User talk:Josiah Rowe/Archive 16

Archive 10

←

Archive 14

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

Archive 18

→

Archive 20

The Art of War (disambiguation)

Thanks for your input. I appreciate having a fresh set of eyes on this. --Digitalmischief (talk) 02:17, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

question

Hi Josiah - isn't this a little like adding something to someone's bio about there being no evidence that he beat his wife? Tvoz/talk 03:54, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Well, once there's been an article in the newspaper of record noting that some guys were trying to prove that you had beaten your wife, then I think it's appropriate to point out that the claim was made, and that there's no evidence behind it. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 03:57, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I suppose - although I would take issue with whether the Times of London is still worthy of the sobriquet "newspaper of record".... but what's being reported is that he wouldn't take the case, so it seems kind of weak to me. But I just saw the discussion on the article talk page, so we can do it there. Cheers Tvoz/talk 04:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Richard Tylman

Greetings, I've recently returned after spending over seven months away from Wikipedia. Today I became aware that in my absence you posted a message on my talk page inviting comment on the Richard Tylman article. I thank you for the invitation, but have chosen not to contribute further to this article. Kind regards, Victoriagirl (talk) 14:13, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

dragged before the gates of troy

touche. at least someone noticed. go well.Bali ultimate (talk) 00:09, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Dalek Variants

Hi Josiah.

OK, I've expanded, cited and tweaked the Dalek Variants article for all I'm worth. I've included a level of detail which hopefully illustrates the major design differences without descending into the realms of the 'millimetre obsessive'. I'm sure there must be other improvements which could be wrought, but I'm too wrapped up in the article now to be able to see them. Fresh, impartial eyes are required to check and polish what I've done.

I'm happy to monitor any further developments in Dalek portrayals on the TV and in films, and to update the article if new variants are seen or new information comes to light. I've never been that interested in Daleks in other media, so I'll be leaving it to others to pitch-in if new Dalek models appear in books, comics and audio dramas etc.

You mentioned submitting Dalek Variants for review as a good article. I have no idea if anybody now thinks it makes the grade or what the process is. If I may I will leave it to others to go down that route if they think it appropriate. My goal was to provided a readable and informative article providing comprehensive detail regarding the various Dalek models seen over the years. If the consensus is that I've acheived that aim, then that's good enought for me.

Once again thanks for your kind advice and encouragement. Donlock (talk) 12:32, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

You've done some great work, Donlock. I started to do a bit of copyediting, but I don't have time to finish it right now. (I'll try to finish it in the next few days — it's mostly minor stuff like quotation marks and excessive use of the {{-}} template.)

The citations to episodes are a great start, but I can see two things that could be improved: first of all, since there are multiple references to many stories, it would be a good idea to use the "refname" element, as explained here, so that the footnotes don't need to be repeated. Second, print resources like the Dalek Book also need to be referenced, preferably using the {{cite book}} or {{citation}} templates.

I don't know whether the article is quite ready for submission as a Good Article yet. Some editors (not me) would probably say there are still too many non-free images in the article, and its debatable whether the references to The Project Dalek Forum and The Dalek Builders' Guild meet the standards of Wikipedia:Reliable sources. (I'm not taking a stand on that one way or the other right now — I'm just saying that some people will question their use as a source.) On the other hand, an argument could probably be made that the Dalek Evolution booklet is an authoritative source by a subject matter expert... I wonder whether it's been entered into the British Library? (That's the sort of question that a reliable source debate would get into.)

Anyway, the article is vastly improved thanks to your work, Donlock, and I thank you for all your efforts. If I have further suggestions on how to improve the page, I'll note them at Talk:Dalek variants. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 19:49, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

"Instalment" is UK spelling

In a recent edit to the page Doctor Who missing episodes, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to other English-speaking countries, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the appropriate variety of English used there. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to the other, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They in turn should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. If you have any queries about all this, you can ask me on my talk page or you can visit the help desk. Thank you.

"Instalment" is the proper UK spelling. See here. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 02:49, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

OK, sorry about that. JoshuaKuo (talk) 02:52, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Ditto; I really wasn't aware that was a legitimate alternate spelling! Dkostic (talk) 04:33, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

That's fine — I just wish people would read one of the two hidden-text notes! —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 04:36, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Doctor Who Missing Episodes Talk

Dear Josiah, sorry to delete your comment as well but the "This is why I will never donate" comment doesn't deserve to be treated as anything other than vandalism. Or if you will, if they want to shut up then let's help them. MartinSFSA (talk) 06:20, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

No problem at all! I shouldn't have fed the troll anyway. Happy 45th! —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 06:22, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Dear Josiah, as you say you're an administrator. Why don't you play good cop, then I'll come back into the room and tell the punk "That old man you knocked down with your rumour is going to die of heart break...and you're gonna fry!" And other such cliches.MartinSFSA (talk) 18:33, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

What do you think I was doing? ;) —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 19:03, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Oh...oh right! In that case after you give Rocko a cigarette I'll go back in and menace him some more. I'm giving up on reverting vandalism on well traveled pages; it carries more weight coming from an admin and I might as well save my patience for those who seem to need it. MartinSFSA (talk) 11:44, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Moved Pages

Thanks for the info, I guess I should have checked first... at least now I know :) I'm just wondering though, is there a bot that can revert all the titles, or do I have to manually revert them myself? Thanks! TheTwoRoads (talk) 22:03, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

ITN

On 2 December, 2008, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2008 Thai political crisis, which you updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--Spencer^T♦C 20:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

It doesn't matter who added it on ITN. We have so few contributors, any help should be recognized. However, if the item was pulled down in a matter of minutes, then there might be issues, but otherwise, I don't see any. Spencer^T♦C 21:40, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Doctor Who themes

I came across an article in The Quietus today about Russell T Davies' run on the show and how it served to emphasize the gay subtext in the show, as well as how Davies can be seen as a more successful version of John Nathan-Turner, with the way they made talents of pop stars / comedians, the return of classic characters and sweeping changes to the status quo. [1] Now do you know where I could implement this source? Doctor Who, History of Doctor Who, Davies' and Turner's articles? Alientraveller (talk) 20:31, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Merry christmas!

Merry christmas Josiah! Hope you have a happy new year and a fantastic 2009! ( PS: Not long to wait until "The Next Doctor" now :D ) JS (chat) 22:13, 24 December 2008 (UTC)