Josephintechnicolor

Your submission at Articles for creation: Giuseppe G. Ruisi (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Giuseppe G. Ruisi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Giuseppe G. Ruisi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 09:02, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Josephintechnicolor (talk) 06:35, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your review. I am getting in touch with the Supreme Ct in Rome for more citations. I will format better as well.

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Josephintechnicolor (talk) 06:37, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your review. I thinned it out and focused on the most notable appointment, Jefferson University and Brookings. Could you give me a sample citation that would improve this wiki?

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Josephintechnicolor (talk) 01:10, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

thank you for your advice and I will work on it. So basically you want something like this but with a higher end publication e.g. NYTimes....https://www.ypo.org/2015/11/ceo-insight-11-questions-with-rick-kimball/

Your submission at Articles for creation: Giuseppe G. Ruisi has been accepted

Giuseppe G. Ruisi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 06:04, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Giuseppe G. Ruisi) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Giuseppe G. Ruisi.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Thank you for this article, may you give us further ones.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

1l2l3k (talk) 11:30, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kelly Hyman (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kelly Hyman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kelly Hyman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 06:28, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Josephintechnicolor was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kelly Hyman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kelly Hyman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Josephintechnicolor (talk) 08:46, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kelly Hyman (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kelly Hyman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kelly Hyman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:04, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kelly Hyman (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StraussInTheHouse was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kelly Hyman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kelly Hyman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SITH (talk) 13:22, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Teahouse, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:36, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of RZB Securities

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on RZB Securities requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Daiyusha (talk) 13:13, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Raiffeisen Bank International, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Matthew hk (talk) 07:15, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Moved from user talk:matthew hk

Dear Matthew hk, RBI's parent company is still RZB. It does not matter if RBI started after WWII, RZB is still their roots. Should a person's own legacy be conveniently removed when an ancestor did something that they don't want public? NO, it is legacy and whether you like it or not it is part of that person. I plan to undo your edits and add the source (noted) but all my information is VERY relevant and your removing it is questionable. Do you have a paid interest in protecting the Raiffeisen profile? I could always bring this to the tea house's attention so we can settle it properly if you like. 08:29, 18 February 2019 (UTC)Josephintechnicolor (talk)

RZB had disappeared. Also, Please don't post defamative material unless you have high quality source to support it. Matthew hk (talk) 08:32, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Matthew

Raiffeisen Bank Intl or RB Intl or RZB or Raiffeisen are still from the same basic roots, they all need to be included. RZB has not disappeared, it has been merged into other entities but it is very much alive. I am sure decedents of the Raiffeisen founder would not say RZB disappeared. Also, the material is not defamatory, it was from other wiki articles and the new sources within them. 04:51, 19 February 2019 (UTC)Josephintechnicolor (talk)

It is WP:content fork and WP:overlap Matthew hk (talk) 04:59, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

I am not creating a separate standalone article that overlaps it is unique and I am linking it to the patriarch. BUT Either way I suggest we make the US entity page and fall everything USA under that page.05:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)Josephintechnicolor (talk)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Josephintechnicolor! You created a thread called Notability: Is being nominated for a Young Artist Award notable at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of RZB Securities

The article RZB Securities has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fail WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Matthew hk (talk) 08:33, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Dear Matthew HK

What is your agenda? The source is valid and has both RZB and Grund are listed. This is an entity of RZB just like all the other entities which are listed. The page was already tagged for merger and now you want it deleted? Your actions are being measured. 08:44, 18 February 2019 (UTC)Josephintechnicolor (talk)

Are you able to read WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH? Wikipedia is not a webhost of every non-notable division of a company. non-notable division may routinely mentioned in the wiki article of the parent company, but did not warrant a separate wiki article or even a section in the wiki article of the parent company. Matthew hk (talk) 08:48, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Josephintechnicolor! You created a thread called Wiki on an actress and nominee of Youth Award at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Kelly Hyman has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kelly Hyman. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 11:06, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Dear Legacypac Thank you. I will get better links for those Fox Videos.Josephintechnicolor (talk) 13:34, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Matthew hk (talk) 12:53, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kelly Hyman (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kelly Hyman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kelly Hyman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:47, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Dear AngusWOOF and Legacypac, thank you for your comments. Just so I know for my own knowledge...if there is second role in addition to The Young and the Restless (top role) will that support approval? 07:29, 4 March 2019 (UTC)Josephintechnicolor (talk)

Dear AngusWOOF and Legacypac with the addition of these links I feel a wikipedia article could now be justified for Kelly Hyman (Legal News Commentator, Lawyer, Actress) and she now falls within the notability threshold. Could you comment please.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/warrenbobrow/2019/04/22/an-interview-with-kelly-hyman-from-actor-to-attorney-with-tact/#6a668d983139 https://video.foxnews.com/v/6022395110001/?fbclid=IwAR2yVxfbqscSxhugv2mDYhonePyb3DQxF0s2hRFnUz4ECH9gDYEdPF-54Ng#sp=show-clips https://www.krdo.com/news/colorado-springs/af-water-contamination-lawsuit-lingers-while-families-wait-for-answers/732863040 https://calbizjournal.com/attorneykellyhyman/ https://video.foxnews.com/v/6022395110001/?fbclid=IwAR2yVxfbqscSxhugv2mDYhonePyb3DQxF0s2hRFnUz4ECH9gDYEdPF-54Ng#sp=show-clips https://observer.com/2019/02/brad-pitt-make-it-right-foundation-sued-lower-9th-ward-responsible/ http://conservativepolitics.info/dinesh-dsouza-debates-social-justice-attorney-kelly-hyman-on-late-term-abortion/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pl50XpdfjiE https://www.foxnews.com/transcript/2020-presidential-democrats-push-for-slavery-reparations https://www.imdb.com/videoplayer/vi158251545 https://video.foxnews.com/v/6006546835001/ https://vimeo.com/315240102 https://www.kitv.com/story/40204036/attorney-kelly-hyman-explores-womens-issues-in-2019 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDo5PfbMk5A http://www.koaa.com/story/38011946/local-law-firm-holds-open-house-for-those-affected-by-contaminated-water#.Wt0SQfujuSI.facebook http://www.krdo.com/news/colorado-springs/af-water-contamination-lawsuit-lingers-while-families-wait-for-answers/732863040

08:44, 23 April 2019 (UTC)Josephintechnicolor (talk)

MfD nomination of Draft:Kelly Hyman

Draft:Kelly Hyman, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kelly Hyman and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Kelly Hyman during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 20:27, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mohamed Ouda. Thank you. Matthew hk (talk) 07:57, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Please visit Wikipedia:Teahouse#Matthew_HK_and_Raiffeisen_ZentralBank_and_Raiffeisen_International https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse#Matthew_HK_and_Raiffeisen_ZentralBank_and_Raiffeisen_International to know more about this issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josephintechnicolor (talk • contribs)

Mohamed Ouda (User talk:Mohamed Ouda Hello Mohamed Ouda, I presume this is all wrapped up for now?08:51, 23 April 2019 (UTC)Josephintechnicolor (talk)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Matthew hk (talk) 20:27, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Matthew hk I have moved on for now. There are better things to do with my time. Let it be on your head that you are willfully denying, deceiving and deleting the truth. Rest assured that Karma will play a role here. Perhaps one day you will answer for your denials or worse you may face such poignant issues yourself and have someone else dismiss them as mere fodder. Watch the movie https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denial_(2016_film) you will find some parallels.Josephintechnicolor (talk) 08:49, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Josephintechnicolor! You created a thread called Matthew HK and Raiffeisen ZentralBank and Raiffeisen International at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

If you want to restore the draft you need to go to WP:DRV Legacypac (talk) 17:49, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Josephintechnicolor! You created a thread called Kelly Hyman (TV Legal Commentator, Lawyer and Actress) at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Draft:CannBioRex Pharmaceuticals

I moved your article draft back to draft space. In my opinion, this article is not ready to be in mainspace yet. Right now, I don't think the references are enough to show that this company passes WP:NCORP. Most of them are press releases or routine coverage of business activity (WP:CORPDEPTH), or else not connected with the company (having founders that have won awards doesn't confer anything to the company, for example). Also, your references are bare which makes them difficult to evaluate. Please improve and submit it through the WP:AFC process. Thanks, shoy (reactions) 20:11, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you shoy, I thought the publications would have some value as well. Noted improvements you have mentioned will be made. We need to change the name to CannBioRx as well, any easy way or is it a MOVE.03:44, 26 June 2019 (UTC)Josephintechnicolor (talk)

Your draft article, Draft:CannBioRex Pharmaceuticals

Hello, Josephintechnicolor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "CannBioRex Pharmaceuticals".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:12, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Francisco R. Adriano Sr. moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Francisco R. Adriano Sr., does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 10:51, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

== Thank you, I will continue to work on this article. Josephintechnicolor (talk) 07:12, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Francisco R. Adriano Sr.

Hello, Josephintechnicolor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Francisco R. Adriano Sr.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:47, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:A Novel Synthetic, Nonpsychoactive Cannabinoid Acid.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:A Novel Synthetic, Nonpsychoactive Cannabinoid Acid.pdf. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 03:15, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:HU-444, a Novel, Potent Anti-Inflammatory, Nonpsychotropic Cannabinoid.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:HU-444, a Novel, Potent Anti-Inflammatory, Nonpsychotropic Cannabinoid.pdf. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 03:15, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Cannabinoids in Models of Chronic Inflammatory Conditions.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:Cannabinoids in Models of Chronic Inflammatory Conditions.pdf. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 03:16, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:The Non-Psychoactive Cannabis Constituent Cannabidiol is an Oral AntiArthritic Therapeutic in Murine Collagen Induced Arthritis.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:The Non-Psychoactive Cannabis Constituent Cannabidiol is an Oral AntiArthritic Therapeutic in Murine Collagen Induced Arthritis.pdf. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 03:17, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:MichaelLandsberg.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:MichaelLandsberg.jpeg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 12:36, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael W. Landsberg, CFP®, CIMA® (May 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Alpha3031 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael W. Landsberg, CFP®, CIMA® and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:16, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Alpha3031, I've made edits to my submission, Michael W. Landsberg. Could you please check? Josephintechnicolor (talk) 10:01, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Some of the new sources added might be independent but none of them show significant coverage (not just passing mentions). It's better to have a few (three or four) very good sources than a lot of sources that verify one fact at a time, an article with only the latter type of source will almost never be accepted. If you have any specific questions about the criteria, suggest asking at the Articles for creation help desk (you can click the link in the template text above) as it will be seen by more than one person. Once you are sure you've found sources that meet the criteria, it's recommended to highlight the best three and resubmit for review. Reviewer will also likely ask same question as DoubleGrazing did below. Alpha3031 (t • c) 09:00, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Josephintechnicolor! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:16, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Josephintechnicolor. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Michael W. Landsberg, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:29, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Josephintechnicolor (talk) 11:50, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I edited the article and provided independent sources that talks about the subject itself.

See sources 1, 2, and 9. I also removed some parts of the article that don't have enough citations.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael W. Landsberg (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael W. Landsberg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 19:55, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Michael W. Landsberg

Hello, Josephintechnicolor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Michael W. Landsberg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael W. Landsberg (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Paul W were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael W. Landsberg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul W (talk) 12:14, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael W. Landsberg (August 25)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by MaxnaCarta was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

— MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 07:40, 25 August 2024 (UTC)