Hello, JuanF7, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

As you have just started editing, I hope you find the following selection of links helpful and that they provide you with some ideas for how to get the best out of Wikipedia.

Happy editing! (talk) 14:39, 20 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

September 2010

edit

  Please refrain from adding Pablo Contreras to the list of notable players for French club AS Monaco FC. His career at the club (28 league appearances and no goals) does not constitute notability for them compared to say Emmanuel Petit, who made over 200 appearances for the club or Claude Puel, who made over 500 appearances for the club or Lucas Bernardi who played in over 200 matches and helped the club reach the UEFA Champions League final. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Joao10Siamun (talk) 13:51, 8 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Boca Juniors, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bocafan76 (talk) 13:51, 14 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Boca Juniors. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Bocafan76 (talk) 16:16, 18 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Boca Juniors. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bocafan76 (talk) 19:52, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Argentinos Juniors, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bocafan76 (talk) 20:02, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

You win, good luck. --Bocafan76 (talk) 13:09, 24 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Joao10Siamun (talk) 19:04, 24 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Boca Juniors. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Bocafan76 (talk) 20:09, 25 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

When adding content as you have done to Boca Juniors and several other articles, you need to add verifiable and reliable sources, if not it violates wikipedia policy, as it falls under WP:NOR. Regards --Bocafan76 (talk) 20:15, 25 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:24, 25 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Claudio Santis

edit
 

The article Claudio Santis has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

place reason here

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jogurney (talk) 16:45, 23 October 2010 (UTC)Reply


Thank you for experimenting with the page Luis Antonio Jiménez on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. He was LOAN TO CESENA with option to buy. Matthew_hk tc 20:52, 6 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

February 2011

edit

  Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Claudio Borghi worked, and it has been reverted or removed. However, if you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bocafan76 (talk) 16:54, 26 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

June 2011

edit

An old issue, why removed the whole section of Luis Antonio Jiménez? [1] Matthew_hk tc 11:01, 23 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

July 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to R. Kelly has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Calmer Waters 22:48, 10 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges, as you did at R. Kelly. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:05, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply