Joshua Lutz
Welcome!
Hello, Joshua Lutz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Academic Challenger 20:57, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Notability of Klaus Holzkamp
edit
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Klaus Holzkamp, by Precious Roy (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Klaus Holzkamp seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Klaus Holzkamp, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:35, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
The article Staffan Lindeberg has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. joe deckertalk to me 06:29, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Staffan Lindeberg for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Staffan Lindeberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Staffan Lindeberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alexbrn (talk) 12:56, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Spandex
editI'm not very active as editor here but, as a frequent user of Wikipedia, wanted a bit more info on 'Spandex', With regard addition of section HARMFUL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT - the content seems quite biased/incomplete/political/inappropriate overall - Consider/compare the Wikipedia article for POLYESTER and it's section regarding the environment - suggest going there and propose what you've put here for polyester appropriately modified and see what editors think? - iow - polyester has similar harmful impacts - but so much more. Not suggesting deleting harmful impact, just improving it... Consider suggesting something more practical as replacement (i.e. - the whole idea of spandex is the elasticity, so replacement should as well) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Relax8 (talk • contribs) 17:48, 17 June 2019 (UTC)