Joycie 15

See Meadow Park for suggestions on the types of articles you're creating (I removed the touristy info...it's not appropriete to Wikipedia but would be welcome at Wikitravel). If you do not add content these are not very helpful articles and will eventually most likely be nopminated for deletion.--Hraefen 21:49, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

• Don't remove tags until the problems have been taken care of. Pace yourself. Instead of making 8 stubs, make one full-fledged article which will be of use to someone. Nothing personal.--Hraefen 21:56, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Trevor Horsley Stand

Please provide sources and references for this article TheRingess 22:52, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!

75px|left Hi Joycie 15. I, SoothingR would like to commend you on your edits pertaining to the article Stonehouse Court Hotel. Edits like that give Wikipedia the christmas spirit which we need so much. Especially today.

Thanks for your peaceful and useful contributions, and I wish you a merry christmas - and ofcourse - a happy new year.

Best wishes, SoothingR^(pour) 14:25, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

Swindon Supermarine

This looks like it was copied straight from the club website - this is possible imfringement of copyright. You should rewrite it with less detail then create a link to the club's website for the reader to get the full information. Tim Fellows 23:13, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

AfD

Just nominated this page Bristol Manor Farm F.C. you create for AfD ComputerJoe 19:18, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Football Players

You have made a number of new bio entries on football players. Please do not include the players number in the article title. The artcle titles should be the proper name. If there is another person by the same name, then use the convention of adding a description after the persons name [ex. "First Last (footballer)"]. Thanks! -- JLaTondre 20:37, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Football Players 2

On the same subject, it's great that you are so keen. I note that you have taken on board the point about article naming. You still need however to change the layout a bit to bring your articles into line with the standard way of doing things, particularly the names: begin the article with the name of the subject '''bolded''', like this, with three single inverted commas on either side - don't make a separate title in the text. For other points please check the guidelines at WP:GTL and WP:MOSBIO. You'll find it worth spending a little time to do this, as it will keep people off your back! I hope you continue to enjoy Wikipedia. Best, Staffelde 02:32, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Gary_owers.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gary_owers.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 09:10, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

==Tommy Smith (Witney footballer)== A tag has been placed on your article Tommy Smith (Witney footballer), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Tommy Smith (Witney footballer) is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Tommy Smith (Witney footballer). Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. AmiDaniel (Talk) 08:45, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Please do not re-create articles that have been speedily deleted, like this one. I have marked it for speedy deletion again, it still contains no claim of notability. Mangojuice 15:02, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Please stop adding semi-professional and amateur footballers to Wikipedia

Under the rules laid out in WP:BIO a footballer has to be a full professional in order to be considered notable enough for inclusion. Semi-professional or amateur players do not count, unless they have had a significant career as a professional beforehand. Please stop adding them to Wikipedia, they will only be deleted and you're wasting everyone's time with your contributions. Qwghlm 15:36, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Please also note that the format of these pieces is rather poor and doesn't comply with Wiki rules and standards etc Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 15:38, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

I have blocked you for 48 hours, because rather than responding to the two messages above, you went merrily on your way and recreated all of these ridiculous articles. Don't do it again. Ashibaka tock 23:58, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Please stop adding others' copyrighted material to Wikipedia

I have noticed a lot of your contributions are taken from other websites - they are therefore copyright violations. I have flagged them as such and they will be deleted. Please do not rip off stuff from others' websites and add it to Wikipedia. It is not welcome here. If you do it again I'll have to ask the administrators to block you again. Qwghlm 11:02, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Jim Harvey

Jim Harvey has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this person might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:Notability (people) for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" template, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but if an editor is still not satisfied that it meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NickelShoe (Talk) 19:54, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Trevor Horsley Stand

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Trevor Horsley Stand, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Paulbrock 13:48, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Luke Graham (footballer)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A {{prod}} template has been placed on Luke Graham (footballer), by ArtVandelay13 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}.

Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Grim Reaper Bot 07:15, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ryan Clarke

A tag has been placed on Ryan Clarke, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g10.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Stephenb (Talk) 08:08, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Ignore this - it was a Twinkle response to some vandalism on the article - sorry for any confusion! Stephenb (Talk) 08:20, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Scott Rogers (footballer)

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Scott Rogers (footballer), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 13:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Sekani Simpson

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Sekani Simpson, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 13:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

St George's Lane

Hi Joycie 15! An article you have been involved with has been tagged by its parent project as needing either a little attention to style, updating, or further development. If you can help with these minor issues please see Talk:St George's Lane, and leave any comments there.--Kudpung (talk) 02:37, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

St George's Lane

Hi Joycie 15! An article you have been involved with has been tagged by its parent project as needing either a little attention to style, updating, or further development. If you can help with these minor issues please see Talk:St George's Lane, and leave any comments there.--Kudpung (talk) 02:38, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Joycie 15! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 87 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Sean Joyce - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Tim Harris (footballer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Shaun Taylor - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brislington F.C.

The article Brislington F.C. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable amateur football club, nothing to indicate notability, fails WP:ORG and WP:ATHLETE.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 08:09, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brislington F.C.

The article Brislington F.C. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable amateur sports club, no reliable sources to satisfy the criteria od WP:ORG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:07, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Brislington F.C. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brislington F.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brislington F.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:33, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bruno Teixeira

The article Bruno Teixeira has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:25, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Adam Garner

The article Adam Garner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:37, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)