11:11, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

My edit keeps getting revised,why?

Why does the edit I made in the photobox in the wiki,Connie Britton keep getting revised? I revised it back to what I put from the original just now,but I don't see anything wrong with the photo I put. It's from wikimedia commons,and it's licensed. Help?99.14.233.23 (talk) 11:24, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

You should discuss this (preferably politely see wp:civil) with User talk:Alrofficial. S/he does seem to have a bit of wp:own? There should be no reason that Alrofficial's view is superior to yours. If you continue to have problems, let me know. Please avoid continuous reverting (see wp:3rr) as it could result in a wp:block Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 11:32, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

I do not want to experiment. I'm just editing the truth...idiots — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.249.28.128 (talk) 20:45, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Sources

You didnt demand sources when I edited the Duel (ride) article but your right i should have used one probably, my mistake. Peace out --151.226.152.74 (talk) 10:30, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Admit it, it was rather strange? Jim1138 (talk) 10:35, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

You've lost me matey :P --151.226.129.136 (talk) 12:54, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

There's no confirmation that he's playing Ramsay Snow.

I made the edit to his page because the official notice from HBO is that he's joined the cast in the role of 'BOY' and have made no confirmation of Ramsay Snow, though it is widely speculated and almost certain that he is playing that role. The official word is that he is 'Boy' and until the show premieres and the spoiler revealed that he is indeed Ramsay, he is boy. You're wrongfully reverting my edits when I actually did provide a source. http://winteriscoming.net/2012/07/iwan-rheon-cast-in-game-of-thrones/ 24.105.216.77 (talk) 01:54, 22 January 2013 (UTC) STOP REVERTING MY EDITS WHEN THEY ARE A FACT

You were linking to Boy which is about the homosapien youth, not the character. Please check your work before saving. BTW: please use secondary, not primary sources. Iwan Rheon's statements are primary. There are plenty of second sources stating he is to be Ramsay Snow. Iwan Rheon is likely under a non-disclosure requiring that he deny it. So it is *not* a fact. Jim1138 (talk) 02:08, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Censorship in Islamic societies

I think you made a mistake in your edit summary. Did you mean to add those Fox News sources back in? You said "rv fox is not a rs" 2.96.201.168 (talk) 02:16, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

I think you're writing about this edit. I would tend to agree that Fox News is biased.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 02:20, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Oops. I undid my revert. I think I'll stay off the page for awhile... Jim1138 (talk) 02:48, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Rockstar

Jim

Old products were removed - they are no longer available

It was mentioned they the Rockstar vodka products are only available in Canada .

These are all facts - thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.87.94.105 (talk) 07:18, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

AmongTheliving66

I have a feeling AmongTheliving66 might be a sock puppet not only is his and 71.95.82.119 edits simalar but because of this [1] either that or he keeps login out to avoid violating the 3RR.--75.65.123.86 (talk) 07:21, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

This IP is user: greaymarshess per [2], and has been known to have made false sockpuppet claims when he disagrees with the user in question. See [[3]] and [[4]]. What the IP refuses to mention is that I told the spellchecking IP to stop editing my edits [[5]]. I also placed a friendly warning on his/her talk page to get my point across [[6]]. Just to be clear I nor The1337gamer are sockpuppets of any kind. I honestly can't believe I'm having to defend myself against this foolery.AmongTheliving66 (talk) 08:04, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

You forget to mention I helped catch one of TheMetallican socks. Not all of them are inaccurate also I have a pretty strong evadince to put forward a sockpuppet investigation on you.--75.65.123.86 (talk) 08:30, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Sounds like fun. Please do. Jim1138 (talk) 08:32, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Bharat and Baratmata

117.205.0.78 (talk) 19:59, 22 January 2013 (UTC) Dear Jim1138. what the corrections I made were correct. Ask any Hindi language professor of this world. I know my nation, I do not need any citation for the basic ground reality to prove, reality doesnot need facts to prove. and please do not use militant word wherever my nations name is being used, how would you like if I or any of the people around the world start using this militant word with your or your nation's or their children's name. Intentions should be brotherhood among the world and not to use abusive language. I have deleted the word militant in the description regarding Bharat Mata and other corrections also. All my decisions were correct and appropriate. with regards, A Bhartian Citizen.

It may be correct, but it was unsourced. Wikipedia must be verifiable. Please cite your significant changes with reliable sources. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 20:01, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

You should be trouted, but...

...I don't ordinarily do that sort of thing. Your series of escalating warning at User talk:Colinrhar are totally inappropriate, as he was not editing when you starting reverting his edits. It's fine to leave a single warning (perhaps with a note that you have reverted edits on multiple articles), but beating an editor over the head with warnings when he has not been online to read the first notice is overkill. I am going to revert all of the warnings after your first one, because it's rather extreme newbie-biting. (He's been here for a while, but outside of a pair of edits over three years ago, he hasn't been active for even a week yet). If the disruptive editing pattern continues, escalation is appropriate, but let him read the warning first. Additionally, you need to throttle back on your usage of huggle; you should have caught that the last four edits to his talk page were all warnings left by you, through Huggle. They were sequential edits by you, so it's not hard to notice a pattern if you're not flying through. Horologium (talk) 20:37, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Unfortunately, huggle does not seem to follow those rules very well. It does some of the time and I do undo it when I notice, but it is hard to keep track of it. I did report the problem (again) to Wikipedia:Huggle/Feedback. There was no comment about it the last time I reported it. Thanks for catching the problem. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 00:09, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for clearing the vandalism from my user page. It is very much appreciated. 72Dino (talk) 00:26, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Seccession

I realize you may have speed editing, rather than actually checking what you were changing, but could you explain to me what is wrong with correcting an obviously wrong year, by removing an unsourced year and replacing it with another unsourced year? I thought there was something about assuming good faith? Obviously I don't back as you didn't.

How many valuble user edits have been reverted by this shoot first, check never activism that plaques wiki....

Please take the time to fact check before unilaterally clocking up edits through indiscriminate reverts. 76.26.217.48 (talk) 04:08, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proclamation_of_the_Irish_Republic — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.26.217.48 (talk) 04:12, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, but I am not going to thoroughly research your edits, and I doubt others will either. If you would leave an wp:edit summary, you might prevent the revert as well as me (and others) having to (re-)research your changes. I did check a November 2012 version in which the date was 1919, suggesting that your edit was not a revert on someone else's vandalism. If you don't want to leave an edit summary, I suspect others will undo your changes too. If you are not going to supply sources, nor explanation, why not flag it as "needs work" and let other's do the work? Sorry about that, but that is the way Wikipedia seems to work. And, I'm sure lots of good edits are removed that way; though far more bad edits. BTW: please read the instructions at the top of my page or on wp:user talk pages on how to leave a note on other's talk pages. It is customary to leave it on the bottom of the page and not in the middle of the page. It makes finding new edits difficult. Jim1138 (talk) 04:24, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

And I did leave a very brief edit summary, rtfm. This error would be EXTREMELY obvious to anyone who knows anything about the subject, or indeed anyone born in Ireland. Given how obvious it was I felt rtfm was more than enough information. I did not anticipate someone editing on a subject matter they know nothing about, and requiring that any unsourced information removed be replaced with sourced information. 76.26.217.48 (talk) 04:35, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

I am not the first person (by far) to say this to you, please do not make edits on subject matters you know nothing about. I would like to add, don't make edits purely based on edit summaries either, or if you are unwilling to check things. What others may or may not do is immaterial. If you go around all day using tools or bots to do this you are to all intents and purposes vandalizing Wikipedia by throughing away lots of good edits. AGF implies you do not lose some good edits for the purpose of losing bad ones. It is straight up vandalism, and edit clocking. It is not how many edits you make that counts. 76.26.217.48 (talk) 04:47, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

You put an edit summary on Secession an article on international affairs, leave a cryptic summary and expect it to be reviewed only by Irish? No. You need to understand that your edits will be reviewed by lay people and judged by your ability to supply reliable sources and summaries. Most of the comments above are by people who are simply too lazy to do so. This is an international Wikipedia, not the Irish Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 04:55, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

no, I expected no one to revert my change without understanding anything about the content of it. Your scatter fire use of hg makes it clear, combined with numerous complaints, that you regularly revert based on edit summaries rather than knowledge of the content in question. And as I said the bad date I changed was unsourced. The period aka full stop in this paragraph is also unsourced but Im pretty sure it is round. You should not change the year stated unless you know, or have good reason to believe it to be different. whether you are Irish, Maori or Martian, it shouldn't matter. . 76.26.217.48 (talk) 05:03, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

if you felt the date required a citation (dubious) you could have used the template to request one. Though I'm sure as HG doesn't have that it was too inconvenient and would slow you down, as you have already stated you were unwilling to check. Slow down" and stop reverting everyone's hard work, the collateral damage is not acceptable under AGF 76.26.217.48 (talk) 05:15, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

The burden of evidence is on you. You changed a long standing date. If you don't make it clear what your change is for, expect a revert. Don't be lazy. Jim1138 (talk) 05:12, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

actually no it's not. That AGF thing again. 76.26.217.48 (talk) 05:15, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Lazy, I'm not the one reverting many peoples valid edits based on my not being willing to take the time to either check, or AGF. 76.26.217.48 (talk) 05:19, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

AGF? That inconsequential warning on your talk page was not AFG? No threats, no consequences. Now you are really blowing things out of proportion. I nor other knowledgeable editors are going to {{cn}} or {{dubious}} every questionable edit. Don't plaster {{Cn}}'s all over my page. That is vandalism. 05:32, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

The eronious revert, especially combined with your own admission that it was based on a edit summary and that you were unwilling to check whether or not you were correct, you basically made a revert on which you had no basis to know whether or not you were right. That is the AGF problem. It has also made me aware of a user with a very long term pattern of similar reverts with no basis in fact, and extremely tenuous grounds for suspicion, certainly not enough to overcome AGF. in effect, it appears to me' that whether intention or nor (and IMHO unintentional, just a lack of awareness of AGF) constitutes an ongoing, high volume systemic newbie biting, data loss, and basically, vandalism. AGF is designed to prevent amongst other things collateral damage by you treating edits as suspicious unless proven to (your) satisfaction otherwise. Your use of the phrase burden of proof proves it... Please start using AGF in your edits, and take th time to check and understand the content, or stick in subject matters you are strong in. There are far too many edits affected by this behavior, and to be honest I am going to have to get some admin help if it persists. AGF. 76.26.217.48 (talk) 05:41, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Be my guest, and good luck. Jim1138 (talk) 05:47, 23 January 2013 (UTC)