User talk:Jodi.Krol

Welcome!

Hi Jodi.Krol! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 21:46, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

June 2025

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Stereopsis—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 13:04, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Please explain.

I extended the content of page Stereopsis to contain all aspects of binocular visison. Stereopsis is only part of it. Then I moved the content to page Binocular vision, because this title is at a higher level. Then I made a redirect to the chapter Binocular_Vision#Stereopsis.

This seems completely logic to me.

Jodi.Krol (talk) 13:16, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

I am using the dutch wiki sandbox because it is not possible to make subpages on the Englisk wiki. Then moving to the real page, there exist errors resulting from differences between the Dutch and English wiki, which I have to correct on the real page. It would be convenient if I could simply make a subpages on the English wiki too.

Jodi.Krol (talk) 13:25, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Re: Stereopsis

Hey, stop doing such edit as you did on Stereopsis (1299939576). And remove these edit as they are causing error to citation template.––kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 09:11, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

it has been removed. It was the result of translating dutch wiki, which should not have translated citations.

Jodi.Krol (talk) 07:31, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Yup, While translating do remember to change citation templates compatible with english wikipedia. If you can't find one, look at wikidata to find the english version of template. Happy Editing.––kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 07:50, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Wim van de Grind moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Wim van de Grind. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is not how academic pages are written in this WP. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 (talk) 02:19, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Wim van de Grind has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Wim van de Grind. Thanks! Ldm1954 (talk) 02:22, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wim van de Grind (September 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WeirdNAnnoyed was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Close to notability, but the interviews can't be used to establish notability as they are not independent, and the same for van de Grind's own books. This leaves the obituary, which is a marginal source. At least one more source that covers the subject in a significant and independent way is needed for an article. Also, the article has a promotional tone, please remove editorializing passages like "van de Grind not only is outspoken, he is also practical".

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wim van de Grind and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 12:20, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Jodi.Krol! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 12:20, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Wim van de Grind

Hello, Jodi.Krol. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wim van de Grind, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Wim van de Grind

Hello, Jodi.Krol. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Wim van de Grind".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 12:25, 28 March 2026 (UTC)