Jrwright72626
Welcome!
Hello, Jrwright72626, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The Chemistry of Large Metal Cluster Ions of the Type M(I)8M(II)6L12X -- A Review, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ... discospinster talk 04:12, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of The Chemistry of Large Metal Cluster Ions of the Type M(I)8M(II)6L12X -- A Review
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on The Chemistry of Large Metal Cluster Ions of the Type M(I)8M(II)6L12X -- A Review requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ... discospinster talk 04:12, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
edit
Message added 16:12, 22 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
... discospinster talk 16:12, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
I'd almost forgotten about this absurd situation. The review was deleted because it "infringed" a copyright, but whoever edited the submission is citing a phantom copyright. There was no copyright to infringe because nothing was ever published (!), not even the paper that was presented verbally along with projected slides at the Lima Peru scientific meeting. I checked with the chairman of that meeting, and he told me that none of the symposium's proceedings were ever put into print. I thus invite the editor who moved to delete my review to show me a document that was actually infringed by what I wrote. It is not a copyright infringement to cite a literature reference or to make brief summaries of the results of cited literature references, especially in the case of historical reviews; if it were, much of the content of Wikipedia would be in violation of copyright law! - John R. Wright, Ph.D., Emeritus Professor of Chemistry, SEOSU — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.134.239.160 (talk) 14:05, 5 November 2014 (UTC)