Jlird808

Welcome

Hello, Jlird808, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Crisco 1492 Happy editing! Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:51, 4 June 2011 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard - a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Feedback

I have responded to your request for feedback. Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:59, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rotex Screeners and Separators

A tag has been placed on Rotex Screeners and Separators, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 18:00, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:MegatexXD.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MegatexXD.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:002427 rotex logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:002427 rotex logo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

File:MegatexXD.jpg needs authorship information.

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:MegatexXD.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided),authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

• If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which:{{subst:usernameexpand|Jlird808}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
  or use the {{own}} template.

• If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:20, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

File:MegatexXD.jpg

Did you forget to indicate the copyright status of this image?

You may wish to read Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags#For_image_creators , or ask what tags are appropriate.

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:26, 7 July 2010 (UTC)Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:20, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:ROTEX Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:ROTEX Logo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:06, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Rotex Screeners and Separators

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Rotex Screeners and Separators, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.rotex.com/06aboutrotex/history.aspx. As a copyright violation, Rotex Screeners and Separators appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Rotex Screeners and Separators has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Rotex Screeners and Separators and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Rotex Screeners and Separators with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Rotex Screeners and Separators.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 16:06, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Defamed By Wikipedia

I no longer attempt to work through Wikipedia talk pages or Wikipedia in general regarding the malicious and defamatory material which left-wing Wikipedia editors, acting out of ideological bias and their own personal agendas, have repeatedly inserted into my Wikipedia entry. I attempted to use the Wikipedia mediation and arbitration procedures, as prescribed, and to date I have not received one single reply from anyone in authority at Wikipedia. Every attempt I have made to use Wikipedia's formal complaints procedure has been simply ignored and my comments taken off line (as this comment probably will be.) FIVE YEARS of discussion was blown away in this manner, I presume because I was making my case against the entry in too persuasive a manner and the Wiki-kooks were becoming embarrassed.

I use multiple accounts, yes, because Wikipedia has responded to my repeated attempts to get them to remove malicious and defamatory material from my entry with silence and with censorship. They say that the greatest compliment one man can pay to another is to attempt to silence him by force. I could do with fewer such compliments from Wikipedia.

These days I carry on my efforts to counter the false, malicious and defamatory material from my entry in a forum which (so far) Wikipedia and the rest of the left has failed to silence. Check out

defamedbywikipedia.blogspot.com

This site has so terrified the Wiki-kooks that they have banned it, so I can't post the complete link. I'm sure you can add in the http etc.

-Harold A. Covington — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.72.244.87 (talk) 14:58, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your draft submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rotex Screeners and Separators. If there is no response within seven days, the request may be declined. If this happens, please feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:submitdraft}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. Glacialfox (talk) 00:34, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

I have put your article back up as a submission for someone else that knows more than me to look at. :) Glacialfox (talk) 18:13, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your draft submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rotex Screeners and Separators. If there is no response within seven days, the request may be declined. If this happens, please feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:submitdraft}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. Hallows AG (talk) 05:31, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your draft submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rotex Screeners and Separators. If there is no response within seven days, the request may be declined. If this happens, please feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:submitdraft}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. Hallows AG (talk) 09:09, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Rotex Global, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

• The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
• Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 23:29, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Want to reupload a logo I deleted

How do I reupload this logo here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:ROTEX_Global_Logo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1. I put it up and then deleted it bcz the article wasnt ready. Now the article has been approved and I would like to reupload. THANKS!! --Jlird808 (talk) 15:43, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

The same way you uploaded it - there is no block on the filename or image itself, so you should be able to re-uploaded it without a problem. However, to make things easier, i simply undeleted the image for you and updated the article to include the image. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 15:51, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Ugh...just my luck. Now that everything's been approved and uploaded I'm being told that we want to use a slightly different logo!!! I would simply upload the file itself and give it a diff name but I feel like I've done this before and had issues with it. Is there a way to just "swap out" the .jpegs? Or should I just delete this one AGAIN and reupload a new one? I have it here on my desktop. THANKS AGAIN!!--Jlird808 (talk) 16:24, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Hiyas Jlird, Sure there is a method for this - since you have the autoconfirmed permission you can simply upload a new image over the existing one. For this you can go to Special:upload.On this page you can directly upload a new image. Select the exact same filename (ROTEX Global Logo.jpg) as the destination, and the upload will overwrite the original file. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 18:28, 28 November 2011 (UTC)