User talk:Jj137/Archive 20

Archive 15

←

Archive 18

Archive 19

Archive 20

Archive 21

Archive 22

→

Archive 25

Archives

---

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Ottawa Linux Symposium

Hi,

I saw that you were the admin who deleted the OLS page last February. I didn't follow the prod procedure, and I don't know what the content of the page used to be, but it seems to me that OLS is definitely worth a wikipedia page, as it is one of the most important conferences for the development of the linux kernel, usually attended by most core developers, and I believe important technical decisions tend to be taken there. It also seems that many wikipedia pages still point to it. Would it be possible to undelete the page?

Thanks. --Nattfodd (talk) 22:13, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

I can't help you that much - I only clean out old Prod pages... I think WP:DELREV would be the best place to take it, actually.   jj137 (talk) 04:36, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiCup

weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 10:43, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 14 and 21, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 29	14 July 2008	About the Signpost

From the editor: Transparency
WikiWorld: "Goregrind"	Dispatches: Interview with botmaster Rick Block
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 30	21 July 2008	About the Signpost

WikiWorld: "Cartoon physics"	News and notes: New Board Chair, compromised accounts
Dispatches: History of the featured article process	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:37, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Infobox MLB player

Hey JJ, we are having a discussion over at the WP:BASEBALL talk page about the possibility of adding a current playing level to the MLB infobox for players who are on a 40-man roster, and therefore have an MLB infobox, but are not currently in the majors. I was wondering if you could help us with coding the infobox, because I have no idea how to do it. Let me know if you can help. Thanks! KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 17:03, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, basically, I was thinking it would be a box that says current playing level, and then you could fill in AAA and the team name, AA, A, etc. It should be optional too, I think, because then it doesn't need to be filled in for all the current MLB players. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 14:12, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

I see there what you put in, but it's only half the width of the infobox. That's the only thing I see. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 15:49, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Very likely easier, but then the entire infobox template has to be changed every time someone gets promoted, etc. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 16:42, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

That seems to be the most efficient method. This way, the code could essentially be copied to a new template, and then those fields just have to be added in. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 19:38, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps instead of "Infobox MLB player", it could be "Infobox MLB 40 man player". That way, all you have to do is add in "40 man", and it's indicative to the reader and to the coder what changes have occurred in their status. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 02:57, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Arkanasas newsletter, updated for August

The Arkansas WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 3 • August 1, 2008 • About the Newsletter Written by User Chet B. Long
Project News Recent Project news: The project is still in the process of reassessing a bunch of articles already tagged as Start-Class, to C-Class. Please help out! Animum created a new script for the project that helps out with tagging WikiProject Arkansas articles. Go and thank him! 2 users have joined the project, User:OverlordQ and User:DH Michaels, making the total member count 25! DH Michaels is new to Wikipedia as well as this WikiProject. Make him feel welcome! Chetblong is currently clearing out Category:Unassessed Arkansas articles, and has gotten to the letter K already. Help him out! The project now has another Featured List! List of Arkansas Razorbacks in the NFL Draft was promoted last week, bringing the total FL count to 2.	Featured article Featured Arkansas article of the month: This list of Arkansas Razorbacks in the NFL Draft includes every former Arkansas Razorbacks player who has been drafted into the National Football League (NFL) since the league began holding drafts in 1936.[a] The University of Arkansas has drafted 245 players into the NFL, but none has ever been selected with the first overall selection. The Razorbacks' highest draft position was second overall in 1954, when Lamar McHan was selected by the Chicago Cardinals. Arkansas' first drafted player in the NFL was Jack Robbins, who was the fifth overall pick by the Chicago Cardinals in 1938. Six players were selected from the 2008 NFL Draft; the highest selection being running back Darren McFadden, who was picked fourth overall by the Oakland Raiders. (more...)	State News Recent state news: Suspect in eight murders arrested in Illinois, United States: Following a manhunt in two states, police have arrested Nicholas Troy Sheley whom authorities suspect in eight murders in the United States. The FBI launched the manhunt on Tuesday after four victims were discovered on June 30, 2008. Wikinews needs more coverage on Arkansas, maybe you would like to help out?
Archives • Newsroom
If you would not like to recieve this newsletter, please add your name here. This newsletter was delivered by Chet B. LongTalk/ARK

--Chet B. Long^Talk/_ARK 04:01, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject College football August 2008 Newsletter

The College football WikiProject Newsletter Issue IX - August 2008
Project news There's less than one month until the 2008-2009 college football season kicks off, and that's no reason to stop editing! Plenty of historical articles, such as past bowl games, need to be written, and editors are always needed to update teams' season articles. Break out of the summer malaise and get ready for kickoff — check out the to-do list on the Wikiproject College football talk page. A hearty congratulations should go out to everyone who has elevated an article to Good Article status since January 1. During the past seven months, the project has more than doubled the number of Good Articles! In 2006 and 2007, there were a total of 40 college football GAs. In the first seven months of 2008, we've created 42. Give yourself a pat on the back! For those of you who haven't yet created a college football good article yet, what are you waiting for? At the present rate, there will be more than 120 by year's end. Be a part of something bigger and build a GA-class college football article today! During the past few months, an excellent notability guideline for college football articles has been constructed at Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/Notability, but your help is needed to make it complete. In particular, your help is requested in defining what makes a college football player notable — Is it being a multiple year starter at a position? Is it being named the best player at a position? Or is it something as simple as holding a school, conference, or national record? Participate in the debate at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football/Notability. The College Football Portal needs to be updated with featured articles and pictures. Do you have a great picture that illustrates the best of college football? Consider adding it to the featured image queue on the portal.	From JKBrooks85 Welcome to the latest issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter! I hope that you're enjoying regular updates about the goings on of college football on Wikipedia, but if not, feel free to add your name to the "no delivery" section on the newsletter signup page. I encourage everyone to make regular visits to the College Football Portal and perhaps make it your Wikipedia entry page instead of using the Main Page as your gateway. Nominations for selected articles and pictures are always welcome, and can serve as a great way to show off that new article you just shepherded to Good Article status or the great picture you took the last time you were at a game. Comments and suggestions on improving the newsletter are always welcome, and help me improve it on a monthly basis. Keep contributing and editing, and don't hesitate to contact me or post on the College Football Wikiproject talk page if you need help or just want someone to look over your article.
New high-rank articles 2005 Sugar Bowl - Promoted to Good Article on July 5 Gene Derricotte - Promoted to Good Article on July 14 2003 Insight Bowl - Promoted to Good Article on July 14 1968 Liberty Bowl - Promoted to Good Article on July 19 2006 Gator Bowl - Promoted to Good Article on July 19 Jack the Bulldog - Promoted to Good Article on July 31 Virginia Tech Hokies football seasons — Promoted to Featured List on July 24 List of Arkansas Razorbacks in the NFL Draft — Promoted to Featured List on July 26
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:28, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject College football August 2008 Newsletter

The August 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:34, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: WikiCup

Sorry, I honestly have no idea to calculate the monthly unique pages edited, I can only find the all time ones on wannabe kate, WBOSITG said he would complete the unique pages edited when he gets beck from his holidays on July 6. Sunderland06 (talk) 20:08, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

I've been rumaging around Wikipedia:WikiProject edit counters and I couldn't find a one that does what we need. Sorry. Sunderland06 (talk) 00:22, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)

The July 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:40, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Los Angeles Lakers Newsletter for August 3, 2008

WikiProject Los Angeles Lakers Newsletter August 3, 2008 By -- K. Annoyomous24

WikiProject Lakers Newsletter Issue 6 - August 3, 2008 In this issue Project News - Recent news from the WikiProject including FA and GA articles. Team News - Transactions and games won and lost by the Los Angeles Lakers. Collaboration - A report on this months' project collaboration, Los Angeles Lakers. Featured Picture - A selected image for the newsletter. Project News As of August 3, the project has 14 members, listed here. As of August 3, the project has a one good article and two featured lists. Good article: Pau Gasol Featured lists: List of Los Angeles Lakers head coaches List of Los Angeles Lakers first and second round draft picks A userbox for the the members of the project is available at User:Basketball110/Lakers. Feel free to add it to your page to show that you are a part of the WikiProject. More members are still needed. To invite people, use the template at Template:WP LAKERS Invite. If and once they have joined, don't forget to welcome them using the template at Template:WPLAKERSwelcome. If you would like to write the next newsletter, please nominate yourself here. Project Collaboration – August 2008 Each newsletter, the editor will select one article that he or she thinks needs a bit of work, or maintaining. This newsletter, K. Annoyomous24 (the editor) chose the article "Kobe Bryant." Don't forget to drop by the page and see what you can do. Featured Picture Jerry West played for the Los Angeles Lakers from 1960 to 1974. 2008 Playoff Bracket First Round Conference Semifinals Conference Finals NBA Finals                         E1 Boston* 4 E8 Atlanta 3 E1 Boston* 4 E4 Cleveland 3 E4 Cleveland 4 E5 Washington 2 E1 Boston* 4 Eastern Conference E2 Detroit* 2 E3 Orlando* 4 E6 Toronto 1 E3 Orlando* 1 E2 Detroit* 4 E2 Detroit* 4 E7 Philadelphia 2 E1 Boston* 4 W1 LA Lakers* 2 W1 LA Lakers* 4 W8 Denver 0 W1 LA Lakers* 4 W4 Utah* 2 W4 Utah* 4 W5 Houston 2 W1 LA Lakers* 4 Western Conference W3 San Antonio 1 W3 San Antonio 4 W6 Phoenix 1 W3 San Antonio 4 W2 New Orleans* 3 W2 New Orleans* 4 W7 Dallas 1 * Division winner Bold Series winner Italic Team with home-court advantage [Playoff Bracket Legend] Teams in italics have home court advantage Teams in bold advance to the next round Numbers to the left of each team indicate team's position in-season Numbers to the right of each team indicate the number of games won The division champions possess an asterisk (*) Team News The Los Angeles Lakers have taken the first seed in the West. Pacific Division W L PCT GB Home Road Div c-Los Angeles Lakers 57 25 .695 – 30–11 27–14 12–4 x-Phoenix Suns 55 27 .671 2 30–11 25–16 10–6 Golden State Warriors 48 34 .585 9 27–14 21–20 10–6 Sacramento Kings 38 44 .463 19 26–15 12–29 3–13 Los Angeles Clippers 23 59 .284 34 13–28 10–31 5–11 Other team news The Lakers lost to the Boston Celtics in the 2008 NBA Finals in Game 6 with a score of 131-92. Transactions The Lakers have been involved in the following transactions during the 2008–09 off-season. Draft pick Player Round Pick Position Nationality College Joe Crawford 2 58 SG USA Kentucky Free Agent Player New team R. Turiaf Golden State Warriors Archives • Newsroom

-- K. Annoyomous24 _{GO LAKERS! Please reply on my talk page. Thanks.} 00:54, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Guideline discussion spam in baseball newsletter?

Hi. I assume you are the keeper of the baseball newsletter you've sent me a few times? Do you think it would be possible to include a link about a discussion which is underway at WT:MLB regarding the notability guideline for baseball players? It's my contention not only that the current guideline is flawed, but that the main cause for the flaws is that too few people were involved in its construction to form a quorum. So I'd like as many people as possible to weigh in. Thanks. —Wknight94 (talk) 03:12, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure when the next newsletter will be delivered, but I added something about it here. It hopefully is enough, but feel free to change it around if you want.   jj137 (talk) 20:06, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Email

Check your email. « Diligent Terrier (talk) 20:14, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Ding.   jj137 (talk) 19:27, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

August 2008

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Mike Mussina worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TestEditBot (talk) 04:05, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

This isn't vandalism... -- RyRy (talk) 04:07, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

LMAO.   jj137 (talk) 04:09, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Note in the paragraph which is being diffed, <ref>Insert footnote text here</ref> is present, and is still there as of this posting. You're welcome :) tj9991 (talk | contribs) 05:28, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Uh, OK? I didn't put that there.   jj137 (talk) 23:23, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: Userpage

Yep, glad to help. (That's what you meant, I hope) I replied to your email as well. See you in a couple of months! « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie » 18:42, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Relisting AfDs

Just a reminder, but when you relist AfDs don't forget to remove them from the log page they were on as well as adding them to the current log page. Cheers, and happy editing! lifebaka++ 19:42, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Whoops, forgot to remove them from the old log pages. It's been a while since I've worked with AFDs...   jj137 (talk) 23:24, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Hey!

I'm finally back from my wikibreak! While I was on it, I moved to New Orleans. How are you doing? Burner0718 ^JibbaJabba! 02:22, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Wow :) Pretty good I guess, haven't edited nearly as much as I used to but occasionally I will (and I was on a wikibreak myself for a while). But, wow, where were you moving from?   jj137 (talk) 02:38, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Philly. BTW, I like your sig. Burner0718 ^JibbaJabba! 02:40, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Okay, let's not get into things too myspacey now. ;) -- RyRy (talk) 02:51, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Aw man... can we finish our story kind sir?   jj137 (talk) 02:54, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

In areas. Some of the Lower 9th Ward almost looks like Katrina hit yesterday, without the water of course, while other parts of that area are coming along nicely. Downtown and the French Quarter and the "well known" areas look like nothing ever happened. Burner0718 ^JibbaJabba! 02:56, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

That's ok, my friends and family asked that alot when I moved in July. Burner0718 ^JibbaJabba! 03:06, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Now that I'm back from my wikibreak, I'll be alot more active. Burner0718 ^JibbaJabba! 03:13, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Just did, cool. Burner0718 ^JibbaJabba! 03:37, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: Hey

Yeah, it's been a while. I can still remember my amazement when I first saw you using Huggle. I was like, "How the hell is he faster than ClueBot????!!"

So, what have you been up to? I sometimes see that you had reverted vandalism a few days earlier on a page that I am reverting, and once in a while I see your comments on some random talk page, but that's about it. I miss our furious Huggle battles back in March when there were like 10 people total who had it, and you were lucky if more than one was on at the same time. A lot has changed since those days. A lot.... J.delanoy^gabs_adds 03:16, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

BTW, to actually answer your question, I'm fine. ;-) J.delanoy^gabs_adds 03:17, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

No it's not just you. Vandalism has slowed down somewhat (for now... summer = no bored kids in homeroom. Wait till school goes back in session....) but the big thing is that there are so many people using Huggle it is absolutely insane. While I can still beat most of them (a-hem), there is simply no getting around the fact that there is no way that all the others are reverting nothing. Although I do have to admit that it is good that practically 100% of blatant vandalism and greater than 90% of more subtle vandalism is caught within a few seconds, I did like it better when there weren't so many Hugglers. I don't know why either. Maybe I just liked the knowledge that I was singlehandedly decimating the Forces of Evil™.

And yeah, I'm an admin. It's cool, but I haven't been yelled at for deleting someone's page yet, and I've had +sysop for more that a week. I feel like such a failure. :P Well, maybe not. I blocked someone without any warnings on their talk page, I softblocked an open proxy that someone else had hardblocked, I deleted this page as CSD G11 (No I'm not that dumb - look at the deleted revisions and the deleted contribs of the guy who made the edits that I "neglected" to restore...), and I've protected either three or four pages that someone else had already protected. So, yeah, looking at it closer, I guess I've got this admin-ing stuff down pat. :-) J.delanoy^gabs_adds 03:42, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Oh, god, you don't want to tempt me with the "delete" button. I made this edit when there were still three days left in my RFA :-) And yes, I have clicked the "delete" button on the Main Page, the Sandbox, and ANI. (It won't let me, although I've heard rumors that there is a way around the 5000 revisions thingy. I also heard that you could irreparably destroy Wikipedia with the same action, so I don't think this is a good topic to continue.....)

I know what you mean. There are so many things we can't do that it's just as well we can't do. Then there are the things we can do... For example, [1].

From Wikipedia:Administrators: "[An administrator is someone who is] familiar with and respects Wikipedia policy, and who has gained the trust of the community. [...] Users seeking help will often turn to an administrator for advice and information.". Hah! J.delanoy^gabs_adds 04:29, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Hell, yeah! I personally like "nuke this page" sooo much better than "delete". And "protect" should be "erect forcefield". Hmm, what should "block" be? J.delanoy^gabs_adds 04:38, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

← Ha, definitely. "Crush by elephant". That's actually pretty creative. What I really like is that it stayed there for more than 10 hours. It stinks that "Pwn user" didn't last for longer than one minute, 'cause that was pretty good too. I guess some people have no sense of humor... J.delanoy^gabs_adds 04:46, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

My thing is, it would be one thing if we were messing around with things that everyone can see, (like changing the "history" tab to "past crappy versions" or something) but all the ANI threads you see involve parts of the interface that nobody other than admins can see, so what difference does it make? Why would you block someone when they're just having a little harmless fun on April Fools Day? It's not like they're running around on a mass delete/block/protect spree. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 04:54, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

AWB

You gave AWB rights to a user, DougsTech, who I think is being careless with it. His stated concern is anti-vandalism, but his actual concern seems to be to rack up as many edits as he can. He's amassed a staggering number in his 4 months and 9 days as a Wikipedian. He seems to be charging at everything like a bull at a gate. Would it be possible to review his use of AWB, please? Mr Barndoor (talk) 16:32, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

According to his talk page, it looks like it was a mistake, and now he is typo fixing, so everything is OK.   jj137 (talk) 17:44, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Email

Replied. « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie » 18:01, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

You've got mail! « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie » 14:08, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Email

Ohai, Jj. You should have email. Thanks, RyRy Public (talk) 02:10, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

deletion of page

i noticed you deleted Chuck Acoustic EP (Tour Edition Promo). Could you send me the deleted article so i can merge it into Chuck (album)? - -[The Spooky One] | ^{[t c r]} 06:50, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Sure, I added it here.   jj137 (talk) 17:16, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Homeschooling newsletter for June 2008

	The Homeschooling WikiProject News
Issue Five • June 2008 • About the Newsletter
News Recent Project News User:Diligent Terrier has retired. Project member count reaches 37 members! Invite others using our invitation templates. You can help the project by tagging the talk pages of articles with {{WikiProject Homeschooling}} We are working on getting the homeschooling article to GA status.
Archives • Newsroom
Newsletter written by User:RC-0722. Newsletter delivered by User:RC-0722

hi

Are you a human? OOB4 (talk) 02:55, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Yes. :P   jj137 (talk) 02:56, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

RE: Question

What, like this? ()

Use

<font color="#{{#switch: {{#expr:{{NUMBEROFEDITS:R}} mod 10}} |0=000099 |1=990000 |2=009900 |3=009999 |4=990099 |5=999900 |6=999999 |7=997966 |#default=000099 }}">

Hope that helps. You can fiddle with colours and stuffs. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 21:49, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Hopefully you don't mind if I put it somewhere on my user or user talk page? They're both outdated and I've been looking for something to update it with.   jj137 (talk) 18:54, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Go right ahead, I don't mind :) weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 20:27, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

?

I saw how users become admins, but it seemed to easy. How do you really become an admin? Marshall T. Williams (talk) 21:46, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Specifics should be explained in detail here ;)   jj137 (talk) 16:48, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou

Just a little note to say thankyou for participating in my successful RFA candidacy, which passed with 96 supports, 0 opposes, and 1 neutral. I am pleasantly taken aback by the amount of support for me to contribute in an administrative role and look forward to demonstrating that such faith is well placed. Regards, WilliamH (talk) 09:10, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Shad Gaspard

Hi, On Shads myspace and in an interview on wwe .com he calls his finishing move THUGNIFICENCE. It’s just a modified big mans STO. It’s spelled different than the character name on the Boondocks, so it must have no connection, and just be plain street slang. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.31.128.225 (talk) 15:13, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Also he also states in an interview with wwe magazine and on his myspace that he has 2first names, 2 middle names and three last names “Shad Chad Javair Jesus Romen Chittick Gaspard”. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.31.128.225 (talk) 15:16, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Huggle

Can I mess with your huggle.css to make Huggle run faster for you? J.delanoy^gabs_adds 16:05, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Sure. I stopped using it a few minutes ago but I don't mind ;)   jj137 (talk) 16:06, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

 Done If it runs slower, then revert me. I made it cache 5 pages ahead of time rather than just 2. You would not believe how much that increases the speed. (5 is the max. Yes, I tried more; it doesn't work...) Do you want me to mess around some more? J.delanoy^gabs_adds 16:10, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Hah, go right ahead. And I just tried it out again... wow, it took about 1 second to notice the difference. :)   jj137 (talk) 16:12, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

OK, done with that too. Now you will be able to revert vandalism in namespaces other than the mainspace. Please be careful, if you start making mistakes and it comes out that I showed you how to make Huggle scan other namespaces, I know at least one person who will take my head off. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 16:15, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Haha, don't worry, I'll be careful. But who exactly would take your head off?   jj137 (talk) 16:18, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Iridescent. At least I'm pretty sure s/he would.... J.delanoy^gabs_adds 16:22, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, well in that case, chances are my head would be taken off first for actually making the mistakes. :P   jj137 (talk) 16:25, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Sierra Vista

Just a question. Are you modifying Sierra Vista, Arizona because of errors in my posts? I think I finally got it to post correctly. Just wondering. Please review, I am new to editing the posts and any suggestions would be appreciated.

Thanks, Tgilbertson (talk) 17:28, 20 August 2008 (UTC)tgilbertson

Very sorry about that. I accidentally removed part of your changes but undid my mistake immediately. Don't worry, everything you added/changed is still there in exactly the same form. Again, very sorry.   jj137 (talk) 18:35, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For being one of the very few people who out-huggle me at Huggle, I, La Pianista, offer you this highly coveted award. Cheers, and happy editing! LaPianista! «talk» 21:34, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Keep up the good work! :)

Thanks

Just a quick thankyou for reverting the vandalism to my talk page. Cheers. Basement12 (talk) 22:07, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

RfA thank you

Jj137/Archive 20, I wish to say thanks for your support in my successful request for adminship, which ended with 82 supports, 3 opposes, and 1 neutral. I will do my best to live up to your expectations. I would especially like to thank Rlevse for nominating me and Wizardman for co-nominating me.
                                                  — JGHowes ^talk - 19 August 2008

Huggle v. Twinkle

Am I the only one that still uses Twinkle? :) Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 21:59, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

No, I've seen a bunch of people use it. For reverting vandalism though, Huggle is definitely faster, which is why I guess most people use it now.   jj137 (talk) 22:00, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, had to circumnavigate the redirect on User talk:Markhelping to warn him. With broadband, Twinkle is almost as fast as rollback, for me at least. Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 22:08, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

True, it comes pretty close. I guess Huggle is easy because with one click it will revert and warn within about 2 seconds. (And it is much easier to find vandalism...) Unless you just prefer Twinkle, I would at least give Huggle a try ;)   jj137 (talk) 00:24, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Right now, I'm good with Twinkle and rollback but I'll probably try Huggle eventually. Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 01:43, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Obviously that's perfectly fine. There's a reason Twinkle is the most used in-browser vandalism reverter (I think).   jj137 (talk) 02:19, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

I just got a good chance to show what they can do with this. lol. Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 02:26, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

LOL. I went to block them but they were already blocked....   jj137 (talk) 02:37, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

I'd like to think it was "Weird Al". Antandrus beat ya. On a side note, ya wanna join this? If you do, let me know if you want rights. Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 02:42, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Ha ha, it was probably someone who saw that music video. I created an account on that wiki.   jj137 (talk) 02:44, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Oh well... Anyway, you're a sysop. Do you want 'crat? Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 02:49, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

(unindent) Sure, fine with me :)   jj137 (talk) 02:49, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

alright, there ya go. Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 02:54, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Awesome, thanks :)   jj137 (talk) 02:55, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

No prob. Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 02:56, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

I replied on the super test wiki. Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 04:32, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

I have Firefox so I'm here and there at the same time. I replied there. Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 04:48, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

nakamura page

Jj137 in the page of shunsuke nakamura the users said "It was a free-kick of such quality that Matt Le Tissier went as far as to describe it as "the best free-kick of all time" but the reference is false look the page of nakamura--82.59.74.49 (talk) 20:06, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

What are you talking about? I can barely even understand what you're saying.   jj137 (talk) 22:25, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

You idiot!

"WP:WHACK" redirects here. You may be looking for WP:Wikipedia is not Whac-A-Mole (WP:WHAC).

Not to be confused with Cod throwing.

Whacking with a wet trout or trouting is a common practice on Wikipedia when experienced editors slip up and make a silly mistake. It, along with sentencing to the village stocks, is used to resolve one-off instances of seemingly silly behavior amongst normally constructive community members, as opposed to long term patterns of disruptive edits, which earn warnings and blocks.

Example

Whack!

The above is a WikiTrout (Oncorhynchus macrowikipediensis), used to make subtle adjustments to the clue levels of experienced Wikipedians.

To whack a user with a wet trout, simply place {{trout}} on their talk page.

Per what you just said on Gtalk. Take that! :P

« Milk's Favorite Cøøkie » 03:33, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 28, August 9, 11 and 18, 2008.

Sorry I haven't been sending this over the past few weeks. Ralbot (talk) 06:19, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 31	28 July 2008	About the Signpost

Wikimania 2008 wrap-up	WikiWorld: "Terry Gross"
News and notes: Unblocked in China	Dispatches: Find reliable sources online
WikiProject Report: Military history	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 32	9 August 2008	About the Signpost

Anthrax suspect reportedly edit-warred on Wikipedia	WikiWorld: "Fall Out Boy"
Dispatches: Style guide and policy changes, July	WikiProject Report: WikiProject New York State routes
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 33	11 August 2008	About the Signpost

Study: Wikipedia's growth may indicate unlimited potential	Board of Trustees fills Nominating Committee for new members
Greenspun illustration project moves to first phase	WikiWorld: "George Stroumboulopoulos"
News and notes: Wikipedian dies	Dispatches: Reviewing free images
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 34	18 August 2008	About the Signpost

From the editor: Help wanted
WikiWorld: "Cashew"	Dispatches: Choosing Today's Featured Article
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:19, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

My edit counter

I fixed the problem you reported (and another place where I used query.php). I think there are other parts of the script that have stopped working over time; I haven't really looked into the situation that much, though, and probably won't have time to at the moment. --ais523 16:16, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

That's fine. Thanks for helping, though.   jj137 (talk) 23:23, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

Hi there. Thanks very much for the Barnstar. It is sincerely appreciated. Cheers Maple Leaf (talk) 15:36, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem, glad I could give it to you.   jj137 (talk) 02:03, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

RE: Test Wiki

Not a problem, if you have any other questions or queries, feel free to ask!

The Helpful One ^(Review) 10:46, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Yo

Wanna go on a trip? TO THE OCHO CINCO TALK PAGE??? HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 19:26, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

He he he. Thanx m8.

I removed the compromise section off the talk page below the spam section. I felt like when I woke up tomorrow it'd be another repeat of the section above it.

That was fun lol. Brought back good memories of last year. I'm gonna go chill. Later. HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 00:03, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Chad

No problem, too much drama for my liking anyways. All I wanted was to wait, so protection will definitely do that! :) « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) @ 20:21, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Yeah Im fine with it, I would have protected it myself, but that would have opened up all kinds of dramaz! ;) « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) @ 20:24, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Haha, you know I think the only person in the NFL that I would expect to do something like this would be Chad. I am still asking myself why Favre had to do his whole thing. I am waiting for him to retire so his page will calm down and can be improved. NFL players these days... jeez :) « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) @ 20:31, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

"things just don't make sense any more... "

You can say that again! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) @ 20:40, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Around the World, update...

We've been hard at work behind the scenes. We can't seem to get the trophy right, but we'll get there. And the set of pages need one more section completed before they can be moved to article space...

... that's right! We're almost ready to move the whole set into the live encyclopedia. One page for every country of the world!

We're currently developing the standard (by example) for these outlines, they're overall format and what they should look like.

One page that is nearly complete and built to the current standard is List of basic Thailand topics. Please take a look, and help us put the finishing touches on it if you have the time. It will be an example (along with List of basic Japan topics and List of basic France topics) for those working on the rest of the lists, and therefore is pretty important.

Any help or input you could provide would be most appreciated.

Thank you.

The Transhumanist    22:52, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

(P.S.: If you respond to this message, please do so on my talk page, so that I'm alerted by Wikipedia's automatic "you've got a message" feature. Thank you. TT)

RE: WP:CUP

Hey there, you can update the scores if you want, alternatively you could leave it to WBOSITG. Whichever you like. P.S. I could be seeing you in the final. ;) Sunderland06 (talk) 01:25, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, that is absolutely correct. Good luck. Sunderland06 (talk) 01:34, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of 1692 in poetry

A tag has been placed on 1692 in poetry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. MuZemike (talk) 17:07, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of 1690 in poetry

A tag has been placed on 1690 in poetry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. MuZemike (talk) 17:07, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of 1691 in poetry

A tag has been placed on 1691 in poetry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. MuZemike (talk) 17:07, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of 1693 in poetry

A tag has been placed on 1693 in poetry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. MuZemike (talk) 17:08, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of 1694 in poetry

A tag has been placed on 1694 in poetry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. MuZemike (talk) 17:08, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of 1696 in poetry

A tag has been placed on 1696 in poetry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. MuZemike (talk) 17:09, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of 1697 in poetry

A tag has been placed on 1697 in poetry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. MuZemike (talk) 17:09, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of 1695 in poetry

A tag has been placed on 1695 in poetry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 18:35, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject College football September 2008 Newsletter

The College football WikiProject Newsletter Issue X - September 2008
Project news Two college football articles are featured article candidates and are looking for comments, criticism, and/or your support. Be sure to visit 2007 USC Trojans football team and 2005 Sugar Bowl to put in a few words. The 2008-2009 college football season has kicked off, and it's time to kick into full gear! Teams ranked in the top 25 should have a single-season page or at the very least a separate football page. Rankings pages and the overall season page should be kept updated, as should the pages of players of note. Heading out to a football game? Be sure to carry a camera and get pictures of players, teams, stadiums, and all the action and pageantry of college football. An excellent guide to taking pictures for WP:CFB can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/Images. Even if you don't think a photo can be immediately used for an article, try uploading it to Wikimedia Commons so future article authors can use it. The College Football Portal needs to be updated with featured articles and pictures. Do you have a great picture that illustrates the best of college football? Consider adding it to the featured image queue on the portal.	From JKBrooks85 Welcome to the latest issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter! I hope that you're enjoying regular updates about the goings on of college football on Wikipedia, but if not, feel free to add your name to the "no delivery" section on the newsletter signup page. I encourage everyone to make regular visits to the College Football Portal and perhaps make it your Wikipedia entry page instead of using the Main Page as your gateway. Nominations for selected articles and pictures are always welcome, and can serve as a great way to show off that new article you just shepherded to Good Article status or the great picture you took the last time you were at a game. Comments and suggestions on improving the newsletter are always welcome, and help me improve it on a monthly basis. Keep contributing and editing, and don't hesitate to contact me or post on the College Football Wikiproject talk page if you need help or just want someone to look over your article.
New high-rank articles 2007 USC Trojans football team - Promoted to Good Article on August 4 Heinz Field - Promoted to Good Article on August 11 Three Rivers Stadium - Promoted to Good Article on August 11 Sid Luckman - Promoted to Good Article on August 20 1986 Peach Bowl - Promoted to Good Article on August 27 2002 San Francisco Bowl - Promoted to Good Article on August 31
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:59, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:32, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

No thanks, BrownBot. ;)   jj137 (talk) 22:34, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

LOL! --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 05:39, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)

The August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:22, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

More Chad bloody Ocho Cinco spam....

Look at my talk page, then his, then Chad Ocho Cinco's. HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 00:44, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Well, you do have a good point, it basically only led to more wikidrama and more edit wars (and you predicted it...). I don't know if I'd call it spam, but either way, it's completely pointless. jj137 (talk) 00:58, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

If its pointless chatter its spam m8 lol. HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 22:26, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

You think that his name is Chad Ocho Cinco (which it is) and laugh your ass off like me =D. HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 12:44, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Chad Ocho Cinco

In my opinion he's went crazy. :D Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 04:48, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

I know, he's crazy. Have you ever seen any of his touchdown celebrations?   jj137 (talk) 20:40, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Unfortunately, yes I have. Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 20:52, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, living in New Orleans staying in Memphis, I don't know if I'll see it or not. Wish I was still in Dayton. :) Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 03:14, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

I'll probably go back to New Orleans tomorrow, I hope I'll have power. ;) Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 21:13, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

The House Band

I wondered when someone might put the unreferenced tag on this article, although I feel it's probably unhelpful. Fact is, there's not much recorded about the band, so I mainly quote from an email exchange I had with with Chris Parkinson, one of the band's former members. Your welcome to view the email if you wish, if that would help.

Drongo (talk) 16:24, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

It doesn't matter whether or not it's unhelpful, it's the fact that there aren't any references on the page that matters.   jj137 (talk) 21:07, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Sdhsakjhdk

I did not understand what you are saying? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 18:24, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

You gave him a 3rd warning, a last warning, and an only warning (and then reported him to AIV) when he had stopped editing.   jj137 (talk) 18:26, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

I issued him three warnings for the three different pages he vandalized. I did not report him to the AIV, but I was about to report him if he vandalized any article again after the only warning. But he is already blocked. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 18:29, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

OK, sorry for the misunderstanding. I wasn't sure about it. (and I misread the AIV report.) Bad mistake on my part.   jj137 (talk) 18:32, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Please clarify

CyHyoung (talk) 18:49, 6 September 2008 (UTC) Could you please explain what defines a noteworthy person. There are equivalently "noteworthy" violists already listed on Wiki. Please see below http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primrose_International_Viola_Competition

This violist has won the first prize at the 08 Primrose Competition and numerous other viola competitions. Murrath is quite well known in his area. It's odd that he is considered not noteworthy when the following less well-known second prize winners have their own Wiki pages:(David Aaron Carpenter, David Kim, Catherine Basrak, etc).

Could you explain.

WP:BIO should explain everything.   jj137 (talk) 19:06, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

AWB aproval

You seem to have miss entered my username see [2]. You left off 87 at the end.Phatom87 ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:30, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

/facepalm. Sorry about that, it looks like Rodhullandemu just fixed it.   jj137 (talk) 00:47, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

08 Red Sox Season

Why did you delete an entire paragraph in the 2008 Red Sox Season article? Calling it random is totally POV. Please don't delete other editors contributions without first discussing it on the talk page. Please revert your edit. Faethon Ghost (talk) 17:14, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Because it was completely out of place and didn't even make sense in the context of the article. And no, Wikipedia isn't a sandbox where anyone can just come and add whatever they want and leave it unremoved. And no, it wasn't POV, and no, I'm not going to revert myself unless someone can give me a good reason it should stay there.   jj137 (talk) 18:11, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

A good reason is that Wikipedia's aim is to be a summary of all human knowledge. Please clean up the paragraph you deleted and reinsert it. Thanks. Faethon Ghost (talk) 05:02, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 00:25, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

No, that isn't a good reason. Look at some of our featured articles. Are they just a large mass of information? Of course not, there is always more info that can added, but we choose quality over quantity. Also, if you're just trying to trick me by not logging in, I'm not falling for it.   jj137 (talk) 00:50, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

I wasn't trying to trick you, just forgot to log in. The 2008 Red Sox Season article is weak compared to the 2008 Yankees Season article. The former has a breakdown of each month and I believe the editor who put the info about opening day on there was trying to get it going for the Red Sox article. Someone who is part of the Red Sox Wikipedia project should want more info in there, not less. The article is a skeleton and when someone tried to put some meat on it's bones you tore it right back off. I fail to see your motivation. Faethon Ghost (talk) 05:02, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Firstly, I apologize for thinking you were trying to "trick me" (there's never a way to be sure). Like I've already said, simply because articles are lacking content does not mean anything can be placed there; if we had a paragraph for all 162 games, the page would probably be so long it would freeze everyone's computer upon loading. I know the guy was just trying to help, but read through it again -- it doesn't sound anything like something written for an encyclopedia, but instead something more suited for a play-by-play analysis, or something like that. Sure, it would be great it we could get some sort of month-by-month summary in the Regular Season section (I think this article is a pretty good example), but a seemingly random paragraph describing the opening day game towards the beginning of the article is not a good idea. If you wanted to get into even more detail, it is written in short, choppy sentences and uses three letter team abbreviations, which we almost never do. Also, yes, I did found the Red Sox WikiProject, but in no way would I ever edit an article to make it worse (that wouldn't make sense). I'm not trying to tear the meat off the bone, as you describe it, I'm just trying to keep our articles from getting overly messy.   jj137 (talk) 20:57, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the thoughtful response. I appreciate your point of view and now I better understand your motivation. I will try to make a month by month summary of the season before it ends. Only 1 and a half games back now! Faethon Ghost (talk) 02:53, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

I know! We still have time to get first :) Hopefully I didn't come across as angry, I was just trying to explain my point of view. Good luck with the summary.   jj137 (talk) 21:55, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Secret Page

I was surfing through Ryry's Autograph book, and you thought that it was a cool search, right? I, therefore, challenge you to find my secret page! Good luck! Vinson 01:13, 7 September 2008 (UTC) Don't give up, it's there all right!

Done, I found it. ;)   jj137 (talk) 01:22, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Nice job, man! Vinson 01:23, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Heh, thanks. Also, don't forget to add another '' at the end of your sig so that everything after it doesn't turn to italics. :)   jj137 (talk) 01:24, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Crap you're right, thanks for the heads up!Vinson 01:25, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

No prob.   jj137 (talk) 01:26, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Hey

I'm back home, with power! Think you can find my secret page? Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 01:39, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Awesome! Found your secret page, BTW. :)   jj137 (talk) 01:41, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Didn't take too long. Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 01:43, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Hehe, since it said all wikilinks were in black, I guessed it would be in the red and scrolled my mouse over all of it. ;)   jj137 (talk) 01:45, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Did you find my trick page? Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 01:46, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Surprisingly, no, the first red link I found was the actual one.   jj137 (talk) 01:47, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

I've thought about changing that someday. Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 01:48, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

The link? Hmm, I think it is pretty well hidden, but sure, go ahead if you want to.   jj137 (talk) 01:50, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

I probably will eventually. Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 01:51, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

(unindent) You have an email about an idea for the link, just in case anyone reads this conversation. ;)   jj137 (talk) 01:54, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

OK, thanks. Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 01:58, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Sure. If you need help "setting it up", just let me know, I can probably get it.   jj137 (talk) 01:59, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

I can probably get it, but I'll let you know. Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 02:04, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Check your email. Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 21:39, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Pornthip

This name at UAA, it's a legit Thai name: Pornthip Rojanasunand — Rlevse • Talk • 01:58, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

OK, thanks for telling me. I wasn't sure about that one.   jj137 (talk) 02:00, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

No problem, I know because my wife is Thai, see User:JoJo — Rlevse • Talk • 02:02, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

James F. Reda & Associates, LLC

I noticed that you delted and blocked the first editor to create this article. I deleted it a second time but didn't block the editor. I have posted a comment at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Contracted editing. Letting you know because I mentioned your name. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 18:08, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

I commented there.   jj137 (talk) 21:00, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 25 and September 8, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 35	25 August 2008	About the Signpost

WikiWorld: "George P. Burdell"	News and notes: Arbitrator resigns, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	Dispatches: Interview with Mav
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 36	8 September 2008	About the Signpost

Wikimedia UK disbands, but may form again	WikiWorld: "Helicopter parent"
News and notes: Wikipedian dies, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Dispatches: Featured topics	Dispatches: Style guide and policy changes, August
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:43, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

email

I sent you an email earlier today. Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 03:13, 12 September 2008 (UTC)