Jojostella6

Welcome!

Hello, Jojostella6, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as John Kneski, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Pichpich (talk) 00:28, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John Kneski

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John Kneski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pichpich (talk) 00:28, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John Kneski

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John Kneski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. bonadea contributions talk 15:50, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of John Kneski for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Kneski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Kneski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hqb (talk) 08:06, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback

If you mean your first feedback comment it is here.

Harkey (talk) 17:30, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

 

In response to your feedback

Hi Jojostella... Sorry that you're not feeling happy about Wikipedia right now. And, just a note, in the case of the page that you are interested in, it was not just one editor. One editor felt that the subject was not notable and proposed that the article be deleted. Then, there was a period for discussion. Interested editors (unfortunately, none came to defend the article) weigh in on whether it should be deleted or not.

It appears that the only voice (other than the proposer's) supported deleting the article. Thus, the discussion was closed and the article was deleted. (I also notice that the article has been deleted 4 times in just over a year!).

Please read this page to understand what is required for including an article about a person in Wikipedia. If you have questions or if there's anything I can do to help, please let me know! Wikipelli Talk 1:46 pm, 27 March 2012, Tuesday (17 days ago) (UTC−4)

Responce:

It is now more clear than ever why every university professors tell their students the very first day of class, " Wikipedia is not a valid resource for your research. " The editing and deletion process is totally subjective. How a 20 year old guy in the military that lists "I like playing video games like World of Warcraft and Battlefield 2" as one of his significant attributes - who has no knowledge of academia or the field of architecture - is qualified to edit anything is beyond me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jojostella6 (talk • contribs) 16:50, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Jojostella6. You have new messages at Wikipelli's talk page.
Message added 17:23, 13 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wikipelli ^Talk 17:23, 13 April 2012 (UTC)