Jjskarate
Thank You
editWords are not enough to express my gratitude to those admin and wikipedians who in one way or the other made my article very meaningful. Thankz a lot guys!!! Jjskarate (talk) 08:25, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Welcome
editWelcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)
Hello, Jjskarate, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Be Bold!
- Learn from others
- Play nicely with others
- Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
- Tell us a bit about yourself
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.
We're so glad you're here! Nate1481 11:07, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
RE: Not for a baby
editYou are doing very well. Don't worry it's not very hard as you become better! Keep up the good work. : ) User5802 (talk) 04:52, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
You have potentials... nice job!! 1 Hoy! Pinoy ako. 03:19, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Notability guides
editThe guides on notability will give you a better idea of what will likely make good articles, I would start here the links from that have some more information on how this works generally, you seem to be good at picking up the style points on writing articles but this may help you when thinking about the sourceing. --Nate1481 09:56, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Suggestion
editMy suggestion to you is to include the most notable and sourced information on Randy in the Jack and Jill School article. I would then ask an administrator to "userfy" the article on Randy. This means you would have the article in your userspace, and if and when a media story is done on him you can add it as a reference, and try again to submit the article. The subject hasn't been covered enough in reliable sources, or at least none that have been provided, for it to be kept on Wikipedia. We can add a redirect so someone searching for Randy will be directed to the appropriate section in the school's article. Take care. ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:10, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- Sources for articles DO NOT have to be available online. Books, for example, can be used as sources. It certainly makes it easier for other users to check sources if they're available online, but if there are substantial stories covering Randy you should add them tot eh article and mention that you've done so in the AfD discussion. You can also add quotes from the articles to the citation itself, so we know exactly what the article says. Focus on the key bits. Cite them the way you cite anything else providing the date, author, page number etc. etc. You can also offer to make them available if you have a scanner or fax or whatever, I suggest doing so at the AfD if your able to do that. I don't know if that helps. Don't panic if it's deleted, nothing is lost forever, and you can have the article "userfied" to work on it. Take care. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:51, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, and as far as the lack of sources because he teaches young ages that aren't covered as much and the coverage is more about the school and the program generally, cest la vie. Such is life. Notability is based on substantial media coverage, it's not necessarily fair or right, but it's how things are done here. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:55, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Greetings
editI hope you are enjoying a healthy and happy 2009. I don't know much about karate, but I trust you are kicking ass. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:30, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Archiving
editNoticed you had cleared out some old comments from your talk page and thought you might find this page useful: Help:Archiving a talk page --Nate1481 08:53, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- May I suggest that you start a blog for the school somewhere and then link the wikipedia school article to the blog? These articles about children do not belong in wikipedia. jmcw (talk) 23:22, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi! May I inquire as to the reason for your revert of my edits to the article? Those edits were done in good faith, to make the article conform with Wikipedia conventions. I have reverted it back to the version prior to your edits, if you feel its unwarranted, we can discuss it. — •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ• Speak! 02:33, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Thankz a lot Guys!!
editI really appreciate your help and contributions in making my articles more interesting and above all pass or conform to the standard of wikipedia.
- No sweat, just trying to make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia. Cheers! — •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ• Speak! 08:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- You're Welcome. 空手道® "avec les mains ou les pieds" 05:36, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Its okey, you deserved it!!— MMaAsia Sambon Hajime!! 02:54, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Milo Karatedo.jpg
editAn image that you uploaded or altered, File:Milo Karatedo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Xeltran (talk) 11:25, 1 March 2009 (UTC) --Xeltran (talk) 11:25, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron!
editWelcome...Be bold! --Buster7 (talk) 22:45, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to ARS!
edit
Hi, Jjskarate, welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron WikiProject! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying and rescuing articles and content that have been nominated for deletion. Every day hundreds of articles are deleted, many rightfully so. But many concern notable subjects and are poorly written, ergo fixable, and should not be deleted. We try to help these articles and content to quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated!
If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you. And once again — Welcome! Addbot (talk) 00:02, 7 January 2013 (UTC) |
Request
editHi friend. Long time no see. Can you help me work up articles on Pilipit ("Twisted"?) and Bitso-bitso (or Bicho-bicho?). I'm involved with this Doughnut Days 2009 important project. :) ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:52, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter (September 2009)
editThe Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Content |
|
Content
Rescue
editWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armageddon theology WritersCramp (talk) 13:18, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Jack and Jill School for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack and Jill School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack and Jill School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Moray An Par (talk) 04:45, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
edit
|
Philippine WikiCon
editYou are invited to the 3rd Philippine Wiki Conference (WikiCon) on May 26, 2012 9am-1pm at the co.lab.exchange in Pasig City. Please fill this form should you signify interest. --Exec8 (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
2019 US Banknote Contest
editUS Banknote Contest | ||
---|---|---|
November-December 2019 | ||
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here |
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)
File permission problem with File:Karate spl moves.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Karate spl moves.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:18, 13 March 2023 (UTC)