User talk:Jkudlick/Archive 2

 < Archive 1    Archive 2    Archive 3 >
All Pages:  1 -  2 -  3 -  4 -  ... (up to 100)


Professional leagues in England

At this AfD [1] you stated that Aldershot Town F.C. football team is or was semi-pro. The main article for this team says it is professional in the lede section, see: Aldershot Town F.C.. This is confusing.

However, I am trying to understand what constitutes a professional league in England. It seems they are everywhere in that country - see:English Football League. Is it possible for you to explain what constitutes an English professional team that would merit notability on Wikipedia? Is notability mostly based on independent coverage in reliable sources? If this is more than you have time for then no problem. Steve Quinn (talk) 04:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Steve Quinn: Consensus is that a fully professiona league is one where the players are compensated enough that they do not need supplemental income, and that season articles are only appropriate for teams in those leagues. Team articles are appropriate for leagues at lower levels, and important statistics can be included in the team articles.
I'm actually out of town, so feel free to ask any additional questions at WT:FOOTY. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 16:32, 31 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Jkudlick: This helps clear things up - I'll be looking around to see what else I can discover. Thanks for pointing me to WT:FOOTY, this is very helpful. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 03:45, 4 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

2018 FIFA World Cup qualification (CONCACAF)

Hi. About your revert based on consistency, how about if I do two columns for own goals at all articles related to the 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification?. Thanks in advance. The Replicator (talk) 17:09, 7 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

@The Replicator: There are three columns for goal scorers in all the articles. To have two columns for own goals makes no sense as it introduces inconsistent formatting into the article. Right now the consensus at WP:FOOTY is to have three columns for goal scorers, including own goals. If I hadn't made the change, someone else would have. You are free to introduce your idea at WT:FOOTY if you wish. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 17:18, 7 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
@The Replicator: I malformed the first ping, so here it is again. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 17:19, 7 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nonsense warning

If you do not have the courtesy to start a discussion, templating me for vandalism is certainly out of the question. The Banner talk 17:40, 7 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

substituting Template:nfa

Can you help me with your recent edits to 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Third Round. Is there something wrong with using the Template:nfa that it needs reverting to original text ? Isnt that the whole point of a template to make things easier and more efficient ? Matilda Maniac (talk) 23:37, 16 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Matilda Maniac: The text of the template documentation had read "This template is intended to be substituted," akin to {{nft}} and {{nwft}}. I altered the documentation to include {{subst only}} to make it more clear that the intent is for it to be substituted. It is true that the intent of a template is to make repetitive tasks simpler, as it is far easier to type {{subst:nfa|USA}} than it is to type [[United States Soccer Federation|United States]]. All I did in the article was to add subst: to the template calls as directed in the template documentation. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 10:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
my apologies. I hadnt realised that using subst causes the wikitext saved as a result of the edit to differ from the text which the user actually entered in the edit window. It just appeared to me that you were typing in the longhand version. I will still use nfa|AUS or equivalent for (Australia) in football boxes - as its easier for me - knowing that at some point these can all get substituted by an editor or a bot at a later time. Cheers. Matilda Maniac (talk) 03:34, 18 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Award, with compliments!

 
The Keeper of the Roll Award
is bestowed to Jkudlick for substantial contributions to the Service Awards Scheme.
Mootros (talk) 07:45, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

RfC for page patroller qualifications

Following up from the consensus reached here, the community will now establish the user right criteria. You may wish to participate in this discussion. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:37, 6 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Invite to the African Destubathon

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jkudlick. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

New Page Reviewer - RfC

Hi Jkudlick. You are invited to comment at a further discussion on the implementation of this user right to patrol and review new pages that is taking place at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/RfC on patrolling without user right. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:39, 23 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Extended confirmed protection policy RfC

You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob13Talk 16:13, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

An invitation for you

Please join us during the month of May 2017 for the...

Women's Sports worldwide online edit-a-thon

 
Contributions to new or existing articles on women athletes
(including WOSO players)
are encouraged and appreciated. For more information and resources, please see WP: Women in Red, the Women's football task force and WP:Women's Sport.
 

#wikiwomeninred

(To subscribe, Women's football task force/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women's football task force/Opt-out list) (Delivered: 16:41, 30 April 2017 (UTC))

Subject of mass mailing: Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: August 2017

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: August 2017


Should the women's football task force become WikiProject: WOSO?

 

According to an op-ed in the recent Signpost, some editors think task forces and subgroups are dying in 2017.

What do you think about forming our own WikiProject separate from WP:FOOTY? There's an on-going discussion of the potential pros and cons on the task force talk page. Input is welcome.

Recent developments

New initiatives have been created for:

  • FA WSL (England's top-division league)
  • NCAA (American university teams, conferences, etc.)
  • W-League (Australia's top-division league)
Ongoing tournaments
Current and upcoming seasons for top-division leagues
Did you know?

While WP:FPL lists only two women's top-division leagues as notable due to its "fully professional" criteria, did you know you can create an article on any player in any league as long as the references meet WP:GNG guidelines? Make sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}.

Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement? Add them to the Open Tasks page if you'd like and other editors may be able to help. Need tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors? Leave a message on the task force talk page.

Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)!

 

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force
#wikiwomeninred

(To subscribe, Women's football task force/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women's football task force/Opt-out list) – Hmlarson (talk) 02:24, 4 August 2017 (UTC) Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jkudlick. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ANI Experiences survey

The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nwft template

Hi!

Your edit to the Nwft template and maybe others has broken several articles because that template was often used without the subst: and with the 3-letter code instead of the full country name. Granted, those occurences should have used subst:, but some articles didn't (such as Belgium women's national football team), and AnomieBOT has afterwards subst'ed these but only after your edit to the template, which has resulted in the bot creating constructs such as MEX.

Why did you so drastistically simplify the Nwft template? It makes it less consistent with related templates such as Template:Nfa. The point of these templates is to speed up typing anyway (as established in this discussion), e.g. CZE is quicker (and safer) to type than Czech Republic. So I'm curious what was wrong with the previous code, as your edit only commented "updating code". Sygmoral (talk) 16:31, 27 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Request to help in Discussion

Please help us in this Discussion. Shahin (talk) 12:54, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

WOSO Task Force News: April 2018

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: April 2018


 
Eniola Aluko of England (in white) and Jovana Mrkić (in red) of Montenegro, 2014

Hello WOSO editors! A few initiatives have been started with an emphasis on making more WOSO links blue (similar to the work that WikiProject Women in Red does) and filling in the gaps within various league, team, and player, etc. articles.

If you're interested in collaborating with others to make more links blue, take a look at the initiatives listed in the box below. Sign up at the bottom of an initiative page and help grow the lists, add potential references, resources, and create the articles ... or create your own initiative.

Did you know ...

WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY (which only includes the players in 1 active women's league)? Often times there is enough media coverage that meets WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. For more information, see WP:WOSO#Notability and be sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}

Current and upcoming seasons for top-division leagues
Current season articles needing creation


Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement? Add them to the Open Tasks.

Has an article you worked on been nominated for deletion? See:

Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors?
Leave a message on the task force talk page.

Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)!

 

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force
#wikiwomeninred

Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. Sent by: Hmlarson (talk) 17:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC) Reply

Autoblock removal request

 
This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.
Jkudlick (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "SGT-Craig". The reason given for SGT-Craig's block is: "Clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia: Per message I left at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SGT-Craig&diff=prev&oldid=841891621 and no real change after".


Accept reason: No reason to believe you are related. Autoblock lifted, happy editing. Yamla (talk) 23:25, 27 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

AfroCine: Join us for the Months of African Cinema in October!

 
 

Greetings!

You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.

This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.

Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!

If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema!

 
 

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:

  • Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
  • Country Winners
  • Diversity winner
  • High quality contributors
  • Gender-gap fillers
  • Page improvers
  • Wikidata Translators

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jkudlick. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: July 2019

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: July 2019


 
Opening ceremony of the 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup, Parc de Princes, Paris, June 7, 2019

Hello WOSO editors! What a 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup in France! There has been a lot of activity on tournament- and player-related Wikipedia articles with all of the worldwide coverage of the tournament and its players. Let's keep the momentum going.

WOMEN IN SPORTS EDIT-A-THON FOR JULY + AUGUST!

WikiProject Women in Red is focusing on Women in Sports during their edit-a-thon for July & August 2019.

Get all the info here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/126

Sign up and help fill in the gaps within various articles related to women's football / soccer - whether they be players, teams, leagues, historical, administrators, referees, etc. Every little bit helps. Be sure to tag your article talk pages with {{WIR-126}}.

These edit-a-thons are a great way to work with others to help bridge the gender gaps on Wikipedia. Thanks for your contributions!

Did you know...

WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY (which only includes the players in two currently active women's leagues)? Often times there is enough media coverage that meets WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. For more information, see WP:WOSO#Notability and be sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}

Current and upcoming seasons for top-division leagues


Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement? Add them to the Open Tasks.

Was an article you worked on nominated for deletion? See:

Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors?
Leave a message on the task force talk page.

Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)!

 

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force
#wikiwomeninred

Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. Sent by: Hmlarson (talk) 03:15, 17 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 03:40, 17 July 2019 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)Reply

SVG question

First of all I would like to thank you for creating SVG ribbons for the administrative service awards. I would also like to ask how you created the ribbons. - ZLEA T\C 23:19, 21 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

@ZLEA: I actually just use a text editor to write the SVG code. I'm not much of an artist, but I'm excellent at math and coding, so simple SVGs like this are how I can contribute. — Jkudlick ⚓ t ⚓ c ⚓ s 00:10, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Question regarding your work on the service awards

Hi, quick question for you... when you were creating the new ribbons for all the service awards, how were you doing it? I am getting ready to update a number of military awards, including fixing their ribbons. Right now I'm looking at doing it in photoshop, but I recall once seeing a tool online for quickly creating ribbons. just curious if you had any insight since your ribbons are excellent looking. thanks! Will (talk) 02:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Wegates: Thanks for the compliment! I actually just use a text editor, like Notepad, to edit the SVG code and view the results in a web browser. I experiment with colors using MSPaint and get the RGB values from the color select menu. A lot of it is trial and error trying to get the colors right or the shapes in just the right places. Getting the stars right was the trickiest part since I needed to use trigonometry to figure out where the star points needed to be. Let me know if I can be of any further assistance. — Jkudlick ⚓ t ⚓ c ⚓ s 04:39, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
I never thought of doing them with direct svg code! that makes total sense. I'm not too worried about doing things like stars and weird shapes for what I'm working on, as I'm doing US military ribbons and they are all vertical stripes. Thanks for the help! Will (talk) 11:14, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

AfroCine: Join the Months of African Cinema this October!

 

Greetings!

After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:

  • Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
  • Diversity winner
  • Gender-gap fillers

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2016 Summer Olympics football group standings templates

 

A tag has been placed on Category:2016 Summer Olympics football group standings templates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:58, 27 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your comment regarding service awards

Hey, I saw your comment regarding service awards. Are you positive that there are no problems with displaying the wrong reward? Because, right now, there is a deletion request, that was opened up on my userpage (which you can find yourself), and apparently people disagree with you, and think that it is indeed a problem to display the wrong reward. Bryan.Wade (talk) 02:07, 18 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!

 

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap fillers - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list