Jimmychoo1111

March 2024

Hello, I'm Moons of Io. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Moons of Io (talk) 02:01, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Vince Connelly, you may be blocked from editing. --Hammersoft (talk) 02:09, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

My information is not unsourced or poorly sourced. Perhaps i will add the newspaper articles to prove it.

And Vince needs to know everyday what he has done and the outcomes Jimmychoo1111 (talk) 02:13, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia isn't a platform for you to voice your displeasure with this person. Either provide information in a neutral, encyclopedic tone and back it up with reliable, secondary sources, or you will be blocked. You already dancing on the edge of being blocked and some administrators would have already blocked you. I strongly encourage you to reconsider how you are editing. If you have questions, by all means ask. Continuing as you have is unacceptable and will result in your being blocked. I hope I've been clear. --Hammersoft (talk) 02:16, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

ive provided the newspapers. have no issues being blocked, there are over 1000 of us doing this. we have all day and night to continue. Right up to the federal election. Jimmychoo1111 (talk) 02:17, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

And I have no issue in protecting the article so additional unsourced or poorly sourced information is not added to the article of a biography of a living person. You've noted (though you didn't use citations properly; please read WP:CITE) three news articles. Two of them are behind paywalls. The third article doesn't support what you've said. I can't confirm or deny what you've written. --Hammersoft (talk) 02:19, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

you just look after your mate Vince. we will look after our mate. Jimmychoo1111 (talk) 02:21, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

<sigh> Descending into personal attacks is not your way forward. Threatening to attack the article with "over 1000 of [you]" is not your way forward. --Hammersoft (talk) 02:23, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

The article has now been protected. If the behavior persists after the protection expires, the article will be protected for considerably longer. It will not matter if you have 100,000 of you doing this. There may be some sites in the world that will permit you to vandalize their content and encourage you to destroy the reputation of someone, but this isn't one of them. We have a policy governing this, and there's no wiggle room on it. --Hammersoft (talk) 02:35, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

actually just providing true information. unlike you who just want to hide it and show only 1 side. yeah over 1000 of us mate, so we have plenty of time Jimmychoo1111 (talk) 02:37, 5 March 2024 (UTC)