Welcome!

edit

Hi Jlvshistory! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 13:10, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Oh, thank you man, thank you so much Jlvshistory (talk) 13:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ebralinag v School Superintendent has been accepted

edit
 
Ebralinag v School Superintendent, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 13:10, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fletcher Ladd has been accepted

edit
 
Fletcher Ladd, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 06:17, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
ohh, thank you man Jlvshistory (talk) 06:20, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Jimenez v. Cañizares has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jimenez v. Cañizares. Thanks! QuantumRealm (meow🦁pawtrack🐾) 14:22, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elias Finley Johnson has been accepted

edit
 
Elias Finley Johnson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Annh07 (talk) 11:23, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much Jlvshistory (talk) 13:07, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

December 2023

edit

  Hi Jlvshistory! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 11:44, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Oh..Thank you for correcting me, I'm so sorry😅 Jlvshistory (talk) 11:48, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Elias Finley Johnson

edit

Hello, I just finished cleaning up Elias Finley Johnson. Thank you for contributing all that content - it's valuable, and appreciated. However, your text contained a lot of errors; pretty much every sentence needed corrections. In the future, please consider having someone look over your content before submitting it, or at least run it through a spellcheck. Thank you, Jessicapierce (talk) 06:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, thank you for your concern, I accept your concern and appreciate it, even though I check my draft before submitting and editing many times, but maybe sometimes I didn't check my drafts for mistakes but I will note this anyway. Again, Thank you for your concern😊 Jlvshistory (talk) 06:59, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jimenez v. Cañizares (December 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aviram7 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 16:04, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Okay, I will remove the unreliable source, thank your concern, but the reason why I put my citation it's because I need a summary about the case Jlvshistory (talk) 10:01, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Jlvshistory! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 16:04, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Mirrors

edit

  Thanks for contributing to the article Creative Korea Party ‎. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 12:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Im so sorry, I realized in split seconds that is has a word 'wiki' in it, I apologize if I ignore it, I will not do it again Jlvshistory (talk) 12:22, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Iowa Perry High School Shooting (January 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul Vaurie was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Paul Vaurie (talk) 21:32, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I intended to modify to draft it into deletion,Im so sorry because I didn't see it yesterday that it was already made Jlvshistory (talk) 23:42, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi Jlvshistory, You recently uploaded an image of a TikTok to Perry High School shooting. The image was removed because it is likely to be deleted from Wikimedia Commons due to lack of proof that it is free content. For future reference, unless you have proof of a relevant license or it is your own work, you should not upload an image to Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons. For further information, see Commons:Licensing. Let me know if you have any questions. Best, Wracking talk! 05:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

But I get it from ABC and other news outlets or website, Does it count as a copy right strike? Jlvshistory (talk) 05:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Wikimedia Commons only hosts content that is free, meaning there are specific instructions from the creator that it can be used by anyone, anytime, for any purpose. Unless you have that proof, you should not upload a file.
There is no such thing as a "copyright strike" here (like there is on YouTube or other sites), but repeated additions of non-free content could lead to a user being blocked. See the image I've added to this comment for more info. Let me know if you have any more questions. Wracking talk! 05:49, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your concern, but I accidentaly typed 'copyright strikes' instead of 'copyright' my bad, thank you for concern Jlvshistory (talk) 05:51, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
thank you very much for understanding* Jlvshistory (talk) 05:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Salinas v. Texas has been accepted

edit
 
Salinas v. Texas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:43, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
alright, thank you Jlvshistory (talk) 10:46, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

January 2024

edit

Again, I ask that you please take more care that your work meets the guidelines of the Manual of Style. Your recent edit of John Frow added an ungrammatical sentence and many inappropriate capital letters. In general, Wikipedia uses sentence case, so it's "Professor, author" instead of "Professor, Author" in the infobox, for example.

I see that you are making good contributions here, but please do your best to make sure that others don't have to clean up after you. Thank you, Jessicapierce (talk) 03:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

I apologize to that but I promise I will do my best, thank you for understanding Jlvshistory (talk) 03:13, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Benjamin Anyene, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rex Heuermann (January 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 19:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
But I can still improve it? Jlvshistory (talk) 03:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Jlvshistory. Thank you for your work on Jimenez v. Cañizares. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:09, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

{{Re|North800}} thank you for your comment Jlvshistory (talk) 00:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joseph Morton (governor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charleston.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:50, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

March 2024

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

  • How is this [1] or this [2] constructive, or any better than vandalism?

2601:19E:4180:6D50:E004:1418:F10B:6EBF (talk) 01:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

    • To partially answer my question, I've looked at a few more of your edits, and it seems there's a problem anytime you're not merely copying citations and have to write something in your own words. The notice above from January is still relevant. You probably should not be editing grammar or adding content at English Wikipedia. Thank you, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:E004:1418:F10B:6EBF (talk) 02:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
      I sincerely apologized for not reading Wikipedia's guidelines thoroughly, I promised I will read the Wikipedia's guidelines even more Jlvshistory (talk) 03:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
I've tried my best to edit this wikipedia page but alright Jlvshistory (talk) 03:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
And right after your response here, you did this [3], which ignores WP:ENGVAR and MOS:OL, among other guidelines. Please stop, or I will ask for administrative intervention. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:E004:1418:F10B:6EBF (talk) 03:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
alright but can I stay there and not delete my account? Jlvshistory (talk) 07:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
I didn't linked any general words on that article, I remove all of linked general words Jlvshistory (talk) 07:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Jlvshistory. Thank you for your work on Jimenez v. Cañizares. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:50, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

April 2024

edit

Per the above messages, it's probably best that you not edit at English Wikipedia. If disruptions continue, I will ask for administrative assistance.

  One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 11:27, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

What are you referring to? Jlvshistory (talk) 11:28, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Most of you latest edit was copied from its source. How can you not know what I'm referring to? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 11:33, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'm writing with my own words using these sources, I don't know what problems do you want me to see, In fact, I also remove unecessary links that I believe was unecessary because they are generalized word and obviously not needed to be linked Jlvshistory (talk) 11:36, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
No, you're copying text almost verbatim. When you write in your own words, as in your comments here, your English has not been adequate to edit here. That you don't seem to understand the problem, is a problem. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 11:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Well, if that's the case my bad but sometimes I copy some words and then I will type it with my own words, and also you reverse some of my edits such as reversing " James Ingraham et al. v. Willie J. Wright, et al." to "Ingraham et al. v. Wright, et al." which is I believe which is wrong because it supposedly the full case name, and that's exactly the template of the infobox. But, anyways, to be honest, I'll decide to be inactive in Wikipedia, if I did something wrong Jlvshistory (talk) 11:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:United States v Macintosh

edit

  Hello, Jlvshistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:United States v Macintosh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Planned Parenthood Arizona v. Mayes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Montgomery.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Victoriano v Elizalde Rope Workers' Union

edit

  Hello, Jlvshistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Victoriano v Elizalde Rope Workers' Union, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Richard Shuckburgh(surgeon)

edit

  Hello, Jlvshistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Richard Shuckburgh(surgeon), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:12, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Barrows v. Jackson

edit

  Hello, Jlvshistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Barrows v. Jackson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:07, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Macke v. Camps

edit

  Hello, Jlvshistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Macke v. Camps, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Victoriano v Elizalde Rope Workers' Union

edit
 

Hello, Jlvshistory. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Victoriano v Elizalde Rope Workers' Union".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:59, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Judiciary Marshals Act

edit

  Hello, Jlvshistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Judiciary Marshals Act, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Nueva Ecija Bus Shooting

edit

  Hello, Jlvshistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nueva Ecija Bus Shooting, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Iowa Perry High School Shooting

edit

  Hello, Jlvshistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Iowa Perry High School Shooting, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Sherry Shriner

edit

  Hello, Jlvshistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sherry Shriner, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Barrows v. Jackson

edit
 

Hello, Jlvshistory. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Barrows v. Jackson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:51, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Macke v. Camps

edit
 

Hello, Jlvshistory. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Macke v. Camps".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Apphia

edit

  Hello, Jlvshistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Apphia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Rex Heuermann

edit

  Hello, Jlvshistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rex Heuermann, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Judiciary Marshals Act

edit
 

Hello, Jlvshistory. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Judiciary Marshals Act".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:03, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Nueva Ecija Bus Shooting

edit
 

Hello, Jlvshistory. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Nueva Ecija Bus Shooting".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:43, 4 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Sherry Shriner

edit
 

Hello, Jlvshistory. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Sherry Shriner".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:23, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

City and County of San Francisco v. EPA moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to City and County of San Francisco v. EPA. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Waqar💬 20:13, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Well, I'm still working on that but thank you Jlvshistory (talk) 13:23, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stanley v. City of Sandford has been accepted

edit
 
Stanley v. City of Sandford, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 14:31, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
thank you Jlvshistory (talk) 14:33, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Silverio v. Republic of the Philippines

edit

  Hello, Jlvshistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Silverio v. Republic of the Philippines, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:07, 4 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: City and County of San Francisco v. EPA has been accepted

edit
 
City and County of San Francisco v. EPA, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

C F A 💬 00:41, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Cummings v. Missouri

edit

  Hello, Jlvshistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cummings v. Missouri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:05, 17 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Womp Womp(slang)

edit

  Hello, Jlvshistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Womp Womp(slang), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:United States v. Macintosh

edit

  Hello, Jlvshistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:United States v. Macintosh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Bienvenu v. Diocese of Lafayette

edit

  Hello, Jlvshistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bienvenu v. Diocese of Lafayette, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:52, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:William S. Ladd (Judge)

edit

  Hello, Jlvshistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:William S. Ladd (Judge), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Sir Stanley Carver

edit

  Hello, Jlvshistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sir Stanley Carver, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:10, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Womp Womp(slang)

edit
 

Hello, Jlvshistory. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Womp Womp".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:47, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:North Carolina v. Butler

edit

  Hello, Jlvshistory. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:North Carolina v. Butler, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:07, 18 October 2024 (UTC)Reply